Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

Foresight News发布于2026-07-20更新于2026-07-20

文章摘要

On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launchpad vlad.fun experienced internal sabotage on its launch day. Two external developers secretly hardcoded their own token into the platform's frontend, making it the only token visible to users and hiding all others. The core team detected the anomaly within two hours, fired the developers, and removed the malicious code. The developers claimed the action was for "clicks." They refunded approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token profits, totaling about 7.8 ETH, to the team. An additional 4.16 ETH in protocol fees from the launch is held in a team multisig wallet. Built by a five-person team in 48 hours, vlad.fun's code was provided by the two external developers. Their last commit added the hardcoded line. When confronted, they initially blamed technical issues, but later attempted to delete the evidence before confessing. The platform is currently paused. A community member, Will Mexi, clarified he was not involved and was the one who discovered and reported the issue, having previously enabled branch protection which preserved the evidence. vlad.fun's design allows token deployment and direct listing on Uniswap V3/V4 in one transaction, with liquidity permanently locked to reduce rug pull risks. It features anti-whale measures and flexible fee routing. Despite this incident, the Robinhood Chain launchpad ecosystem remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction.


Author: Nicky, Foresight News


On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launch platform vlad.fun experienced malicious actions by internal developers on its launch day. According to official sources, two external developers involved in building the platform secretly created their own token and hardcoded it into the frontend code, causing only that token to be visible to users upon platform launch, while all other creators' tokens were completely hidden. The team discovered the anomaly within two hours, promptly dismissed the involved developers, and removed the malicious code.


The official statement emphasized that the team never approved issuing a vlad.fun platform token, and the two individuals unilaterally decided to launch one for "page views." After negotiation, the duo returned approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token proceeds. The recovered funds, totaling about 7.8 ETH, have been deposited into the team's secure wallet. Additionally, approximately 4.16 ETH in protocol fees generated from the platform launch are held in the team's multi-signature address.


Public information shows that vlad.fun was rapidly built by a small team of 5 within 48 hours. Currently, two project-affiliated members have issued statements, but the specific identities of the two external developers have not been disclosed as of publishing. According to the incident explanation thread posted by the project's official account on July 18th, the two external developers were responsible for providing the core codebase for the launchpad. In the final code commit before the platform went live, they manually added a line of hardcoded logic to the frontend, forcing their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while other creators' tokens were completely obscured due to loading issues.


After the launch, users quickly noticed the anomaly, with the entire platform displaying only one token. Team members began reviewing the code and found the manually added hardcoded line in the commit history. When questioned by the team, the two developers initially blamed technical issues such as RPC failures, environment variable problems, and caching, but the persistent visibility of the relevant token contradicted such explanations.


According to the official account, one of the developers later requested the disabling of the branch protection feature on the code repository, claiming a need to "rollback some content." Before removing the protection, the team performed a timestamp backup of the entire repository and observed the two deleting the line containing the hardcoded logic. The official statement noted that this attempt to destroy evidence ultimately revealed their intent. Confronted with the evidence, the two developers admitted to their actions.


This incident highlights the trust risks faced by rapidly built crypto projects when involving external developers. The identities of the two involved developers have not been publicly disclosed, with the team stating they have taken advice to withhold their identities for now. vlad.fun stated that in the future, external personnel will no longer be allowed access to sensitive systems, and the team prefers developing based on open-source contracts.


The official website shows that vlad.fun is currently in a suspended operational state. The team stated they will prioritize handling matters for affected users.


Community member Will Mexi publicly clarified his role after the incident. He stated he was responsible for project application listings, frontend optimization, design, branding, and animations, and was not one of the two developers involved, nor did he participate in planning or executing the operation. According to his account, he tested a normal version of the website about 20 minutes before launch, so he did not notice the anomaly.


Will Mexi said that after the platform officially launched, he saw the token appearing illogically, immediately read the newly committed code, discovered the hardcoded line, and promptly reported it to the core team. He also mentioned that enabling branch protection earlier was due to caution regarding external code, and this setting ultimately preserved the complete commit history and evidence of intent. He simultaneously denied purchasing any platform tokens and claimed to have incurred losses due to expensive RPC, API, and server deployment costs.


