[Solana]How a Crypto Developer Faked a DeFi Ecosystem

CoinDesk发布于2022-08-05更新于2022-08-05

文章摘要

The Macalinao brothers used a web of bogus identities to create the illusion of a dev community, juicing value on the Saber protocol and Solana blockchain. Now they're moving to Aptos.

Something about Sunny Aggregator felt off-kilter to the cryptocurrency user known as Saint Eclectic.

Sunny was the newest decentralized finance (DeFi) app to hit Solana during that blockchain’s scorching bull run last summer, when its native token jumped fivefold. Sunny was barely two weeks old by early September, but billions of dollars in crypto were flooding this yield farm.

Still, Saint and others had questions: Who was behind Sunny? Why was its developer, one “Surya Khosla,” pseudonymous? Was its codebase audited? Would users’ cash be safe?

“There was no indication of who Surya was,” Saint recalled recently, “so many users didn’t feel comfortable” putting their crypto in.

Their suspicions proved prescient.

CoinDesk has learned who Surya was: Ian Macalinao, the chief architect of Saber, a stablecoin exchange built on top of Solana. In turn, he built Sunny Aggregator on top of Saber.

And that’s just the top of the pile.

Coding as 11 purportedly independent developers, Ian, a 20-something computer wiz from Texas, created a vast web of interlocking DeFi protocols that projected billions of dollars of double-counted value onto the Saber ecosystem. That temporarily inflated the total value locked (TVL) on Solana, as the network was racing toward its zenith last November. The DeFi faithful regard TVL as a barometer for on-chain activity.

“I devised a scheme to maximize Solana’s TVL: I would build protocols that stack on top of each other, such that a dollar could be counted several times,” Ian wrote in a never-published blog post reviewed by CoinDesk. The blog post was prepared on March 26, three days after Cashio, one of Ian’s secretly built protocols, lost $52 million in a hack.

People close to the matter confirmed the draft’s authenticity.

Peak value

Ian’s ploy worked for a while. By his count, Saber and Sunny comprised $7.5 billion of Solana’s $10.5 billion TVL at their peak. (Billions of those dollars were double-counted between his two protocols.)

“I believe it contributed to the dramatic rise of SOL,” Ian wrote of a time when Solana’s native currency traded at $188.

Solana network’s TVL continued to swell even after the Saber ecosystem began losing steam in mid-September 2021, topping at $15 billion around Nov. 9, according to data provider DeFiLlama, while Saber’s TVL had by then dropped 64%.

Ian wrote he disdained this “vanity metric”; nonetheless, “it bothered me that Ethereum TVL was so much higher” than Solana’s, because in his view, DeFi projects on Ethereum – the largest blockchain for DeFi – are “stacked” to double-count deposits.

“I wanted to create a system very similar to this,” he wrote. One problem: “If the same team built each protocol, TVL would be more silly as a metric. Thus I created more anonymous profiles,” he wrote.

Ian wore 11 masks.

In public, Ian and his brother Dylan called their anonymous personas “friends,” or “friends of friends.” Their “Ship Capital” coder club was laying the “blueprints for my ideal DeFi ecosystem,” Ian wrote in the unpublished blog. Saber and its so-called liquidity provider (LP) tokens anchored everything.

“If an ecosystem is all built by a few people, it does not look as authentic,” Ian wrote in his blog post. “I wanted to make it look like a lot of people were building on our protocol, rather than ship 20+ disjoint[ed] programs as one person.”

The Macalinaos wanted other crypto protocols to become so dependent on Saber that “its failure would lead to the entire system going down,” as Dylan phrased it on Oct. 1, 2021. “Btw this is the 200 IQ [Saber Labs] strategy, but few understand…”

The Macalinao brothers offered no comment by press time.

A ‘Sybil attack’

There are valid reasons to seek shelter in pseudonyms. Ian’s weaponized “anons,” however, mounted something akin to a “Sybil attack” abusing crypto users’ trust. (A Sybil attack is when a computer in a network uses bogus identities to gain disproportionate influence over the whole.)

Read more: Why CoinDesk Respects Pseudonymity: A Stand Against Doxxing

“I am revealing this because it is inevitable that I will be found out,” Ian wrote in his never-published blog.

