Did The Cardano Founder Help To Derail XRP’s Growth? Ripple Community Draws Out Hoskinson

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-05-18Last updated on 2026-05-18

Abstract

A Ripple community member accused Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson of being involved in the "ETHgate" saga, alleging it helped derail XRP's growth. The ETHgate refers to claims that the U.S. SEC favored Ethereum by not classifying it as a security, while suing Ripple over XRP's status. The member suggested this hampered XRP's price performance. Hoskinson defended himself, noting he left Ethereum in 2014 due to disagreements and has since been critical of the network. He questioned how he could later conspire with Ethereum against XRP. The accuser later admitted the claim was based on hearsay and expressed hope for the truth to emerge. The discussion originated from a debate about the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure bill that recently advanced in the Senate. Hoskinson warned the bill is imperfect and could allow the SEC to classify new projects as securities. The accuser stated support for the bill, hoping it would enable both ADA and XRP to rally. Ripple's CEO commented that XRP's status is already clarified by a prior court ruling, regardless of the bill's passage.

A member of the Ripple community has called out Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson for helping derail XRP’s growth through the ETHgate saga. In response, Hoskinson has defended himself, arguing that it is impossible he was involved in the XRP lawsuit.

Cardano Founder Accused Of Derailing XRP’s Growth

In an X post, Ripple community member Wino opined that the Cardano founder was involved in the ETHgate, which negatively impacted XRP’s growth. The ETHgate involves allegations that the U.S. SEC favored Ethereum over XRP by declaring that the former wasn’t a security. The Commission also eventually sued Ripple, arguing that XRP was a security.

This notably impacted XRP’s growth as the altcoin stagnated for most of the lawsuit and failed to record any significant gains even during the 2021 bull run. XRP and Ethereum were notably ranked as the largest altcoins by market cap at the time, making them direct competitors and fueling speculation that the ETHgate was aimed at bringing XRP down.

Meanwhile, in response to claims that he was involved in the ETHgate, the Cardano founder noted that he was “pushed” out of Ethereum in June 2014. He added that since then, they have spent 12 years attacking him. As such, he questioned how it was possible that he decided, years later, to coordinate with them to help Ethereum attack XRP.

It is worth noting that the Cardano founder was one of Ethereum’s co-founders but left in June 2014 over differences with Vitalik Buterin and the other co-founders. Since then, Hoskinson has criticized Ethereum on several occasions, including once predicting that the network wouldn’t survive the next ten to fifteen years.

Wino, who had accused the Cardano founder of being part of ETHgate, later revealed that his accusation was based on hearsay and that he was hoping the truth would come out someday. He added that he was rooting for the CLARITY Act to pass, so that ADA and XRP could both record parabolic rallies.

Focus Is On The CLARITY Act

Wino’s accusations stemmed from a discussion of the CLARITY Act, in which the Cardano founder had warned that the crypto bill was far from perfect. He further remarked that, under the bill, there was a risk that the SEC would classify new crypto projects as securities. However, pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton had before now mentioned that failure to pass the crypto bill risks a ‘Gensler 2.0.’

The CLARITY Act advanced to the full Senate last week as the Senate Banking Committee voted in favor of the bill. The crypto market structure bill will provide regulatory clarity for crypto assets such as XRP and Cardano, classifying them as commodities. However, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse opined that XRP will be okay whether or not the crypto bill passes, as Judge Analisa Torres already ruled that the crypto isn’t a security.

ADA trading at $0.25 on the 1D chart | Source: ADAUSDT on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'ETHgate' saga mentioned in the article?

AThe 'ETHgate' saga refers to allegations that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) favored Ethereum over XRP by declaring Ethereum was not a security, while later suing Ripple, arguing that XRP was a security.

QHow did Charles Hoskinson defend himself against accusations of being involved in ETHgate?

ACharles Hoskinson defended himself by noting he was 'pushed' out of Ethereum in June 2014, has been attacked by its proponents for 12 years since, and questioned how it would be possible for him to later coordinate with them to attack XRP.

QWhat potential impact does the CLARITY Act have on cryptocurrencies like XRP and Cardano (ADA)?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to provide regulatory clarity by classifying cryptocurrencies like XRP and Cardano (ADA) as commodities, rather than securities, which could positively impact their regulatory standing and market performance.

QAccording to the article, why did the Ripple community member, Wino, later reveal about his accusation?

AWino later revealed that his accusation against Charles Hoskinson was based on hearsay, and he expressed hope that the truth would eventually come out. He also stated he was rooting for the CLARITY Act to pass.

QWhat was Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse's opinion on XRP's status regardless of the CLARITY Act's outcome?

ARipple CEO Brad Garlinghouse opined that XRP will be okay whether or not the CLARITY Act passes, as Judge Analisa Torres had already ruled that XRP is not a security.

Related Reads

Clarity Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment

"Clear Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment" analyzes the evolving U.S. regulatory landscape for stablecoins, focusing on the interplay between the proposed "Clarity Act" and the existing "Genius Act." The article argues that the Genius Act successfully fostered "payment stablecoins" by permitting tokenized assets like U.S. Treasuries as reserves. This created a structured market where stablecoin issuers (like USDC) must hold these reserves, often purchased as Tokenized Money Market Funds (TMMFs) from giants like BlackRock. These TMMFs are primarily B2B products, ensuring user-facing stablecoins remain non-interest-bearing and used primarily for payments. The upcoming Clarity Act is seen as the next phase, aiming to restrict passive yield on stablecoins. Its goal is to dismantle the arbitrage advantage of offshore stablecoins like USDT by redirecting Treasury demand towards compliant, U.S.-sanctioned TMMFs. For on-chain and compliant offshore dollars, this creates new pressure: they must spur adoption and utility to generate yield, as simple Treasury staking may be restricted. This indirectly promotes dollar circulation and sustained Treasury purchases. Ultimately, the analysis posits that U.S. regulation seeks to create a new dollar distribution model. By separating payment function from yield generation and anchoring both to U.S. debt instruments, it aims to embed the dollar and Treasury demand into the global crypto economy, managing yields through sanctioned intermediaries while leaving room for DeFi and cross-border arbitrage.

