The End of the 'Bitcoin Hoarding Myth': MicroStrategy Sells BTC for the First Time in 3 Years

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-06-02Last updated on 2026-06-02

Abstract

The article discusses the significant move by MicroStrategy, often dubbed the "Bitcoin whale," which sold 32 BTC at an average price of $77,135 last week, marking its first sale in three years. This action, primarily to service obligations on its STRC digital credit product, has impacted market sentiment, contributing to a BTC price drop below $71,000 and declines in related crypto stocks. While the sale was small relative to its total holdings of over 843,706 BTC (with a cost basis of ~$75,699), it symbolically challenges the firm's long-standing "HODL" strategy and the broader "digital gold" narrative for Bitcoin. The piece also highlights a related event on the Polymarket prediction platform, where a contract on the sale was settled as "no" due to the lack of an official statement, underscoring how such markets trade on defined rules rather than absolute facts. Furthermore, it notes growing skepticism from figures like Mark Cuban and Peter Schiff regarding Bitcoin's role as a hedge, suggesting a potential shift in investor perception amid current market pressures.

Original|Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010 )

MicroStrategy, the "first public BTC stock" and "biggest Bitcoin diamond hand," has started selling! According to MicroStrategy's disclosure, it sold 32 Bitcoin last week at an average price of $77,135, generating $2.5 million.

Possibly influenced by this news, BTC fell below $71,000 last night, currently trading around $70,560; crypto-related stocks closed broadly lower on the US market, with Bullish down 7.99%, DeFi Development down 7.97%, Circle down 7.11%, MicroStrategy down 5.85%, and Upexi down 5.04%.

MicroStrategy's move to stop buying BTC and sell a small amount has added fuel to the fire for the already liquidity-tight crypto market. At a time when major CEXs are vying for US stock trading, the bleeding in the crypto market continues.

MicroStrategy Selling: Not the First Time, But This Time is Different

This sale of BTC is not MicroStrategy's first in history.

In 2022, following the collapse of the then second-largest crypto exchange FTX, the crypto industry entered a deep winter, with BTC once falling below $20,000; on December 22, 2022, MicroStrategy sold 704 BTC at a price of $16,776, and quickly repurchased 810 BTC on December 24, 2022, at $16,845.

This sale operation by MicroStrategy is primarily to repay the STRC financing dividend.

As a fixed-income digital credit product launched by MicroStrategy, STRC can be called its "flagship product." However, after repurchasing $1.5 billion in convertible debt last month, MicroStrategy's cash reserves fell to approximately $871 million, covering only about 6 months of its projected $1.7 billion annual preferred dividend obligation. On May 29, STRC once fell to $97.11 before recovering and closing at $98.57.

When MicroStrategy released its Q1 earnings in early May, it had already stated clearly: "If the convertible notes mature or are called for redemption without being converted into common stock, the company may need to sell common stock or Bitcoin to generate sufficient cash to fulfill these obligations." At that time, MicroStrategy's Q1 report recorded a net loss of $12.54 billion, almost entirely from paper losses on BTC ($14.46 billion); as of the end of Q1, the total cost basis for 818,334 BTC was $61.81 billion, corresponding to an average purchase price of approximately $75,537 per coin. Recommended reading: MicroStrategy Q1 Earnings: Paper Loss of $14.4 Billion, Does Not Rule Out Selling Bitcoin to Pay Dividends

Of course, from an operational perspective, MicroStrategy's move is understandable, and Michael Saylor had previously stated: "Even if we sell 1 BTC, we will buy 10 to 20 times more." Selling is for better buying. However, from the perspective of industry confidence, this move not only temporarily declares a "deadlock in the BTC treasury model," but also significantly dampens the enthusiasm for hoarding and buying cryptocurrencies within the industry, having a substantial impact on short-term market sentiment.

After this sale of 32 BTC, MicroStrategy still holds 843,706 BTC, worth $60.936 billion, with an average cost of $75,699, representing an unrealized loss of $2.932 billion. Last month, benefiting from the overall market rebound, MicroStrategy's holdings once showed an unrealized profit of $8.2 billion.

It is worth mentioning that on May 28, MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor published an article with the theme "HODL" (Hold On for Dear Life), calling on the market to hold Bitcoin firmly amid the current downturn.

The "Messy Account" Behind MicroStrategy's Sale: Polymarket's "No Official Word Means No Sale" Farce

Besides the sale itself, the "event adjudication farce" it stirred up on the prediction market Polymarket is also quite comical.

