Anchored, But Under Strain

insights.glassnodeОпубликовано 2025-12-10Обновлено 2025-12-10

Введение

Bitcoin remains structurally fragile, trading between the STH-Cost Basis at $102.7k and the True Market Mean at $81.3k. On-chain conditions are weakening, with rising unrealized and realized losses, alongside elevated selling from long-term holders. Despite some demand absorbing this pressure, reclaiming key levels like the 0.75 cost-basis quantile ($95k) is crucial for a bullish reversal. Off-chain activity reflects caution: ETF flows are negative, spot and futures liquidity are subdued, and options markets show heightened demand for short-term downside protection ahead of the FOMC meeting. Traders are accumulating volatility, anticipating a near-term move. Post-FOMC, volatility may compress, but the market remains range-bound, balancing persistent sell pressure against patient demand.

Bitcoin enters the week still confined within a structurally fragile range, bounded by the STH-Cost Basis at $102.7k and the True Market Mean at $81.3k. Last week, we underscored weakening on-chain conditions, thinning demand, and a cautious derivatives landscape that collectively echo the early-2022 setup.

Although price has held marginally above the True Market Mean, unrealized losses continue to expand, realized losses are rising, and spending by long-term investors remains elevated. The key upper thresholds to reclaim are the 0.75 cost-basis quantile at $95k, followed by the STH-Cost Basis. Until then, the True Market Mean remains the most probable bottom-formation zone, barring a new macro shock.

Live Chart

Time Works Against the Bulls

Remaining in a mild bearish phase reflects the tension between modest capital inflows and persistent sell pressure from top buyers. As the market holds within a weak but bounded range, time becomes a negative force, making unrealized losses harder for investors to endure and increasing the likelihood of loss realization.

The Relative Unrealized Loss (30D-SMA) has climbed to 4.4% after nearly two years below 2%, marking a shift from a euphoric phase to one of elevated stress and uncertainty. This hesitation now defines the range, and resolving it will require a renewed wave of liquidity and demand to rebuild confidence.

Live Chart

Losses Rising

This time-driven pressure is further evident in spending behavior. Even as Bitcoin has rebounded from the November 22 low to roughly $92.7k, the 30D-SMA Entity-Adjusted Realized Loss has continued climbing, reaching $555 million per day, the highest level since the FTX collapse.

Such elevated loss realization during a moderate price recovery reflects mounting frustration among top buyers who are capitulating into strength rather than holding through the rebound.

Live Chart

Holding Back the Reversal

Rising realized losses are further anchoring the recovery, especially as they coincide with a surge in realized profit from seasoned investors. During the recent bounce, >1-year holders increased their realized profit (30D-SMA) above $1B per day, peaking at a new ATH of over $1.3B. Together, these two forces—time-driven capitulation by top buyers and heavy profit-taking by long-term holders ,explain why the market continues to struggle reclaiming the STH-Cost Basis.

Yet, despite this significant sell pressure, price has stabilized and even slightly recovered above the True Market Mean, signalling persistent and patient demand absorbing distribution. In the short term, if seller exhaustion begins to emerge, this underlying buy pressure could drive a retest of the 0.75 quantile (~$95k) and potentially the STH-Cost Basis.

Live Chart

Off-Chain Insights

ETF Woes

Turning to spot markets, US Bitcoin ETFs logged another quiet week, with the 3-day average of net flows remaining consistently below zero. This extends the cooling trend that began in late November and marks a clear departure from the robust inflow regime that supported price appreciation earlier in the year. Redemptions have been steady across several major issuers, underscoring a more risk-averse stance among institutional allocators as broader market conditions remain unsettled.

As a result, the spot market is operating with a thinner demand buffer, reducing immediate buy-side support and leaving price more vulnerable to macro catalysts and volatility shocks.

Live Chart

Liquidity Remains Subdued

In parallel with softer ETF flows, Bitcoin’s spot relative volume continues to sit near the lower bound of its 30-day range. Trading activity has weakened through November and into December, mirroring the price decline and signalling a retreat in market participation. The contraction in volume reflects a more defensive positioning across the board, with fewer liquidity-driven flows available to absorb volatility or sustain directional moves.

With spot markets running quieter, attention now turns to the upcoming FOMC meeting, which could act as a catalyst for renewed participation depending on the policy tone.

Live Chart

Futures Ghost Town

Extending this theme of muted participation, futures markets also show limited appetite for leverage, with Open Interest failing to meaningfully rebuild and funding rates pinned near neutral. These dynamics highlight a derivatives environment defined more by caution than conviction.

Across perpetual markets, funding hovered around zero to slightly negative during the week, underscoring the continued retreat in speculative long positioning. Traders remain balanced or defensive, contributing little directional pressure via leverage.

With derivatives activity subdued, price discovery tilts more heavily toward spot flows and macro catalysts rather than speculative expansion.

