Kalshi and Polymarket Face Scrutiny as Lawmakers Target Death-Related Betting Markets

TheNewsCrypto发布于2026-03-02更新于2026-03-02

文章摘要

Prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket are under scrutiny from U.S. lawmakers after users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts related to the potential death of Iran’s Supreme Leader. Over $529 million was traded on related Polymarket contracts. Six Democratic senators have urged the CFTC to ban such death-related prediction contracts, citing ethical and national security risks. Kalshi’s CEO defended the platform, though the company later admitted to unclear contract wording and issued refunds. Polymarket, which operates offshore with fewer regulations, saw some users profit $1 million from well-timed bets. The situation highlights ongoing regulatory challenges in the prediction market industry.

Prediction market platforms like Kalshi andPolymarket are facing pressure after users placed larger bets on the events connected to the U.S. strikes on Iran, which include contracts linked to the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei. According to the reports, more than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes. Kalshi’s market is asking whether Khamenei has generated over $50 million in trading volume.

Lawmakers Demand Regulatory Actions

Six Democratic senators have urged the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person’s death. In a letter to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, the senators argued that such markets pose a serious ethical and national security risk.

Tarek Mansour, Kalshi CEO, defended the platform, stating that Kalshi does not list contracts directly tied to death and designs rules to prevent users from profiting from someone’s death. However, confusion emerged over how the Khamenei contract was settled. Under Kalshi’s official rules filed with the CFTC, which are to be settled at the last traded price before Khamenei’s death.

Kalshi later admitted the wording was unclear. The company announced it would refund all the trading fees from the market and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei’s death.

Polymarket, which operates outside U.S. regulations and only requires a crypto wallet to trade. Blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaos reported that six newly created accounts made about $1 million in profit by correctly betting on the strike date. Some of these bets were placed just hours before the attack occurred. This debate highlights how prediction markets should be regulated. Kalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Hong Kong and Shanghai Authorities Integrate Cargo Data on Blockchain

TagsCrypto MarketCryptocurrency

相关问答

QWhat is the main reason Kalshi and Polymarket are facing scrutiny from lawmakers?

ALawmakers are scrutinizing them because users placed large bets on events connected to U.S. strikes on Iran, including contracts linked to the death of Iran's Supreme Leader, which they argue pose serious ethical and national security risks.

QHow much trading volume was generated on Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the U.S. strikes on Iran?

AMore than $529 million was traded on the Polymarket contracts related to the timing of the strikes.

QWhat specific action did six Democratic senators demand from the CFTC regarding prediction markets?

AThey urged the CFTC to ban prediction contracts that are linked to or correlate with a person's death.

QHow did Kalshi respond to the confusion over the settlement of its Khamenei contract?

AKalshi admitted the wording was unclear, announced it would refund all trading fees from that market, and fully reimburse traders who placed bets after Khamenei's death.

QWhat key difference in regulation is highlighted between Kalshi and Polymarket?

AKalshi operates under U.S. oversight by the CFTC, while Polymarket operates offshore with fewer restrictions and only requires a crypto wallet to trade.

你可能也喜欢

奥特曼承认:高估了AI抢饭碗!黄仁勋:失业论完全搞反了

2025年10月,OpenAI CEO山姆·奥特曼曾预言可能出现由AI管理的大公司。然而在2026年7月的播客中,他改口称人们“并不真正想要一个AI CEO”,因为公司决策需要明确的责任归属和真人间的信任。他承认自己高估了AI消灭初级白领岗位的速度,“就业末日”大概率不会到来。 几乎同时,英伟达CEO黄仁勋在YC创业课上指出,“AI毁掉工作”的叙事完全搞反了。他认为,AI替代的是工作中的具体“任务”,而非整个“工作”。例如放射科医生和软件工程师,虽然AI承担了更多读片和写代码任务,但这些岗位的数量反而在增长,因为效率提升后业务规模扩大,产生了更多对沟通、判断、协调等AI无法替代的人类技能的需求。 马里兰大学与LinkUp的数据显示,截至2025年第四季度,美国整体招聘需求未被AI压垮,明确面向应届生的岗位比例甚至有所回升。报告指出,年轻员工可能更受益于AI工具,它能快速提供经验,使其变得“便宜又好用”。 然而,挑战依然存在:AI最先接管的正是数据录入、基础分析等标准化入门任务,这使得新人积累初期经验的传统路径变窄,入门台阶正在升高。 两位领袖的观点共同揭示了一个趋势:AI越强大,人类工作的核心价值就越向承担责任、建立信任、做出最终判断等层面集中。这些无法被机器替代的部分,构成了个人真正的职业护城河。

marsbit17分钟前

奥特曼承认:高估了AI抢饭碗!黄仁勋:失业论完全搞反了

marsbit17分钟前

每周编辑精选 Weekly Editor's Picks(0725-0731)

