Is Washington About To Kill Crypto Prediction Markets For Good? — Why Congress Suddenly Cares

bitcoinist发布于2026-03-26更新于2026-03-26

文章摘要

On March 25, two separate acts were introduced to ban U.S. congressional staff, members of Congress, and federal officials from trading on prediction markets. Representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts issued an immediate office-wide ban, calling these markets “playgrounds for corrupt insiders” that create perverse incentives. Separately, Representatives Adrian Smith and Nikki Budzinski introduced the bipartisan PREDICT Act, which would prohibit elected officials, senior appointees, and their families from trading on political and policy outcome markets. Violators would face a 10% fine on the value of the trade and forfeiture of profits. The moves reflect growing concern in Washington over insider trading risks in prediction markets, especially following instances of traders making large profits on geopolitical events. These actions may lead to stricter regulations and increased scrutiny on crypto-based prediction platforms.

Two different acts banning congressional staff, members of congress and federal officials from trading on prediction markets were introduced on Wednesday, March 25, one of them being effective immediately.

Massachusetts Bans Crypto Prediction Market

Washington’s battle against prediction markets rages on. Following a bipartisan Senate bill introduced on Monday that targets sports‐style bets on platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, democratic representative Seth Moulton of Massachusetts (MA-06) formally banned all of his staff from “participating in prediction markets”, such as the aforementioned, “to trade or hold positions on political, legislative, regulatory, geopolitical outcomes, or any information that is learned in an official capacity”. The press release frames it as the first such explicit office-wide ban in Congress.

Moulton’s rationale is clear: staff are meant to serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events. As he views it, prediction markets have become ethically questionable “playgrounds for corrupt insiders”:

Prediction markets have become a playground for corrupt insiders who are able to place bets on things like election outcomes, wars, and even the deaths of public figures. This is creating a perverse incentive structure that poses a genuine threat to American society today.

Congressional staff and the Members they work for exist to serve the constituents of the districts they represent, not to profit off of the very policy decisions and world events that we are here to respond to.

Nebraska Bans Crypto Prediction Market Too

On Nebraska’s side, Congressman Adrian Smith (R-NE-03) and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski (D-IL-13) introduced the Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act), another bipartisan effort that aims to ban members of Congress, their spouses and children, the president and vice president, and senior appointees from trading on political and policy outcome markets.

Their core argument and statement are very similar to Moulton’s. Recent episodes of little‐known traders making massive profits on contracts tied to war with Iran or the length of government shutdowns have sharpened fears about insider information leaking into these markets. Smith said:

Serving the American people is a privilege, not a pathway to profit. Our commonsense, bipartisan bill will give Americans confidence that the decisions of their elected officials are guided by merit, not personal profit.

Budzinski added:

The American people are tired of politicians using their influence for personal gain, and the rise of prediction markets has made those concerns even more relevant. In recent months, we’ve seen instances of little-known traders making massive profits on events ranging from war with Iran to how long a government shutdown will last, raising necessary questions about the use of inside information.

Breaking the PREDICT Act would trigger a civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury, the announcement states.

A Growing Concern For Washington?

These new episodes come on top of earlier efforts like Rep. Ritchie Torres’s Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act, following the capture of Venezuela’s former dictator Nicolás Maduro, which also targeted insider trading on platforms such as Polymarket.

For on‐chain and offshore prediction markets, a hard ban on US officials could actually de‐risk the space by reducing headline “insider” scandals, but it also raises the odds of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

As it becomes increasingly clear that Washington has its attention set on ethically questionable crypto ventures, it is not too far-fetched to think that similar logic could be extended to other high‐beta crypto venues where policy and profit visibly collide (e.g., tokens tightly linked to election or war outcomes). Traders would do well pricing in regulatory overhang alongside usual market risk.

BTC’s price drops slightly after reaching $71k yesterday, trading for around $69k today. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

相关问答

QWhat is the main reason cited by Representative Seth Moulton for banning his staff from participating in prediction markets?

AMoulton believes staff should serve constituents, not profit from policy choices and global events, and views prediction markets as ethically questionable 'playgrounds for corrupt insiders'.

