More Bitcoin Investors Slip Into Unrealized Losses Following Recent Selloff – Here Are The Numbers

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-06-06Last updated on 2026-06-06

Abstract

Bitcoin's recent selloff, pushing prices toward $60,000, has led to a significant increase in investor unrealized losses. Data shows the percentage of Bitcoin supply held at a profit has fallen to about 55%, approaching a critical low. Market analysts describe this as a distribution phase, indicating a potential large-scale transfer of holdings. Despite massive accumulation by entities like MicroStrategy and ETFs, removing over 1.2 million BTC from circulation, strong selling pressure persists, keeping prices subdued and testing key market support levels.

Bitcoin’s recent pullback has significantly flipped the sentiment across the market, with many predicting a more sustained downward performance toward the $60,000 price mark. Following this sharp decline, more investors are now underwater as BTC’s holders’ profitability strongly declines.

Bitcoin’s Sharp Decline Leaves More Holders Underwater

Given its persistent downward trend over the past weeks, the Bitcoin market dynamics are starting to see one of its most crucial changes in this cycle. One area that has significantly felt the heat of this ongoing bearish action is the holder profitability.

Currently, unrealized losses across the BTC market are experiencing a notable rise, underscoring the heightened pressure that volatility is placing on investors. CryptoQuant’s verified author and market expert, Darkfost, shared that BTC’s price has posted a 12.5% correction over the past week, pushing more investors into unrealized losses.

This increase in unrealized losses implies that many investors who entered the market during the most recent surge are now below their purchase cost as prices decline from recent highs. A sustained rise in this trend could trigger a shift in investors’ sentiment and behavior, leading to increased caution, reduced risk appetite, and a potential capitulation among some weak traders.

Source: Chart from Darkfost on X

According to fresh data, the percentage of supply held in profit has now fallen to about 55%, which is considered a notably low level. However, this level is still slightly above those seen in previous bear market cycles. In the past, bear markets were able to lower this indicator below 50%, indicating that the market was dominated by unrealized losses.

As seen on the chart, this key metric dropped to 53% in February this year. With the rate at which this metric is dropping now, Darkfost believes it will breach the 50% mark sooner than expected. While this remains a bearish development in the short term, especially for those with a long-term vision, this type of period has persistently represented profitable opportunities in the past.

Market Structure Showing A Massive Change Of Hands

Following his examination of this current market structure, Ki Young Ju, the founder of CryptoQuant, has declared this period a distribution phase that feels like a massive change of hands. At the time of the post, BTC’s investors’ average cost basis was around $53,000, which is crucial for the market. This is because bear markets have historically only ended when the price dropped below the realized price.

Given the institutional inflows and Michael Saylor’s Strategy barely selling any BTC, the founder believes that the level would be hard to revisit. However, current price action suggests unusually strong sell pressure that could push BTC to this level.

Since January 2023, MSTR has bought over 711,206 BTC and sold only 32 BTC, removing 711,174 BTC from circulation. Furthermore, ETFs absorbed 509,102 BTC, and MSTR purchased 650,706 BTC while the price was also at $63,000 in March 2024. Combined, that’s over 1,240,808 BTC removed from circulation, but the price is back at the same level.

Moving to exchanges reserves, about 2.7 million BTC are being held in addition to Satoshi’s estimated 1 million BTC holdings. Nearly half of exchange reserves, or more Bitcoin than Satoshi’s stack, have been consumed, and the price has not changed.

BTC trading at $61,899 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what is the current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit, and why is this level significant?

AThe current percentage of Bitcoin supply held in profit has fallen to about 55%. This is significant because it's considered a notably low level, and it is close to breaching the 50% mark, a threshold which historically indicated a market dominated by unrealized losses during previous bear cycles.

QWhat does CryptoQuant founder Ki Young Ju declare about the current Bitcoin market structure?

AKi Young Ju declares the current period a distribution phase that feels like a massive change of hands.

QWhat is the mentioned average cost basis for BTC investors, and what is its historical relevance?

AThe average cost basis for BTC investors was around $53,000 at the time of the analysis. This is historically relevant because bear markets have typically only ended when the price dropped below the realized price (a metric closely related to the average cost basis).

QHow much Bitcoin have ETFs and MicroStrategy collectively removed from circulation since January 2023, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, ETFs have absorbed 509,102 BTC and MicroStrategy has purchased 650,706 BTC (after accounting for minimal sales), collectively removing over 1,240,808 BTC from circulation.

QWhat key effect has Bitcoin's recent 12.5% price correction had on investors?

AThe recent 12.5% price correction has pushed more Bitcoin investors into a state of holding unrealized losses, meaning their current holdings are valued below their original purchase cost.

Related Reads

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

"From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply and Institutional Frenzy May Lead to 'Explosive' Price Rally Analysts suggest Bitcoin's price action could mirror gold's over the past two decades, following the launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs. Gold ETFs, introduced in 2004, drove gold's price surge to a current market cap near $28 trillion. Both gold and Bitcoin are non-yielding stores of value, with prices driven purely by investor sentiment rather than cash flows or credit. Gold ETFs experienced dramatic cycles: explosive growth, painful drawdowns, and slow recoveries, with each cycle reaching higher peaks. Bitcoin ETFs, approved in early 2024, saw rapid institutional adoption but are now facing similar volatility. Recent warnings highlight the risk of significant ETF outflows disrupting the current rebound. BlackRock's IBIT, a leading Bitcoin ETF, has sold nearly 100,000 BTC to meet redemptions while still holding over 733,000. The core parallel is fixed supply: when demand surges, prices explode, but demand is often volatile and wave-like, not steady. Institutional interest, through ETFs and corporate adoption, remains a key support pillar, helping to cushion sell-offs. If Bitcoin captures even a fraction of gold's role as a store of value, its upside potential is immense, though the path will be marked by high volatility. For investors, focusing on long-term trends and managing risk is crucial as this 'price explosion' narrative unfolds."

