# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Strategy

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Strategy", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Complete Analysis of Trump's Tariff "Playbook": A Practical Operation Guide

Former President Trump has announced new tariffs targeting multiple European nations, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, starting at 10% on February 1 and escalating to 25% by June 1. These measures are tied explicitly to his strategic objective of acquiring Greenland, which he insists must be a "complete and comprehensive purchase." This follows a recurring pattern in Trump’s trade strategy: using high-stakes tariff threats as a negotiation tool, often announced over weekends when markets are closed to maximize psychological impact. The approach typically triggers an initial wave of market volatility and emotional selling, followed by a rebound as investors anticipate negotiated resolutions before tariffs take effect. The Kobeissi Letter outlines a consistent tactical playbook observed since early 2025: tariff threats are introduced, markets react negatively, buying opportunities emerge mid-week, and eventual deal announcements drive market rallies. While the Greenland demand is notably more ambitious than previous objectives—such as persuading China to drop export controls—the expected market response and negotiation timeline are projected to follow a similar cyclical pattern. Ultimately, the strategy leverages volatility as an opportunity, with disciplined traders capitalizing on predictable fluctuations tied to trade war headlines.

marsbit01/19 07:02

Complete Analysis of Trump's Tariff "Playbook": A Practical Operation Guide

marsbit01/19 07:02

Bitcoin's Short-Term Bear-to-Bull Transition: Will History Repeat Itself? | Invited Analysis

Summary of Bitcoin Market Analysis by Conaldo (Odaily Guest Analyst): This weekly trading report provides a technical analysis of Bitcoin's recent price action and outlines short-term trading strategies. The analyst, leveraging proprietary quantitative models (Momentum Quant, Sentiment Quant, and Spread Trading models), reviews the past week and forecasts the upcoming period. **Key Points & Performance:** * **Strategy Execution:** A single short-term, leveraged (1x) trade was executed last week, resulting in a -1.07% return. The trade was closed according to strict risk management rules after the market moved against the initial short signal. * **Price Validation:** The previous week's core prediction was validated as BTC's price successfully broke through the key resistance zone of $94,500-$95,000, reaching a high near $97,963. * **Current Market Structure:** The weekly chart analysis indicates the overall trend remains bearish, requiring caution. The daily chart shows a recent rebound with initial signs of bullish momentum, though its sustainability is not yet confirmed. **Technical Outlook & Key Levels (Jan 19-25):** * **Critical Zone:** The $94,500-$95,000 area is identified as the crucial level to watch for determining short-term direction. * **Resistance Levels:** Key resistance areas are $94,500-$95,000, $97,500-$99,500, and a major level near $102,000 (the 21-week moving average). * **Support Levels:** Key support areas are $89,500-$91,000, $86,000-$86,500, and a major level near $84,000. **Trading Strategy:** Two scenarios are proposed for the coming week using 30% capital: * **Scenario A (Bullish Break):** If BTC stabilizes above $94,500-$95,000, consider a long position with a stop-loss 1.5% below entry. * **Scenario B (Bearish Rejection):** If BTC is rejected at or falls below $94,500-$95,000, consider a short position with a stop-loss 1.5% above entry, targeting ~$86,500. **Historical Context & Broader Trend:** A comparison to a past market cycle (2021) suggests the 21-week moving average will be a critical multi-week bull/bear divider. A failure to break and hold above it could lead to further downside, potentially below $80,000. A true trend reversal to bullish would require the weekly MACD to show a clear bullish crossover. **Risk Management Emphasis:** The report strongly emphasizes disciplined risk management: setting stop-losses immediately upon entry and trailing them to protect capital and lock in gains as the trade moves favorably. *Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Markets are volatile; always conduct your own research (DYOR).*

Odaily星球日报01/19 05:21

Bitcoin's Short-Term Bear-to-Bull Transition: Will History Repeat Itself? | Invited Analysis

Odaily星球日报01/19 05:21

MACD Real Backtest: Can Technical Indicators Lead You to Profit?

Based on a comprehensive 5-year backtest of the MACD trading strategy on BTC and ETH, this analysis delivers a sobering reality check for traders. The key finding is that 90% of short-term trading activity, particularly lower timeframes (15m, 30m, 1h), underperforms a simple "buy and hold" strategy due to transaction costs, noise, and psychological strain. The "benchmark" returns for simply holding the assets were +48.86% for BTC and +53.00% for ETH. The data reveals that MACD strategy performance is highly dependent on timeframe and leverage: * **Short Timeframes (15m, 30m, 1h):** Nearly all configurations resulted in significant losses or complete liquidation (-100%), severely underperforming the buy-and-hold benchmark. * **4-Hour Timeframe:** This was the only timeframe where the MACD strategy consistently generated alpha. * **BTC 4h (1x leverage):** ~+96% return, successfully outperforming buy-and-hold by avoiding major bear markets. * **ETH 4h (1x leverage):** ~+205% return, dramatically outperforming its buy-and-hold benchmark due to ETH's strong trend-following characteristics. * **Leverage Impact:** Leverage (2x, 3x) on the 4h timeframe amplified these gains effectively (e.g., ETH 4h 3x leverage yielded +552%). However, higher leverage (5x) often led to diminished returns due to funding fees and volatility decay, despite increased risk. The "Death Matrix" of results shows that short-term, high-leverage trading is akin to gambling" with a near-certain outcome of failure. The final recommendation is clear: for most investors, a buy-and-hold strategy is superior to active trading on low timeframes. For those seeking to outperform, the only viable approach is applying moderate leverage (2x-3x) exclusively on the 4-hour timeframe, with ETH presenting the best opportunity for significant excess returns.

marsbit01/17 08:45

MACD Real Backtest: Can Technical Indicators Lead You to Profit?

marsbit01/17 08:45

Just Spent 250 Million to Buy Companies, Then Laid Off 30%: Polygon Is Changing Its Way of Survival

Polygon, a major blockchain scaling solution, has laid off approximately 30% of its workforce while simultaneously spending $250 million to acquire two companies: Coinme, a licensed crypto-fiat exchange with an extensive US ATM network, and Sequence, a wallet infrastructure and cross-chain routing provider. This strategic pivot signals a shift away from its core Layer-2 (L2) business, where it faces intense competition from dominant players like Base, and toward building a comprehensive stablecoin payment infrastructure called the "Open Money Stack." The acquisitions provide critical pieces for this new direction: Coinme offers regulatory licenses and on-ramps/off-ramps, while Sequence provides the technical backend for seamless cross-chain transactions. The goal is to target B2B clients like banks and payment providers. This move is seen as a necessary "blood change." Polygon's previous strategy, focused on enterprise adoption and NFTs, yielded limited long-term results. In the crowded L2 space, it struggled against competitors with superior user distribution, such as Base, which is integrated with Coinbase's massive user base. The new focus on stablecoin payments is a promising but highly competitive market, with giants like Stripe, PayPal also making significant investments. While Polygon CEO claims this puts them in competition with Stripe, the company is betting on an open infrastructure model versus Stripe's more closed ecosystem. The strategy carries risks. Coinme has faced regulatory penalties in the past, and Polygon is entering a field with well-established traditional finance players. However, success could transform Polygon from a protocol reliant on tokenomics into a profitable company with real revenue streams, a rarity in crypto. The core challenge is that the window for crypto-native companies to capture this market is narrowing as traditional finance accelerates its adoption of blockchain technology.

marsbit01/16 04:54

Just Spent 250 Million to Buy Companies, Then Laid Off 30%: Polygon Is Changing Its Way of Survival

marsbit01/16 04:54

活动图片