Did Coinbase Refuse To List XRP On Purpose? Ripple Exec’s Old Tweets Resurface

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-03-31Обновлено 2026-03-31

Введение

The XRP community has resurfaced old tweets from Ripple's CTO Emeritus David Schwartz, suggesting Coinbase may have deliberately refused to list XRP. In posts from May and June 2023, Schwartz described a "hypothetical" scenario where an exchange, believed to be Coinbase, refused to list XRP despite it being beneficial, instead asking Ripple for millions in payment. He noted that after an agreement, XRP's listing generated 20% of the exchange's revenue. Schwartz indicated that an adversary in litigation (likely the SEC) used this payment to imply Ripple was unfairly boosting XRP adoption. Coinbase initially listed XRP but delisted it in 2021 following the SEC's lawsuit alleging XRP was a security. It relisted the token in July 2023 after a court ruling declared XRP not a security. XRP price was negatively impacted during the lawsuit and is currently trading around $1.32, down over 2% in 24 hours.

The XRP community has drawn attention to old X posts by Ripple’s CTO Emeritus, David Schwartz, suggesting that Coinbase may have refused to list XRP on purpose. Schwartz had also suggested that the exchange asked Ripple for money before it could list the altcoin.

Ripple’s CTO Emeritus X Posts Reveal Coinbase XRP Listing Saga

Crypto pundit Digital Asset Investor drew attention to old X posts from the Ripple executive in which he discussed the Coinbase XRP listing story and a hypothetical scenario in which Ripple was asked to pay listing fees for XRP. In the first X post, which was made back in May 2023, Schwartz said, “The story of Coinbase listing XRP is the only story I most wish I could tell that I can’t.”

The Ripple CTO Emeritus’ statement was in response to a question by another X user who asked how much the firm likely paid Coinbase to list XRP. This has raised speculations that the exchange may have initially refused to list XRP. In June 2023, Schwartz made another X post in which he described a “hypothetical” scenario in which an exchange refused to list XRP despite it being in its interest.

Instead, the exchange asked Ripple to pay millions before it could list XRP and told Ripple it would have listed XRP a while ago if the crypto firm hadn’t existed. The CTO Emeritus said they finally reached an agreement with the exchange, and then the exchange listed XRP. Upon XRP’s listing, Schwartz said the altcoin accounted for 20% of the exchange’s revenue.

Schwartz’s prior post in May 2023, in which he mentioned Coinbase, has led members of the XRP community to conclude that the Ripple CTO Emeritus was likely referring to Coinbase in the hypothetical scenario he painted.

The Impact Of The SEC Lawsuit

It is worth noting that Coinbase had listed XRP before the SEC lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020, but moved to delist the token in 2021 as the lawsuit took shape. This was based on the SEC’s claim that XRP was a security. The crypto exchange then relisted XRP in July 2023 after Judge Analisa Torres declared that XRP wasn’t a security.

In his hypothetical scenario, Schwartz said that a litigation adversary used the fact that they paid money for XRP’s listing to imply that the crypto firm was using money to unfairly boost XRP’s adoption or liquidity. However, the CTO Emeritus said they simply paid the money to avoid their existence hurting the XRP ecosystem. The XRP price was negatively impacted during the lawsuit, which lasted for five years.

At the time of writing, the XRP price is trading at around $1.32, down over 2% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.32 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat did Ripple's CTO Emeritus David Schwartz suggest about Coinbase's XRP listing process?

ADavid Schwartz suggested that Coinbase may have refused to list XRP on purpose and asked Ripple for money before listing the altcoin.

QWhen did David Schwartz first hint at the Coinbase XRP listing story on social media?

AHe first hinted at it in May 2023 with an X post stating: 'The story of Coinbase listing XRP is the only story I most wish I could tell that I can’t.'

QWhat hypothetical scenario did Schwartz describe regarding an exchange's refusal to list XRP?

AHe described a scenario where an exchange refused to list XRP despite it being in its interest, instead asking Ripple to pay millions, and claiming it would have listed XRP earlier if Ripple didn't exist.

QHow did the SEC lawsuit against Ripple impact Coinbase's listing of XRP?

ACoinbase delisted XRP in 2021 following the SEC's lawsuit claiming XRP was a security, but relisted it in July 2023 after a judge declared XRP was not a security.

QWhat was the significance of the payment Ripple made to the exchange according to Schwartz?

ASchwartz stated they paid the money to avoid their existence hurting the XRP ecosystem, not to unfairly boost adoption or liquidity, though litigation adversaries used it to imply otherwise.

Похожее

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit5 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit5 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit11 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit11 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit11 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit11 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit26 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit26 мин. назад

