# Сопутствующие статьи по теме VC

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "VC", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Five Years Later, Vitalik Overturns the Future He Set for Ethereum

Five years after championing Layer 2 (L2) scaling as Ethereum's future, Vitalik Buterin has dramatically reversed his position, declaring that L2s have largely failed to fulfill their original vision of "branded sharding." In a pivotal post, he argued that most L2 solutions remain highly centralized, reliant on multi-signature bridges and sequencers, and thus are not truly extending Ethereum's security or decentralization. The initial push for L2s was a survival response to Ethereum's cripplingly high fees and congestion during the 2021 DeFi and NFT boom, when competitors like Solana gained traction. However, despite massive venture funding—with projects like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Starknet raising billions—progress toward full decentralization (Stage 2) has been slow. Many operate more like centralized databases, prioritizing control and regulatory compliance over Ethereum's core values. Meanwhile, Ethereum itself has scaled significantly. Through upgrades like EIP-4844 and increased gas limits, L1 transaction fees have plummeted by over 99%, often costing just cents. This reduces L2's cost advantage and exposes their drawbacks: bridge vulnerabilities, fragmented liquidity, and complex user experiences. Vitalik now urges L2s to pivot from mere scaling to providing unique functional value—like privacy, ultra-fast finality, or application-specific optimizations—that L1 cannot easily offer. He reframes L2s as a spectrum of specialized "plugins" rather than essential scaling layers. This shift signals a market consolidation where only L2s with genuine utility and decentralization will survive, ending an era of inflated valuations and "ghost chain" projects. Ethereum is reclaiming its sovereignty by becoming scalable on its own terms.

marsbit02/04 05:52

Five Years Later, Vitalik Overturns the Future He Set for Ethereum

marsbit02/04 05:52

Reviewing Arthur Hayes' 2025: All Hype Calls Ultimately Lead to Cashing Out

Arthur Hayes, the founder of BitMEX and a prominent crypto influencer, had a highly profitable yet controversial 2025. While his public calls, such as predicting "$1 million Bitcoin" and "$10,000 ETH," attracted retail traders, his on-chain actions often contradicted his bullish narratives, resulting in gains for him and losses for followers. His strategies fell into three main categories: 1. **"Pump and Dump" of VC Coins**: Hayes frequently promoted tokens like Hyperliquid (HYPE), where he held early, low-cost shares. He would build hype with ambitious predictions, then sell near peaks. For instance, he sold HYPE just before a price drop, citing "unlock risks," only to buy back months later. 2. **Failed Revival of "Old Narratives"**: Attempts to boost outdated sectors like DeSci (e.g., BIO) and metaverse projects (e.g., WILD) largely failed. His investments in these areas saw significant losses, with some tokens dropping over 85%. 3. **The ZEC "Smokescreen"**: Hayes aggressively promoted Zcash (ZEC), claiming a "$10,000 target," while simultaneously selling ETH and other assets to fund ZEC purchases. This move allowed him to shift transparent assets (ETH) into privacy-focused ZEC, obscuring his true position. He later sold ETH again to reinvest in other areas, using ZEC’s volatility to divert market attention. Hayes operates as a pragmatic trader, not a steadfast "HODLer." His public analyses are valuable for macro insights, but his on-chain activity reveals a pattern of leveraging influence for personal profit. The key lesson: monitor his wallet actions, not just his words, to understand his true moves in a volatile crypto market.

marsbit01/29 09:50

Reviewing Arthur Hayes' 2025: All Hype Calls Ultimately Lead to Cashing Out

marsbit01/29 09:50

All Wealth Myths Are a Conspiracy of Non-Consensus and Time Compounding

The article explores how extraordinary wealth creation in venture capital stems from non-consensus bets combined with long-term compounding. It highlights Balderton Capital’s landmark investment in Revolut, which generated nearly 1,400x returns. In 2015, Balderton invested £1 million in Revolut’s seed round, despite its early technical flaws and rejection by Y Combinator. Partner Tim Bunting saw potential in co-founders Nikolay Storonsky and Vlad Yatsenko—a driven ex-trader and a steady engineer—and recognized a structural opportunity in European banking. Post-2008 crisis, trust in traditional banks was low, regulation (PSD2) enabled open banking, smartphone adoption soared, and consumers demanded digital-first finance. Revolut expanded aggressively into a global super-app, offering forex, crypto, stocks, and banking—often amid controversy over culture, compliance, and growth-at-all-costs. Balderton supported Revolut throughout: backing its crowdfunding round, aiding management maturity, and helping secure a UK banking license. By 2025, Revolut reached 65M users, $4B+ revenue, and a $75B valuation. Balderton’s success was underpinned by its equal-partnership model—inherited from Benchmark Capital—ensuring aligned incentives and collaborative decision-making. The case illustrates the power law in VC: a few outlier investments drive most returns. The formula for outsized returns involves non-consensus founders, structural timing, and patient capital across cycles. The Revolut story exemplifies how vision, courage, and long-term commitment can transform risk into legendary reward.

marsbit01/26 13:05

All Wealth Myths Are a Conspiracy of Non-Consensus and Time Compounding

marsbit01/26 13:05

活动图片