Kalshi and Polymarket Face Scrutiny as Lawmakers Target Death-Related Betting Markets

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-03-02更新于2026-03-02

文章摘要

Prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket are under scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers after users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts related to the potential death of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Over $529 million was traded on related Polymarket contracts. Six Democratic senators have urged the CFTC to ban such death-related prediction contracts, citing ethical and national security risks. Kalshi’s CEO defended the platform, though the company later admitted to unclear contract wording and issued refunds. Polymarket, which operates offshore with fewer regulations, saw some users profit $1 million from well-timed bets. The situation highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in the prediction market industry.

Prediction market platforms like Kalshi andPolymarket are facing pressure after users placed larger bets on the events connected to the U.S. strikes on Iran, which include contracts linked to the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. According to the reports, more than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes. Kalshi’s market is asking whether Khamenei has generated over $50 million in trading volume.

Lawmakers Demand Regulatory Actions

Six Democratic senators have urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person’s death. In a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, the senators argued that such markets pose a serious ethical and national security risk.

Tarek Mansour, Kalshi CEO, defended the platform, stating that Kalshi does not list contracts directly tied to death and designs rules to prevent users from profiting from someone’s death. However, confusion emerged over how the Khamenei contract was settled. Under Kalshi’s official rules filed with the CFTC, which are to be settled at the last traded price before Khamenei’s death.

Kalshi later admitted the wording was unclear. The company announced it would refund all the trading fees from the market and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei’s death.

Polymarket, which operates outside U.S. regulations and only requires a crypto wallet to trade. Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaos reported that six newly created accounts made about $1 million in profit by correctly betting on the strike date. Some of these bets were placed just hours before the attack occurred. This debate highlights how prediction markets should be regulated. Kalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsCrypto MarketCryptocurrency

相关问答

QWhat is the main reason Kalshi and Polymarket are facing scrutiny from lawmakers?

ALawmakers are scrutinizing them because users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts linked to the death of Iran's Supreme Leader, which they argue pose serious ethical and national security risks.

QHow much trading volume was generated on Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the U.S. strikes on Iran?

AMore than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes.

QWhat specific action did six Democratic senators demand from the CFTC regarding prediction markets?

AThey urged the CFTC to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person's death.

QHow did Kalshi respond to the confusion over the settlement of its Khamenei contract?

AKalshi admitted the wording was unclear, announced it would refund all trading fees from that market, and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei's death.

QWhat key difference in regulation is highlighted between Kalshi and Polymarket?

AKalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions and only requires a crypto wallet to trade.

你可能也喜欢

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

以太坊网络上因希望进行质押的验证者数量激增,形成了约250万枚ETH的激活队列,新参与者需等待约43天才能激活其代币。然而,Sygnum Bank的托管与质押部门负责人托马斯·布伦纳指出,这种漫长的等待不应被直接解读为强烈的看涨信号。 布伦纳表示,验证者队列的拥堵虽然反映了机构需求,但也受到以太坊协议技术特性的显著影响。他提到,自Dencun升级后,每日验证者吞吐量被限制在约57,600枚ETH,且这一限制在Pectra升级中并未提高。Pectra升级允许单个验证者最多持有2048枚ETH并支持自动复利功能,大型质押运营商可以向现有验证者追加ETH而非创建新验证者。但即便仅向现有验证者添加1枚ETH,该交易也会与新的质押者一同进入相同的激活队列。 因此,布伦纳认为,并非队列中的所有ETH都源自新投资者的需求,其中部分积累来自于已质押ETH的再分配、对现有验证者的补充以及复利过程。他指出,一个更重要的市场信号是提款队列几乎为空,这表明现有参与者正在维持其网络头寸,显示出真实的信心。 目前,以太坊网络上已质押约4120万枚ETH,约占流通总量的33.8%。布伦纳还强调,尽管ETH价格有所疲软,机构投资者并未放弃质押。许多机构将质押收益视为以太坊内在的基本特性,但机构参与的最大障碍之一仍是隐私问题。由于验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易在区块链上可被追踪,机构投资者对扩大其质押规模持谨慎态度,隐私问题仍是制约以太坊机构质押市场更快增长的主要障碍。

cryptonews.ru2小时前

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

cryptonews.ru2小时前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

韩国央行公布了其代币化存款测试结果。该试点项目涉及28家央行及国际金融机构,韩方参与者包括KB国民银行、NH农协银行、新韩银行、友利银行和韩亚银行。 测试显示,从支付指令到最终结算的整个过程平均耗时约1分20秒,其中最终结算平均需80秒。在测试中,参与者执行了30笔交易,覆盖17种不同场景,包括企业和银行间转账,并涉及韩元、美元和欧元等六种货币。交易总额约合99.5万美元。 央行表示,平台在整个测试期间运行稳定,尽管仅在部分连接现有银行基础设施的环境下运作。即使在支付网络和银行系统兼容性有限的情况下,代币化存款结算仍能无缝、快速、透明地完成。 此外,韩国央行还通过Project Agora平台,在NH农协银行和新韩银行之间完成了一笔2000万韩元(约1.389万美元)的内部转账测试。该交易涉及手动连接其批发型央行数字货币(CBDC)平台Project Hangang至央行现有网络,以验证兼容性。 同时,韩国KB国民银行与日本三菱日联金融集团(MUFG Bank)也完成了使用存款代币的支付测试。这些代币是银行在试点中发行的数字凭证,并非由央行直接发行。韩国央行计划继续测试存款代币支付。 去年,韩国当局曾承诺加强对韩元稳定币的监管,要求其发行必须获得韩国央行和金融服务委员会(FSC)的批准。

cryptonews.ru3小时前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

cryptonews.ru3小时前

交易

现货
活动图片