# Сопутствующие статьи по теме VC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "VC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Dialogue with OpenMind Founder: After Securing $20 Million Investment from Pantera, Sequoia, and Others, How Far Has the Robot 'Android' System Come?

Jan Liphardt, founder of OpenMind and a Stanford and UC Berkeley professor, discusses his vision to build a decentralized "Android-like" operating system for robots. After raising $20 million from investors like Pantera Capital and Sequoia China, OpenMind aims to solve fragmentation in the robotics industry, where over 150 hardware vendors operate in isolation with software focused only on mechanical control. OpenMind’s core includes the open-source robot operating system OM1 and the decentralized FABRIC protocol. OM1 enables individual robot intelligence, while FABRIC facilitates secure machine-to-machine and human-machine collaboration, identity verification, and micro-transactions. The system has attracted thousands of developers on GitHub and is being integrated with leading Chinese robotics firms like Unitree, Astribot, and Ubtech. A key milestone is the development of a robot application store, with the first app already launched. OpenMind’s enhanced robot dog can recognize owners, map environments, remember objects, answer questions, and monitor home safety. Liphardt emphasizes the role of blockchain in enabling global governance, immutable record-keeping, and machine-economy transactions. He sees near-term adoption in homes, schools, and workplaces by 2026, with challenges including hardware reliability, adaptive real-world performance, and safe AI behavior. OpenMind’s long-term goal is to develop "social models" for robots that are transparent, open-source, and privacy-centric, ensuring they remain beneficial and secure alongside humanity.

marsbit01/26 02:11

Dialogue with OpenMind Founder: After Securing $20 Million Investment from Pantera, Sequoia, and Others, How Far Has the Robot 'Android' System Come?

marsbit01/26 02:11

Dialogue with Hashkey Capital Partner Xiao Xiao: The Story and Key Insights Behind Raising $250 Million in 3 Months

HashKey Capital, a leading Asian crypto VC, successfully raised $250 million for its fourth fund, HashKey Fintech Multi-Strategy Fund IV, in just three months. The fund attracted institutional investors, family offices, and high-net-worth individuals, with a total target of $500 million. Unlike previous funds, this multi-strategy fund will focus on liquid assets, including public market investments, OTC purchases of tokenized assets, and selective private market deals. It offers greater flexibility and mid-term redemption options to meet LP demands for liquidity and exit opportunities. The fund will invest in global infrastructure, scalability solutions, and large-scale application scenarios. Xiao Xiao emphasized that mass adoption requires real usage motivation, sustainable business models, and network effects. Despite a market slowdown, HashKey remains active, seeking high-quality projects during cooler market periods. The firm avoids overvalued deals and prioritizes teams with strong execution, clear vision, and proper fund management. Xiao also discussed the evolving role of Chinese founders, noting their strength in execution and operational expertise, while highlighting the trend toward hybrid global teams. He expects greater transparency in the industry and a convergence of equity and token-based financing models. The crypto primary market is increasingly blending traditional and crypto-native exit strategies, with capital concentrating around top-tier projects and blurred lines between primary and secondary investments.

marsbit01/20 10:54

Dialogue with Hashkey Capital Partner Xiao Xiao: The Story and Key Insights Behind Raising $250 Million in 3 Months

marsbit01/20 10:54

Farewell to 'Storytelling' for Funding: What Kind of Projects Can Survive Beyond 2026

Title: Beyond Storytelling: What Projects Will Survive Beyond 2026 The venture capital landscape in crypto has fundamentally shifted. In 2025, top market maker and investor Wintermute Ventures approved only 4% of the 600 projects it reviewed. This reflects a broader trend: total crypto VC deals plummeted 60% from 2024, with capital concentrating heavily in later-stage rounds (56% of total funding). The driver is a radical change in market structure. Institutional capital now dominates (75% of liquidity), but it is largely trapped in major assets like BTC and ETH. The altcoin narrative cycle collapsed from 61 days to just 19-20 days, leaving little time for money to flow to smaller projects. The traditional four-year bull cycle is broken; a 2026 recovery requires a major catalyst. Consequently, VC investment logic has moved from "spray and pray" to a survival-of-the-fittest model. Funding now targets projects that can prove viability from the seed stage. Key requirements for survival include: 1. **Hard Proof of Product-Market Fit:** Real data points are mandatory, such as 1,000+ active users or $100k+ in monthly revenue, with a DAU/MAU ratio above 50%. 2. **Capital Efficiency & Default Alive Status:** Startups must achieve "default alive" status, with monthly burn not exceeding 30% of revenue. Large, cash-burning teams are untenable. 3. **AI Integration & Technical Sophistication:** AI is no longer optional; it's essential for reducing development cycles and optimizing operations. Privacy tech like zero-knowledge proofs is critical for compliance, especially in RWA tokenization. 4. **Liquidity & Exchange Compatibility:** Projects must plan their exchange listing path from day one, ensuring compatibility with institutional liquidity channels like ETFs. For investors, the mandate is clear: adapt or fail. The new standard is not "how big the story can be" but "can this project prove its ability to generate revenue from seed." Investment must focus on AI-crypto fusion, compliance, and emerging markets. The era of betting on narratives is over; execution and sustainable profitability are now the only metrics that matter.

marsbit01/16 09:13

Farewell to 'Storytelling' for Funding: What Kind of Projects Can Survive Beyond 2026

marsbit01/16 09:13

From "Heaven-Sent Public Chain" to "Heaven-Forsaken Public Chain": What Led to the Collapse of Berachain?

Once hailed as a "top-tier public chain," Berachain has seen a dramatic decline, with its new nickname "doomed chain" reflecting its severe downturn. Launched in February 2025 with an innovative Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism aimed at boosting DeFi efficiency, the project initially attracted significant interest. Its TVL surged to $3.3 billion, with over 140,000 active addresses. However, the ecosystem quickly deteriorated. TVL has since collapsed to $180 million, and the chain’s daily revenue dropped to just $84. The sharp decline is attributed to several critical issues. The tokenomics heavily favored venture capitalists (VCs), who received 34.31% of the total token supply, while retail participants received minimal allocations. This high Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) and low circulating supply model led to artificial price spikes followed by a steep crash—BERA fell from a high of $9 to around $0.7, a drop of over 90%. Internal challenges also mounted. The foundation cut most of its retail-focused marketing team and saw key developers, including the chief developer, leave. Community trust eroded further when a Balancer protocol vulnerability forced a network halt in November 2025. Additionally, major token unlocks are scheduled starting February 2026, with 12.16% of supply—including significant VC holdings—set to be released, likely increasing selling pressure. Despite attempts at strategic shifts, including a partnership to use BERA as a reserve asset, the project faces intense community criticism and a loss of developer interest, with many moving to competing chains. The foundation has admitted that its "retail-first" strategy was ineffective, and if given another chance, it would not have sold so many tokens to VCs.

比推01/15 15:24

From "Heaven-Sent Public Chain" to "Heaven-Forsaken Public Chain": What Led to the Collapse of Berachain?

比推01/15 15:24

活动图片