Avenir + Glassnode: Bitcoin's Liquidity Profile

insights.glassnode发布于2025-06-23更新于2025-07-01

As Bitcoin integrates more deeply with global markets, its behavior is shifting - no longer governed by crypto-native cycles but by global liquidity, regulated access points, and institutional positioning. This report, co-authored by Glassnode and Avenir Group, presents a multi-dimensional analysis of Bitcoin’s market structure through on-chain activity, exchange-based liquidity, and macroeconomic linkages.

Across four chapters, the report introduces a unified liquidity framework that helps decode market conditions with greater precision - and contextualizes Bitcoin's role in a complex, multi-asset world.

📄
Download your copy of the report here.

A Unified Framework for Analyzing Bitcoin’s Liquidity

The Avenir x Glassnode report introduces a framework that integrates on-chain activity, market microstructure, and macroeconomic linkages into a single analytical view.

Rather than treating these layers in isolation, the report examines how capital moves between them - and how structural imbalances in one domain (such as ETF flows or order book depth) can influence dynamics across the broader market.

Below is a preview of key findings from the study:

On-Chain Liquidity: Demand Scales with Bitcoin’s Market Maturity

Bitcoin’s price performance since the 2022 cycle low continues to track closely with previous cycles - despite a significantly larger market capitalization. This indicates that capital inflows are scaling in line with the asset’s growth, reinforcing its structural depth.

Realized Cap has surged by over $544B since November 2022, pushing Bitcoin’s network liquidity to an all-time high of $944B. As institutional and sovereign adoption accelerate, on-chain data shows that Bitcoin’s role in the global financial system is expanding - mirroring broader macro liquidity trends.

Off-Chain Market Microstructure: ETFs, Order Books, and Derivatives

Perhaps the most underexplored layer of Bitcoin market analysis is the off-chain microstructure: the mechanics of how trades execute across spot and derivative venues, and how institutional access vehicles such as ETFs influence flows.

One of the most significant findings in the report is that the majority of inflows into U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs appear to be unhedged. This suggests that institutional allocators are using these vehicles not for arbitrage or basis trading - but to express directional, long-only exposure. As a result, ETF flows may exert a more lasting effect on price formation than initially assumed.

In addition, order book imbalance analysis using z-scores reveals persistent structural dislocations between bids and asks, which can act as early indicators of directional shifts. These imbalances tend to emerge well before trend reversals, offering a tool for more granular risk assessment.

Macro Linkages: Bitcoin Aligns with Global Liquidity and Risk Cycles

Bitcoin's behavior in 2025 shows increasing alignment with macroeconomic variables. Correlation and beta analysis in the report demonstrates that Bitcoin now exhibits:

  • A positive beta to global liquidity
  • A positive correlation to risk assets like equities
  • A negative correlation to the U.S. dollar and credit stress indicators

This represents a shift from Bitcoin’s earlier, more idiosyncratic phase, and places it in the same analytical domain as traditional macro assets. Volatility clustering also supports this observation: Bitcoin’s realized volatility now more closely mirrors equities and gold than commodities or FX.

Discover more in the full report

This Avenir x Glassnode report delivers a thorough institutional assessment of Bitcoin’s evolving liquidity profile. Inside, you'll uncover:

  • On-chain indicators of capital inflows and profit-taking regimes
  • Exchange-level data, derivatives trends, and limit order book analysis
  • Altcoin market fragmentation and liquidity divergence
  • Correlations between Bitcoin and traditional macro indicators
  • A framework for interpreting Bitcoin as a structurally maturing macro asset

To explore these dynamics in detail, including chart data and methodology, access the full report here.

Glassnode remains committed to providing the highest quality data and analysis to support institutional investors in the world of digital assets. Contact us for bespoke reports, data services, and more. For more reports on the current trends in the crypto markets, please visit Glassnode Insights.

热门币种推荐

你可能也喜欢

抵押品美元:稳定币之上的“第二层美元”如何形成?

稳定币并非直接复制欧洲美元体系,其核心功能是提供可转让的美元结算余额,主要替代离岸美元体系中运营和结算层面的部分需求,而非创造完整的美元资产负债表能力。 真正的变革在于:当金融中介以稳定币作为抵押品,在其之上创造出第二层美元债权时,便形成了“抵押品美元”。这并非稳定币本身,而是另一张资产负债表针对一笔受控的代币余额所开立、并提供融资的第二层负债。其货币属性取决于这项债权能否被第三方以接近面值的方式接受和持有。 与欧洲美元体系由银行负债直接创造弹性不同,抵押品美元的弹性路径更曲折:它始于对代币的控制权,通过折价(h)将抵押品价值(V_token)转化为融资能力(X = V_token × (1 − h)),其最终弹性则依赖于开立该债权的资产负债表以及后续资金方的支持。 决定其稳健性的关键变量包括:对代币的法律与操作控制权、折价设定的严谨性(需覆盖发行方风险、赎回路径、市场深度等多重因素),以及第二层债权能否获得持久且接近面值的融资。 在压力情景下,风险传导机制与传统体系不同。折价扩大与代币价格下跌可能形成恶性循环,最先失效的往往是上层的第二层债权,而非底层的稳定币本身。抵押品通道的脆弱性在于,它缺乏像传统离岸美元市场那样成熟的最后交易商机制或央行流动性支持架构。 因此,稳定币改变了离岸美元体系中特定层级的债权形态,但体系本身仍在。只有建立在稳定币之上的第二层债权能够可靠地跨越“代币流动性”到“银行美元流动性”的鸿沟时,“抵押品美元”才真正具备系统性意义。

链捕手54分钟前

抵押品美元:稳定币之上的“第二层美元”如何形成?