**每周编辑精选(0725-0731)摘要** 本文筛选深度分析,滤除资讯噪音,带来一周核心洞察。 **宏观局势**:美联储迎来近年“最不确定”会议。尽管经济数据为等待提供空间,但高通胀、地缘风险及官员鹰派表态,令市场无法完全排除加息风险,并已为此付费。 **投资与创业**: * 加密投资是长期心态博弈,获胜者需看清资产本质、确信趋势并能承受深度回撤。建议长线布局比特币与优质公链。 * 全球股市(尤科技股)呈现“币圈化”:叙事压倒估值,杠杆放大情绪,社交媒介加速共识极端化。 * Hyperliquid、Polymarket等龙头平台的跨界尝试遇阻,核心难点在于复制原有赛道的用户习惯与流动性深度。 * 多个加密协议收入增长但代币价格不涨,原因在于内部抛压、负面情绪及竞争。好协议不等于好代币,需审视收入、分配与释放机制。 **AI与存储**: * 英伟达信用违约率暴涨,反映市场对AI云设施扩张风险的定价。中国芯片产业崛起正撼动全球存储定价逻辑。 * 存储板块“一夜惊魂”是基本面与预期面脱节,市场已开始为2027年潜在供给过剩提前定价。 * AI烧钱凶猛,市场耐心受考验。多空分歧在于:需求真实但供给受限 vs. 未来回报可见度低。 * SK海力士虽录得史上最赚钱季度,但股价仍“不及预期”,显示市场对其未来增长空间的定价存在分歧。 **政策与稳定币**:美国《Clarity法案》推进至最后阶段,但道德条款等关键分歧仍存,且需与其他争议法案争夺有限表决时间,年内落地概率被下调。若未通过,对加密市场冲击或有限,但将增加未来立法难度。 **CeFi & DeFi**:Ondo代币近期上涨,源于其在链上交易美股主线动作密集,既占据上游代币化资产份额,又向下游拓展保证金应用。但受制于整体市场颓势,涨势更多是短期资金博弈。 **以太坊与扩容**:Lido正启动将800多万枚ETH迁移至Pectra升级后的新型验证器架构,这代表了staking资本管理效率的结构性提升,但不会直接降低用户Gas费用。当前ETH价格走弱,部分源于投资者对其价值增长逻辑感到困惑。 **其他要点**:TradeXYZ平台对A股新股定价展现高精准度;Pons平台币半月暴涨登顶Robinhood Chain;币印破产案例警示平台钱包并非资产托管;一周热点还包括美联储按兵不动、MiCA落地欧洲、长鑫科技上市创纪录、OpenAI称未来12个月将“震撼世界”等。

marsbit52分钟前

每周编辑精选 Weekly Editor's Picks(0725-0731)

marsbit52分钟前

少投入不是苹果的免死金牌

《少投入不是苹果的免死金牌》一文指出,虽然苹果在AI浪潮中因资本开支克制而一度受到市场青睐,但其面临的挑战正在显现。 文章首先描述了市场的反差:当Meta、谷歌等巨头因巨额AI投入引发担忧时,苹果在AI领域的迟缓进展反而被视为“亮点”,其股价一度上涨。然而,这种“全靠同行衬托”的领先难以持续。 随后,文章分析了苹果最新财报。尽管2026财年第三财季营收与净利润均创同期历史新高,主要得益于iPhone和Mac的强劲销售,但财报发布后股价却大幅下跌。原因在于苹果对下一季度的增长指引低于市场预期。 核心问题在于供应链。AI热潮导致内存和芯片需求激增、价格上涨及产能紧张,严重波及苹果。其Mac产品线已因高端芯片供应不足而受限,并被迫提价。外界预测iPhone新品也将大幅涨价,这可能影响未来销量。为应对供应链风险,苹果库存大幅增加,并寻求与中企合作采购内存芯片,但此举面临政治阻力。 与其他科技巨头动辄数千亿美元的AI资本开支相比,苹果的资本开支不仅未增,反而下降,这使其保持了健康的现金流。但同时,苹果研发费用大幅增长,却未能在AI领域取得显著成果,形成反差。 文章总结,苹果虽未在AI烧钱竞赛中陷得太深,却无法避免由这场竞赛引发的供应链与成本冲击。即将卸任的库克对公司未来表示信心,但苹果能否在AI时代保持领先,仍存疑问。

marsbit1小时前

少投入不是苹果的免死金牌

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货
活动图片