Instead, the Macalinaos in May published “Saber Public Goods” to propagate the “Saber team’s” prolific code across Solana. Eight of Ian’s 11 secret projects appear there. Their disclosure is mum on the anons and their master. Sunny and Cashio, whose tokens imploded, don’t show up, either.

‘My army of anons’

Surya Khosla was Ian’s moniker when building Sunny Aggregator. Surya popped onto Twitter in August 2021. Saint Eclectic, the Sunny skeptic, hesitated to deposit his LP tokens in the work of this mysterious character, an anon with an artificial intelligence-generated face.

One factor swung in Surya’s favor: The Ian puppet claimed to know brother Dylan “pretty well in real life.” On Sept. 9 of last year, Dylan Macalinao tweeted he “felt comfortable” putting his own crypto into Sunny Aggregator. “We audited their code,” Dylan, who is in his early 20s, said.

Dylan lent Surya the credibility he needed to win over skeptics like Saint.

The problem was, the lead developer, “Surya Khosla,” didn’t exist. Dylan’s brother Ian built Sunny Aggregator. Ian had made Surya up.

It was Ian’s first dalliance with assumed identities for Saber – and far from his last.

Ian wrote in March 2022 that he had created 11 ”anonymous founders that are actually me.”

Ship Capital had many “friends": 0xGhostchain, who created Cashio; Goki Rajesh, builder of multi-signature wallet Goki; Larry Jarry from mining rewards aggregator Quarry; Swaglioni, the “grandmaster” of governance platform TribecaDAO; and of course Surya Khosla from Sunny Aggregator, Saber’s yield farm.

These DeFi Lego bricks were the jewels of the Saber ecosystem. Lesser-known protocols Crate (run by kiwipepper), aSOL (0xAurelion), Arrow (oliver_code) Traction.Market (0xIsaacNewton), Sencha (jjmatcha) and Venko App (ayyakovenko), rounded out the crown, according to Ian’s blog. He admitted to creating the lot.

Pump it

Ian, Dylan and the puppet anons promoted Ship Capital’s work incessantly on social media.

They shilled their counterparts’ launches and integrations, praised their brethren's thinkfluencer tweets, credited each other for inspiring them to build on Solana. They even circulated Ian’s self-referential memes.

Sometimes they waxed philosophical. When on Dec. 29 prolific Solana developer Armani Ferrante (a real person) tweeted, “If you're not making mistakes you're too slow,” five Ian stooges responded in four minutes:

CoinDesk - UnknownOne of Ian Macalinao's experiments quotes its master on Twitter.

“As @simplyianm likes to say… it's an experiment!” declared @_kiwipepper – “herself” one of them.

Others danced around the truth. “Team size =! Success,” Ian tweeted on Dec. 7, 2021. “I would pay @larrinator01 and @0xGoki 10x market rate in a heartbeat. Not that they need my money…” (Ian’s Goki and Larry personas cheered).

Ian’s anons were cheeky when outsiders challenged their legitimacy.

“I’m no puppet,” Surya Khosla asserted on Nov. 25. In early January he joked of “doxxing myself” to another developer as a reward for building atop Sunny; Ian’s creation even tweeted a photo that purported to show himself visiting the Macalinao brothers in Los Angeles.

It's impossible to know whether Ian puppeteered his anons’ Twitters after springing them from his workbench. But two people who have worked with Ship Capital recalled the inexplicable behavior of its crew. One persona’s Telegram account would come online after another logged off.

Regardless, Ian admits in the unpublished draft to pulling their strings where it mattered most: the codebases.

“If you are a developer, it is very easy to find out which open source protocols were written by me: there is always a ‘flake.nix’ file that only I use.”

CoinDesk verified that many of the projects described in Ian’s blog contained the “flake.nix” file.

#CashioRulesEverythingAroundMe

To understand how the “army of anons” pumped double-counted value into Saber, 0xGhostchain’s Cashio project offers a compelling view.

Unveiled last November near the crypto market peak, Cashio’s CASH was billed as a “decentralized stablecoin” whose dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies were backed by “liquidity provider” tokens. (LP tokens are a type of crypto asset that holders “stake” to earn extra yield. DeFi protocols issue them to users whose loaned tokens keep trades moving smoothly.)

