A Decade in the Making: Is the Prediction Market's Next Star About to Take the Stage?

比推Опубликовано 2025-12-08Обновлено 2025-12-08

Введение

The evolution of the crypto prediction market is a notable case of a once-dismissed sector achieving product-market fit after a decade. Early platforms like Gnosis (2015) and Augur (2018) struggled due to high transaction costs, poor user experience, regulatory pressure (e.g., CFTC classifying them as gambling), and immature oracles. By 2020, platforms like Polymarket remained niche, with low trading volumes and TVL. The turning point came in 2024, driven largely by the U.S. presidential election. Polymarket’s election prediction market saw over $2.7 billion in volume, with monthly trading surging from $62 million to $2.1 billion. Key factors for this breakthrough include: improved scalability and lower fees via L2 solutions like Polygon and Base; regulatory shifts, such as CFTC approving platforms like Kalshi; and broader market narratives emphasizing real-world utility over speculation. Prediction markets have evolved from being perceived as gambling to providing real-time probabilistic signals, attracting institutional investment and mainstream media attention. The sector’s growth underscores that early "failure" in crypto may stem from immature infrastructure rather than lack of demand, suggesting other dismissed sectors like crypto gaming or DePIN could similarly rebound under improved conditions.

The evolution of the crypto prediction market is fascinating because it was once categorized as a "disproven" track. It took a full decade to achieve PMF (Product-Market Fit), and its development has surpassed market expectations. Sometimes, in the crypto space, drawing conclusions too early might not be appropriate.

The concept of prediction markets itself isn't new; it has existed in the crypto field for a long time. In 2015, the Gnosis project began development; in 2018, Augur officially launched. It was a decentralized prediction market platform built on Ethereum, allowing users to create and bet on future events, with settlements made using cryptocurrency.

In 2020, Polymarket (based on Polygon) also launched, but it remained on the fringes. Coupled with regulatory factors, it struggled along. Polymarket's initial monthly trading volume was only in the millions of dollars; Augur's TVL plummeted nearly 80% after the 2020 election, sliding from its peak to just a few million dollars. The entire industry's peak TVL hovered around $7 million, with monthly trading volumes under $100 million. Regulatory pressure (e.g., the CFTC viewing it as "gambling") and imperfect oracles (prone to manipulation) further stifled growth.

The real explosion of the entire prediction market only began in 2024. Particularly, the 2024 US election became a turning point. Polymarket's election prediction market trading volume exceeded $2.7 billion, and the platform's monthly trading volume soared from $62 million in May to $2.1 billion in October, a growth of over 30 times. The annual nominal trading volume reached $16.3 billion, far exceeding the sum of all previous years.

Why did it take ten years to achieve PMF?

First, early crypto faced technical and user experience barriers. The prediction market concept was good, and the demand seemed significant, but the actual user experience excluded the vast majority. For example, early Augur was built on Ethereum L1, with extremely high transaction costs—gas fees were frighteningly high back then, and confirmation speeds were slow. Additionally, ordinary users had to master wallets and complex interfaces, which involved a steep learning curve. These high barriers corresponded to insufficient liquidity and user concerns about manipulation.

Second, regulatory pressure was constant. The US CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission) categorized prediction markets as "gambling" or derivatives and increased scrutiny after 2018. During this period, Augur was fined for betting on sensitive events; Polymarket paid a $1.4 million fine in 2022 and exited the US mainland. Its founder, Shayne Coplan (born in 1998), even had his New York apartment raided by the FBI, who confiscated his electronic devices (though he wasn't arrested). Regulatory ambiguity prevented institutional funds from entering. This pressure made it very difficult to build liquidity.

Third, the market narrative shifted. From 2016-2018, most crypto users were more focused on speculation than utility tools; the 2020-2023 DeFi/NFT frenzy diverted attention, with prediction market TVL stuck at just $7 million. The lack of major event drivers made it hard to accumulate liquidity.

Fourth, oracles were immature and easily manipulated.

2024 was the turning point. As mentioned, the 2024 US election was a catalyst, but it was far more than that.

From 2024 to now, prediction markets have truly taken off. Besides Polymarket, the centralized prediction platform Kalshi has emerged. In 2025, prediction market trading volume reached $27.9 billion (a 210% year-on-year increase), with a weekly peak of $2.3 billion. The combined TVL of Polymarket and Kalshi exceeded $20 billion. Both are valued at the tens of billions of dollars level. Prediction markets have suddenly become the market's darling.