As we mentioned in the article MicroStrategy Q1 Earnings: Paper Loss of $14.4 Billion, Does Not Rule Out Selling Bitcoin to Pay Dividends, the probability of "MicroStrategy selling BTC before May 31" was only around 40% at that time.

As May ended, on June 1, Polymarket data showed that the probability for "MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin in May" skyrocketed from yesterday's low of 12% to 80%, but then fell back to 58%, with over $16.4 million in cumulative market trading.

Ultimately, this matter was settled with a "No" outcome following Polymarket's official ruling. Polymarket stated, "We are aware of the controversy surrounding this prediction market. If a clarification announcement is to be issued, it will be released at 1 PM ET on June 1; if no statement is issued by then, it means the Polymarket team will not provide further clarification. Regardless of whether clarification content is issued, the order book will be settled at 1 PM ET that afternoon."

Because MicroStrategy did not issue an official statement about the sale, the event was ultimately settled as "MicroStrategy did not sell BTC in May." This once again verifies that prediction markets trade not on "the truth itself," but on "events within the defined rules."

BTC's "Digital Gold" Narrative Shaken, "Safe Haven Asset" Property Undermined

After the news of MicroStrategy's sale broke, economist, gold investment advocate, and cryptocurrency critic Peter Schiff posted, stating that "MicroStrategy selling 32 Bitcoin last week" is a signal of MicroStrategy transitioning from the "biggest Bitcoin buyer" to a seller, and questioning the source of future incremental demand.

Billionaire investor Mark Cuban, who previously viewed BTC as "a better version of gold," recently stated that he has sold most of his Bitcoin holdings, citing diminished confidence in Bitcoin as a hedge against fiat currency devaluation and geopolitical risks, expressing clear disappointment with the BTC "digital gold" narrative.

JPMorgan also noted in a previous analysis that "devaluation trades" for gold and BTC are heating up, with investors exiting safe-haven assets.

With prices falling repeatedly, perhaps BTC and the crypto market can only wait for the Trump administration to "love crypto once again."

Related Questions

QWhat action did Strategy take regarding Bitcoin after 3 years, and what was the result?

AStrategy sold 32 Bitcoin at an average price of $77,135, raising $2.5 million. This marks its first Bitcoin sale in over 3 years.

QWhat was the main reason for Strategy's sale of Bitcoin this time?

AThe primary reason was to raise cash to cover dividend obligations for its STRC financing product, following a decline in its cash reserves.

QHow did the prediction market Polymarket handle the resolution of the event 'Strategy sells Bitcoin in May'?

APolymarket settled the event as 'No' because Strategy did not issue an official announcement confirming the sale by the specified deadline. It highlighted that prediction markets trade based on defined rules and conditions, not necessarily the underlying truth.

QWhat impact did Strategy's sale of Bitcoin have on market perception according to the article?

AThe sale was seen as a significant blow to market confidence, undermining the 'Bitcoin treasury' model and dampening enthusiasm for accumulating Bitcoin. It also contributed to a decline in Bitcoin's price and related stocks.

QWhat is the current state of Strategy's Bitcoin holdings after this sale?

AAfter selling 32 BTC, Strategy holds 843,706 Bitcoin with an average cost basis of $75,699 per coin, resulting in an unrealized loss of approximately $2.932 billion based on the article's figures.

Related Reads

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit2h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit2h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

**"Spicy Commentary": Three Tales of Crypto's Wild Week** This week's "Spicy Commentary" column highlights three dramatic stories from the cryptocurrency world. First, **MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor** addressed the controversy over his company potentially selling Bitcoin. At the BTC Prague event, he clarified, "I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. I told *you* never to sell *your* Bitcoin." This "do as I say, not as I do" stance was criticized by netizens as peak linguistic gymnastics, noting a history of him previously stating the company would "never" sell. Second, a **bizarre fraud case** emerged from Beijing. A 60-year-old woman, obsessed with getting rich from crypto but unwilling to risk her own savings, posed online as the 20-something "god-daughter" of a high-ranking official. She catfished a young man, convincing him to give her over 200,000 yuan for fabricated emergencies. She then invested all the stolen money into cryptocurrency with 10x leverage, only to lose everything in a market crash. The woman was sentenced to four years in prison for fraud. Finally, a **sobering trader's tale** surfaced on Reddit. A user posted "Tale of a crypto trader," confessing their net worth had plummeted from a peak of $45 million to roughly $17,200, primarily due to holding meme coins too long. The post, described as a crypto "book of confessions," sparked reactions ranging from sympathy to critique about greed, poor risk management, and the perils of treating meme coins as long-term investments instead of taking profits. The column concludes that this week featured masterful rhetoric, elaborate scams, and extreme financial volatility, stitching together another chapter in crypto's unpredictable theater.

