Nasdaq’s Big Bet On Tokenization Gets Regulatory Green Light From SEC

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-20Last updated on 2026-03-20

Abstract

Nasdaq has received SEC approval to launch a pilot program allowing tokenized versions of stocks and ETFs to trade on its exchange alongside traditional shares. These tokenized assets will share the same order book, pricing, and shareholder rights as their conventional counterparts. The program is limited to eligible participants and includes securities from the Russell 1000 Index, as well as S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 ETFs. This initiative, developed in partnership with the Depository Trust Company, reflects a broader institutional move toward blockchain-based trading to reduce settlement times and extend market hours. The SEC approval signals a regulatory shift toward clearer digital asset rules under the current administration.

Nasdaq struck a deal with crypto exchange Kraken earlier this month to let public companies issue their own tokenized shares directly on blockchain networks. Now it has the green light to go further.

Traditional And Tokenized Stocks To Share The Same Order Book

The US Securities and Exchange Commission approved Nasdaq’s proposal Wednesday to allow tokenized versions of stocks and other securities to trade on its exchange alongside their traditional counterparts.

The two versions will share the same order book, the same price, the same ticker, and carry identical shareholder rights.

Nasdaq first filed the proposal in September, partnering with the Depository Trust Company, a key market infrastructure firm, to make it work.

Not everyone can take part. The pilot is limited to “eligible participants” only, who will have the choice of trading either form of a given stock.

The eligible securities are drawn from the Russell 1000 Index — which tracks the 1,000 largest US-listed companies by market capitalization — plus exchange-traded funds that follow the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

The SEC did not rubber-stamp the proposal through without pushback. Concerns were raised about market surveillance and the risk of price gaps opening between the two versions of the same stock.

Nasdaq later filed an amendment spelling out additional safeguards, which appeared to satisfy regulators.

NYSE Owner Also Moving Into Blockchain-Based Trading

Nasdaq is not alone in this push. The Intercontinental Exchange, which owns the New York Stock Exchange, invested in crypto exchange OKX in early March with plans to launch its own tokenized stocks.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.39 trillion today. Chart: TradingView

The two biggest US exchange operators are now moving in the same direction at roughly the same time.

Tokenization — putting traditional assets on a blockchain — has gained traction among major financial institutions because of its potential to cut settlement times and open the door to longer trading hours.

Until now, most of that activity has stayed in the testing phase. This pilot puts it on a live exchange for the first time under formal regulatory approval.

SEC Chair Paul Atkins said Tuesday the agency plans to seek public comment on a range of crypto-related exemptions, including one that would allow certain securities tied to crypto to raise funds over a 12-month window without registering under standard securities laws.

Nasdaq Greenlight: Broader Policy Shift Backs The Move

The approval fits a broader shift in how US regulators have approached digital assets since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House.

The SEC under Atkins has moved away from the enforcement-heavy stance of his predecessor and toward building clearer rules for the industry.

For now, the Nasdaq pilot remains controlled and narrow. But if eligible participants adopt the tokenized format in meaningful numbers, it could set the template for how US stock markets operate in the years ahead.

Featured image from Nasdaq, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the SEC's approval for Nasdaq's tokenization proposal?

AThe SEC's approval allows Nasdaq to trade tokenized versions of stocks and securities alongside traditional ones on the same exchange, sharing the same order book, price, ticker, and shareholder rights, marking a major step in integrating blockchain technology into mainstream financial markets.

QWhich securities are eligible for trading in Nasdaq's tokenization pilot program?

AThe eligible securities are drawn from the Russell 1000 Index, which includes the 1,000 largest US-listed companies by market capitalization, plus exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that follow the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100.

QWhat concerns did the SEC raise about Nasdaq's tokenization proposal, and how were they addressed?

AThe SEC raised concerns about market surveillance and the risk of price gaps between traditional and tokenized versions of the same stock. Nasdaq filed an amendment outlining additional safeguards, which satisfied regulators.

QHow does tokenization benefit traditional financial markets according to the article?

ATokenization has gained traction because it can reduce settlement times and potentially enable longer trading hours by putting traditional assets on a blockchain, improving efficiency and accessibility in financial markets.

QWhat broader regulatory shift does the SEC's approval of Nasdaq's tokenization pilot represent?

AThe approval reflects a broader shift in US regulatory approach under SEC Chair Paul Atkins, moving away from an enforcement-heavy stance toward building clearer rules for the digital asset industry, aligning with President Donald Trump's supportive policies.

Related Reads

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

The article explains that the key to profiting on Polymarket, a prediction market platform, lies not just predicting real-world events correctly, but in meticulously understanding the specific rules that govern how each market will be resolved. It illustrates this with examples, such as a market on Venezuela's 2026 leader, where the official rules defining "officially holds" the office overruled the intuitive answer of who was in practical control. Other examples include debates over the definition of a "token" or what constitutes an "agreement." The core argument is that a "reality vs. rules" gap creates pricing discrepancies that savvy traders ("车头" or "whales") exploit. The platform has a formal dispute resolution process managed by UMA token holders to settle ambiguous outcomes. This process involves proposal submission, a challenge window, a discussion period, and a final vote. However, the article highlights a critical flaw in this system compared to a traditional court: the lack of separation between the arbiters (UMA voters) and the interested parties (traders with financial stakes in the outcome). This conflict of interest undermines the discussion phase, leads to herd mentality, and results in opaque final decisions without explanatory rulings. Consequently, the system lacks a body of precedent, making it difficult for users to learn from past disputes. The ultimate takeaway is that success on Polymarket requires a lawyer-like scrutiny of the rules to identify and capitalize on the cognitive gap between how events appear and how they are contractually defined for settlement.

marsbit27m ago

You Bet on the News, the Pros Read the Rules: The True Cognitive Gap in Losing Money on Polymarket

marsbit27m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

The core debate surrounding the Federal Reserve's potential interest rate cuts is intensifying amid geopolitical conflict and rebounding inflation. The key question is whether high energy prices will cause persistent inflation or weaken consumer demand enough to force the Fed to cut rates. Citigroup presents a bullish case for cuts, arguing that oil supply disruptions from the Strait of Hormuz are temporary and will not lead to lasting inflationary pressure. They point to receding bond yields and oil prices as evidence the market is pricing in a short-lived shock. Citi's data also shows tightening financial conditions, a stabilizing labor market, and healthy tax returns, supporting their view that the path to lower rates remains open. Conversely, Deutsche Bank offers a starkly contrasting, more hawkish outlook. They argue the Fed's current policy is already neutral and expect rates to remain unchanged indefinitely. Their view is based on stalled disinflation progress and a shift toward more hawkish rhetoric from key Fed officials like Waller, who cited risks from prolonged Middle East conflict and tariffs. Other officials, including Williams and Hammack, signaled rates would likely stay on hold for a "considerable time." The market pricing has shifted dramatically, now forecasting zero cuts in 2026. The imminent release of the March retail sales "control group" data is highlighted as a critical test. This metric, which excludes gas station sales, will reveal if high gasoline prices are eroding consumer spending in other areas. A weak reading could support the case for imminent rate cuts, while a strong one would bolster the argument for the Fed to hold steady. This data is pivotal for determining the near-term policy path.

marsbit47m ago

Will the Fed Still Cut Interest Rates? Tonight's Data Is Crucial

marsbit47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片