Solana emerges as the go-to network for Wrapped Bitcoin: Impact on SOL?

ambcrypto发布于2025-09-21更新于2025-09-22

Key Takeaways

Why is Solana’s 30% WBTC dominance significant?

It establishes Solana as a key BTC liquidity hub, driving on-chain activity, DeFi usage, and institutional interest.

How does this impact SOL?

Growing BTC flows and institutional demand boost SOL’s on-chain utility, fee capture, and bullish potential.


Wrapped Bitcoin’s [WBTC] Q3 income report shows traders are actively leveraging cross-chain bridges to pull Bitcoin [BTC] liquidity. Earnings are up 2.3% quarter-over-quarter, closing at $75.6k. 

While this is modest compared to the $2.45 million peak in Q4 last year, it still signals a solid uptick in on-chain activity. Among L1s, Solana [SOL] is clearly dominating this flow, capturing 30.6% of all WBTC users on-chain.

In short, traders are increasingly routing BTC liquidity through Solana.

For example, Orca [ORCA] is the largest WBTC/SOL DEX, where 24-hour volume has hit $16.16 million. Meanwhile, the number of holders has doubled to 55k.

SolanaSolana

Source: GeckoTerminal

These numbers show that SOL is becoming a key hub for BTC liquidity.

However, it doesn’t stop there. Once tokenized, WBTC moves through Solana’s DEXs, AMMs, lending rails, and yield farms. This allows traders to use BTC liquidity efficiently for swaps, lending, and yield strategies.

According to AMBCrypto, this is where Solana’s L1 strength really shows.

Solana handles BTC at scale

Solana’s L1 infrastructure keeps BTC moving across on-chain strategies.

This on-chain flow explains why traders are making the shift. Traders move BTC on Solana for a fraction of what it would cost on Bitcoin, where fees can range from $5 to $50+ for the same transfer. 

On top of that, Solana can handle 65k+ TPS, enabling BTC to move at scale without network congestion. The result? 30.6% of all WBTC users (1.7 million) are on Solana. Naturally, institutions will follow suit.

SOLSOL

Source: Dune

In short, Solana’s WBTC dominance is setting the stage for a bullish run.

With institutional BTC appetite surging and Solana locking in as a liquidity hub, the network is racking up wins on multiple fronts. SOL’s on-chain demand from institutions is hitting all-time highs.

And this clearly isn’t random. With Solana cementing its role as the settlement layer for BTC flows, big money is starting to rotate capital onto the network, positioning SOL as the go-to L1 for institutional BTC liquidity.

Share

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

微信与Telegram在架构层面有着根本性的差异,主要体现在数据存储、功能设计和生态开放度上。 **数据存储方式**:Telegram提供无限云端存储,所有消息历史在各设备间自动同步。微信则采用本地存储,消息在服务器交付后不保留,因此更换设备需通过特定功能迁移,且桌面版必须依赖手机在线确认才能登录。 **功能设计差异**:在频道讨论方面,Telegram为帖子自动关联评论区,实现一体化讨论。微信的公众号文章评论需经发布者审核才可显示,缺乏与文章直接关联的讨论系统,用户交流需跳转至聊天或小程序。文件传输上,Telegram支持最大2-4GB的文件,微信则限制为200MB,大文件需借助“文件传输助手”或第三方服务。 **开发与生态**:Telegram的Bot API完全开放免费,开发门槛低。微信小程序生态庞大(活跃数量超480万),但属于封闭系统,需经过审核、认证,甚至提供商业许可才能使用部分API,准入要求更高。 **支付整合**:微信支付深度融入中国日常生活,覆盖绝大多数线下场景及公共服务,替代了现金和银行应用。Telegram没有内置的法定货币支付系统,主要通过第三方机器人实现支付功能,尤其侧重加密货币,这反映了其去中心化理念,但在传统金融基础设施完善的地区,限制了其作为日常金融工具的应用。 **安全考量**:文章未深入讨论加密机制。Telegram提供端到端加密的私密聊天选项,而微信聊天信息不采用端到端加密。值得注意的是,微信将通讯与支付高度集成于单一界面,理论上扩大了潜在的攻击面。有数据显示,仅2025年初新加坡就记录了数百起涉及仿冒微信等支付平台员工的诈骗案件,损失巨大。这引出一个技术问题:当通讯与支付功能在同一个应用内结合得越紧密,聊天安全漏洞可能带来的代价就越高。 总结而言,两者代表了不同的平台哲学:微信构建了一个深度融入现实经济的封闭但高度集成的生态系统;而Telegram则围绕开放协议、灵活数据存储和低开发者门槛进行设计。这种架构选择决定了各自的目标用户和使用场景。

cryptonews.ru52分钟前

您会惊讶地发现,WeChat 和 Telegram 在架构层面竟如此不同

cryptonews.ru52分钟前

交易

现货

热门文章

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

2025年5月22日,比特币价格正式突破11万美元大关,创下历史新高。在政策面、宏观经济、资金面与投资者结构共同作用下,一场结构性牛市浪潮正在展开。而此轮上涨背后的核心驱动,是美国《GENIUS稳定币法案》的实质性进展以及多项利好的叠加。本文将从政策端突破、宏观环境转向、链上与ETF资金结构、交易行为演化,以及重点受益赛道五大维度,全面解析此轮BTC再创新高的深层逻辑,并前瞻下半年市场的潜在趋势。

2.0k人学过发布于 2025.05.22更新于 2025.05.22

加密市场宏观研报:《GENIUS Act》法案取得重大进展,BTC突破历史新高,后市全新展望

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对BTC(BTC)币价的意见。

活动图片