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Что такое XRP 2.0

XRP 2.0: Новая грань в мире криптовалют Введение в XRP 2.0 В постоянно развивающейся сфере криптовалют появляются новые проекты, стремящиеся к вниманию и внедрению. Один из таких многообещающих проектов - это XRP 2.0, новая криптовалюта, созданная для использования передовых технологий блокчейна и надежных методов шифрования. Хотя название вызывает ассоциации с XRP от Ripple, важно отметить, что XRP 2.0 функционирует независимо, сосредоточив внимание на повышении безопасности сделок, конфиденциальности и масштабируемости. Поскольку цифровая финансовая среда все больше принимает децентрализованные решения, XRP 2.0 намерена внести значимый вклад в web3 и общее расширение криптопроектов. Что такое XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 в своей основе - это проект криптовалюты, цель которого - создать безопасную и децентрализованную экосистему цифровой валюты. Его базовая технология интегрирует сложные принципы блокчейна с современными методами шифрования. Основная цель XRP 2.0 - утвердиться как надежная и эффективная платформа, позволяющая быстро осуществлять транзакции с приоритетом на улучшенную защиту конфиденциальности для своих пользователей. Проект рекламируется как решение многих недостатков, с которыми сталкиваются существующие криптовалюты, предлагая систему, способную обрабатывать более высокий объем транзакций с улучшенной скоростью и конфиденциальностью. Эта универсальность позиционирует XRP 2.0 как значимого конкурента на рынке, переполненном различными цифровыми валютами. Кто создатель XRP 2.0? Идентичность создателя XRP 2.0 была обозначена как «Уилбур». Однако исчерпывающие данные о Уилбуре или связанном с ним проекте остаются неясными. Анонимность многих создателей криптовалют не является редким явлением в этой отрасли и часто применяется для сохранения определенной степени конфиденциальности и безопасности. Кто инвесторы XRP 2.0? <pна данный момент конкретная информация о инвестиционных фондах или организациях, поддерживающих xrp 2.0, не доступна публично. в секторе криптовалют поддержка репутабельными инвесторами может существенно повлиять на кредитоспособность и успех проекта, однако прозрачность в отношении финансовых спонсоров 2.0 еще была установлена. Как работает XRP 2.0? XRP 2.0 выделяется использованием сочетания технологий блокчейна и продвинутых алгоритмов шифрования, что обеспечивает безопасные и децентрализованные транзакции. Его инновационная структура включает уникальные функции, разработанные для повышения вовлеченности пользователей и расширения функциональности за пределами традиционных транзакций с криптовалютами. Среди этих функций XRP 2.0 интегрирует возможности с искусственным интеллектом, такие как текст в изображение и текст в речь. Эти дополнения разработаны для улучшения интерактивной работы пользователей, способствуя более широкому применению в различных секторах. Соединяя технологические достижения с дизайном, ориентированным на пользователя, XRP 2.0 стремится привлечь внимание разнообразных индивидуумов и предприятий, стремящихся интегрировать решения с криптовалютой в свои бизнес-процессы. Хронология XRP 2.0 Для понимания XRP 2.0 необходимо рассмотреть ключевые события, которые определили его путь до сих пор: 23 июля 2023 года: XRP 2.0 представлен как новый проект криптовалюты, стремящийся революционизировать возможности безопасных и децентрализованных транзакций в области блокчейна. 8 сентября 2023 года: Запуск другого проекта, XRP20, который представляет собой токен ERC-20 на блокчейне Ethereum и не имеет отношения к XRP 2.0. 13 ноября 2023 года: XRP Ledger подвергается значительному обновлению с выпуском программного обеспечения серверов rippled версии 2.0.0. Важно отметить, что это развитие не связано с проектом криптовалюты XRP 2.0. Ключевые моменты о XRP 2.0 Чтобы выделить суть XRP 2.0, возникают несколько критически важных факторов: Уникальные особенности: Включение таких функций, как основанные на ИИ текст в изображение и текст в речь, дополнительно разнообразит потенциальные приложения XRP 2.0. Технология блокчейна: Структура использует современные механизмы блокчейна и протоколы шифрования, обеспечивая безопасную и децентрализованную среду для транзакций. Масштабируемость и конфиденциальность: XRP 2.0 придает приоритет повышенным мерам защиты конфиденциальности в процессах транзакций и масштабируемости, необходимой для привлечения растущей базы пользователей. Нет связи с Ripple: Важно отметить, что, несмотря на свое название, XRP 2.0 не имеет никаких отношений или сотрудничества с XRP от Ripple, что отличает его операционные рамки и цели в экосистеме криптовалют. Заключение XRP 2.0 представляет собой амбициозное начинание в сфере криптовалют, стремясь предложить сочетание безопасности, конфиденциальности и эффективности в цифровых транзакциях. Интегрируя сложные технологии и удобные функции, проект стремится расширить горизонты того, что может достичь криптовалюта в современной цифровой экономике. Хотя анонимность его создателя и отсутствие раскрытых инвесторов могут вызвать вопросы у некоторых, акцент XRP 2.0 на передовых функциональных возможностях и децентрализации увеличивает его привлекательность на фоне все более переполненного крипто-рынка. Поскольку мир криптовалют продолжает развиваться, XRP 2.0 может еще стать ключевым игроком в расширении безопасных и масштабируемых блокчейн-решений.

198 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.04.05Обновлено 2024.12.03

Что такое XRP 2.0

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 13: запуск основной сети HIP-4 ожидается в середине 2026 года на фоне смещения фокуса рынка к масштабируемому внедрению ключевых криптоактивов, включая XRP

HIP-4 представит децентрализованные рынки прогнозов без разрешений, бинарные (исходные) контракты и опционы 0DTE.

1.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.22Обновлено 2026.04.22

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 13: запуск основной сети HIP-4 ожидается в середине 2026 года на фоне смещения фокуса рынка к масштабируемому внедрению ключевых криптоактивов, включая XRP

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на XRP (XRP) представлены ниже.

活动图片

Топ вопросы

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow