# Liquidity Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Liquidity", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Key Data for Gate 2025 Spot Listing: Nearly 80% of Exclusive Projects Closed Higher Within 30 Minutes of Opening, with a Median Increase of Approximately 81%

Based on an analysis of 447 new assets listed on Gate.io in 2025, key data reveals significant trends in post-listing performance. The majority (71%) of new listings were initial listings (including 28 exclusives), with the rest being non-initial listings. In the critical price discovery window, initial listings, particularly exclusives, showed markedly higher median gains and positive return rates. Notably, nearly 80% of exclusive listings were in positive territory 30 minutes after launch, with a median gain of approximately 81%. This performance advantage for initial listings was sustained across the 5-minute to 24-hour windows but diminished over longer timeframes. By 72 hours, the median gain for the entire sample neared breakeven, declining to negative figures at the 7-day and 30-day marks. The proportion of assets trading above their listing price also fell over time, from 61.7% at 30 minutes to just 35.1% after 30 days. The data indicates that while short-term, high-multiple gains are possible—especially for high-profile exclusive and initial listings—returns are not linear and tend to converge or decline significantly after approximately three days. This highlights Gate.io's effectiveness in capitalizing on market attention and executing listings that generate early wealth effects, particularly for assets with strong narratives like AI infrastructure and meme coins.

marsbit01/16 07:30

Key Data for Gate 2025 Spot Listing: Nearly 80% of Exclusive Projects Closed Higher Within 30 Minutes of Opening, with a Median Increase of Approximately 81%

marsbit01/16 07:30

The Hidden Costs and Structural Dilemmas of Tokenized Assets

Tokenized assets face a critical structural challenge: a severe lack of deep, reliable on-chain liquidity. While tokenization promises to unlock trillions in traditional assets for DeFi, the reality is that markets for tokens like gold (PAXG, XAUT) and stocks (e.g., TSLAx, NVDAx) are extremely shallow compared to their traditional counterparts (e.g., CME). This results in exponentially higher slippage—often exceeding 100 basis points for trades over $4M—and makes large transactions costly or impossible. Fragile liquidity also leads to market instability, such as flash crashes on exchanges that trigger cascading liquidations across connected DeFi protocols. The root cause is a misalignment with market makers' incentives: high minting/redemption fees, slow settlement times, and capital lock-ups make providing liquidity for tokenized assets inefficient and risky. Without a new market structure that bridges on-chain access with off-chain liquidity depth, tokenization will remain stuck in a low-liquidity equilibrium, limiting its scalability and utility in DeFi.

marsbit01/16 06:51

The Hidden Costs and Structural Dilemmas of Tokenized Assets

marsbit01/16 06:51

When Big Money Gets Serious, RWA Liquidity Issues Come to the Fore

When large capital enters the RWA (Real World Asset) tokenization space, the underlying liquidity constraints become critically exposed. Tokenized assets like gold (e.g., PAXG, XAUT) and equities (e.g., TSLAx, NVDAx) suffer from severe liquidity shortages, leading to high slippage, fragile market structures, and amplified systemic risks. For instance, a $4 million trade in tokenized gold can incur ~150 bps slippage, while traditional CME gold futures show negligible impact even at $20 million. DEXs perform worse, with Uniswap recording average slippage of 25–35 bps and occasional extremes beyond 50 bps. This liquidity crisis is structural: minting/redemption fees (10–50 bps), slow redemption cycles (T+1 to T+5), and fragmented order books deter market makers. Capital remains underallocated due to high opportunity costs and inventory risks. Shallow liquidity triggers volatility spillovers—e.g., Binance’s PAXG anomalies caused cascading liquidations on Hyperliquid. For RWA scalability, the market structure must evolve: deeper integration with traditional liquidity, faster redemptions, and reduced frictions are essential. Tokenization’s promise hinges not on on-chain assets alone, but on building robust liquidity infrastructures.

marsbit01/16 04:28

When Big Money Gets Serious, RWA Liquidity Issues Come to the Fore

marsbit01/16 04:28

When Big Money Gets Serious, RWA Liquidity Issues Come to the Fore

Liquidity is the foundation of asset confidence, but the reality for tokenized real-world assets (RWA) like gold and stocks reveals a critical structural flaw. While tokenization promises enhanced capital fluidity and DeFi integration, most tokenized assets suffer from dangerously thin liquidity, making them impractical for meaningful capital deployment. Analysis shows extreme slippage in major tokenized gold assets (PAXG, XAUT). A $4 million trade incurs nearly 150 basis points (bps) of slippage on perpetual exchanges, compared to just 3 bps for a $20 million trade in traditional CME gold futures. Spot markets for these assets offer less than $3 million in effective depth. In AMM DEXs like Uniswap, average slippage consistently ranges between 25–50 bps, with individual trades experiencing premiums as high as 68%. The problem extends to tokenized equities. A $1 million trade in tokenized Tesla (TSLAx) sees ~5% slippage, while NVIDIA (NVDAx) reaches an unworkable 80%. Traditional markets handle the same trades with ~15 bps impact. This liquidity scarcity isn't just about high transaction costs; it destabilizes the entire market structure. Thin order books are prone to manipulation and price anomalies. A 10% price swing on a centralized exchange (CEX) can trigger cascading liquidations across interconnected DeFi protocols, demonstrating how localized illiquidity amplifies systemic risk. The core issue is structural. Market makers face high friction: slow, costly minting/redemption processes (10-50 bps fees, T+1 to T+5 settlement), inability to hedge efficiently, and significant opportunity cost compared to deeper crypto markets. Current solutions (AMMs, order books) disperse rather than concentrate liquidity. For RWA to scale, a new market structure is needed—one that leverages off-chain liquidity for price discovery, eliminates redemption delays, and doesn't force market makers to hold illiquid inventory. Tokenization hasn't failed; the supporting market infrastructure has yet to be built.

Odaily星球日报01/16 04:25

When Big Money Gets Serious, RWA Liquidity Issues Come to the Fore

Odaily星球日报01/16 04:25

Midnight: Perp traders are walking away – And NIGHT pays the price

Midnight (NIGHT) has entered a pronounced bearish phase, declining 41% over three weeks with an additional 10% drop in the last 24 hours. The sell-off is driven by perpetual traders, leading to significant capital outflows of $5.4 million and reducing the total perpetual contract balance to $47.95 million. The funding rate has turned negative (-0.0156%), indicating strong selling pressure and short dominance. Data from Binance and OKX, which hold the largest shares of NIGHT's open interest, shows their taker buy/sell ratios have fallen below zero, confirming aggressive selling. With liquidity clusters acting as price magnets, NIGHT may fall further toward $0.060. However, a rebound toward $0.073 is possible if bullish sentiment returns, though bearish momentum currently prevails.

ambcrypto01/16 02:01

Midnight: Perp traders are walking away – And NIGHT pays the price

ambcrypto01/16 02:01

Pundit Warns XRP Is On The Verge Of Being Sold Out, What’s Going On?

A debate between market analyst Jake Claver and other commentators has brought attention to a potential supply crisis for XRP, predicting the token is nearing a complete sell-out. The core issue lies in the XRP Ledger’s hard-coded escrow system, which limits Ripple to releasing only 1 billion tokens monthly, regardless of market demand. With 60.7 billion XRP in circulation and nearly 40 billion locked in escrow, the supply is structurally inelastic. This rigidity could lead to a severe supply shock if large institutional buyers, such as BlackRock, attempt to purchase significant amounts. Current XRP ETFs have seen massive inflows—over $1.37 billion in one week—effectively pulling tokens from public markets into institutional holdings. As demand surges and available liquid supply on exchanges dwindles, price may become the only mechanism to balance the market, signaling that the window for acquiring XRP at lower prices is closing rapidly.

bitcoinist01/16 01:01

Pundit Warns XRP Is On The Verge Of Being Sold Out, What’s Going On?

bitcoinist01/16 01:01

$3 billion in 30 days – Why USDC’s transaction volume on XDC signals major shift in DeFi!

