# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Stablecoins

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Stablecoins", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Iran's Path to 'De-Dollarization': When Weapons Begin to Be Settled in Cryptocurrency

Iran's "De-Dollarization" Path: When Weapons Begin to Be Settled in Cryptocurrency Iran has officially integrated cryptocurrency into its national survival and foreign strategy, as evidenced by its defense export center Mindex accepting crypto, barter, or rial for military contracts as of January 2026. This move highlights crypto’s role as an "anti-sanction financial tool" in one of the most sanctioned and regulated sectors: arms trade. Driven by severe constraints—including a depreciating rial, severed international banking ties, and high-risk energy and weapon export channels—Iran has turned to crypto to meet economic targets. In 2025, parliamentary leaders emphasized that without crypto, Iran could not achieve its goal of a 10% digital economy share. Iran is now the world’s fourth-largest cryptocurrency mining hub, leveraging subsidized electricity. Stablecoins, especially USDT, have also become critical for liquidity—reportedly facilitating around $1.5 billion in transactions linked to entities like the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. During a nationwide internet blackout in January 2026, crypto demonstrated resilience through offline workarounds like satellite networks (Starlink, Blockstream), Bluetooth mesh systems (Bitchat), and SMS-based Bitcoin transfers (Machankura). Iran’s experience reflects a broader trend: nations like Russia and Venezuela are also using crypto to bypass sanctions, transforming it from a financial innovation into a strategic geopolitical tool for value transfer and access to global markets.

marsbit01/17 02:32

Iran's Path to 'De-Dollarization': When Weapons Begin to Be Settled in Cryptocurrency

marsbit01/17 02:32

A 'Clarity Act': Why Has It Caused Such an Uproar in the Crypto World?

A historical perspective reveals that money has rarely been neutral—it inherently carries an expectation of return. From ancient Mesopotamia to modern banking, the principle that holding or lending money should yield compensation has persisted. Against this backdrop, stablecoins emerged, promising faster settlement, lower costs, and 24/7 availability within a borderless digital economy. However, the proposed U.S. CLARITY Act, combined with the already-passed GENIUS Act, seeks to prohibit stablecoin issuers from paying interest or rewards to holders, permitting only limited “activity-based rewards.” This has sparked intense opposition from both the crypto industry and banking sectors. Critics argue that the bill effectively reduces stablecoins to mere payment conduits rather than capital-optimizing assets, contradicting the historical function of money. Key concerns include unfair competition, as traditional banks can offer interest and rewards while stablecoin issuers are restricted. The bill also introduces ambiguities around decentralized finance (DeFi) and tokenized assets, potentially stifling innovation and pushing capital overseas. Prominent industry figures, including Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, have withdrawn support, stating they would prefer no legislation over a harmful one. The bill currently lacks sufficient congressional support, particularly from Democrats, and faces skepticism for reinforcing existing banking structures rather than fostering healthy competition. Ultimately, the debate highlights the challenge of regulating a form of money inherently designed for efficiency and competition, urging lawmakers to create rules that integrate rather than isolate digital assets.

比推01/17 00:08

A 'Clarity Act': Why Has It Caused Such an Uproar in the Crypto World?

比推01/17 00:08

活动图片