# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Risk

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Risk", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Programmers Must Read: Job Hunting in Web3, Avoid These Four Types of High-Risk Gambling-Related Platforms

Chinese programmer "Xiao Wang" considers a Web3 career transition but faces job offers involving "perpetual contracts, on-chain gambling, and prediction markets," raising legal concerns. A legal team advises caution, identifying four high-risk platform types that may constitute illegal operations under Chinese law, despite attractive salaries and remote work: 1. **Web3 Gaming Platforms**: Often disguised as decentralized games (GameFi) but operate as on-chain casinos using USDT/ETH as chips, with smart contracts handling bets and payouts. Developers building betting logic, random number generators, or fund pools are considered key technical support in gambling operations. 2. **Perpetual Contract Development**: High-leverage crypto trading platforms (e.g., 150x) where users bet on price directions. Courts increasingly view these as gambling, and developers working on matching engines, liquidation systems, or referral programs face liability. 3. **Prediction Markets**: Framed as financial innovation for event forecasting, they essentially function as binary betting on outcomes (e.g., price movements or macro events). Technologists designing prediction contracts or oracle integrations are seen as enabling gambling mechanisms. 4. **Gambling Payment Platforms**: High-risk payment/clearing services for gambling sites, often masked as "payment solutions" or "USDT gateways." Developers building fiat/crypto deposit/withdrawal systems or currency exchange logic may be implicated in providing gambling-related financial services. Key advice: Reject any role where the core business involves "betting on outcomes with platform profit from odds/leverage." Conduct a two-step self-check: 1) Analyze the project’s overall model (white paper/website) for gambling patterns; 2) Scrutinize if your role involves critical components like betting logic, payout rules, or fund settlement. Prioritizing risk avoidance is crucial to prevent potential criminal liability and career disruption.

marsbit02/25 00:08

Programmers Must Read: Job Hunting in Web3, Avoid These Four Types of High-Risk Gambling-Related Platforms

marsbit02/25 00:08

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

The Federal Reserve is exploring the use of prediction markets, particularly Kalshi, as a real-time tool for policy insights. A Fed-affiliated working paper found that Kalshi’s predictions for core CPI and unemployment are statistically comparable to—and sometimes more accurate than—Bloomberg consensus estimates. Prediction markets aggregate real-money, belief-backed trading, offering frequent updates and capturing nuanced shifts that traditional surveys miss. For instance, Kalshi priced inflation uncertainty in real time during a trade policy scare—a dynamic monthly surveys couldn’t reflect. While these markets provide valuable signals, they also carry risks. Prices reflect both expectations and risk preferences, and heavy reliance on sports betting for liquidity makes macroeconomic markets vulnerable to regulatory changes. If sports betting is restricted, liquidity could dry up, increasing manipulation risks. Moreover, if the Fed openly uses prediction markets, it could create a feedback loop where traders manipulate smaller markets like Kalshi to influence broader policy communication and traditional financial instruments. Despite these concerns, prediction markets offer a uniquely timely and distributed form of expectation aggregation—especially for events like FOMC meetings, where informed participants trade with real stakes. The Fed should require open data transparency to mitigate manipulation and carefully weigh the signal against the noise.

比推02/24 18:33

More Accurate Than Polls, More Dangerous Than Imagined: Prediction Markets in the Eyes of the Fed

比推02/24 18:33

Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

The Bank of Korea (BOK) has urged that the issuance of Korean won-pegged stablecoins should be led by commercial banks, warning that private issuance could undermine monetary policy and create foreign exchange and financial stability risks. In a report submitted to the National Assembly, the central bank described stablecoins as "currency-like substitutes" and emphasized that their rollout must consider broader economic impacts, not just industrial profits. The BOK expressed concerns that stablecoins could be used to circumvent foreign exchange regulations and stressed that non-bank issuers might conflict with Korea’s separation of banking and commerce principles. It recommended that banks, which are subject to strict regulatory standards, should be the primary issuers, with any expansion beyond banks proceeding cautiously after risk assessments. The report reflects ongoing debates among policymakers about who should be allowed to issue won stablecoins and echoes the BOK’s previous warnings on the matter. While acknowledging stablecoins' potential role in the digital asset revolution, the bank proposed structural safeguards, including a bank-focused consortium model and a statutory interagency policy body for oversight. The BOK cited the U.S. GENIUS Act as an example of cross-agency supervision. However, this bank-led approach has faced opposition from industry members, including some policymakers, who argue that clearer rules for issuers could sufficiently mitigate risks.

TheNewsCrypto02/23 12:52

Bank of Korea Urges Bank-Led Won Stablecoin Issuance

TheNewsCrypto02/23 12:52

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

Several major ETF issuers, including Bitwise Asset Management, GraniteShares, and Roundhill Investments, have recently filed applications with the U.S. SEC to launch prediction market ETFs. These ETFs are designed to track the outcomes of U.S. political events, such as the 2028 presidential election and the 2026 midterms, allowing investors to trade election probabilities through traditional brokerage accounts like Robinhood or Fidelity. Prediction markets aggregate crowd-sourced forecasts using real-money contracts, where prices reflect the market’s consensus probability of an event occurring. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have demonstrated strong predictive accuracy in events like the 2024 U.S. election, often outperforming traditional polls due to their incentive-based structure. The proposed ETFs would track the price movements of these prediction market contracts, with share values fluctuating between $0 and $1. If the predicted event occurs, the corresponding “Yes” ETF would settle near $1; otherwise, it would approach $0. Unlike Bitcoin ETFs, which track asset prices, these are binary outcome products, more akin to options or insurance. If approved, these ETFs could bring prediction markets into mainstream finance, offering new tools for hedging and macro risk management. However, concerns remain about potential market manipulation, public perception influence, and regulatory approval, as the SEC may view them as gambling-like instruments. The move represents a significant test of how “probability as an asset” is accepted in traditional markets.

marsbit02/22 12:46

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

marsbit02/22 12:46

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

A new wave of ETF applications has been submitted to the SEC by asset managers including Bitwise, GraniteShares, and Roundhill Investments. These ETFs aim to track the outcomes of U.S. political elections—such as the 2028 presidential race and 2026 midterm control of Congress—by packaging prediction market contracts into tradable securities. This would allow mainstream investors to use traditional brokerage accounts to bet on electoral results, similar to platforms like Polymarket or Kalshi, but within the regulated financial system. Prediction markets aggregate crowd-sourced probabilities through financial incentives, often demonstrating stronger predictive accuracy than traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. The proposed ETFs would reflect binary event probabilities, with share prices fluctuating between $0 and $1. If the predicted outcome occurs, the ETF value approaches $1; otherwise, it nears zero. Most funds would liquidate after the event settles. This move could significantly broaden participation and liquidity, potentially making prediction markets a tool for hedging policy risks or macro strategies. However, it also raises regulatory and ethical concerns, including potential market influence on public perception and the risk of manipulation. The SEC’s approval remains uncertain, as it may view these products as blurring the line between investing and gambling. The outcome of these applications could signal a major shift in how probabilistic events are traded and perceived in mainstream finance.

Odaily星球日报02/22 12:43

Prediction Market ETFs: A Foray into the Mainstream or Playing with Fire?

Odaily星球日报02/22 12:43

活动图片