Foresight News2h ago

Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

Foresight News2h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

Trembling, Humans: AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint Yes, AI is still rapidly accelerating. While deep learning seemed to stall quickly in its early years, large models after years of development show no sign of hitting their ceiling. At the Zhiyuan Conference 2026, the focus is on enabling AI to move from the digital world into the physical world. Scaling Law remains effective, continuing to drive advancements in both large language models and multimodal models. The industry is now entering a phase of pursuing World Models, though unresolved technical paths and data issues mean this exploration may take 3-5 more years. Concurrently, breakthroughs in Agents are accelerating AI's real-world application in fields like healthcare and meetings. Making Agents truly useful requires key hardware-software co-design, evident from the strong presence of chip vendors at the conference. We stand at a new historical threshold where AI is becoming a foundational force reshaping the world. The first day of the conference highlighted AI's evolution from "knowing how to chat" to "knowing how to work." Scaling Law persists, World Models are the next key battleground, and Agents are transitioning from usable to好用 (user-friendly). Scaling Law is not ending but diversifying. New models like Anthropic's Fable 5 demonstrate scaling through parameter size, synthetic data, and reinforcement learning. Advancements in AI Coding and Agent deployment are enabling a trend of AI self-evolution, potentially allowing AI to take over digital world iterations. World Models represent the next frontier for large models extending into the physical realm, but no current model is truly impressive at solving real-world problems. Technical consensus is lacking, with debates on data sources (video, simulation, real-world). Different approaches are emerging: language-centric, pixel-centric, 3D-structure-centric, and visual-representation-centric models. Zhiyuan Institute is exploring a fifth path: unified latent space modeling fusing language and visual representations, and introduced its own under-development World Model, Physis-v0.1. On the product side, Agents are key to bringing AI into daily life. Since 2025, the "Year of the Agent," products have become more proactive and capable of complex tasks. Zhiyuan showcased four vertical Agents for cardiac diagnosis, autonomous research, meeting summarization, and protein risk discovery. However, technical challenges remain, particularly in context engineering like memory and orchestration. "Harness" – the engineering framework around an Agent – is crucial for maximizing its capabilities by clarifying intent, designing workflows, and incorporating validation and feedback. In summary, AI's breakneck pace continues on multiple fronts: foundational model scaling, the ambitious pursuit of World Models for physical understanding, and the ongoing refinement of practical Agents. The journey from capable to truly reliable and useful AI systems is well underway.

marsbit3h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

marsbit3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

Elon Musk becomes the world's first trillionaire, driven by SpaceX's IPO valuing the company at $1.77 trillion. However, his vast wealth is largely illiquid: he holds over 85% voting control, likely through super-voting shares that are subject to lock-ups and selling restrictions. While his net worth surpasses $1 trillion across SpaceX, Tesla, and private holdings, only a tiny fraction (potentially under 2% annually) could be converted to cash without jeopardizing control and market confidence. SpaceX's IPO also creates paper millionaires for roughly 4,400 employees, but their holdings face lock-up periods, exercise costs, and taxes, delaying and reducing actual cash proceeds. Only 4.2% of total shares are initially available for public trading, making the stock price highly sensitive to limited net buying or selling pressure. A major test will come when lock-ups expire for the remaining 96% of shares. The article contrasts SpaceX's wealth distribution with potential AI IPOs. Anthropic and OpenAI could generate employee wealth pools 20 times larger than SpaceX's in paper value, due to their higher valuations relative to revenue and potentially more distributed ownership. However, sustaining those high price-to-sales multiples post-IPO is uncertain. A key financial puzzle for SpaceX investors is its xAI unit. While it has locked in an estimated $26 billion in annual compute revenue from clients like Anthropic and Google, the unit reported a $6.4 billion loss in 2025. More critically, estimated annual capital expenditures of ~$30.8 billion exceed that revenue. The long-term viability of SpaceX's AI narrative hinges on whether this compute income can eventually cover the unit's massive ongoing investments and losses.

链捕手3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片