A significant shift is occurring in DeFi, moving the focus from Total Value Locked (TVL) to transaction utility as the key indicator of a network's strength. While Ethereum leads in TVL and stablecoin market share, the emphasis is now on real-world usage and transaction volume. This is exemplified by the XDC Network, which recently processed over $3 billion in USDC transactions in 30 days—a volume rivaling traditional payment networks. This surge highlights USDC's evolving role beyond a "safe haven" into a critical "cash leg" for settlements and real-world payments. High stablecoin transaction volume signals a network's growing dominance, reflecting real-world utility, liquidity efficiency, and institutional adoption in the expanding DeFi ecosystem.

ambcrypto01/15 15:02

$3 billion in 30 days – Why USDC’s transaction volume on XDC signals major shift in DeFi!

ambcrypto01/15 15:02

Visa Revelation: The 50-Year Cycle of Stablecoin 'Fragmentation Dilemma'

In the 1960s, the credit card industry was fragmented networks with limited interoperability. Visa succeeded not just through technology, but by creating a cooperative structure that unified banks under a shared network, aligning incentives, distributing ownership, and enabling compound network effects. It operated as a neutral third party, granted members profit shares and governance rights, and enforced exclusivity to consolidate growth. Today, stablecoins face a similar fragmentation issue, with over 300 stablecoins listed on Defillama, each confined to its own ecosystem, limiting network effects and liquidity. Services like Anchorage Digital and Ethena enable new issuers to create stablecoins, but this exacerbates fragmentation rather than solving it. The solution lies in adopting a Visa-like model: a neutral, cooperative structure where issuers and protocols unite under a single stablecoin standard. Members would share reserve yields and participate in governance, fostering widespread adoption and retaining value within the network instead of fragmenting liquidity. This approach could drive the mainstream integration stablecoins need.

marsbit01/15 14:45

Visa Revelation: The 50-Year Cycle of Stablecoin 'Fragmentation Dilemma'

marsbit01/15 14:45

Former New York Mayor Involved in Rug Pull Allegations: On-Chain Investigation into NYC Token

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams faces allegations of a "rug pull" following the launch of the NYC token. Shortly after its debut on January 13, the token’s value plummeted over 80% when the liquidity pool creator address (9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt) removed approximately 2.377 million USDC just 30 minutes post-launch. This caused the token’s market cap to crash from a high of $600 million to under $100 million. Beosin’s on-chain analysis traced the initial funding to a Mayan bridge and Kraken. After the crash, the same address began making small purchases of NYC tokens, but the price only recovered to around $0.133. The address still holds 1.332 million USDC, resulting in an estimated profit of $330,000. Adams denied personal profit or involvement in removing funds. However, the analysis confirms liquidity manipulation, with only about $1 million returned to liquidity after $2.37 million was withdrawn. This incident highlights the significant risks associated with celebrity-backed tokens.

marsbit01/15 10:38

Former New York Mayor Involved in Rug Pull Allegations: On-Chain Investigation into NYC Token

marsbit01/15 10:38

Arthur Hayes Deep Dive: Why Did Bitcoin Underperform Gold and the Nasdaq in 2025?

Arthur Hayes argues that Bitcoin's underperformance against gold and the Nasdaq in 2025 was not a failure but an expected outcome driven by distinct market dynamics. He posits that Bitcoin's price is directly tied to US dollar liquidity, which contracted during the year. In contrast, gold's surge was fueled by price-insensitive central banks aggressively buying it to de-risk from US Treasury holdings, fearing asset freezes like the one imposed on Russia. The Nasdaq's resilience, despite lower liquidity, is attributed to the "nationalization" of AI by the US government under Trump, where state-directed capital flows into strategic tech sectors irrespective of market signals. Hayes predicts a reversal in 2026, forecasting a significant expansion of dollar liquidity through Fed balance sheet growth, increased bank lending to strategic industries, and government interventions in the housing market. This, he believes, will propel Bitcoin's price upward. His trading strategy involves leveraged Bitcoin exposure through stocks like MicroStrategy and Metaplanet.

marsbit01/15 09:12

Arthur Hayes Deep Dive: Why Did Bitcoin Underperform Gold and the Nasdaq in 2025?

marsbit01/15 09:12

活动图片

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow

Industry News