# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Stablecoins

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Stablecoins", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article "Why Banks Are Determined to Ban Yield-Bearing Stablecoins?" explores the ongoing debate around the U.S. cryptocurrency market structure bill (CLARITY), particularly the fierce opposition from large banks against interest-bearing stablecoins. Banks argue that such stablecoins could cause deposit outflows, but the author refutes this, explaining that funds used to purchase stablecoins like USDC ultimately flow back into the banking system as reserves held by issuers like Circle. The real concern for banks is not the total volume of deposits but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. major banks (e.g., Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase) rely heavily on "low-interest banking," where transaction deposits (used for payments, transfers) pay near-zero interest, creating a significant spread between deposit rates and the Fed’s benchmark rate. This model generates massive profits—over $360 billion annually from interest differentials and transaction fees. Stablecoins directly compete with transaction deposits by offering similar utility (payments, settlements). If stablecoins can generate yield, users may shift funds from bank transaction accounts to stablecoins to earn higher returns. While the money remains in the banking system (as stablecoin reserves), it moves from low-cost transaction deposits to higher-yield instruments, squeezing bank profit margins and reducing fee income. Thus, banks oppose yield-bearing stablecoins to protect their lucrative low-cost deposit base and maintain control over profit distribution, making it a central issue in the CLARITY legislative battle.

marsbit01/19 09:43

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

marsbit01/19 09:43

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

The article explores why U.S. banks are strongly opposing interest-bearing stablecoins, despite claims that such assets could cause bank deposit outflows. It argues that funds flowing into stablecoins like USDC do not leave the banking system—instead, they are held as reserves in highly liquid assets like cash or Treasury bills, which eventually return to banks. The real concern for large banks is not the total volume of deposits, but a shift in deposit structure. U.S. megabanks rely heavily on low-cost transactional deposits (used for payments and transfers), which pay near-zero interest. These deposits allow banks to profit from the spread between the Fed funds rate and what they pay depositors, as well as from transaction fees. Interest-bearing stablecoins threaten this model. They offer similar transactional utility but also provide yield, incentivizing users to move funds out of traditional bank transactional accounts. While the money may return to the banking system, it would likely be placed in higher-yielding deposit accounts, increasing banks’ funding costs. Additionally, stablecoins could disrupt banks’ fee income from payment services. The core issue is profit redistribution: stablecoins—especially those offering yield—could reduce banks’ low-cost funding advantage and erode their transaction revenue, explaining the fierce opposition to interest-bearing models in proposed legislation like the CLARITY Act.

Odaily星球日报01/19 09:26

Why Must Banks Ban Stablecoin Yields?

Odaily星球日报01/19 09:26

Institutions Besiege the Crypto World: Deconstructing Three Fatal Traps, A Core Guide for Retail Investors to Avoid Pitfalls

Amidst the recent crypto market hype—such as the London Stock Exchange adopting blockchain settlement, prediction markets hitting $700M in daily volume, and Vietnam’s high USDT payment success rates—many retail investors are eager to jump in. However, this article warns of three major traps set by institutions to exploit散户 (retail investors). First, the LSE’s move is not an endorsement of crypto but a strategic power grab to control on-chain asset pricing and settlement rules, sidelining retail participants. The advice: avoid short-term speculation on "institutional narrative coins" and focus on long-term spot holdings. Second, prediction markets are dominated by professional Wall Street teams using quant models, insider information, and arbitrage strategies. Retail traders, relying on limited information, are at a severe disadvantage. The guidance: only use disposable funds for such high-risk activities. Third, while USDT adoption in Vietnam appears promising with 97% payment success, it serves mainly as a hedge against currency volatility rather than mainstream payment. Challenges like trust issues, slow confirmations, and limited usability hinder broader adoption. The core advice for散户 is to avoid chasing hype, not overweight high-risk sectors, and stick to long-term positions in major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH. Separate entertainment funds from investment capital, and stay rational to survive institutional dominance.

marsbit01/19 05:39

Institutions Besiege the Crypto World: Deconstructing Three Fatal Traps, A Core Guide for Retail Investors to Avoid Pitfalls

marsbit01/19 05:39

The United States Will Not Reject Stablecoins

The article argues that the U.S. has no fundamental reason to reject stablecoins, despite regulatory friction. The debate centers on the "passive yield" mechanism, with traditional banks fearing massive deposit outflows—potentially up to $6 trillion—from community banks into yield-bearing stablecoins like USDC, which could raise lending costs. Coinbase counters that yield is a tool for user benefit and efficiency, helping users escape near-zero bank interest rates. Stablecoin issuers like Tether and Circle have become significant buyers of U.S. Treasury bonds, holding $1700 billion in Treasuries and accounting for a small but growing share of the money supply. With foreign demand for U.S. debt declining, stablecoins help sustain Treasury markets. The piece traces the rapid evolution of on-chain yield mechanisms, from Ethena’s USDe—which surged then contracted after deleveraging events—to more mature vault-based models like those on Morpho. While on-chain yield products have advanced, real-world adoption in payments remains limited. The solution proposed is integrating yield into payment systems, making yield a default feature during transactions—not just when holding or idling—thus benefiting users, merchants, and platforms. Examples like Airwallex’s yield products and travel platform partnerships show the potential. The conclusion is that stablecoins must expand utility and user base to succeed, with the next challenge being the governance of yield vaults to prevent systemic risks.

marsbit01/19 03:37

The United States Will Not Reject Stablecoins

marsbit01/19 03:37

Has the Crypto Talent Market Saturated with an 80% Plunge in Job Openings?

Has the crypto job market reached saturation? The data from early 2026 suggests a sharp slowdown. In the first two weeks of January 2026, only 85–90 new unique job postings were recorded across major crypto-focused job boards—an 80% drop compared to the same period in 2025, which saw around 38 postings per day. Despite the decline, certain trends stand out: 60% of roles are technical/engineering positions, while 40% are non-technical or business development roles. About 65% of openings are mid-to-senior level, indicating that companies are prioritizing experienced talent to lead core projects. Most roles require 5+ years of experience, with management positions demanding 7+ years. Hiring remains strongest among growth-stage companies that have completed Series A funding or beyond. Key areas attracting talent include infrastructure, stablecoins, and payment/fintech startups. Prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket are also actively competing for talent. A notable shift is the rising influence of the Solana ecosystem. For the first time since 2016, Solana attracted a larger share of new developers (22%) than Ethereum (16%) in 2024. With a 70% year-over-year increase in ecosystem funding in Q3 2025, Solana is challenging Ethereum’s long-standing dominance in developer and hiring markets. Looking ahead, the author suggests that the crypto job market will continue to evolve. Projects with strong fundamentals, real users, and sustainable revenue models are likely to succeed in 2026, especially as the industry reacts to the underperformance of many tokens launched in recent years.

marsbit01/19 02:10

Has the Crypto Talent Market Saturated with an 80% Plunge in Job Openings?

marsbit01/19 02:10

活动图片