The Ethereum Foundation is Dead, The Era of Ethereum's Pluralistic Organizations Has Dawned

marsbit发布于2026-07-10更新于2026-07-10

文章摘要

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced the dissolution of its Protocol Support Team, marking a significant organizational shift. This move, described as the largest layoff in EF's history with a 20% staff reduction, follows a major internal restructuring announced in late June. The restructuring, which EF framed as necessary to streamline for future challenges, has drawn criticism for its perceived cold execution. Concurrently, several new independent non-profit organizations have emerged, founded by former EF members. These include Ethlabs, a research and development lab, and Ethereum Institutional, which focuses on promoting institutional adoption of Ethereum. Their rise is seen as both filling roles vacated by EF's downsizing and signaling a fragmentation of the Ethereum ecosystem's leadership. Amidst these changes, EF is also integrating advanced AI tools into its security operations. The security team has begun using AI agents to conduct red-team testing, which has already uncovered vulnerabilities in Ethereum's code. While EF states that AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift hints at potential future reductions in human-centric roles within the organization. The article posits that these developments—massive layoffs, the exodus of key personnel like former Executive Director Xiaowei Wang, the rise of rival organizations, and AI integration—collectively point to a decline in EF's central authority. Once the undisputed lead...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010 )

Last night, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced its dissolution. Prior to this, Wang Xiaowei, co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of the EF's organizational reform," had also officially resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

Alongside the organizational and personnel changes, there is the functional replacement and encroachment on the Ethereum Foundation's role by non-profit independent organizations such as ETHLabs and Ethereum Institutional; there is also the technical progress, like the EF's security team recently using AI agents for red team testing of the ETH network and discovering real vulnerabilities.

As ETH's price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following its internal reform. Related to this is the divisive transformation that the leading body of Ethereum is directly confronting.

The Ethereum Foundation Enters an Era of Decline: The Rise of Multiple Contenders, Talent Drain, and the AI Transformation

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and actions affecting market sentiment through token sales. Criticism of the EF within the Ethereum community is particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his final ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with the EF, urging the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of the EF's Protocol Support Team is like a thunderclap, fully exposing the internal contradictions and crisis of division within the EF organization to everyone. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since the EF's establishment,' not merely changes among some leadership personnel as before.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Course of EF's Major Layoffs

It all begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" officially released by the EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, the EF distinguished its new organizational structure into layers: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional. It later explained that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, representing 20% of EF's membership." What feels even more disheartening is that the announcement begins by stating: "Through this process, we have obtained the structure, activities, and personnel necessary to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments are considered obsolete, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that the EF, which has always presented itself as a research-oriented organization and an ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed a冷酷 aspect of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of the EF Protocol Support Department Becomes a Significant Marker of EF's Organizational Split

It is worth mentioning that the work of the EF Protocol Support Department leaned towards infrastructure construction, primarily responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP progression, running the Ethereum protocol, etc. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the Protocol layer part of the EF.

Coinciding with the day the EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by 5 former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to promote Ethereum as the settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Ethereum treasury company under Tom Lee), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

List of ETHLabs community participants (Source: Official account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "Ethereum's Institutional Finance Application Plan," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary layers, applications, and the entire ecosystem. Simultaneously, the organization emphasizes its collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, responsible for institutional demand对接 and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free consulting related to Ethereum applications for banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the commencement of core team recruitment, focusing in the coming weeks on hiring for roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, and technical positions like Solutions Architect, Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff turmoil formally concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support Department, also drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally pushed by Vitalik last year. Beyond the organizational-level split and the loss of top talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, the EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Attack and Defense Begins, Upgrades in EF Security Team Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software dependencies within the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

Vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on Github as CVE-2026-34219.

Researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, searching, gap filling, and verification to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. The EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way of working, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review, but requiring researchers to exercise more cautious judgment over a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT 5.6 model, the future maintenance of Ethereum protocol security will likely be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although the EF currently mentions that "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel in the EF security team and even across the entire organizational structure may be further reduced in the future. In other words, the EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the fulfillment of its functions.

