# Сопутствующие статьи по теме FOMC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "FOMC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

After 6 Quarters of Calling for Rate Cuts, Rate Expectations Are Instead Moving Upwards

In September 2024, the Federal Reserve began its rate-cutting cycle, projecting a median federal funds rate of 3.4% by the end of 2025—implying four additional cuts. However, six quarters later, the March SEP (Summary of Economic Projections) reveals a significant shift: the rate now stands at 3.50%-3.75%, 25 basis points higher than initially expected. The median projection for 2026 has also risen from 2.9% to 3.4%. The Fed’s internal consensus has fractured. Out of 19 FOMC participants, seven now expect no rate cuts in 2026, while seven anticipate only one cut. This 7:7 split reflects a fundamental disagreement over the direction of monetary policy, moving from debates over the magnitude of cuts to whether cuts should occur at all. Persistent inflation is the core issue. The Fed has consistently revised its PCE inflation forecasts upward over the past six quarters, with the 2026 projection now at 2.7%—up 0.6 percentage points from initial estimates. Core PCE, a key indicator of underlying inflation, was revised up sharply to 2.7%, signaling entrenched price pressures. Despite slightly raising its GDP growth forecast to 2.4% and holding unemployment steady at 4.4%, the Fed’s unchanged median rate projection conflicts with its own rising inflation outlook. Market expectations remain more dovish, pricing in around 50 basis points of cuts, but the Fed’s internal division and consistent underestimation of inflation suggest continued uncertainty. The central bank is effectively chasing reality, with no clear consensus on the path ahead.

marsbit03/19 02:30

After 6 Quarters of Calling for Rate Cuts, Rate Expectations Are Instead Moving Upwards

marsbit03/19 02:30

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

The Federal Reserve is exploring the use of prediction markets, particularly Kalshi, as a real-time tool for policy insights. A Fed-affiliated working paper found that Kalshi’s predictions for core CPI and unemployment are statistically comparable to—and sometimes more accurate than—Bloomberg consensus estimates. Prediction markets aggregate real-money, belief-backed trading, offering frequent updates and capturing nuanced shifts that traditional surveys miss. For instance, Kalshi priced inflation uncertainty in real time during a trade policy scare—a dynamic monthly surveys couldn’t reflect. While these markets provide valuable signals, they also carry risks. Prices reflect both expectations and risk preferences, and heavy reliance on sports betting for liquidity makes macroeconomic markets vulnerable to regulatory changes. If sports betting is restricted, liquidity could dry up, increasing manipulation risks. Moreover, if the Fed openly uses prediction markets, it could create a feedback loop where traders manipulate smaller markets like Kalshi to influence broader policy communication and traditional financial instruments. Despite these concerns, prediction markets offer a uniquely timely and distributed form of expectation aggregation—especially for events like FOMC meetings, where informed participants trade with real stakes. The Fed should require open data transparency to mitigate manipulation and carefully weigh the signal against the noise.

比推02/24 18:33

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

比推02/24 18:33

活动图片