Cashio accepted only LP tokens from Saber as collateral. That wasn’t overly strange last November, when Saber, an “automated market maker” with over $1 billion in TVL, was a major DeFi trading venue for stablecoin pairs on Solana. (Saber’s current TVL is $90.6 million.)

Cashio relied on Saber ecosystem projects created by Ian’s anons to generate yield.

It first packaged Saber LP tokens into “tokenized baskets” using Crate, which Ian built under the pseudonym “kiwipepper.” It sent those “crates” through a yield redirection platform called Arrow – Ian built this as “oliver_code.” Finally, Cashio said it earned yield by staking these deposit derivatives in “Surya’s” Sunny Aggregator as well as Quarry, which Ian built as “Larry Jarry.” Profits flowed to Cashio’s treasury, managed by a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO).

Confused? Cashio’s customers were. CoinDesk asked two high-profile users of Cashio to explain the app’s convoluted process; neither could. The app’s “about” page didn’t help much, either.

CoinDesk - UnknownChart a deleted user made in Cashio's Discord server on Feb. 19

What users cared about was this: Cashio’s DeFi machine accepted their Saber LP tokens and spat out CASH tokens.

It was a lucrative trade. CASH holders could deposit their LP-backed stablecoins into Sunny liquidity pools and earn returns of 10%-30%. Had they deposited Saber LP tokens into Sunny instead of Cashio, they would get just 5%-10%, one trader said. It didn’t matter that the same crypto asset was behind both.

Such is the logic of DeFi money Legos.

Ramming deposits from Saber-to-Cashio-to-Crate-to-Arrow-to-Sunny-or-Quarry had even bigger implications for Saber. According to Ian, it turned $1 of apparent TVL into $6. Many DeFi projects measure their worth by touting total user deposits: TVL.

“TVL can only count if protocols are built separately,” Ian wrote, explaining why his anons’ protocols appeared to be separately built.

According to TVL tracker DeFiLlama, Saber’s deposits peaked at $4.15 billion on Sept. 11 2021; its flagship SBR token had topped out at 90 cents days earlier. Sunny Aggregator’s TVL also peaked on Sept. 11, at $3.4 billion. Its SUNNY token had flirted with an all-time-high of 18 cents one day before.

Both tokens have plummeted 99%, according to data provider CoinGecko. Saber’s and Sunny’s TVL hardly fared better as they have both dropped by over 96%.

Fallen angels

Cashio’s March 23 implosion from a $52 million hack was a broadside against Ship Capital.

Ian said in the unpublished blog that he “pushed very hard for people to stake more into Cashio,” because he wrote its code. He apologized for their “catastrophic” losses in a protocol that he created using a pseudonym and endorsed under his true identity.

In the unpublished post, Ian begged the hacker – a self-styled Robin Hood-type who railed against American and European fat cats – “to consider returning the funds.” The hacker later did return $14 million of the $39 million that hack victims requested.

Ian wrote that if the hacker didn’t pay users back in full, “I will do what I can to repay affected personal users in my personal Saber and Sunny tokens. This won’t cover the full amount, but it’s all I have to offer.” He never made good on that unpublished pledge.

‘A barrier for criticism’

Pseudonymity is widespread in crypto, and not in itself evidence of wrongdoing. Thirteen years after bitcoin’s debut, the true identity of its creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, remains unknown. Yet even after a recent brutal sell-off, the bellwether cryptocurrency boasts a $442 billion market capitalization.

Ian, however, wanted “a barrier for criticism,” according to the unpublished post:

“I only want to focus on building and creating value in my perception of what I believe is the best way of doing things. I do not want to deal with excessive criticism before my ideas are fully brought to market, and being anonymous is an easy way to distance myself (and the protocols I work on) from this.”

Ian’s arrival in Solanaland in October 2020, according to Discord server logs, was hardly the self-proclaimed “shipooor’s” first code rodeo. His GitHub commit history stretches back over a decade, with the first public crypto contribution, on an EOS project, in late 2017.

In early January 2021, Ian discussed the tokenomics of what he considered (rightly, it turned out) as a doomed-to-depeg stablecoin in the Discord for Basis.Cash. There, he became “obsessed” with building decentralized money.

