# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Risk

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Risk", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Matrixport Research: After Months of Caution, Bitcoin Enters a Phase of Structural Gameplay

Since mid-October, Bitcoin has been in a corrective phase with subdued market sentiment, though recent structural shifts suggest a transition from a one-sided downtrend to a more complex, range-bound consolidation. Key indicators from derivatives positioning, ETF flows, and technical analysis point to a market entering a new phase of structural博弈. Bitcoin has been trading within a $70,000–$100,000 range amid low implied volatility and reduced risk appetite. Factors such as tax-loss selling and cautious institutional behavior have contributed to the sideways movement, with limited upward catalysts and restrained risk asset momentum. A significant structural inflection point is approaching with the expiration of a record $17.2 billion in Bitcoin options on December 26, 2025. The concentration of put options near $85,000 may make that level a focal point for price action. Post-expiration, market dynamics may shift as risk budgets reset and potential ETF inflows return in January, offering room for sentiment improvement. While 2026 may remain challenging for long-only strategies, tactical opportunities are emerging as Bitcoin’s a period of underperformance relative to other assets. The options expiration event may serve as a catalyst for renewed positioning ahead of expected January inflows, marking a critical window for observing structural change and potential sentiment reversal.

marsbit12/26 09:37

Matrixport Research: After Months of Caution, Bitcoin Enters a Phase of Structural Gameplay

marsbit12/26 09:37

Web3 Entrepreneurship in Mainland China: What Can and Cannot Be Done?

Summary: Under China's current legal and regulatory framework, Web3 entrepreneurship is possible but must avoid activities related to issuing tokens, speculative trading, fundraising, or operating exchanges. The article outlines four viable paths: 1. **Pure Technology & Infrastructure**: Developing blockchain as a distributed database or collaborative tool for enterprises and governments, focusing on data verification, supply chain coordination, and judicial record-keeping without financial incentives. 2. **De-Financialized Digital Assets**: Creating non-fungible tokens (NFTs) as digital collectibles, membership passes, or copyright certificates—emphasizing utility over investment value and avoiding secondary market trading. 3. **Compliance & Risk Management Services**: Providing legal, regulatory, and analytical support for Web3 projects, including anti-money laundering measures and chain monitoring, which are increasingly essential as regulations evolve. 4. **Overseas-Centric Operations with Domestic Support**: Structuring projects so that technical development, research, and backend services are handled in mainland China, while financial aspects (e.g., token issuance, trading) are managed by compliant entities abroad. The author stresses that success depends on treating Web3 as a tool rather than a financial instrument, avoiding public promotions of crypto investments, and ensuring clear legal boundaries to sustain long-term operations.

marsbit12/26 07:15

Web3 Entrepreneurship in Mainland China: What Can and Cannot Be Done?

marsbit12/26 07:15

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

In 2025, precious metals surged dramatically, with silver breaking above $50 and reaching a record high of $72/oz, gaining 143% annually, while gold hit $4,524.30/oz with a 70% yearly increase. In contrast, Bitcoin fell 8% year-to-date to $87,498, down 30% from its October peak of $126,000. This divergence challenges the "digital gold" narrative, as macro tailwinds driving metals—such as a weaker USD, Fed rate cut expectations, and geopolitical risks—did not extend to cryptocurrencies. Investors preferred established safe havens like gold and silver, with central banks and retail buyers increasing physical holdings. Studies confirmed gold's stability during macro shocks, while Bitcoin behaved more as a high-beta risk asset, correlating with equities. Structural demand differences widened the gap: silver benefited from both safe-haven and industrial demand (e.g., solar panels, electronics), whereas Bitcoin lacks real-world utility and relies solely on financial speculation and on-chain settlements. Without industrial demand, Bitcoin depends on ETF inflows, which have recently turned negative. Silver's rally reflects macro pricing of low real rates and a weak dollar, underscoring Bitcoin's exclusion from the hard asset system. For Bitcoin to recover, clearer regulation, renewed institutional interest, or heightened appreciation of its censorship-resistant features may be needed. However, silver's crowded positioning poses indirect risks to Bitcoin if volatility spikes. The 2025 divergence shows Bitcoin has not yet achieved "hard asset" status. While it may outperform under specific conditions, it currently lacks the institutional trust and industrial utility that support precious metals.

marsbit12/26 05:57

Gold and Silver Repeatedly Hit New Highs, Why Has Bitcoin Fallen Instead of Rising?

marsbit12/26 05:57

活动图片