QWhat is the name of the bipartisan act introduced by Congressman Adrian Smith and Congresswoman Nikki Budzinski to ban trading on political prediction markets?

AThe Preventing Real-time Exploitation and Deceptive Insider Congressional Trading Act (PREDICT Act).

QWhat are the penalties for violating the PREDICT Act according to the announcement?

AA civil fine equal to 10% of the value of the banned trade, plus a requirement to hand over all profits from it to the U.S. Treasury.

QWhich earlier legislative effort targeted insider trading on platforms like Polymarket, as mentioned in the article?

ARep. Ritchie Torres's Financial Prediction Markets Public Integrity Act.

QHow might a hard ban on US officials using prediction markets affect the crypto prediction market space?

AIt could de-risk the space by reducing headline 'insider' scandals but also increase the likelihood of stricter KYC and monitoring requirements in the US.

你可能也喜欢

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

以太坊网络上因希望进行质押的验证者数量激增,形成了约250万枚ETH的激活队列,新参与者需等待约43天才能激活其代币。然而,Sygnum Bank的托管与质押部门负责人托马斯·布伦纳指出,这种漫长的等待不应被直接解读为强烈的看涨信号。 布伦纳表示,验证者队列的拥堵虽然反映了机构需求,但也受到以太坊协议技术特性的显著影响。他提到,自Dencun升级后,每日验证者吞吐量被限制在约57,600枚ETH,且这一限制在Pectra升级中并未提高。Pectra升级允许单个验证者最多持有2048枚ETH并支持自动复利功能,大型质押运营商可以向现有验证者追加ETH而非创建新验证者。但即便仅向现有验证者添加1枚ETH,该交易也会与新的质押者一同进入相同的激活队列。 因此,布伦纳认为,并非队列中的所有ETH都源自新投资者的需求,其中部分积累来自于已质押ETH的再分配、对现有验证者的补充以及复利过程。他指出,一个更重要的市场信号是提款队列几乎为空,这表明现有参与者正在维持其网络头寸,显示出真实的信心。 目前,以太坊网络上已质押约4120万枚ETH,约占流通总量的33.8%。布伦纳还强调,尽管ETH价格有所疲软,机构投资者并未放弃质押。许多机构将质押收益视为以太坊内在的基本特性,但机构参与的最大障碍之一仍是隐私问题。由于验证者地址、存款地址和提款交易在区块链上可被追踪,机构投资者对扩大其质押规模持谨慎态度,隐私问题仍是制约以太坊机构质押市场更快增长的主要障碍。

cryptonews.ru2小时前

以太坊上形成了长达43天的质押队列:但专家认为,这并非真正的看涨信号

cryptonews.ru2小时前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

韩国央行公布了其代币化存款测试结果。该试点项目涉及28家央行及国际金融机构,韩方参与者包括KB国民银行、NH农协银行、新韩银行、友利银行和韩亚银行。 测试显示,从支付指令到最终结算的整个过程平均耗时约1分20秒,其中最终结算平均需80秒。在测试中,参与者执行了30笔交易,覆盖17种不同场景,包括企业和银行间转账,并涉及韩元、美元和欧元等六种货币。交易总额约合99.5万美元。 央行表示,平台在整个测试期间运行稳定,尽管仅在部分连接现有银行基础设施的环境下运作。即使在支付网络和银行系统兼容性有限的情况下,代币化存款结算仍能无缝、快速、透明地完成。 此外,韩国央行还通过Project Agora平台,在NH农协银行和新韩银行之间完成了一笔2000万韩元(约1.389万美元)的内部转账测试。该交易涉及手动连接其批发型央行数字货币(CBDC)平台Project Hangang至央行现有网络,以验证兼容性。 同时,韩国KB国民银行与日本三菱日联金融集团(MUFG Bank)也完成了使用存款代币的支付测试。这些代币是银行在试点中发行的数字凭证,并非由央行直接发行。韩国央行计划继续测试存款代币支付。 去年,韩国当局曾承诺加强对韩元稳定币的监管,要求其发行必须获得韩国央行和金融服务委员会(FSC)的批准。

cryptonews.ru2小时前

韩国银行公布代币化存款测试结果

cryptonews.ru2小时前

交易

现货
活动图片