Live Chart

IV Pops at the Front End

Turning to the options market, Bitcoin’s muted spot action contrasts sharply with a sudden rise in short-dated implied volatility, as traders position for a larger move. Interpolated Implied Volatility, which estimates IV at fixed deltas rather than relying on listed strikes, reveals a clearer structure of how risk is being priced across maturities.

On the 20-Delta CALL, the one-week tenor jumped by roughly ten vol points from last week, while longer maturities stayed relatively flat. The same pattern appears on the 20-Delta PUT, with short-dated downside IV lifting as longer expiries remain quiet.

Overall, traders are accumulating volatility precisely where they expect stress, preferring to own convexity rather than fade it ahead of the December 10 FOMC meeting.

Live Chart
Live Chart

Downside Demand Returns

Complementing the rise in front-end volatility, downside protection is once again commanding a premium. The 25-delta skew, which measures the relative cost of puts versus calls at the same delta, has climbed to roughly 11 percent in the one-week tenor, indicating a clear pickup in demand for short-dated downside insurance ahead of the FOMC meeting.

Skew remains tightly clustered across maturities, ranging from 10.3 percent to 13.6 percent. This compression suggests that the preference for put protection is broad-based across the curve, reflecting a consistent hedging bias rather than isolated stress confined to the front end.

Live Chart

Skew Index Shows a Different Tone

Adding another layer to the options picture, the skew index presents a more nuanced signal compared with the 25-delta skew. Because it is weighted toward low-delta options, it captures pricing across the full downside wing. The one-week and one-month readings sit in put territory, yet the three-month and six-month values, around 2.2 percent and 6.7 percent, fall into call territory, since the index is calculated as calls minus puts.

This creates a notable divergence: the 25-delta skew leans bearish across maturities, while the longer-dated skew index shows upside variance being priced more richly than downside. In essence, traders are not bidding deep OTM downside protection in the longer tenors, even though mid-delta puts remain supported. The surface therefore signals short-term caution, but a more balanced to mildly bullish tone further out the curve, a pattern typical in crypto where participants often hold far-OTM calls for asymmetric upside.

Live Chart

Volatility Accumulation

Rounding out the options landscape, weekly flow data reinforces a clear pattern: traders are buying volatility, not selling it. Premiums bought dominate total notional flow, with a slight lead from puts. This does not reflect a directional bias, but rather a regime of volatility accumulation. When traders purchase both wings, it signals hedging and convexity-seeking behaviour rather than sentiment-driven speculation.

Combined with rising implied volatility and a downside-leaning skew, the flow profile suggests that market participants are preparing for a volatility event with a bias toward the downside.

Live Chart

After FOMC

Looking ahead, implied volatility has already begun to ease, and historically, IV tends to compress further once the final major macro event of the year passes. With the December 10 FOMC meeting serving as the last meaningful catalyst, the market is preparing for a transition into a low-liquidity, mean-reverting environment.

After the announcement, gamma sellers typically re-enter, accelerating IV decay into year-end. Absent a hawkish surprise or a notable shift in guidance, the path of least resistance points toward lower implied volatility and a flatter surface through late December.

Live Chart

Conclusion

Bitcoin continues to trade within a structurally fragile environment where rising unrealized losses, elevated realized loss realization, and heavy profit-taking from long-term holders collectively anchor price action. Despite this persistent sell pressure, demand remains sufficiently resilient to keep price above the True Market Mean, suggesting patient buyers are still absorbing distribution. A short-term push toward the 0.75 quantile or even the STH Cost Basis remains possible if seller exhaustion begins to surface.

Off-chain conditions echo this cautious tone. ETF flows remain negative, spot liquidity is subdued, and futures markets lack speculative engagement. Options markets reinforce a defensive posture, with traders accumulating volatility, bidding short-dated downside protection, and positioning for a near-term volatility event ahead of the FOMC meeting.

Taken together, market structure suggests a weak but stable range, held up by patient demand yet constrained by persistent sell pressure. The short-term path hinges on whether liquidity improves and sellers relent, while the longer-term outlook depends on the market’s ability to reclaim key cost-basis thresholds and shift out of this time-driven, psychologically taxing phase.