So, what are the driving factors?

In contrast to the obstacles faced between 2015-2024, these barriers have been removed one by one, leading to a qualitative improvement in user experience and other aspects.

First, changes in technical barriers/user experience. Polygon, Base L2 networks, and others have reduced gas fees to just cents and increased transaction speeds by 10 times. Platforms like Polymarket have optimized UIs, supporting one-click betting with stablecoins, attracting non-crypto natives. Furthermore, DeFi has developed immensely, providing deep liquidity. For users, participating in prediction markets has become very convenient. Kalshi, being a centralized prediction platform integrated with Robinhood and others, offers even easier participation.

Second, regulatory changes. After the 2024 US election, regulators pushed crypto-friendly policies. The CFTC approved regulated platforms like Kalshi in 2025. The SEC/CFTC clarified the legality of "spot commodity crypto," and stablecoin legislation passed Congress. Overseas, places like Switzerland, despite having blacklists, show an overall environment shifting from hostile to supportive, with institutional funds pouring in (e.g., ICE investing $2 billion).

Third, market narrative change. This cycle lacks a particularly dominant narrative. Real utility has become a focus. Coupled with the catalyst of the '24 election predictions, Polymarket expanded into sports, economics, tech, and other fields. Media push (e.g., reports by CNN/Bloomberg) and social network dissemination fueled the prediction market boom.

Fourth, both institutions and communities are driving growth. a16z is actively participating, creating a narrative around "event-driven financial infrastructure." Community users are also actively participating, pushing up TVL.

Fifth, prediction markets are gradually evolving from "gambling" into a new signal type, akin to providing real-time probability signals.

From the decade-long evolution of prediction markets, an interesting conclusion emerges: not all "disproven" tracks necessarily lack PMF. Sometimes, the conditions just aren't ripe yet. This phenomenon is especially evident in the crypto field. Due to the underdeveloped infrastructure in the first decade (expensive/slow/poor user experience...), many attempts couldn't successfully reach ordinary users. Perhaps future Crypto Game/social/AI agent/DePIN/digital identity... and other tracks, some parts might be over, but some sectors might still have a chance to prove themselves again.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7593865

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhy did it take nearly a decade for crypto prediction markets to achieve Product-Market Fit (PMF)?

AEarly crypto prediction markets faced significant barriers including high transaction costs and slow speeds on Ethereum L1, complex user interfaces requiring wallet management, regulatory pressure from entities like the CFTC which viewed them as gambling, immature oracles prone to manipulation, and a market narrative focused on speculation and other trends like DeFi and NFTs rather than utility. These factors combined to create high user barriers and insufficient liquidity.

QWhat was the key catalyst that led to the explosive growth of prediction markets in 2024?

AThe 2024 U.S. presidential election served as the major catalyst. It drove massive engagement, with Polymarket's election prediction market alone seeing over $2.7 billion in trading volume. This event demonstrated the utility and demand for prediction markets, leading to a surge in platform usage and mainstream media attention.

QHow did improvements in infrastructure contribute to the rise of prediction markets?

AThe adoption of Layer 2 scaling solutions like Polygon and Base drastically reduced gas fees to just a few cents and increased transaction speeds by 10x. Platforms like Polymarket also optimized their user interfaces, integrated stablecoins for easy betting, and leveraged deeper DeFi liquidity. This made participation much cheaper, faster, and more accessible to both crypto-native and non-crypto users.

QHow did the regulatory landscape for prediction markets change around 2024-2025?

AThe regulatory environment shifted from hostile to more supportive. Following the 2024 election, U.S. regulators like the CFTC approved regulated platforms such as Kalshi. The SEC and CFTC provided clearer guidance, clarifying the legality of 'spot commodity crypto,' and stablecoin legislation was passed by Congress. This newfound regulatory clarity allowed institutional capital to flow into the space.

QBesides elections, what other factors are driving the new narrative for prediction markets?

AThe narrative has evolved from pure speculation or 'gambling' to being seen as a source of valuable 'real-time probability signals' for events in sports, economics, and technology. This utility, combined with a lack of a dominant speculative narrative in the crypto cycle, media coverage from major outlets like CNN and Bloomberg, and active promotion by venture firms like a16z as 'event-driven financial infrastructure,' has driven widespread adoption.

Похожее

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit8 мин. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit8 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit12 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit12 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报17 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报17 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit22 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit22 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit23 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit23 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片