Somewhere along the way, he tried and failed to “build a multiprotocol DeFi ecosystem” that ended “in criticism and ridicule,” Ian’s post said. “Moving to Solana was a way for me to reset that.”

Read more: UST’s Do Kwon Was Behind Earlier Failed Stablecoin, Ex-Terra Colleagues Say

Public statements

Who were these anonymous builders flocking to Saber? Ian grappled with the question at last year’s Solana conference in Lisbon, Portugal, during a panel called “From Zero to $2 Billion: How Saber Became the Biggest DeFi App on Solana.”

“We brought in some friends to basically build on top of Saber and just grow out the ecosystem,” Ian told Chris McCann of Race Capital, Saber’s biggest venture capital (VC) backer.

One “friend’s” project was Sunny; Crate, the tokenized basket-making protocol from Ian’s alias kiwipepper, was another.

“But that person also has, like a lot of friends that they know,” Ian told the audience. One of those friends-of-friends built Cashio, a stablecoin project backed by Saber LP tokens that fed liquidity into Sunny Aggregator, he claimed.

“We could promote [CASH] to get more liquidity into Saber,” he said on stage.

In a brief interview with CoinDesk Thursday, McCann said he was unaware of Ian’s intimate connection to Cashio.

“He’s always mentioned that there is somebody else that created it, but I do not know who the somebody else is nor have I met them.”

Ian’s unpublished blog reveals Cashio’s true origin. Coding as 0xGhostchain, Ian rushed to complete an exemplar of Saber LP-backed stablecoins in time for Breakpoint, the Solana ecosystem’s biggest-ever gathering of fellow developers. Ian wanted others to copy Cashio, he wrote. Each protocol that parroted its dependence on Saber LP tokens would become a liquidity spigot gushing yet more TVL into the $1.7 billion mothership.

“This is part of why the code was insecure, it was rushed for this deadline,” he wrote on March 26, after a hacker had spoofed Cashio’s unaudited smart contracts with fake collateral, draining it of $52 million.

Cashio’s Discord community – where passionate users roam – likely believed the CASH code was safe. After all, Ian told them on Nov. 23: “I personally audited” it. He pitched a similar yarn to crypto Twitter on March 23, the day of the exploit: “I did not audit Cashio as closely as I should have.”

Both statements contradict what Ian wrote in his unpublished letter:

“I didn’t get anyone else to look at the code, including an auditor. I should not have done this.”

CoinDesk - UnknownA reply to a tweet by Ian Macalinao...

CoinDesk - Unknown...that he later deleted

Moving on

“It was always the goal to eventually have real people building projects,” Ian wrote in the unpublished blog.

On July 23, the brothers started wooing external developers to Saber with a “DAO accelerator program.” Its application form asks: “How will your protocol deeply integrate with the Saber Protocol thereby increasing Saber's volume/TVL/capital efficiency?”

That effort comes as the brothers cast off from Solana for Aptos, an up-and-coming blockchain – porting Saber with them. Many Solana developers are in tow, a venture capital source said. The Macalinaos are betting on it: they helm a VC that’s anchored in Aptos, three sources said. Their VC is called Protagonist. Its old name was “Ship Capital.”

Seven Saber ecosystem users told CoinDesk they felt abandoned by the Macalinao brothers. Some lost money in CASH tokens (the erstwhile stablecoin went to zero). Others say their crypto is stuck in derivative tokens issued by Sunny. One pseudonymous user, Brad_Garlic_Bread, said he lost around $300,000 across Sunny and Saber – “there's a lot of people worse off than me.”

The community assumes Ian is running the show “but no one knows for sure,” Brad_Garlic_Bread said.

He’s still trying to get Ian’s attention. On July 16, Brad asked if Ian “can pretend to be Surya for like a day” to help Sunny Aggregator's investors recover locked tokens. Ian was answering questions in the Saber Discord; he skipped Brad’s.

Other SUNNY token-holders asked Ian for clues about the yield aggregator’s future. Saber is moving to Aptos – will Sunny do the same? They asked what became of Sunny’s lead developer.

“The main sunny dev got burned out after losing most of their savings from the Cashio hack,” Ian said on July 16. He said he would “encourage” this disenchanted dev to rebuild Sunny in Move, a coding language Ian says is safer than Solana’s Rust for building multi-million-dollar protocols.

