End of a Decade-Long Debate: US Legislatively Distinguishes 'Digital Commodities vs. Digital Securities' for the First Time, CFTC Takes Over Secondary Market

marsbit发布于2025-12-10更新于2025-12-10

文章摘要

The U.S. is advancing the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to resolve the long-standing regulatory debate over whether digital assets are securities or commodities. The bill establishes a clear distinction: tokens issued on sufficiently decentralized blockchains are classified as "digital commodities" under CFTC oversight, while those meeting the Howey test remain "digital securities" regulated by the SEC. It introduces a "mature blockchain" exemption, allowing networks like Bitcoin to avoid SEC registration if they meet decentralization criteria. The CFTC will oversee secondary markets, requiring trading platforms to register as digital commodity exchanges. The legislation also includes limited fundraising exemptions and mandates coordination between the CFTC and SEC via a joint advisory committee. This move, supported by crypto-friendly appointments under the Trump administration, signals a structured regulatory approach aimed at fostering innovation while protecting investors.

On December 10, US Senators Gillibrand and Lummis stated at the Blockchain Association Policy Summit that the draft of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) is expected to be released this weekend and enter the revision and hearing voting stage next week. This means this long-awaited legislative project has officially entered its decisive window.

The bill was first introduced in the US House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, by House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry and Digital Assets and Innovation Subcommittee Chairman French Hill. It passed the House vote by an overwhelming majority (294 votes in favor) on July 17 and is currently awaiting final review by the Senate.

Core Design of the Bill: Classification Over a One-Size-Fits-All Approach

The core of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act lies in its attempt to end the decade-long tug-of-war between US regulators and the industry over "whether it is a security or a commodity." It is the first legislation to draw a clear boundary for digital assets, avoiding a one-size-fits-all regulatory model in favor of a classified regulatory framework. Specifically:

Legal Distinction Between "Digital Commodities" and "Digital Securities"

The bill explicitly defines the vast majority of tokens natively issued on decentralized blockchains as "digital commodities," transferring their regulatory authority to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Only those tokens that meet the Howey Test and possess typical "investment contract" characteristics will continue to be regulated by the SEC under securities laws.

"Mature Blockchain" Exemption Path

To prevent all tokens from being forcibly classified as securities, the bill establishes a "mature blockchain system" standard: a blockchain must simultaneously satisfy conditions such as "high decentralization" (no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power) and derive its value primarily from the actual use of the network to be exempt from SEC securities registration requirements. This provides a clear path for mainstream assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, ensuring that regulation does not stifle technological progress.

Secondary Market Fully Transitions to CFTC Oversight

The bill requires all platforms engaged in the trading of digital commodity spots or derivatives to register with the CFTC as a "Digital Commodity Exchange" (DCE), digital commodity broker, or dealer. Considering industry realities, the bill also specifically sets up a 360-day "provisional registration" channel to ensure that existing compliant platforms are not forced to shut down due to technical violations during the transition period, thereby achieving a stable transition.

Limited Fundraising Exemption

Even for initial token offerings on mature blockchains, if still deemed an "investment contract," the issuer can apply for an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Securities Act. However, the total annual fundraising amount must not exceed $75 million, and stricter information disclosure obligations must be fulfilled. This design attempts to strike a balance between encouraging innovation and protecting investors.

Division of Labor Between CFTC and SEC: From Confrontation to Collaboration

The prolonged jurisdictional tug-of-war between the SEC and CFTC over digital assets has long been described as the "Achilles' heel" of the crypto industry. Regulatory uncertainty was even considered a significant hidden cost suppressing innovation vitality in the US. If the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act officially takes effect, it will legislatively end this situation, establishing a clear division of responsibilities: the CFTC becomes the core regulator of the digital commodity secondary market, while the SEC focuses on token offerings and private placement behaviors in the primary market that still possess securities attributes.

To ensure coordination between the two agencies in overlapping areas, the bill requires the establishment of a permanent "Joint Advisory Committee". Either agency must formally respond to non-binding recommendations put forward by the committee when formulating rules that may affect the other's jurisdictional scope. This mechanism aims to avoid future regulatory gaps or overlapping regulations.

Simultaneously, the bill provides clear protection for the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem: protocol front-end developers, node validators, miners, and other non-custodial, non-profit roles will be explicitly excluded from the definitions of "broker" or "dealer," significantly reducing the compliance burden at the protocol level and preserving reasonable space for technological innovation.

Supporting Actions Progressing Simultaneously: CFTC is "Implementing First"

As the Senate review of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act enters a critical stage, on December 5, Acting Chairman of the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), Caroline D. Pham, announced that spot cryptocurrency products will, for the first time, be permitted to trade on CFTC-registered regulated futures exchanges.

Pham stated that this move is part of the Trump administration's plan to establish the US as the "cryptocurrency capital of the world," aiming to address the lack of safeguards on offshore exchanges by providing a regulated domestic market.

Furthermore, as part of the "Crypto Sprint" initiative, the CFTC will also promote the use of tokenized collateral (including stablecoins) in derivatives markets and revise rules to support the application of blockchain technology in infrastructure such as clearing and settlement. This will strengthen the CFTC's leadership role in the digital asset space, highly aligning with the spirit of the bill.

Trump's Nominations Accelerate: Crypto-Friendly Leadership in Place

Since Trump's second term, the personnel layout of major US financial regulatory agencies has continued to tilt towards supporting digital assets. This shift has become a key catalyst for the development of the crypto industry.