Foresight News18m ago

From Gold to Bitcoin: Fixed Supply + Institutional Frenzy, Might It Repeat the 'Explosive' Price Trend?

Foresight News18m ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

The article argues that the popular narrative of "AI agent shopping" – equipping AI with a wallet to autonomously handle purchases – is fundamentally flawed and oversimplifies the complexity of shopping. It deconstructs shopping into two core actions: **information retrieval** (standardized, easily automated) and **value judgment** (deeply subjective and human-centric). The narrative mistakenly assumes AI can fully handle both. Value judgment itself has two layers: **evaluation** (assessing options against criteria) and **demand definition** (setting the criteria, weights, and values). The latter is inherently human and dynamic, as preferences are not fixed but constructed during the decision-making process ("constructive preferences"). The real dividing line for automation is not product standardization, but whether the **act of choosing** itself holds experiential value. For mundane purchases (e.g., printer paper), full AI delegation works. For experiential goods (e.g., wine, furniture), the joy of selection is core to consumption, so AI should act as an assistant that narrows options, leaving the final choice to humans. The "AI wallet" concept confuses three separate elements: decision-making, execution, and fund custody. Current payment industry solutions (e.g., from Stripe, Mastercard, Google, Visa) show that limited, scoped payment authorization tokens are sufficient for most consumer scenarios, not full fund custody. The true use case for autonomous AI wallets is in **B2B procurement** and **machine-to-machine (M2M) settlements** for standardized, high-frequency, low-value transactions. The real bottlenecks for AI shopping are not payment technology, but **1) the lack of trusted data sources** (e.g., fake reviews, counterfeit goods) and **2) the impossibility of automating human demand definition**. The conclusion is that the focus should be on safely automating the assessment and filtering process while reserving for humans the rights to define their criteria and enjoy the final act of choice. For experiential goods, the platform's competitive advantage shifts to providing a superior selection experience.

Foresight News1h ago

Why Is AI Agent Shopping Hard to Popularize?

Foresight News1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

After nine months of being short, prominent crypto trader Doctor Profit has closed all his bearish positions and started buying Bitcoin near $64,000, signaling a complete bullish reversal. He argues that structural market changes—such as impending U.S. regulation (CLARITY Act) and institutional adoption via securities tokenization—are rewriting the traditional four-year cycle script, potentially bringing the market bottom forward from the widely expected September/October timeframe. This view finds some technical support from on-chain analyst gumsays, who notes a bullish divergence on Bitcoin's weekly chart has persisted for 147 days, nearing the 161-day duration seen before the 2022 cycle low. However, cycle researcher Jake Pahor presents a counter-argument based on historical data. Analyzing patterns since 2014, he identifies three common features of past bear market bottoms: a ~12-month duration from peak to trough, a sustained period of extreme fear (with a proprietary risk score below 20), and the price falling below Bitcoin's realized price (~$53,000 currently). The current cycle, only nine months from its October 2025 peak, meets none of these conditions. The debate highlights a market torn between "front-running" a potential early bottom driven by new fundamentals and waiting for confirmation through traditional on-chain and sentiment metrics. While Doctor Profit opts for aggressive buying, Pahor maintains a disciplined, tiered accumulation strategy, continuing weekly buys at current risk levels but reserving larger orders for if more extreme fear emerges.

marsbit1h ago

After Nine Months of Shorting, a Full Turn to Long: Renowned Trader Opens Bitcoin Positions Around 64K, Crypto Market Long-Short Divergence Intensifies

marsbit1h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

Veteran trader's case study: trading the market's "wrong expectations". This trade centered on a textbook "expectation error" after a weak CPI report. While the market initially priced in broad monetary easing (sending Nasdaq to 30,060), the crucial 30-year real yield hit a 20-year high. This signaled a fractured transmission mechanism: short-term rates eased, but long-term funding costs (vital for tech valuations) refused to fall. The trader executed five short positions on the Nasdaq (NQ) as it fell from 30,060 to 28,768. The core methodology: don't just trade the data, but analyze the market's implied causal chain and identify where it breaks. In this case, the chain was: Weak CPI → Policy Easing → Lower Long-Term Funding Costs → NQ Valuation Expansion. The break occurred between policy easing and long-term rates. The "veto variable" – long-term real yields – refused to confirm the bullish narrative. Trades were structured around "fast variables" (price) temporarily repairing while "slow variables" (funding conditions) remained broken. The article outlines a repeatable framework: 1) Map the market's implied causal chain. 2) Identify the veto variable. 3) Observe if it rejects the narrative. 4) Enter when price still follows the old script. 5) Choose the cleanest asset expression (e.g., short NQ, not broad S&P). 6) Define both invalidation and fulfillment exit conditions. The key insight: Alpha often comes not from an information edge, but from a "reaction function edge" – recognizing when the market is applying an outdated causal logic to new data. The critical question: What causal chain is the market's first reaction relying on, and is that chain still valid today?

marsbit2h ago

Senior Trader's Confession: How to Trade Market's False Expectations?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

939 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片