# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Risk

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Risk", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has urged that the issuance of Korean won-pegged stablecoins should be led by commercial banks, warning that private issuance could undermine monetary policy and create foreign exchange and financial stability risks. In a report submitted to the National Assembly, the central bank described stablecoins as "currency-like substitutes" and emphasized that their rollout must consider broader economic impacts, not just industrial profits. The BOK expressed concerns that stablecoins could be used to circumvent foreign exchange regulations and stressed that non-bank issuers might conflict with Korea’s separation of banking and commerce principles. It recommended that banks, which are subject to strict regulatory standards, should be the primary issuers, with any expansion beyond banks proceeding cautiously after risk assessments. The report reflects ongoing debates among policymakers about who should be allowed to issue won stablecoins and echoes the BOK’s previous warnings on the matter. While acknowledging stablecoins' potential role in the digital asset revolution, the bank proposed structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body for oversight. The BOK cited the U.S. GENIUS Act as an example of cross-agency supervision. However, this bank-led approach has faced opposition from industry members, including some policymakers, who argue that clearer rules for issuers could sufficiently mitigate risks.

TheNewsCrypto02/23 12:52

Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

TheNewsCrypto02/23 12:52

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

Several major ETF issuers, including Bitwise Asset Management, GraniteShares, and Roundhill Investments, have recently filed applications with the U.S. SEC to launch prediction market ETFs. These ETFs are designed to track the outcomes of U.S. political events, such as the 2028 presidential election and the 2026 midterms, allowing investors to trade election probabilities through traditional brokerage accounts like Robinhood or Fidelity. Prediction markets aggregate crowd-sourced forecasts using real-money contracts, where prices reflect the market’s consensus probability of an event occurring. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy in events like the 2024 U.S. election, often outperforming traditional polls due to their incentive-based structure. The proposed ETFs would track the price movements of these prediction market contracts, with share values fluctuating between $0 and $1. If the predicted event occurs, the corresponding “Yes” ETF would settle near $1; otherwise, it would approach $0. Unlike Bitcoin ETFs, which track asset prices, these are binary outcome products, more akin to options or insurance. If approved, these ETFs could bring prediction markets into mainstream finance, offering new tools for hedging and macro risk management. However, concerns remain about potential market manipulation, public perception influence, and regulatory approval, as the SEC may view them as gambling-like instruments. The move represents a significant test of how “probability as an asset” is accepted in traditional markets.

marsbit02/22 12:46

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

marsbit02/22 12:46

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

A new wave of ETF applications has been submitted to the SEC by asset managers including Bitwise, GraniteShares, and Roundhill Investments. These ETFs aim to track the outcomes of U.S. political elections—such as the 2028 presidential race and 2026 midterm control of Congress—by packaging prediction market contracts into tradable securities. This would allow mainstream investors to use traditional brokerage accounts to bet on electoral results, similar to platforms like Polymarket or Kalshi, but within the regulated financial system. Prediction markets aggregate crowd-sourced probabilities through financial incentives, often demonstrating stronger predictive accuracy than traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. The proposed ETFs would reflect binary event probabilities, with share prices fluctuating between $0 and $1. If the predicted outcome occurs, the ETF value approaches $1; otherwise, it nears zero. Most funds would liquidate after the event settles. This move could significantly broaden participation and liquidity, potentially making prediction markets a tool for hedging policy risks or macro strategies. However, it also raises regulatory and ethical concerns, including potential market influence on public perception and the risk of manipulation. The SEC’s approval remains uncertain, as it may view these products as blurring the line between investing and gambling. The outcome of these applications could signal a major shift in how probabilistic events are traded and perceived in mainstream finance.

Odaily星球日报02/22 12:43

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

Odaily星球日报02/22 12:43

From Lloyd's Coffeehouse to Polymarket: Prediction Markets Are Reshaping the Insurance Industry

From the coffeehouses of 17th-century London to the blockchain-based prediction markets of today, the fundamental nature of risk management is being reimagined. The article begins with a contemporary crisis: major insurers like Farmers Insurance and State Farm are canceling hundreds of thousands of policies in states like Florida and California, a "great insurance withdrawal" driven by catastrophic losses from hurricanes and wildfires that have shattered traditional actuarial models. The narrative then returns to the origin of modern insurance at Lloyd's Coffee House, where merchants and shipowners gathered to collectively underwrite voyages, dispersing individual risk among a group. For centuries, this model of risk transfer, priced by expert actuaries, has dominated. However, climate change and unprecedented disasters are now exposing its limits. The article proposes looking beyond insurance to the financial concept of *hedging*—offsetting risk rather than transferring it. Examples include Ray Dalio's innovative solution for McDonald's to lock in corn and soybean meal prices to launch the McChicken, and Southwest Airlines' legendary fuel hedging strategy that saved it billions. This "elegant" mechanism turns future uncertainty into present-day certainty through open markets. The pivotal shift is embodied by Polymarket, a prediction market platform. Here, users can trade contracts on the outcome of real-world events, from elections to weather patterns. This creates a decentralized, real-time mechanism for pricing risk based on collective wisdom, not proprietary models. A homeowner in Florida could, for instance, buy a contract predicting a hurricane's landfall; its payout would act as a personalized hedge against damage. While prediction markets threaten to disintermediate insurers by eliminating information asymmetry and operational friction, they are not a complete replacement. They excel at pricing objective, verifiable risks (weather, events) but fail with complex, subjective ones (car accidents, health). The future likely holds a hybrid model: prediction markets serving as a foundational pricing layer and risk-hedging tool, while traditional insurers evolve to focus on personalized service, complex underwriting, and long-term risk management in areas where deep engagement is required. The piece concludes that we are witnessing a historic shift from passive risk acceptance to active risk trading, empowering individuals to become their own risk managers in an increasingly uncertain world.

marsbit02/21 08:12

From Lloyd's Coffeehouse to Polymarket: Prediction Markets Are Reshaping the Insurance Industry

marsbit02/21 08:12

活动图片