# Сопутствующие статьи по теме VC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "VC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Crypto Morning Brief: Coinbase Launches Stock Trading and Prediction Market Services, Binance Explores Relaunch of Binance.US

**Crypto Morning Brief** Key market movements include BTC dropping below $86,000 and ETH falling under $2,800. Federal Reserve Governor Waller signaled that the weak job market supports the case for continued interest rate cuts. Major exchange developments are a central theme. **Coinbase** significantly expanded its services, launching stock trading with zero commissions, 24/5 availability, and a partnership with prediction market provider Kalshi. It also introduced AI-driven wealth management and business services. Meanwhile, **Binance** is reportedly exploring options to restart its US operations, Binance.US, which could involve a capital restructuring to reduce founder CZ's ownership stake. In other news, **Tether** launched a peer-to-peer password manager called PearPass, emphasizing enhanced security by avoiding cloud storage. **SBI Ripple Asia** announced plans to launch an XRP-based yield product and explore real-world asset tokenization on the XRP Ledger. Binance Wallet introduced a new on-chain lending feature, and Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet received support for its management proposals from Norway's sovereign wealth fund. On the regulatory and corporate front, crypto VC firm **Shima Capital** is shutting down following SEC fraud charges against its founder, who has agreed to a settlement. Bitcoin miner **Hut 8** signed a $7 billion data center lease agreement.

深潮12/18 01:39

Crypto Morning Brief: Coinbase Launches Stock Trading and Prediction Market Services, Binance Explores Relaunch of Binance.US

深潮12/18 01:39

Circle's Acquisition of Axelar Sparks Controversy: Giant Wants the Team, Not the Token

Circle, the stablecoin giant, has announced the acquisition of the core team and intellectual property of Interop Labs, the initial developer of the cross-chain protocol Axelar Network. However, the deal explicitly excludes the Axelar Network project itself, its foundation, and its native token AXL. These will continue to operate independently under community governance, with another contributing team, Common Prefix, taking over Interop Labs' former activities. This "acquire-the-team, not-the-token" structure has caused significant controversy and triggered a 15% drop in the price of AXL. The crypto community is divided into opposing camps. The opposition, including VCs and prominent figures, argues the move is a de facto "rug pull." They contend it is unethical for the team and equity holders to profit from the acquisition while token holders, who funded the project's early development, are left with an asset that may now be worthless. Critics state this highlights a fundamental conflict between equity and token-based financing. Supporters, including investment chiefs, defend the move as a normal market behavior. They explain that in traditional capital structures, tokens sit at the very bottom, below debt and equity. In acquisitions, it is standard for higher-priority stakeholders to be paid first, and tokens have no inherent claim to proceeds. They argue Circle acted within existing commercial frameworks by purchasing only the most valuable assets—the talent and IP. The core conflict exposed is the ambiguous legal and economic nature of tokens. They are often narratively treated as "quasi-equity" during good times but are structurally relegated to having no rights in events like acquisitions. This case underscores the urgent need for the industry to define and institutionalize the rights and position of tokens within capital structures.

Odaily星球日报12/16 03:27

Circle's Acquisition of Axelar Sparks Controversy: Giant Wants the Team, Not the Token

Odaily星球日报12/16 03:27

The Dilemmas and Future of Web3 Chinese Entrepreneurs

In the increasingly mainstream crypto industry, Chinese entrepreneurs appear to be receding from the center stage. While early Chinese-founded projects like Binance, OKX, and Bitmain once dominated sectors such as exchanges and mining, a noticeable decline in the visibility and influence of new-generation Chinese entrepreneurs has emerged since the 2020 DeFi Summer. Three major factors contribute to this trend. First, regulatory crackdowns and shifting geopolitical dynamics in China disrupted local crypto activities, forcing entrepreneurs to relocate overseas and lose their native market advantages in user acquisition and community building. Second, capital preferences have shifted structurally toward欧美-led ventures due to better compliance alignment and exit opportunities, leaving Chinese projects at a funding disadvantage. Third, a mismatch exists between the skill sets of Chinese engineers—who excel in B2C applications—and the industry’s earlier focus on B2B infrastructure development. Notable exceptions, like Hyperliquid’s Jeff Yan, highlight the rising importance of multicultural backgrounds. Many successful new-wave founders have Western education or experience, enabling better integration into global ecosystems. The article concludes that future success in crypto will depend less on cultural origin and more on cross-cultural collaboration, long-term technical commitment, and adaptive resilience amid regulatory complexity.

marsbit12/15 14:32

The Dilemmas and Future of Web3 Chinese Entrepreneurs

marsbit12/15 14:32

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

Alliance DAO founder qw (@QwQiao) sparked intense debate in the crypto community by claiming that Layer 1 blockchains have "limited moats," rating them only 3/10 in terms of sustainable competitive advantage. This triggered strong reactions from key industry figures. Dragonfly Capital partner Haseeb strongly disagreed, arguing that Ethereum’s decade-long dominance despite well-funded challengers proves its strong moat. Others, like Multicoin’s Kyle Samani and researchers from Ethereum and Circle, questioned whether liquidity alone constitutes a real moat, with some calling it fleeting and unreliable. In response, qw elaborated on his moat rating framework, giving traditional giants like Microsoft, Apple, and Visa perfect scores (10/10) based on revenue models and infrastructure, while rating top crypto projects around 5/10. He notably rated Bitcoin at 9/10, citing its unique founding story and Lindy effect, but deducted a point due to uncertainties around security and quantum threats. The debate expanded into what truly constitutes a moat in crypto. Critics argued qw’s framework overemphasizes current revenue and undervalues network effects, trust, and technological ethos. Defenders of blockchain moats pointed to elements like developer ecosystems, brand strength, switching costs, and application diversity as core defensive attributes. The article concludes that the crypto industry is still young and small compared to traditional finance and tech giants. Rather than fixating on abstract moat concepts, the priority should be solving real user needs at scale, driving adoption, and expanding overall market reach.

marsbit12/13 03:06

Public Chain Moat Only 3/10? Alliance DAO Founder's Remarks Ignite Crypto Community Debate

marsbit12/13 03:06

活动图片