One week later, Ian said the Sunny dev felt rejuvenated after giving Move a go.

“‘Feels like early Solana all over again.’”

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

对话投资人郑迪:微策略卖币实验、AI经济和美股机遇

前沿科技投资人郑迪(didier)在访谈中分析了近期比特币下跌、微策略财务策略、AI经济影响及美股机遇等话题。 郑迪认为,比特币近期下跌的核心原因并非单纯宏观因素或ETF赎回,而是市场开始预期微策略(MicroStrategy)在“每股含币量中性”原则下,为支付优先股股息可能持续小额卖出比特币。这引发了市场对持续抛压的担忧,导致相关资金提前撤离。他认为,微策略创始人Michael Saylor正在测试市场对持续小额卖币的承接能力,这是一场与市场的博弈。但单凭此事不太可能引发“死亡螺旋”,后续若无重大利空,局面有望扭转。 关于AI驱动的美股上涨,郑迪指出,其核心驱动力在于Token(代币)正成为新时代的“劳动力”。AI和Token正在替代许多传统由人执行的工作,企业未来会将更多预算分配给Token、模型和算力,从而提升效率和利润率。这推动了上游芯片、光模块、数据中心等美股产业链的持续上涨,标志着机器经济时代的开始,具有中长期持续性。 针对加密交易所接入美股的现象,郑迪认为这是行业发展的自然趋势。由于真正有价值的加密原生资产有限,交易所转向美股等真实世界资产是寻找更具流动性标的的选择。这并不一定挤压加密资产,长期看,区块链技术为真实资产上链和未来的机器经济提供了基础设施,反而可能利好比特币。对于从加密市场转向美股的交易者,郑迪建议无需刻意改变交易逻辑,因为美股中同样存在类似山寨币的meme属性资产或价值成长股,可以找到熟悉的风格。 郑迪提到,“1011事件”对加密行业流动性造成重创,大量现金损失是压垮山寨币行情的最后一根稻草,相关炒作热情已转移至流动性更好的美股市场。 对于宏观前景,郑迪对下半年持更谨慎态度,因市场上涨后不确定性增加,且巨型公司(如SpaceX)上市可能带来流动性压力。中期选举结果也可能影响Web3和AI领域的政策环境。长期来看,他依然看好AI对生产率的提升以及AI与区块链的结合,认为未来将进入更产业化、机构化的阶段,但需关注技术带来的社会分配问题。

marsbit15分钟前

对话投资人郑迪:微策略卖币实验、AI经济和美股机遇

marsbit15分钟前

灰度抄底指南:利用现金流评估加密货币价值

本文探讨了在加密货币市场下跌背景下,如何利用现金流评估加密资产价值,并以去中心化借贷协议Aave为例进行深入分析。 核心观点认为,并非所有加密资产都适用相同估值方法。像比特币这类“类商品资产”依赖稀缺性和共识,而许多DeFi代币等“现金流资产”则与协议业务活动绑定,可通过分析协议收入、利润及代币价值捕获机制来估值。 报告指出,DeFi已成为能产生持续真实收入的赛道。Aave作为头部借贷协议,财务数据透明,拥有多元收入来源和雄厚国库。通过现金流折现(DCF)分析和与传统金融科技公司(市盈率约20-25倍)对比,灰度研究部认为AAVE代币当前合理估值区间为80-100美元(现价约75美元)。报告还预测,在监管明确化等利好情景下,其一年内价值可能升至约175美元。 文章强调,代币价值捕获机制至关重要,即协议如何将利润回馈给代币持有者(如回购、分红)。Aave通过治理演进,正加强协议经济与代币价值的绑定。同时,DAO的法律地位与监管政策(如《CLARITY法案》)仍是影响估值的关键不确定因素。 最后,报告认为市场正趋于成熟,资金从炒作项目流向具备实质收入、清晰商业模式和基本面的资产。投资者应关注如Aave、Uniswap等真正创造现金流的协议,运用基本面分析发现投资机会。

marsbit2小时前

灰度抄底指南:利用现金流评估加密货币价值

marsbit2小时前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对SOL(SOL)币价的意见。

活动图片