# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Regulation

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Regulation", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Tether Hires Big Four Auditor, USDT Enters Verifiable Stage for the First Time

Tether, the issuer of USDT, has hired Big Four firm KPMG to conduct a full financial audit of its $127 billion reserves. This marks a significant shift for the controversial stablecoin, moving it into a verifiable financial framework for the first time. Unlike previous attestations, which only confirmed reserves at a point in time, a GAAP-based audit will examine asset origins, internal controls, and financial reliability over time. This development is seen as more impactful than pending legislation, as institutional adoption relies on audited financials rather than regulatory promises. If KPMG issues an unqualified opinion, Tether’s credibility could be fundamentally upgraded, pressuring other stablecoin issuers without Big Four audits to follow suit. The move may accelerate institutional adoption by pensions, corporates, and payment firms, while reshaping the stablecoin landscape. Despite years of regulatory scrutiny and skepticism, Tether has maintained dominance due to its global liquidity and accessibility. An audit could reposition USDT from a contested asset to a verifiable financial instrument, reducing counterparty risk and encouraging broader use in digital infrastructure. The outcome of the audit will be critical: a clean opinion may validate the entire asset class, while a qualified one could introduce new challenges. The industry is watching closely, as this audit could signal a new phase of institutional acceptance for stablecoins.

marsbit03/30 08:10

Tether Hires Big Four Auditor, USDT Enters Verifiable Stage for the First Time

marsbit03/30 08:10

New U.S. AI Policy: Ending the Era of '50 Laboratories,' Washington Opens a New Wide Door

The U.S. is shifting from a fragmented, state-by-state regulatory approach for AI to a unified federal framework, echoing the historical centralization seen with the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. While this move promises to reduce compliance burdens and enhance competitiveness against global rivals like China, it fundamentally represents a consolidation of regulatory power in Washington. The new policy aims to establish federal preemption over state laws, creating a single set of rules to streamline innovation and maintain U.S. leadership in AI’s scale-driven economy. However, this centralization also risks increased federal control over time, potentially limiting flexibility and introducing future regulatory uncertainties. The framework addresses key areas like child protection, energy costs, intellectual property, and free speech but relies on existing laws and courts rather than a new dedicated agency. Compared to the EU’s safety-first and China’s state-led models, the U.S. prioritizes market scale and innovation speed. For startups, compliance may simplify in the short term, but long-term risks include political volatility and unresolved legal gray areas, particularly around data usage and intellectual property. Ultimately, the era of state-level "laboratories" is ending, replaced by a more efficient but centrally controlled federal "factory."

marsbit03/30 05:55

New U.S. AI Policy: Ending the Era of '50 Laboratories,' Washington Opens a New Wide Door

marsbit03/30 05:55

Cyber Chumaxian: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Forgotten Mysticism of Northeast China

"Cyber Shamans: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Untold Story of Northeast China’s Occultism" For millennia, the Chinese have developed complex metaphysical systems—from oracle bone divination to the I Ching and Four Pillars of Destiny—to seek security in an uncertain world. Despite modern technology’s attempt to replace superstition with rationality, AI has ironically become occultism’s latest tool. Recent crackdowns exposed fake Taoists using AI to answer existential queries, while apps like CeCe attract millions with free AI fortune-telling, later charging for live “spiritual” consultations. At the heart of this fusion is Northeast China, where Shamanic and “Chumaxian” traditions (based on animal spirits possessing humans) have evolved into a robust industry. Historically rooted in hardship—from the migration waves of “Chuang Guandong” to post-industrial unemployment—Northeastern metaphysics thrives on uncertainty. Today, it offers what many call “therapy tailored for the Chinese soul”: externalizing blame through cosmic narratives (e.g., bad luck years or evil spirits), unlike Western psychology’s inward focus. AI accelerates this shift. With algorithms now matching expert diviners in accuracy, low-end fortune tellers are being replaced. Meanwhile, prompt-savvy “metaphysical engineers” use AI to generate readings, focusing only on emotional delivery. Live-streamed “cyber shamans” combine folksy warmth with AI-generated scripts, offering cheap comfort in anxious times. This trend has even gone global. Startups like FateTell sell AI-translated Chinese astrology reports to overseas users, repackaging “feudal superstition” as Eastern philosophy for Silicon Valley elites. Yet behind the rise of AI mysticism lies a deeper human yearning—for certainty in an unstable world. As regulations tighten on AI divination, the core demand remains: whether through shamans or algorithms, people still seek comfort when facing the unknown.

marsbit03/30 02:08

Cyber Chumaxian: Fake Taoists, AI Fortune-Telling, and the Forgotten Mysticism of Northeast China

marsbit03/30 02:08

活动图片