# Сопутствующие статьи по теме VC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "VC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

HTX Research's Latest Report Deciphers Pre-Market Trading Ecosystem: How a Hundred-Billion-Dollar Market Reshapes the Starting Line of Web3 Assets

HTX Research, the dedicated research arm of HTX, has released a new report titled "Pre-Market Trading Ecosystem: Mechanism Evolution, Market Structure, and Future Trends Behind a Ten-Billion Scale." The study systematically examines the formation, asset structures, and major models of the pre-market trading ecosystem in crypto, as well as its profound impact on project issuance and exchange systems. The report highlights the emergence of a "1.5-level market" that bridges primary and secondary markets, driven by tightened funding conditions and extended token generation event (TGE) timelines. This pre-market allows early contributions and future expectations to be transformed into tradable instruments. Three core asset structures form this ecosystem: pre-market OTC, spot, and perpetual contracts tied to future token value; tradable points systems linked to airdrop incentives; and NFT-based rights such as whitelist spots and early access passes. Together, these create a multi-layered pre-trading system. HTX has actively explored this space, launching pre-market perpetual contracts for assets like WLFI before their official listings. While pre-market has reached a multi-billion dollar scale with strong growth potential, it also faces challenges including thin liquidity, information asymmetry, and a lack of standardized regulations. Ultimately, pre-market trading is evolving from a grey-area activity into a structured, institutionalized market layer that is reshaping project launches, exchange strategies, and early user participation in crypto.

marsbit12/18 08:57

HTX Research's Latest Report Deciphers Pre-Market Trading Ecosystem: How a Hundred-Billion-Dollar Market Reshapes the Starting Line of Web3 Assets

marsbit12/18 08:57

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

The 2025 public blockchain landscape reveals a stark divide between hype and reality, with a severe concentration of value and widespread "zombification" of projects. Analysis of DeFiLlama's on-chain fee data exposes a critical structural issue: the crypto space is dominated by a "profit concentration and long-tail zombie" era. Notable examples highlight this crisis. Algorand, a chain with a $1 billion market cap and advanced technology, generated a mere $17 in daily fees, while Cardano, a top-10 asset, saw only around $6,000. These "classic chains" are likened to empty, expensive cities with no real economic activity. The biggest value capturers are not the most technologically elegant chains. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, succeeding as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers—crypto's only true mass-adoption use case. Solana ($600k daily) thrives as a high-frequency casino for meme coins and speculation, and Base ($105k daily) demonstrates that distribution (via Coinbase) is more critical than pure technology. The only validated business models generating significant fees are low-cost payments, high-frequency speculation, and, to a lesser extent, Ethereum's asset settlement layer. The VC-driven model is failing. New chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which raised hundreds of millions, show a severe disconnect between their high valuations and meager daily fee revenue (ranging from $320 to $12,000). Their lifecycle often follows a "pump and dump" pattern: VC funding -> airdrop farming -> token listing -> user exodus -> collapsed on-chain activity. The industry suffers from a massive oversupply of block space with a dire lack of killer applications. The article concludes that investors must shift from valuing narratives to scrutinizing financials. They should avoid "zombie coins" with high valuations and negligible fees, focus on chains with organic, fee-generating demand, acknowledge that distribution and community are now more valuable than pure tech, and see through the VC subsidy game. This is a necessary market correction; only by paying for real, generated value—not promised future stories—can the industry achieve healthy growth.

比推12/18 06:36

Public Chains 2025: The Bustle Belongs to the Casino, the Desolation to the Ecosystem

比推12/18 06:36

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

Crypto Public Chains Face a Reality Check: A Grim Settlement in 2025 The crypto market, often perceived as a lens of soaring market caps and futuristic promises, reveals a starkly different reality when analyzed through on-chain fee data. A deep dive into DeFiLlama’s “Fees by Chain” metrics exposes a severe structural issue: the public chain ecosystem is dominated by profit concentration, while the long tail languishes in zombification. Notable examples highlight this disparity. Algorand, a chain backed by Turing Award-winning cryptography, recorded a meager $17 in daily protocol revenue despite a billion-dollar valuation. Similarly, Cardano, a top-ten asset by market cap, generates only around $6,000 in daily fees, indicating a lack of substantial economic activity beyond basic transfers. In contrast, the chains capturing real value are those serving clear, immediate demands. Tron leads with $1.24 million in daily fees, powered primarily by its role as a low-cost payment rail for USDT transfers. Solana follows with nearly $600,000, driven largely by its vibrant on-chain casino of meme coin trading and speculation. Base, backed by Coinbase’s distribution power, has also emerged as a serious contender. These cases underscore that proven, fee-generating business models in crypto are currently limited to payments, high-frequency speculation, and Ethereum’s role as a settlement layer. The analysis further reveals the failure of the VC-driven model. Newer chains like Sui, Sei, and Starknet, which launched with massive funding and high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV), show alarmingly low daily fees—often in the low thousands or even hundreds of dollars. Their typical lifecycle involves attracting airdrop farmers with incentives, followed by a collapse in organic activity once subsidies end. This reflects a critical issue of “block space inflation”: too many chains have been built, without a proportional growth in killer applications that demand that capacity. The market is at an inflection point. Investors are shifting from valuing narratives to scrutinizing fundamentals. The new imperative is to identify chains that generate genuine, fee-based revenue from organic user demand—not those sustained by speculation, subsidies, or empty promises. This necessary清算 (settlement) in valuation may be painful, but it is essential for the industry's long-term health. The era of paying for dreams is giving way to an era of paying for proven utility.

