# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DeFi

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DeFi", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Stablecoins at a Crossroads: Clear Regulations Drive Adoption, Systemic Risks Remain

Stablecoins are at a critical juncture, with regulatory clarity driving their rapid evolution from crypto trading tools to mainstream payment and settlement infrastructure. The U.S. GENIUS Act and the EU’s MiCA framework have established federal and regional standards for issuance, reserves, and auditing, accelerating their adoption. Market capitalization has surpassed $300 billion, with USD-pegged stablecoins dominating, though euro and other fiat-backed alternatives are growing. Use cases are expanding significantly, with enterprises adopting stablecoins for cross-border payments, payroll, and treasury management due to their 24/7 availability and low transaction costs. They are increasingly integrated into traditional finance as settlement and custody solutions. However, systemic risks remain. USD-pegged stablecoins face potential de-pegging risks, insufficient reserve transparency, and high centralization, which could trigger liquidity crises. Large holdings of sovereign bonds or fixed-income assets may also impact bond markets and monetary policy. The IMF has warned about financial stability risks and dollarization concerns. For stablecoins to mature into reliable, compliant, and interoperable digital infrastructure—rather than just survive—they require transparent issuance mechanisms, robust regulatory coordination, and effective systemic risk controls.

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:03

Stablecoins at a Crossroads: Clear Regulations Drive Adoption, Systemic Risks Remain

cointelegraph_中文12/08 11:03

When Nasdaq Starts 'Putting Stocks on the Chain', What Are We Really Welcoming?

Nasdaq is advancing a proposal to move U.S. stock settlement onto the blockchain, which could fundamentally reshape the infrastructure of American capital markets. This shift aims to replace the current slow, manual, and multi-layered clearing system with real-time, automated on-chain settlement. While many discussions focus on surface-level changes like 24/7 trading, the core transformation is structural: moving from outdated T+2 (or even T+1) settlement to instantaneous, programmable, and transparent ledger-based clearing. This isn’t about making stocks “more Web3” but modernizing a financial system that still relies on processes from the 1970s. The existing system—with its custodians, sub-custodians, and clearing intermediaries—creates operational friction, risk, and cost, as seen during events like the GameStop trading halts and the FTX collapse. On-chain settlement could reduce the need for traditional custodial roles, compress arbitrage opportunities built on settlement delays, and turn static securities into dynamic, composable financial instruments. The move faces significant resistance from entrenched intermediaries who profit from the current structure, but the direction of change appears inevitable. As demonstrated by Hong Kong’s recent issuance of a green bond settled in one second (versus five days), tokenization of traditional assets is becoming an operational reality—not a conceptual experiment. When stocks migrate on-chain, other assets like bonds and derivatives may follow, leading to a quiet but profound shift in how global markets function. This isn’t just a change in technology; it’s a change in the nature of finance itself.

cointelegraph_中文12/08 10:33

When Nasdaq Starts 'Putting Stocks on the Chain', What Are We Really Welcoming?

cointelegraph_中文12/08 10:33

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Summary: Over the weekend, a public dispute erupted between Solana's two leading lending protocols, Jupiter Lend and Kamino, centered on the definition of "risk isolation." The conflict began when Kamino's co-founder, Marius Ciubotariu, accused Jupiter Lend of misleading users. He argued that Jupiter's early marketing claimed its lending pools were "risk-isolated," preventing cross-contamination between assets. However, Kamino contends that Jupiter Lend's design, which allows for the rehypothecation (re-use) of collateral across pools, creates a risk of contagion, contradicting its marketing. In response, Jupiter's COO, Kash Dhanda, admitted the initial "zero contagion risk" social media posts were inaccurate and apologized. The debate highlights a core disagreement on the definition of "risk isolation." Jupiter and its supporters argue the term has design flexibility, noting that while pools share a liquidity layer, each has independent parameters. Kamino and its allies insist that any rehypothecation negates true risk isolation. The dispute escalated when Tushar Jain, a partner at Kamino investor Multicoin Capital, strongly criticized Jupiter, accusing the team of being either incompetent or deliberately misleading. In contrast, Solana Foundation President Lily Liu urged for cooperation, emphasizing that the Solana lending market is much smaller than Ethereum's and that internal conflict only helps competitors. The clash is seen as an inevitable result of intense competition. Kamino was long the Solana lending leader, but Jupiter Lend has rapidly gained significant market share. In a tighter market with reduced liquidity and heightened safety concerns, the competition between the two protocols has become increasingly fierce.

marsbit12/08 10:22

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

marsbit12/08 10:22

BNB Chain Annual Review: Daily Active Addresses Lead Among L1s, Stablecoin Supply Doubles

BNB Chain achieved significant growth in 2025, establishing itself as a leading Layer 1 blockchain with record-breaking metrics. It recorded the highest daily active users (DAU) among all L1s, peaking at 5 million, and maintained a 22.6% market share. Its Layer 2 solution, opBNB, also led in DAU among L2s. Total DEX trading volume surpassed $2 trillion, with 2025 volume reaching approximately $680 billion. Meme coins were a major driver of activity, with BNB Chain一度 surpassing Solana and Ethereum in meme trading volume. Infrastructure like the Four.Meme launchpad and zero-fee campaigns fueled this trend. Stablecoin performance was particularly strong, with total supply doubling to $14 billion. Monthly active addresses for stablecoins ranked first among all blockchains, supported by low fees and initiatives like the "0 Gas Fee Carnival." BNB Chain also emerged as a key platform for Real-World Assets (RWA), with a market cap of $1.74 billion and TVL surging 1,510% quarter-over-quarter. Major institutional entries included BlackRock's BUIDL fund and partnerships with Ondo Finance and Circle. Perpetuals trading grew steadily, with Aster becoming a flagship protocol. Despite challenges, BNB Chain solidified its role as a multi-chain infrastructure hub in Web3.