marsbit2m ago

Clarity Act Outlook: No Yield, No Payment

marsbit2m ago

Money Has Gone to Bonds and IPOs, Leaving Only HYPE Rising in Crypto

The article "Where Has All the Money Gone? Bonds and IPOs Are Soaring, While Crypto Only Sees HYPE Rising" analyzes the recent underperformance of major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum compared to traditional financial markets. It identifies three primary factors diverting capital away from crypto: First, surging bond yields, with the 30-year U.S. Treasury hitting a near 20-year high of 5.12%, are attracting capital seeking safe, predictable returns. This is evidenced by Bitcoin spot ETFs experiencing a significant $10.39 billion net outflow in mid-May. Second, a massive $4 trillion IPO pipeline, highlighted by SpaceX's upcoming listing, is absorbing risk capital that might otherwise flow into crypto. Platforms like Hyperliquid are even channeling on-chain crypto liquidity into pre-IPO trading for traditional stocks. Third, uncertainty surrounds new Federal Reserve Chair Warsh's ability to deliver expected interest rate cuts this year due to conflicting political pressures and stubborn inflation expectations, potentially eliminating a hoped-for source of new market liquidity. Consequently, while traditional equities and bonds rally, the crypto market's post-leverage crash recovery is stalled. The notable exception is assets like Hyperliquid (HYPE), which is rising due to its role in facilitating traditional asset trading, underscoring a market divergence where only crypto projects with novel, cross-market narratives are gaining. The article concludes that Bitcoin's next major catalyst may be the August enactment of the CLARITY Act, but warns of a potential retest of the $70,000 support level before then.

marsbit17m ago

Money Has Gone to Bonds and IPOs, Leaving Only HYPE Rising in Crypto

marsbit17m ago

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Secure Financing?

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Raise Capital? Within a decade, autonomous software agents—legal entities capable of signing contracts, holding bank accounts, and generating revenue—will create their own capital markets. These markets will feature rating agencies, underwriters, indices, and brokers, mirroring traditional public equity markets. Agents will perform routine services like marketing, logistics, and customer support at a fraction of human-operated costs, creating massive economic pressure for adoption. Four converging forces ensure this outcome: 1) Overwhelming cost advantages, with AI inference costs plummeting; 2) Existing, revenue-generating agent companies (e.g., Sierra, Harvey) proving market demand; 3) Established legal frameworks (e.g., Wyoming's memberless LLCs) enabling algorithmic management; and 4) A vast pool of yield-seeking private credit capital ready to fund new asset classes. The capital stack for agent companies will be multi-layered, evolving through stages: venture equity for early infrastructure, programmatic working capital advances (similar to Shopify Capital), revenue-based financing (RBF), and finally, institutional slate financing—pooling many agents to diversify risk, attracting large firms like Apollo. Tokenization will act as a settlement layer, enhancing liquidity, not an origination model. Objections regarding regulation, human oversight, or comparisons to SaaS are addressed: regulation will adapt, full autonomy will dominate for efficiency, and agents are distinct as legal entities that own their cash flows and liabilities. Due diligence shifts from founder assessment to analyzing code, contracts, and auditable operational history. The current bottleneck is not capital supply or demand but the intermediate institutional layer—standardized contracts, rating methodologies, and audit frameworks. The final constraint—reliance on human capital allocation—will be severed when agents can algorithmically access funding based on their performance. This transforms agents from software curiosities into fundable blocks of the real economy, unleashing their full productive potential. The rope is loosening.

marsbit1h ago

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Secure Financing?

marsbit1h ago

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Get Funded?

"Agents Capital Markets: How Autonomous Agents Will Raise Capital" Within a decade, specialized capital markets will emerge for AI Agents—software entities with legal personhood that perform work, earn revenue, and need capital. Unlike today's AI companies (like Sierra or Harvey) backed by traditional VC, these future *Agent companies* will be autonomous, legally-recognized entities (e.g., Wyoming memberless LLCs) that directly own assets, sign contracts, and incur liabilities. The driving forces are fourfold: 1) **Overwhelming economics** (Agent companies can deliver services at 85-90% lower cost than human firms); 2) **Proven demand** (current Agent operators already generate billions in revenue); 3) **Existing legal frameworks** enabling algorithmically-managed companies; and 4) **Massive, yield-seeking capital pools** (e.g., private credit) looking for new, uncorrelated assets. Agent capital markets won't rely on one model but a multi-layered "stack" matching different growth stages: 1) VC equity for early human-led builders; 2) Programmatic working capital advances (like Stripe Capital); 3) Revenue-based financing (RBF); 4) Slate financing (pooled funds for many Agents, similar to Hollywood); and 5) Tokenization as a secondary settlement layer, not a primary funding source. The ultimate shift is from funding constrained by human decision-makers to capital flowing algorithmically based on an Agent's auditable performance, contract book, and cash flows. This transition will be enabled by standardized infrastructure—rating methodologies, contracts, indices—turning Agents from software experiments into a foundational, financeable sector of the economy. The constraints are loosening; the opportunity is here.

链捕手1h ago

Agents Capital Markets: How Will Autonomous Agents Get Funded?

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片