Core team member @SOLsesame also expressed support in the incident thread. He belongs to the core small team that has collaborated with Will Mexi and others for over a year and is not one of the involved external developers. His background shows he is an active builder in the Solana ecosystem, having been deeply involved in the ai16z ecosystem and its PartnersNFT and PartnersDAO projects. Recently, he collaborated with Will Mexi to build and launch the Black Bull NFT series from scratch for the ANSEM community within 24 hours.


As a token launchpad on Robinhood Chain, vlad.fun differs from traditional bonding curve launchpads. Its design goal is to complete token deployment and direct launch to Uniswap V3 or V4 in a single transaction, making tokens instantly tradable on decentralized exchanges without going through a "graduation" migration step. Liquidity pool positions are permanently locked via a locker contract and cannot be withdrawn by the team, reducing the risk of rug pulls at the mechanism level.


In terms of fairness design, the platform employs mechanisms such as a fixed supply, no presale, and no large team allocations. It also offers an optional developer priority buy feature, allowing developers to buy at launch with zero transaction fees. An anti-whale mechanism limits single wallet holdings to 2%, preventing concentrated holdings by a single address. For fee routing, the platform supports setting a 1% to 5% transaction fee, which can be instantly directed to specified recipients, including wallet addresses, social accounts, or buyback/burn proxies. Fees are locked at launch and cannot be changed. Additionally, the platform plans optional models such as staking for rewards.


Despite vlad.fun hitting pause due to the internal incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain has not cooled down. According to DefiLlama data, the chain's current TVL is approximately $258 million, with 24-hour fees around $118,000 and revenue about $106,000. Uniswap's 24-hour fee expenditure on the chain reached $1.95 million. The ecosystem has already gathered multiple launchpads, each forming a differentiated competitive landscape: the latecomer PONS holds the leading launchpad position with intensive development and continuous updates. Its platform token has a market cap of about $12 million, with a gain of over 4200% in the past 7 days. Furthermore, the Butterfly platform focuses on stock-like meme tokens but has yet to produce a hit. Native Uniswap innovative mechanism tokens, such as RWA dividend-sharing tokens like index, which received official attention, once surged to a market cap of $30 million on July 17th.

热门币种推荐

相关问答

QWhat was the primary technical action taken by the two external developers that led to the incident on vlad.fun?

AThey secretly added a line of hardcoded script to the platform's front-end code, which forced only their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while hiding all other creators' tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the main reason given by the developers for their actions, and what key evidence contradicted this reason?

AThey claimed it was for 'page views.' However, the key contradictory evidence was that when questioned, they initially tried to blame technical issues like RPC failures or cache problems, but the fact that their token remained consistently visible made these excuses implausible.

QHow did the core team discover and prove the malicious intent of the external developers?

AAfter users reported seeing only one token, the team reviewed the code commit history and found the manually added hardcoded line. The developers then tried to delete this code and asked to disable branch protection on the repository, which the team had already backed up. Their attempt to destroy evidence confirmed their malicious intent.

QWhat are two key design features of the vlad.fun platform aimed at reducing scam risks compared to traditional launchpads?

A1. Tokens are launched directly to Uniswap V3/V4 in a single transaction, making them instantly tradable without a migration step. 2. The liquidity pool is permanently locked via a locker contract, preventing the team from withdrawing it and reducing 'rug pull' risks.

QWhat is the current status of the vlad.fun platform following the incident, and what does the article suggest about the broader launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain?

AThe vlad.fun platform is currently paused. The article suggests that despite this incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction and others exploring different niches.

你可能也喜欢

少投入不是苹果的免死金牌

《少投入不是苹果的免死金牌》一文指出,虽然苹果在AI浪潮中因资本开支克制而一度受到市场青睐,但其面临的挑战正在显现。 文章首先描述了市场的反差:当Meta、谷歌等巨头因巨额AI投入引发担忧时,苹果在AI领域的迟缓进展反而被视为“亮点”,其股价一度上涨。然而,这种“全靠同行衬托”的领先难以持续。 随后,文章分析了苹果最新财报。尽管2026财年第三财季营收与净利润均创同期历史新高,主要得益于iPhone和Mac的强劲销售,但财报发布后股价却大幅下跌。原因在于苹果对下一季度的增长指引低于市场预期。 核心问题在于供应链。AI热潮导致内存和芯片需求激增、价格上涨及产能紧张,严重波及苹果。其Mac产品线已因高端芯片供应不足而受限,并被迫提价。外界预测iPhone新品也将大幅涨价,这可能影响未来销量。为应对供应链风险,苹果库存大幅增加,并寻求与中企合作采购内存芯片,但此举面临政治阻力。 与其他科技巨头动辄数千亿美元的AI资本开支相比,苹果的资本开支不仅未增,反而下降,这使其保持了健康的现金流。但同时,苹果研发费用大幅增长,却未能在AI领域取得显著成果,形成反差。 文章总结,苹果虽未在AI烧钱竞赛中陷得太深,却无法避免由这场竞赛引发的供应链与成本冲击。即将卸任的库克对公司未来表示信心,但苹果能否在AI时代保持领先,仍存疑问。