Похожее

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

The article outlines five core architectural patterns for effective AI Agents, emerging from tools like Codex and Claude, that move beyond simple prompts towards reusable, process-based capabilities. 1. **Skills**: Reusable, parameterized workflows that function like method calls, allowing a single process (e.g., "/investigate") to handle various tasks based on input parameters. 2. **Thin Harness**: A lightweight execution framework (~200 lines) that manages the AI model's "hands and feet"—handling loops, file I/O, and context—without becoming bloated. 3. **Resolvers**: Routing tables that map tasks to specific Skills, preventing "context corruption" when managing dozens of Skills and ensuring outputs go to the correct locations. 4. **Latent vs. Deterministic Layer**: A critical separation where LLMs handle judgment, synthesis, and pattern recognition, while deterministic code handles tasks requiring precision, consistency, and low cost (like calculations). 5. **Memory**: A persistent, accumulating knowledge base (e.g., a markdown folder) with a "current trusted conclusion" section and an append-only timeline, enabling the system to learn and retain context over time. Together, these patterns create a "process power"—a durable competitive advantage. Unlike one-off prompt-based applications whose value quickly commoditizes, a well-designed AI Agent system encodes experience into reusable, parameterized workflows, offloads stable rules to code, and continuously learns through memory. This creates a structured, hard-to-replicate capability that can provide sustained value for individuals or businesses, such as an accountant automating client reviews while preserving privacy and accumulating expertise.

marsbit37 мин. назад

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

marsbit37 мин. назад

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

This report by Tiger Research examines the evolution of risk management in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending. It highlights a power shift from protocol developers to specialized professional risk operators who manage on-chain capital. The era of protocols and community governance solely dictating DeFi lending is ending. A new professional asset management layer has emerged. While the sector is nascent, capital and distribution channels are rapidly consolidating around top risk operator teams, whose past performance is now a key criterion for institutional entry. The industry's development, accelerated by modular infrastructures like Morpho, has led to a clear division of labor mirroring traditional finance: distribution channels (e.g., exchanges), strategy/risk management (the risk operators), and product infrastructure/asset custody (smart contract protocols). This structure lowers the entry barrier for traditional institutions. Currently, the total value managed by risk operators is approximately $70 billion, dominated by a few leading teams like Steakhouse (RWA focus), Sentora (AI models), and Gauntlet (crisis management). Competition now centers on collateral standards, distribution access, and crisis response capabilities. The report outlines three primary entry paths for institutions: 1) **Distribution Model**: Leveraging external risk operators as backend service providers (common for exchanges). 2) **Asset Supply Model**: Onboarding real-world assets to DeFi as collateral. 3) **Independent Operator Model**: Building an in-house team to become a risk operator (e.g., Bitwise). The core opportunity lies in the strategy/risk management layer, where traditional financial institutions can leverage their existing expertise in due diligence and risk assessment without deep technical development. A vast opportunity gap exists: the global traditional asset management industry manages ~$147 trillion, while the entire DeFi sector is only ~$800 billion, with the risk operator niche at ~$70 billion. This disparity signifies immense growth potential. Once robust risk frameworks and clearer regulations are established, even a minor allocation from traditional markets could trigger exponential DeFi growth. Early movers who help build these foundational systems will gain significant rule-setting influence and first-mover advantages.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

marsbit44 мин. назад

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

In an interview with Circle's Chief Economist Gordon Liao, the conversation covers the strategic significance of USDC replacing USDH as the reference asset on the decentralized perpetual exchange Hyperliquid. This shift, facilitated by Coinbase as the reserve manager and Circle providing technical infrastructure, aims to capture net interest income for the platform, with 90% of reserve earnings directed back to Hyperliquid for HYPE token buybacks. Liao discusses how stablecoins like USDC, with their substantial on-chain settlement volumes (e.g., $21 trillion in Q1 2026), are emerging as marginal buyers of U.S. Treasuries, concentrating on short-term debt and effectively reducing the weighted duration of the market, which may provide underlying support for long-term rates. The dialogue also explores the evolving nature of stablecoins as both a medium of exchange and a vehicle for capital and collateral liquidity. Additionally, the panel touches on the CLARITY Act's legislative progress, noting compromises around "activity-based rewards" and remaining hurdles like ethics concerns. On AI, there's debate over value capture, with predictions that distribution and application layers, rather than foundational model companies like OpenAI, will accrue most value. Regarding the bond market, Liao attributes the rise in 30-year yields primarily to an increased term premium (around 80 bps) driven by supply-demand dynamics, including fiscal expansion and changing investor demand, rather than expectations of Fed rate hikes.

marsbit49 мин. назад

Interview with Circle's Chief Economist: USDC's Entry into Hyperliquid Benefits Circle and HYPE, Stablecoins Are Becoming Marginal Buyers of U.S. Treasuries

marsbit49 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить MEGA

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение MegaETH (MEGA) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки MegaETH (MEGA).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение MegaETH (MEGA)После приобретения вами MegaETH (MEGA) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля MegaETH (MEGA)С легкостью торгуйте MegaETH (MEGA) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

236 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.30Обновлено 2026.04.30

Как купить MEGA

Как купить TWT

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Trust Wallet (TWT) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Trust Wallet (TWT).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Trust Wallet (TWT)После приобретения вами Trust Wallet (TWT) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Trust Wallet (TWT)С легкостью торгуйте Trust Wallet (TWT) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

127 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.05.07Обновлено 2026.05.07

Как купить TWT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на A (A) представлены ниже.

活动图片