Complete Analysis of Trump's Tariff "Playbook": A Practical Operation Guide

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-01-19Обновлено 2026-01-19

Введение

Former President Trump has announced new tariffs targeting multiple European nations, including Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and Finland, starting at 10% on February 1 and escalating to 25% by June 1. These measures are tied explicitly to his strategic objective of acquiring Greenland, which he insists must be a "complete and comprehensive purchase." This follows a recurring pattern in Trump’s trade strategy: using high-stakes tariff threats as a negotiation tool, often announced over weekends when markets are closed to maximize psychological impact. The approach typically triggers an initial wave of market volatility and emotional selling, followed by a rebound as investors anticipate negotiated resolutions before tariffs take effect. The Kobeissi Letter outlines a consistent tactical playbook observed since early 2025: tariff threats are introduced, markets react negatively, buying opportunities emerge mid-week, and eventual deal announcements drive market rallies. While the Greenland demand is notably more ambitious than previous objectives—such as persuading China to drop export controls—the expected market response and negotiation timeline are projected to follow a similar cyclical pattern. Ultimately, the strategy leverages volatility as an opportunity, with disciplined traders capitalizing on predictable fluctuations tied to trade war headlines.

Author: The Kobeissi Letter

Compiled by: Jesse

This is an in-depth analysis from The Kobeissi Letter regarding the Greenland tariff incident and Trump's "tariff strategy".

Is the Trade War Making a Comeback Due to New Tariffs on Greenland?

Just moments ago, President Trump announced new tariffs on the European Union and confirmed his primary strategic objective: the acquisition of Greenland. This includes a new 10% tariff on Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Finland, effective February 1st.

Furthermore, these tariffs will be increased to 25% on June 1st and will absolutely not be canceled until a Greenland deal is reached. According to Trump, this deal must be a "complete and comprehensive purchase" of Greenland.

Before analyzing our precise strategy, it must first be noted: trade wars have become a "cyclical headwind." Tariffs always return when the market least expects it, only to slowly dissipate. This is the product of President Trump's "tariff strategy," which is meticulously designed.

A recent case occurred on October 10th, when President Trump threatened to impose 100% tariffs on China starting November 1st (just 21 days after the announcement). This timing might sound familiar because it is an integral part of the strategy playbook. After the news broke, S&P 500 futures extended their intraday decline to -3.5% before the weekend.

October 10th - Trump threatens 100% tariffs on China

President Trump always begins with punitive and threatening messages, which is part of his negotiation tactics. And, this move works for him. In the October confrontation with China, it ultimately ended with the signing of a new trade agreement and China canceling its rare earth export restrictions, which Trump had said were harming the U.S.

This time, the announcement was made on a Saturday, and market futures won't open until Monday evening (because Monday is a federal holiday). The market reaction might be accompanied by similar "emotional selling," but considering there is time to digest the news, the impact might be less severe.

This is all part of President Trump's "tariff strategy," which we will detail below:

The Tariff Strategy Playbook

In 2025, our investment strategy's returns were almost double that of the S&P 500, largely because we capitalized early on asset price volatility during trade wars. Below is the specific coping strategy we have consistently applied:

A comprehensive step-by-step guide to navigating Trump's trade wars:

  • Friday: President Trump posts an obscure message hinting at tariffs on a specific country or industry. Markets decline as uncertainty increases. This event started Friday with Trump threatening tariffs on Denmark.

  • Later that day or shortly after (Saturday in this case): President Trump announces a massive new tariff, usually 25% or higher.

  • Saturday and Sunday: President Trump repeatedly escalates tariff threats while markets are closed to maximize psychological impact.

  • Over the weekend: The targeted country(ies) typically respond publicly or signal willingness to negotiate.

  • Sunday 6 PM ET (Monday evening in this instance): Futures open, and the market reacts initially with an emotional sell-off to the tariff headlines; futures prices drop.

  • Monday and Tuesday: President Trump continues public pressure, but investors start realizing tariffs are not yet in effect and are weeks away from implementation (e.g., Feb 1st).

  • Wednesday of the same week: Dip buyers step in and trigger a relief rally, but this move often fades and leads to another decline. This is usually when the "smart money" starts buying.

  • The following weekend (about a week later): President Trump posts that negotiations are underway and he is working with the target country's leader(s) towards a solution.