marsbit44分钟前

少投入不是苹果的免死金牌

marsbit44分钟前

一周精选丨股市史诗级震荡,长鑫科技上市重塑存储格局,Saylor目标9月8日前后推动STRC回锚

PANews精选一周要闻。AI领域热度持续,智能体钱包成为加密支付新战场,Coinbase等巨头布局小额支付以抢占AI经济入口。韩国股市经历剧烈震荡,多次熔断并引发清算风暴,科技股暴跌堪比币圈行情。算力产业进入系统化竞争阶段,国产GPU与AI智能体(Agent)结合成为焦点。 宏观方面,长鑫科技上市后市值巨大,在经历长期亏损后单季度盈利显著。花旗银行预警未来大宗商品市场可能出现的极端风险。美联储维持利率不变,但内部出现罕见分歧,释放鹰派信号。 机构观点显示,有分析认为当前AI板块调整是去杠杆过程,长期牛市逻辑不变。中国散户在传统投资渠道收窄后,正转向加密资产等新途径。市场讨论未来货币形态,比特币价值受关注。比特币矿企被指出需向能源综合服务商转型。 市场热点包括NFT交易通过“抽卡”等新玩法激活流动性,但部分加密协议面临收入增长与代币价格脱钩的问题。RWA(真实世界资产)链上规模增长但利用率不足。以太坊公布2030年长期发展蓝图,Lido也进行了大规模升级。 行业动态方面,新银行领域面临洗牌,稳定币竞争加剧。重点资讯包括:美股收涨,Coinbase股价波动;MicroStrategy增持比特币并计划推动STRC回锚;多家AI与加密公司获得融资;韩国股市与长鑫科技股价出现大幅波动;巨鲸交易员在AI相关交易中获利了结。

marsbit1小时前

一周精选丨股市史诗级震荡,长鑫科技上市重塑存储格局,Saylor目标9月8日前后推动STRC回锚

marsbit1小时前

当市场开始质疑AI资本开支:五家科技巨头Q2财报全解析

2026年7月下旬,谷歌、英特尔、微软、Meta、苹果五家科技巨头相继发布第二季度财报。尽管各家营收和利润普遍超预期,且AI相关业务(如谷歌云、英特尔数据中心、Azure)增长强劲,但市场反应出现显著分化,焦点已从需求转向资本开支与现金流回报。 **谷歌**营收创十二季度双位数增长纪录,云业务同比大增82%,但资本支出同比翻倍至449亿美元,并上调全年指引,导致上市以来首次录得负自由现金流,股价下跌。 **英特尔**营收创十五年来最强增速,数据中心与AI业务表现突出,但因大幅上调资本支出指引引发对自由现金流的担忧,股价经历“过山车”式反转。 **微软**业绩超预期,Azure年收入首破千亿美元,同时通过会计调整下调资本支出指引并承诺正自由现金流,股价创十八年来最佳单日表现。 **Meta**广告业务稳健,营收增长28%,但因成本费用大增55%及资本开支指引上调,自由现金流同比萎缩逾90%,遭遇猛烈抛售。 **苹果**营收利润创同期新高,但下一季度营收指引上限低于预期,叠加供应链瓶颈担忧,股价大跌,市值单日蒸发超3000亿美元。 总结而言,本财报季显示AI需求依然强劲,但市场对巨额资本开支何时转化为实际回报的耐心正在消耗。各公司对资本开支节奏与现金流前景的表述,已成为影响股价的关键因素。

Odaily星球日报1小时前

当市场开始质疑AI资本开支:五家科技巨头Q2财报全解析

Odaily星球日报1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买PEOPLE

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)购买完您的ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易ConstitutionDAO(PEOPLE)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

1.8k人学过发布于 2024.03.29更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买PEOPLE

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对PEOPLE(PEOPLE)币价的意见。

活动图片