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Paul Atkins stated in an interview with CNBC that the US "resistance" to cryptocurrency has lasted "too long." Paul Atkins was appointed by Trump and took office in 2025. He views the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act as part of "Project Crypto," which aims to bring order and fairness to digital asset classification through legislation and rules.

Simultaneously, on October 25, 2025, Trump nominated Brian Quintenz to serve as CFTC Chairman and Commissioner. He is a former crypto lawyer who represented numerous crypto companies (such as venture capital funds and blockchain projects) at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP and has served as Chief Legal Counsel of the SEC's Crypto Task Force since March 2025, reporting directly to Atkins.

Trump also nominated Travis Hill to serve as Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC); he had been serving as Acting Chairman since 2025. Hill is also crypto-friendly, having publicly supported banks' involvement in crypto custody and stablecoin issuance, believing it can enhance financial inclusion. The FDIC regulates the interface between banks and crypto (e.g., stablecoin issuers), and his appointment may facilitate banks' entry into the crypto space.

After the government resumed operations, the SEC has also successively introduced system optimization plans to accelerate the ETF approval pace. The overall signal is very clear: regulatory logic is transitioning from defensive management to structural acceptance.

Conclusion: The US is Completing the "Crypto Rule of Law Puzzle"

More importantly, the progress of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act may consolidate the effectiveness of the U.S. Stablecoin Innovation Act signed by Trump earlier this year, which already provides a safety framework for stablecoin issuance. This bill further completes the legislative puzzle for the crypto industry, fills market structure gaps, and promotes the US from a "follower" to a "leader" in global crypto regulation.

Overall, these policy and personnel changes预示 (foreshadow) structural opportunities for the US crypto ecosystem. Regulatory clarity could attract more institutional capital inflows. However, challenges have not disappeared, such as coordinating DeFi regulatory details and aligning with international standards. But for global crypto practitioners, this is not just an American story; it is a crucial window period for the entire industry.

相关问答

QWhat is the core design principle of the Crypto-Asset Market Structure Act (CLARITY Act) regarding digital asset regulation?

AThe core design principle is to avoid a 'one-size-fits-all' regulatory model and instead adopt a classification framework. It clearly distinguishes between 'digital commodities' and 'digital securities' by law, ending the decade-long jurisdictional tug-of-war between regulators.

QWhich US regulatory agency is given primary oversight of the secondary market for digital commodities under the proposed bill?

AThe Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is given primary regulatory authority over the secondary market for digital commodities. Trading platforms must register with the CFTC as Digital Commodity Exchanges (DCEs), brokers, or dealers.

QWhat is the 'mature blockchain' exemption path outlined in the CLARITY Act?

AThe 'mature blockchain' exemption allows a token to be exempt from SEC securities registration if its underlying blockchain is 'highly decentralized'—meaning no single entity controls more than 20% of the token supply or validation power—and its value is primarily derived from the network's actual use.

QWhat key personnel changes has the Trump administration made to foster a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment?

AThe Trump administration has appointed crypto-friendly leaders, including SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, CFTC Chairman nominee Brian Quintenz (a former crypto lawyer), and FDIC Acting Chairman Travis Hill, who supports banks engaging in crypto custody and stablecoin issuance.

QHow does the bill aim to ensure coordination between the CFTC and SEC to avoid future regulatory gaps or overlaps?

AThe bill mandates the establishment of a permanent 'Joint Advisory Committee.' Both agencies must formally respond to the committee's non-binding recommendations when formulating rules that could impact the other's jurisdiction, ensuring coordination and preventing regulatory gaps or duplication.

你可能也喜欢

做市商与套利者的两种生存结构

在微观高频交易领域,做市商与套利者是两种长期并存的核心生存结构。本文从风险敞口的角度,对比分析了两者的差异。 做市商通过挂单(Maker模式)提供流动性,以赚取买卖价差为目标,资金利用率高。其风险敞口源于被动成交的不连续性,常形成随机、高频的碎片化库存。这种敞口在价格均值回归期间可能贡献超额利润,但在单边行情下会导致库存积压、亏损放大。 跨所套利者则主要通过吃单(Taker模式)捕捉不同交易所间的价差或资金费率,但名义资金利用率较低,且需支付更高手续费。其风险敞口主要源于交易所间规则不对称(如订单步长不同)、执行延迟等工程层面问题,这类敞口基本属于利润的损耗项。 两者的核心区别在于:做市商是用放弃“成交时间控制权”(出售时间)来换取价差收益和低手续费,其敞口在一定范围内是利润来源;套利者则是以“资金沉没”(出售空间)为代价,换取确定性的空间套利机会,其敞口多为成本。两者都在“执行摩擦损耗”与“残差风险波动”间寻求平衡。 最终,成熟的策略会趋向融合:套利者会使用Maker模式以降低成本,做市商在风控预警时也会采用Taker平仓或对冲。二者都以不同形式的风险敞口,向市场兑换微薄而残酷的确定性收益。

链捕手36分钟前

做市商与套利者的两种生存结构

链捕手36分钟前

交易

现货
合约

热门文章

如何购买MEGA

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买MegaETH(MEGA)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买MegaETH(MEGA)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的MegaETH(MEGA)购买完您的MegaETH(MEGA)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易MegaETH(MEGA)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易MegaETH(MEGA)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

350人学过发布于 2026.04.30更新于 2026.04.30

如何购买MEGA

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对A(A)币价的意见。

活动图片