  • Sunday 6 PM ET that weekend: Futures open sharply on optimism, but gains pare back after the Monday cash market open.

  • After Monday open: Senior administration officials like Treasury Secretary Bessent appear on live TV, reassuring investors and highlighting progress towards a deal.

  • The next 2-4 weeks: Officials across the Trump administration continuously leak progress on the trade deal.

  • Eventually: The trade deal is officially announced, and markets hit new all-time highs.

  • Cycle: Repeat from Step 1.

Of course, this is not a 100% guaranteed roadmap, but based on our experience, almost every trade war flare-up since January 2025 has followed roughly this same path.

Note: This time, President Trump's plan to acquire Greenland is undoubtedly a higher demand than getting China to cut export controls. Therefore, the execution of this strategy might be more prolonged, but it will follow a similar sequence of events.

Timing is Key

President Trump's entire negotiation strategy revolves around timing and pressure. He provides a 2-3 week buffer before tariffs take effect to allow for a deal. Trump's goal is for these tariffs never to actually take effect; he wants the deal. This also explains why these announcements increasingly occur on weekends when markets are closed. He pushes the threat to the brink. This is why they work: if they were actually implemented and sustained, they would have the power to shake markets and change the world.

In the last round of the trade war with China, President Trump announced a new trade deal with China on November 1st—the very day the 100% tariffs were scheduled to take effect.

Ultimately, those who can remain objective and follow the process during trade war volatility are accessing one of the best trading environments ever.

As mentioned, this objective, systematic approach has led to our performance outperforming the market benchmark. As shown in the chart below, our investment strategy's returns have been nearly five times that of the S&P 500 since 2020.

Conclusion

This time, President Trump's plan to acquire Greenland is indeed a higher demand than previous ones. Market turbulence might last longer, but we reiterate the original point: the best traders are profiting from the asset price volatility caused by trade war headlines.

Volatility equals opportunity.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main strategic goal behind Trump's recent announcement of new tariffs on EU countries?

ATrump's primary strategic goal is the acquisition of Greenland, with the tariffs serving as leverage tool to force a deal for a 'complete and comprehensive purchase' of the island.

QAccording to the article, what is the typical initial market response to a Trump tariff announcement, and why?

AThe typical initial market response is an 'emotional sell-off' or a drop in futures, as seen with the S&P 500 futures falling -3.5% after the October 10th China tariff threat, due to the sudden increase in uncertainty and psychological pressure.

QDescribe the key pattern or 'playbook' of Trump's negotiation strategy as outlined in the article.

AThe playbook involves announcing tariffs on a Friday or weekend to maximize psychological impact, escalating threats while markets are closed, allowing a 2-3 week buffer before implementation for negotiations, and ultimately announcing a trade deal just before tariffs are set to take effect, leading to a market rally.

QHow does the article suggest savvy traders should approach the volatility caused by these tariff threats?

ASavvy traders should remain objective, follow the established pattern of the 'tariff playbook,' and use the price volatility and emotional sell-offs as opportunities to buy assets at lower prices, ultimately profiting from the subsequent market recovery and new highs after a deal is announced.

QWhy might the current situation regarding Greenland be different from previous tariff negotiations, according to the analysis?

AThe acquisition of Greenland is a much larger demand than previous requests, such as getting China to cut export controls, which suggests the negotiation process could be longer and more protracted, though it will likely follow a similar event sequence.

Похожее

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit7 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit11 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit11 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报16 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报16 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit21 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit21 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit22 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit22 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить S

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Sonic (S) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Sonic (S).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Sonic (S)После приобретения вами Sonic (S) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Sonic (S)С легкостью торгуйте Sonic (S) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.4k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.15Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить S

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

Он решает проблемы масштабируемости, совместимости между блокчейнами и стимулов для разработчиков с помощью технологических инноваций.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.09Обновлено 2025.04.09

Sonic: Обновления под руководством Андре Кронье – новая звезда Layer-1 на фоне спада рынка

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

HTX Learn — ваш проводник в мир перспективных проектов, и мы запускаем специальное мероприятие "Учитесь и Зарабатывайте", посвящённое этим проектам. Наше новое направление .

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.04.10Обновлено 2025.04.10

HTX Learn: Пройдите обучение по "Sonic" и разделите 1000 USDT

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на S (S) представлены ниже.

活动图片