深潮12/08 09:52

BNB Chain Annual Review: Daily Active Addresses Lead Among L1s, Stablecoin Supply Doubles

深潮12/08 09:52

Prediction Markets: A Decade of Refinement, Who's Next?

The evolution of the crypto prediction market is a compelling case study, having taken nearly a decade to achieve product-market fit (PMF) after being prematurely dismissed. Early projects like Gnosis (2015) and Augur (2018) struggled with high Ethereum gas fees, poor user experience, regulatory pressure (e.g., CFTC classifying them as gambling), and immature oracles, leading to low liquidity and trading volumes. The turning point came in 2024, catalyzed by the U.S. presidential election. Polymarket’s trading volume surged, with monthly activity exploding from $62 million to $2.1 billion. By 2025, the sector’s annual trading volume reached $27.9 billion. Key drivers for this breakthrough include: 1) Improved infrastructure (Layer 2 solutions like Polygon and Base drastically reduced fees and sped up transactions); 2) Regulatory shifts (CFTC approval of platforms like Kalshi and clearer crypto-friendly policies); 3) A new market narrative focused on utility over speculation, amplified by media coverage; and 4) Broader event categories beyond politics. This demonstrates that some "disproven" crypto sectors may not lack PMF but were simply ahead of their time, awaiting better infrastructure and market conditions. This pattern suggests potential future revivals in other early-stage areas like crypto gaming, social, or DePIN.

marsbit12/08 08:31

Prediction Markets: A Decade of Refinement, Who's Next?

marsbit12/08 08:31

2025 Tether Financial Analysis: An Additional $45 Billion in Reserves Needed to Maintain Stability

The article analyzes Tether's financial stability in 2025, arguing it functions as an unregulated bank rather than a simple payment operator. It applies a banking regulatory framework (Basel Capital Framework) to assess if Tether holds sufficient capital (its ~$6.8B in excess reserves) to cover potential losses from its asset portfolio. The core issue is whether Tether's total capital is adequate for its risk-weighted assets (RWAs). Its $181.2B in assets are largely in low-risk instruments (~77%), but ~13% is in volatile commodities like gold and Bitcoin. The analysis estimates Tether's RWAs between $62.3B and $175.3B, depending on the conservative treatment of its Bitcoin holdings. Under a baseline scenario, Tether's capital ratio is near minimum regulatory requirements. However, compared to well-capitalized banks, it may need an additional ~$4.5B in capital to support its current $USDT issuance. A more punitive treatment of Bitcoin could imply a deficit of $12.5B-$25B. Tether's counter-argument points to substantial group-level profits and equity (~$20B+), but these are not legally committed to the token entity and are invested in illiquid ventures like mining and AI. The article concludes that the sufficiency of Tether's capital is a complex, structural question without a definitive answer, dependent on asset risk weightings and the firm's willingness to mobilize group resources in a crisis.

marsbit12/08 07:31

2025 Tether Financial Analysis: An Additional $45 Billion in Reserves Needed to Maintain Stability

marsbit12/08 07:31

A Decade in the Making: Is the Prediction Market's Next Star About to Take the Stage?

The evolution of the crypto prediction market is a notable case of a once-dismissed sector achieving product-market fit after a decade. Early platforms like Gnosis (2015) and Augur (2018) struggled due to high transaction costs, poor user experience, regulatory pressure (e.g., CFTC classifying them as gambling), and immature oracles. By 2020, platforms like Polymarket remained niche, with low trading volumes and TVL. The turning point came in 2024, driven largely by the U.S. presidential election. Polymarket’s election prediction market saw over $2.7 billion in volume, with monthly trading surging from $62 million to $2.1 billion. Key factors for this breakthrough include: improved scalability and lower fees via L2 solutions like Polygon and Base; regulatory shifts, such as CFTC approving platforms like Kalshi; and broader market narratives emphasizing real-world utility over speculation. Prediction markets have evolved from being perceived as gambling to providing real-time probabilistic signals, attracting institutional investment and mainstream media attention. The sector’s growth underscores that early "failure" in crypto may stem from immature infrastructure rather than lack of demand, suggesting other dismissed sectors like crypto gaming or DePIN could similarly rebound under improved conditions.

比推12/08 05:59

A Decade in the Making: Is the Prediction Market's Next Star About to Take the Stage?

比推12/08 05:59

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Jupiter Lend and Kamino, the two leading lending protocols on Solana, are embroiled in a public dispute over Jupiter’s “risk isolation” claims. The conflict began when Jupiter promoted its lending product as having isolated risk between pools, but critics—led by Kamino—argue Jupiter’s design actually allows cross-contamination through rehypothecation (reusing collateral across pools). Kamino’s co-founder publicly accused Jupiter of misleading users, prompting community backlash. Jupiter later deleted earlier promotional content and acknowledged the description was inaccurate. The debate centers on differing interpretations of “risk isolation,” with Jupiter defending its model as a balance between safety and capital efficiency. Multicoin Capital, a Kamino investor, escalated the situation by accusing Jupiter of incompetence or intentional deception. In response, the Solana Foundation urged both sides to collaborate rather than compete internally, highlighting the larger opportunity in expanding the DeFi lending market overall. The clash reflects growing tension as Jupiter Lend rapidly gains market share in a shrinking TVL environment, turning former allies into rivals in Solana’s competitive lending landscape.

Odaily星球日报12/08 05:09

Solana's Two Leading Lending Protocols Clash, Foundation Steps In to Mediate

Odaily星球日报12/08 05:09

活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow

Industry News

Bitcoin