# Сопутствующие статьи по теме VC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "VC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Following the Clues: Guess What Projects a16z with $15 Billion Will Invest In?

a16z Raises $15 Billion, Signaling Major Crypto Investments Ahead Venture capital giant Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) has raised $15 billion in new funding, its largest round to date. The firm emphasized that winning the next century of technological competition hinges on advancements in AI and crypto. The capital will be allocated across six funds, with significant implications for the crypto sector: * **App Fund ($1.7B):** Targets consumer applications, including Web3, fintech, and AI apps. * **Infrastructure Fund ($1.7B):** Focuses on foundational tech, including blockchain protocols (L1s, L2s), developer tools, and AI infrastructure. * **Growth Fund ($6.75B):** Will back mature, late-stage companies, such as established crypto exchanges and unicorns (e.g., Coinbase). A review of a16z's 2025 investments revealed heavy bets on prediction markets (Kalshi), wallet services, privacy blockchains, stablecoins, and AI-crypto intersections. Looking to 2026, a16z's published "big ideas" highlight key areas of excitement, suggesting these will be prime investment targets. These include: * Enhanced privacy as a core crypto feature. * The expansion of smarter prediction markets. * "Crypto-native" stablecoins and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. * Improved on/off-ramps for stablecoins. * The convergence of AI and crypto, specifically around agentic systems ("know your agent"). * The concept of the internet evolving into a bank. In summary, a16z's massive new war chest is poised to aggressively fund the next wave of innovation across crypto applications, infrastructure, and the growing AI-crypto frontier.

marsbit01/12 08:39

Following the Clues: Guess What Projects a16z with $15 Billion Will Invest In?

marsbit01/12 08:39

A Game with No Winners: How to Break the Deadlock in the Altcoin Market?

The altcoin market is currently trapped in a "four-lose dilemma" due to flawed token distribution models. The prevalent low initial circulation strategy, designed to artificially maintain high fully diluted valuations (FDV), has backfired. It creates a scenario where centralized exchanges, token holders, project teams, and venture capitalists all ultimately suffer. Exchanges face community backlash from poor token performance, holders experience price collapse as supply unlocks, projects damage the industry's fundraising capacity, and VCs see their long-term investment channels deteriorate. Market responses, such as the 100% initial circulation of meme coins and the community-centric MetaDAO model, have failed to provide sustainable solutions, often creating new problems like extreme volatility or alienating talented founders. A potential path forward requires rebalancing interests: exchanges should shift from arbitrary lockups to KPI-based unlocks; holders should demand transparency and control over major decisions without micromanaging; projects must only issue tokens with clear utility and product-market fit; and VCs should stop forcing token launches on every project. The next 12 months will be challenging as the market absorbs the last wave of excess supply from the 2021-2022 funding boom. However, this digestion period, coupled with more selective token launches and evolving standards, could lead to a healthier market. The long-term viability of the altcoin model depends on avoiding a "lemon market" where only failing projects issue tokens, while successful ones opt for traditional equity. Despite current hardships, tokens retain unique advantages for driving growth and building loyal communities when implemented correctly.

marsbit01/12 03:38

A Game with No Winners: How to Break the Deadlock in the Altcoin Market?

marsbit01/12 03:38

From Intern to the Main Table: The 'Fast Lane of Life' for Early Crypto Participants

From Intern to the Main Table: The "Fast Track" of Early Crypto Participants The article chronicles the remarkable journeys of early cryptocurrency adopters who leveraged internships and entry-level roles during Bitcoin's nascent stages (2013-2017) to achieve extraordinary success. It highlights three key figures: 1. **Xiao Hong (founder of AI company Manus, acquired by Meta in 2025)**: As a sophomore intern at Chinese Bitcoin media outlet YiBit in 2013, he absorbed decentralized principles that later informed his AI work. His path exemplifies how early crypto exposure provided a "vector" for identifying future technological shifts. 2. **Ge Yuesheng (youngest billionaire in Bitmain’s founding team)**: Initially an intern at a私募 firm, he used family resources to become Bitmain’s earliest angel investor at age 21, securing 28% equity. His risk-taking during crypto’s volatility led to co-founding Matrixport. 3. **Wang Hui (OKCoin’s first employee)**: He built OKCoin’s technical infrastructure from scratch, later founding JEX (acquired by Binance). His story underscores OKCoin’s role as a "crypto黄埔军校" (Huangpu Military Academy) for talent. Common success factors include: - **Timing**: Entering during crypto’s "chaotic phase" (2013-2017) offered disproportionate growth opportunities. - **Mentorship**: Aligning with visionaries like神鱼(Shenyu), Wu Jihan, or Xu Mingxing provided access to high-value networks. - **Risk tolerance**: Embracing uncertainty during bear markets and early adoption yielded outsized returns. The piece acknowledges survivorship bias but argues that early crypto immersion cultivated a unique mindset—blending technical intuition, product agility, and long-term conviction—that enabled these individuals to thrive across subsequent tech waves (AI, Web3). In a rapidly evolving industry, today’s interns could be tomorrow’s billionaires.

比推01/08 14:29

From Intern to the Main Table: The 'Fast Lane of Life' for Early Crypto Participants

比推01/08 14:29

Airdrop Farming Economics: The Hidden Symbiotic Chain of Projects, VCs, and Studios

The article "Airdrop Economics: The Hidden Symbiosis Between Projects, VCs, and Airdrop Hunting Studios" explores the perverse economic incentives in the crypto industry that have led to a symbiotic, yet destructive, relationship between project teams, venture capitalists (VCs), exchanges, and professional airdrop hunting operations (studios). The core driver is identified as the "cold start paradox": Exchanges like Binance and OKX demand high user activity and transaction volume for listing, but new projects lack real users. To meet these demands, projects tacitly collaborate with studios that use automated scripts to generate massive volumes of fake transactions, addresses, and social media engagement, creating an illusion of popularity. VCs further fuel this system. Needing high-valuation exits, they pressure portfolio companies to maximize vanity metrics (active addresses, transactions, TVL) before a Token Generation Event (TGE), often turning a blind eye to the fraudulent data that inflates these numbers. The airdrop, originally a marketing tool to attract real users, has been completely subverted. It now functions as a payment mechanism where projects trade future tokens for the fake data studios provide. The article details the industrial-scale operation of these studios, which use fingerprint browsers, bulk wallet generation, AI-powered KYC bypasses, and task platforms like Galxe and Layer3 as their playbook. This activity creates a negative-sum game: it dilutes rewards for real users, clogs networks with high fees, and makes it impossible to gauge genuine product-market fit. Case studies of Starknet and zkSync show catastrophic user retention rates below 2% and plummeting activity post-airdrop, revealing the fabricated nature of their growth. The consequence is a classic case of "bad money driving out good." The ecosystem is polluted with noise, rewarding projects that optimize for bots over real users and punishing those focused on genuine utility. The author concludes that the industry is trapped in a "Performative Economy" and can only escape by shifting focus from vanity metrics to creating real economic value where using a product is more profitable than farming it.

marsbit01/07 00:38

Airdrop Farming Economics: The Hidden Symbiotic Chain of Projects, VCs, and Studios

marsbit01/07 00:38

活动图片