marsbit12/18 04:08

The Brutal Reckoning of the Public Chain Market in 2025: The Thriving Casino, The Fake Ghost Town, and VC's Harvesting Scheme

marsbit12/18 04:08

VC "Dead"? No, the Industry is Undergoing a Brutal Shakeout

The article addresses the prevailing sentiment that "VC is dead" in the crypto industry, arguing that while some venture capital firms have indeed failed, the sector as a whole is not dying but undergoing a severe shakeout. The author, a former VC investor, states that many Asian VCs have been hit hardest, with top firms shutting down or scaling back significantly. Even second- and third-tier Western VCs are now facing similar challenges, marked by reduced investment pace and difficulty in exiting portfolios. This downturn is seen as a delayed effect of the 2022 market collapse, exacerbated by broken four-year cycle expectations, overvalued deals, and extended token lockups that strain returns. However, the piece contends that VCs won’t disappear entirely. They remain essential for funding early-stage projects and supporting innovation. Well-vetted VC backing has been behind nearly all major successful crypto projects, and quality ventures continue to attract interest. The industry is moving toward a maturity phase with higher barriers to entry—akin to Web2. VCs will need stronger reputations and expertise to compete. Projects are increasingly judged by real user adoption and revenue, not just narratives or token launches. Hyperliquid and Polymarket are cited as examples of projects that built sustainable traction before launching tokens. Despite current challenges, the author remains optimistic: top talent continues to enter the space, and foundational areas like stablecoins, prediction markets, and AI-driven economies hold promise. While the barrier to success is higher than in previous cycles, Web3 remains a land of opportunity—especially when compared to the hyper-competitive Web2 environment.

marsbit12/18 03:04

VC "Dead"? No, the Industry is Undergoing a Brutal Shakeout

marsbit12/18 03:04

Crypto Morning Brief: Coinbase Launches Stock Trading and Prediction Market Services, Binance Explores Relaunch of Binance.US

**Crypto Morning Brief** Key market movements include BTC dropping below $86,000 and ETH falling under $2,800. Federal Reserve Governor Waller signaled that the weak job market supports the case for continued interest rate cuts. Major exchange developments are a central theme. **Coinbase** significantly expanded its services, launching stock trading with zero commissions, 24/5 availability, and a partnership with prediction market provider Kalshi. It also introduced AI-driven wealth management and business services. Meanwhile, **Binance** is reportedly exploring options to restart its US operations, Binance.US, which could involve a capital restructuring to reduce founder CZ's ownership stake. In other news, **Tether** launched a peer-to-peer password manager called PearPass, emphasizing enhanced security by avoiding cloud storage. **SBI Ripple Asia** announced plans to launch an XRP-based yield product and explore real-world asset tokenization on the XRP Ledger. Binance Wallet introduced a new on-chain lending feature, and Bitcoin treasury company Metaplanet received support for its management proposals from Norway's sovereign wealth fund. On the regulatory and corporate front, crypto VC firm **Shima Capital** is shutting down following SEC fraud charges against its founder, who has agreed to a settlement. Bitcoin miner **Hut 8** signed a $7 billion data center lease agreement.

深潮12/18 01:39

Crypto Morning Brief: Coinbase Launches Stock Trading and Prediction Market Services, Binance Explores Relaunch of Binance.US

深潮12/18 01:39

Circle's Acquisition of Axelar Sparks Controversy: Giant Wants the Team, Not the Token

Circle, the stablecoin giant, has announced the acquisition of the core team and intellectual property of Interop Labs, the initial developer of the cross-chain protocol Axelar Network. However, the deal explicitly excludes the Axelar Network project itself, its foundation, and its native token AXL. These will continue to operate independently under community governance, with another contributing team, Common Prefix, taking over Interop Labs' former activities. This "acquire-the-team, not-the-token" structure has caused significant controversy and triggered a 15% drop in the price of AXL. The crypto community is divided into opposing camps. The opposition, including VCs and prominent figures, argues the move is a de facto "rug pull." They contend it is unethical for the team and equity holders to profit from the acquisition while token holders, who funded the project's early development, are left with an asset that may now be worthless. Critics state this highlights a fundamental conflict between equity and token-based financing. Supporters, including investment chiefs, defend the move as a normal market behavior. They explain that in traditional capital structures, tokens sit at the very bottom, below debt and equity. In acquisitions, it is standard for higher-priority stakeholders to be paid first, and tokens have no inherent claim to proceeds. They argue Circle acted within existing commercial frameworks by purchasing only the most valuable assets—the talent and IP. The core conflict exposed is the ambiguous legal and economic nature of tokens. They are often narratively treated as "quasi-equity" during good times but are structurally relegated to having no rights in events like acquisitions. This case underscores the urgent need for the industry to define and institutionalize the rights and position of tokens within capital structures.

Odaily星球日报12/16 03:27

Circle's Acquisition of Axelar Sparks Controversy: Giant Wants the Team, Not the Token

Odaily星球日报12/16 03:27

活动图片