# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Strategy

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Strategy", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

94,500 May Become the Bull-Bear Battle Line for Bitcoin, Daily Chart Structure Enters Key Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

Bitcoin Price Analysis: $94,500 as Key Pivot Level, Weekly Outlook and Trading Strategies In this weekly analysis, crypto market analyst Cody Feng reviews Bitcoin's performance and outlines key levels and strategies for the coming week. Last week, BTC traded within the predicted range of $84,000–$94,500, hitting a high of $94,789 and a low of $89,311. A short trade executed at the $94,500 resistance level yielded a 3.4% gain using a 1x leverage. The trade was based on a "short at resistance" strategy, supported by proprietary quantitative models for momentum and spread trading. Current model readings suggest mixed signals: - Weekly charts indicate a bearish trend with momentum below zero, though selling pressure is slowing. - Daily charts show consolidation near the zero line, indicating a battle between bulls and bears. This week (Jan 12–18), BTC is expected to continue trading between $84,000–$94,500. A break below $84,000 could lead to a test of $80,000, while a sustained move above $94,500 may signal a stronger rebound. Key resistance levels are $92k–$93k, $94.5k–$95k, and $97.5k–$99.5k. Support levels are $89.5k–$91k, $86k–$86.5k, $83.5k–$84.5k, and $80k. Trading strategies include: - Maintaining a 65% mid-term short position unless $94,500 is broken. - Using 30% capital for short-term trades based on range-bound (A), breakdown (B), or breakout (C) scenarios. Macro focus this week features multiple Fed speakers whose comments may influence liquidity expectations and medium-term market sentiment. Risk management is emphasized: set stop-losses at entry, move to breakeven at +1% profit, and trail stops thereafter. Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Trade with caution.

Odaily星球日报01/12 07:01

94,500 May Become the Bull-Bear Battle Line for Bitcoin, Daily Chart Structure Enters Key Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

Odaily星球日报01/12 07:01

Has the Era of Project Buyback Bonuses Really Come to an End?

"Project Buybacks: The End of an Era?" In traditional finance, stock buybacks are often seen as a confidence booster. However, this strategy has largely failed to produce positive results in the Web3 space. Recently, Jupiter co-founder SIONG proposed halting $JUP's buyback program after the project spent over $70 million on repurchases with little positive impact on the token price. Similarly, Helium's founder Amir Haleem announced an end to their buyback, calling it "throwing money into a black hole." Data from 2025 shows a collective downturn for major projects that executed buybacks. Despite Hyperliquid spending $716 million and others like Pump.fun, LayerZero, Raydium, and Sky also making significant investments, most tokens continued to decline in value, raising questions about the efficacy of buybacks. The debate highlights a split in perspectives: some founders advocate reallocating funds towards user acquisition and product development to strengthen fundamentals. Others, like DeFi OG CM, argue that buybacks are inherently beneficial by reducing circulating supply, though they don't guarantee short-term price increases. Critics, including Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz, view buybacks as a pessimistic mechanism, signaling a lack of better growth opportunities. Former Aave executive Ajit Tripathi called the buyback narrative "the most value-destructive play after memecoins." Alternative strategies are emerging. Selini Capital's Jordi Alexander emphasizes the importance of execution timing, suggesting dynamic buybacks based on price-to-earnings ratios rather than repurchasing at inflated valuations. Solana's Anatoly favors long-term capital accumulation through staking mechanisms to reward long-term holders and dilute short-term speculators. The consensus is evolving: buybacks alone are not a solution. Effective token value management requires strategic financial planning—buying low, reserving capital during high valuations—and, crucially, building fundamental product value and user demand to sustain long-term growth. Without solid fundamentals, buybacks merely become an exit liquidity for short-term traders.

marsbit01/09 12:07

Has the Era of Project Buyback Bonuses Really Come to an End?

marsbit01/09 12:07

The Biggest Trap of Stablecoins: 99% of Companies Issuing Tokens Are Just 'Self-Indulgent'

Stablecoins are increasingly being adopted by traditional finance companies like Klarna, PayPal, Stripe, and Cash App due to their ability to reduce settlement costs, enable global reach, and provide instant settlements. However, the article argues that most companies issuing their own branded stablecoins are engaging in futile "self-aggrandizement," as the market cannot sustainably support thousands of different tokens. Key benefits of stablecoins include significantly lower transaction fees compared to credit cards, borderless transactions without FX fees, and 24/7 near-instant settlement. While these advantages are clear, the article emphasizes that success depends not on issuing a token, but on integrating stablecoins as a payment rail into existing products and workflows. Case studies highlight different approaches: PayPal’s PYUSD serves as a defensive move to retain users within its ecosystem; Klarna uses stablecoins to reduce internal payment friction; and Stripe strategically avoids issuing its own token, instead facilitating transactions using established stablecoins like USDC. The piece concludes that liquidity, acceptance, and integration matter far more than branding. Merchants and users will gravitate toward simplicity and reliability, leading to natural consolidation around a few dominant stablecoins. The real value lies in leveraging stablecoins to improve payment infrastructure—not in creating yet another branded digital dollar.

比推01/07 18:19

The Biggest Trap of Stablecoins: 99% of Companies Issuing Tokens Are Just 'Self-Indulgent'

比推01/07 18:19

活动图片