Summary: The EF Organizational Reform Phase Concludes, Might It Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we systematically analyzed the EF's organizational reform in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform', Where is the Ethereum Foundation Heading?" Back then, Vitalik was still ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational reform; in May of this year, after more than a year of organizational renewal, Vitalik surprisingly changed his tune, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termist approach."

It must be said that as ETH has grown into an asset worth hundreds of billions, the EF, this official ecosystem organization established for nearly a decade, has also entered the awkward position of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously declared—"will no longer write regular blog posts and has decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said earlier this month in a podcast, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems the EF can hardly shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving a breakthrough in ETH's price." Future large-scale adoption and institutional-grade investment may have to be hoped for from organizations like ETHlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for the EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum in a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Its Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum is 'Sick,' Are These Three Prescriptions the Right Cure?

Where is the Road? A Brief Analysis of the 3 Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem

Listing Ethereum's Seven Deadly Sins, Who Can Play the "Divine Comedy of Salvation" for It?

Where Lies Ethereum's Orthodoxy? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Mind

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Journey of Changing Hands, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat significant organizational change was announced by the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and what was its broader implication?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team announced its formal dissolution. This event is seen as a major indicator of internal conflict and a splitting crisis within the EF, marking one of its largest rounds of layoffs to date.

QAccording to the article, what are the names and primary goals of the two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the EF restructuring?

AThe two new organizations are Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional. Ethlabs aims to promote Ethereum as a global economic settlement layer. Ethereum Institutional focuses on driving the institutionalization and enterprise-level application of Ethereum and its ecosystem.

QHow has the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporated AI, and what was a key outcome of this integration?

AThe EF security team deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities. A key outcome was the discovery of a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub library (CVE-2026-34219), which has since been patched.

QWhat shift in perspective did Vitalik Buterin reportedly express regarding the Ethereum Foundation's role, as mentioned in the article's conclusion?

AVitalik Buterin shifted from actively pushing for organizational reform to stating that the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and should move towards a smaller, more long-termist approach. The article suggests he may even see a future where the EF plays more of a 'mascot' role.

QWhat criticism from within the Ethereum community towards the EF is highlighted in the article, and who exemplified this sentiment?

AThe EF has been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and market-affecting sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman exemplified this sentiment by selling his remaining ETH holdings to express dissatisfaction and encouraging the community to build independently of the EF.

你可能也喜欢

大模型能写出工业级优化算法吗?MIT提出FrontierOR给AI设下考场

麻省理工学院等机构的研究者推出了FrontierOR基准,用于评估大语言模型(LLM)设计大规模优化算法的能力。该基准不同于传统测试建模或调用求解器的任务,重点考察LLM能否像运筹学(OR)专家一样,针对复杂工业问题结构,自主设计出可扩展、高效且高质量的算法,例如分解、启发式搜索或混合策略。 FrontierOR包含180个源自OR学术文献的真实任务,并筛选出50个更具挑战性的“Hard”子集。评测采用两阶段流程:首先生成的算法需通过小实例的可行性预筛,然后在工业级规模的大实例上评估其解质量、速度及综合质效(QTE)。 实验结果显示,顶尖模型如GPT-5.3、Claude Opus 4.6等,在代码可执行性上已接近上限,但要在Hard任务上生成同时满足高质量和高速度的算法仍很困难。分析表明,能力较强的模型已减少基础建模错误,失败模式转向搜索深度与策略设计不足。此外,研究测试了三种自演化框架(如CORAL),发现通过迭代优化,LLM生成的算法性能可显著提升,在部分最难任务上QTE指标能从0.15提升至0.50。 这项工作标志着LLM-for-OR的研究重心正从“能否建模”转向“能否设计算法”,为开发能自主设计优化算法的AI智能体指明了方向,未来可能在供应链、能源、交通等领域实现更智能的决策支持系统。

marsbit1小时前

大模型能写出工业级优化算法吗?MIT提出FrontierOR给AI设下考场

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

2.8k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片