链捕手54分钟前

别被 12.5 亿上限误导:Strategy 三套售币资金池暗藏巨额抛盘

近日,Strategy 公司出售了3588枚比特币(约2.16亿美元),用于分红和补充美元储备,但对外仍宣称其12.5亿美元的“构建储备”额度完好无损。这揭示了其比特币变现计划中一个关键会计区分:只有为“构建储备”而出售比特币才受12.5亿美元上限限制,而为“补充储备”等其他目的售币则无此限制。 该公司的变现计划允许为三大目的出售比特币: 1. **构建储备**:上限12.5亿美元。 2. **覆盖优先股支出**:用于支付股息、利息,或在动用储备后售币回填,此渠道无明确上限。 3. **股份回购资金**:用于回购优先股或普通股,两类回购上限各10亿美元,合计潜在抛售规模达20亿美元。 因此,公司潜在的比特币抛售总规模远超市场普遍认知的12.5亿美元,可能超过30亿美元(仅计算有上限的渠道)。 文章指出,“构建”与“补充”储备在会计上的划分,虽目的相同(变卖比特币换取现金以支付股息利息),却直接影响其售币是否消耗公开额度。这标志着Strategy从单纯的“买入并持有”比特币公司,转变为一家进行复杂主动资本管理的机构,其操作常在不同资本工具(如普通股、优先股、比特币)之间权衡利弊,内部存在矛盾。 投资者需意识到,Strategy已非简单的比特币杠杆投资标的,其未来抛售比特币的规模和动机需仔细解读其公告中的每一个专业术语。投资该公司,实质上是在押注其能否在复杂的资本运作中维持平衡,避免体系崩溃。作者表示不会参与这种押注。

Foresight News1小时前

别被 12.5 亿上限误导:Strategy 三套售币资金池暗藏巨额抛盘

Foresight News1小时前

当 BTC 最大买家变成卖家,Strategy 抛售 3,588 枚比特币后谁在接盘?

这篇文章讨论了MicroStrategy(MSTR)近期抛售3,588枚比特币(套现约2.16亿美元)以支付优先股股息的事件,及其对市场和加密叙事的影响。 **核心议题:当最大买家变为卖家** 三位嘉宾(Austin Campbell, Ram Ahluwalia, Chris Perkins)围绕这一转变展开讨论。关键点包括: 1. **困境与转折**:随着MSTR股价相对其比特币持仓净值(mNAV)的溢价消失,公司无法再通过增发股票低成本收购比特币,被迫转向出售资产。这标志其“印股票买比特币”的增长循环断裂。 2. **市场影响**:抛售行为破坏了MicroStrategy作为比特币“永不卖出”持有者的叙事。有观点认为,其巨大的市场存在感甚至可能暂时成为了比特币吸引更广泛机构资金的障碍。 3. **未来挑战**:若比特币价格不显著上涨,公司可能面临持续出售资产以维持股息的压力。 **延伸讨论:代币与股权的价值之争** 文章进一步探讨了加密项目中的资本结构问题,认为在传统“债务-股权”架构之外,很难定义“代币”作为一种独立的资本形式。多数代币因缺乏明确价值捕获和实用性,长期存活率极低。 **稳定币竞争格局** 分析指出,稳定币市场正成为争夺“净利息收入”的新战场,但普遍面临“效用不足”的核心挑战。同时,像Tether这样放弃欧洲合规市场的行为,显示了不同区域策略的差异。未来,大型银行可能发行稳定币,借此捕获全球范围的收益,而这将对非美国银行的美元存款业务构成冲击。 **其他市场观察** - Securitize等加密公司的IPO估值波动巨大,交易更像高风险的“看涨期权”。 - 当前资本正被AI/半导体行业强烈虹吸,但市场最终将回归对基本面和现金流的关注。

marsbit1小时前

当 BTC 最大买家变成卖家,Strategy 抛售 3,588 枚比特币后谁在接盘?

marsbit1小时前

交易

现货

热门文章

如何购买S

欢迎来到HTX.com!我们已经让购买Sonic(S)变得简单而便捷。跟随我们的逐步指南,放心开始您的加密货币之旅。第一步:创建您的HTX账户使用您的电子邮件、手机号码注册一个免费账户在HTX上。体验无忧的注册过程并解锁所有平台功能。立即注册第二步:前往买币页面,选择您的支付方式信用卡/借记卡购买:使用您的Visa或Mastercard即时购买Sonic(S)。余额购买:使用您HTX账户余额中的资金进行无缝交易。第三方购买:探索诸如Google Pay或Apple Pay等流行支付方法以增加便利性。C2C购买:在HTX平台上直接与其他用户交易。HTX场外交易台(OTC)购买:为大量交易者提供个性化服务和竞争性汇率。第三步:存储您的Sonic(S)购买完您的Sonic(S)后,将其存储在您的HTX账户钱包中。您也可以通过区块链转账将其发送到其他地方或者用于交易其他加密货币。第四步:交易Sonic(S)在HTX的现货市场轻松交易Sonic(S)。访问您的账户,选择您的交易对,执行您的交易,并实时监控。HTX为初学者和经验丰富的交易者提供了友好的用户体验。

2.8k人学过发布于 2025.01.15更新于 2026.06.02

如何购买S

相关讨论

欢迎来到HTX社区。在这里,您可以了解最新的平台发展动态并获得专业的市场意见。以下是用户对S(S)币价的意见。

活动图片