# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Gambling

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Gambling", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Prediction Markets: An Extended Form of Binary Options?

After observing prediction markets, it is increasingly evident that they share significant similarities with binary options. In many respects, prediction markets can be viewed as an extended form of binary options. Both utilize binary (yes/no) contracts where the price fluctuates between 0 and 1, reflecting the market's consensus probability of an event occurring. For instance, a price of 0.7 indicates a perceived 70% likelihood. At expiration, the contract settles at 1 if the event occurs and 0 otherwise—mirroring the payoff structure of binary options. The core of both systems lies in forecasting binary outcomes and using market prices to estimate event probabilities. They aggregate collective intelligence, allow speculation, and enable risk management. However, differences exist: prediction markets cover a broader range of verifiable events (e.g., weather, elections, or box office results) with flexible timeframes, while binary options are primarily focused on short-term financial asset movements (e.g., stocks or currencies). Additionally, binary options are often more speculative and face stricter financial regulations in regions like the EU and the US. Prediction markets, though currently less regulated (especially in crypto), emphasize accuracy and may eventually come under regulatory scrutiny due to concerns like market manipulation. These distinctions could lead to divergent regulatory and developmental paths in the future.

marsbit12/22 12:05

Prediction Markets: An Extended Form of Binary Options?

marsbit12/22 12:05

Machi Big Brother's Leverage Game: Where Does the 'Never-Ending' Money Come From?

Machi Big Brother (Jeffrey Huang), a well-known crypto investor, suffered a series of 10 liquidations on Hyperliquid, causing his account balance to plummet from $1.3 million to just over $53,000. This is part of a pattern of extreme leveraged trading—using 15x to 25x leverage—that has previously led to a $54.5 million swing from profit to loss. Despite these massive losses, he repeatedly replenishes his margin, raising the question: where does the money come from? His capital structure has three main sources: 1. **Traditional tech exit**: He co-founded 17LIVE (formerly 17 Media), and a 2020 share buyback provided substantial liquid fiat capital. 2. **Early crypto projects**: Though controversial and often unsuccessful (e.g., Mithril and Cream Finance), these ventures generated significant early crypto-native capital. 3. **NFT liquidity mining**: He strategically monetized high-value NFTs (like Bored Apes) through large-scale sales, airdrop farming (e.g., Blur rewards), and NFT-backed lending, continuously converting illiquid assets into ETH or stablecoins. His ability to absorb millions in losses suggests a deep, diversified reserve, estimated at over $100 million in unallocated liquid capital. He further refreshes this reserve by launching new token projects, like MACHI on Blast. For ordinary investors, this case is a stark warning: extreme leverage is highly risky, and surviving such volatility requires immense capital depth most do not have. Transparency on-chain exposes these risks, but the mechanical efficiency of platforms like Hyperliquid can amplify losses. The key lesson: survival outweighs the pursuit of rapid riches.

深潮12/16 14:53

Machi Big Brother's Leverage Game: Where Does the 'Never-Ending' Money Come From?

深潮12/16 14:53

Crypto Prediction in the Gray Zone: Alliance Formation, Regulatory Pressure, and the Battle for the Future

The article "Encrypted Predictions in the Gray Area: Alliances, Regulatory Pressure, and Future Debates" discusses the recent formation of the "Prediction Market Alliance" by Kalshi and Crypto.com, joined by Coinbase, Robinhood, and Underdog. This alliance aims to unify the industry's voice and promote a balance between regulation, liquidity, and trust in the rapidly growing but legally ambiguous encrypted prediction market sector. Unlike traditional gambling, encrypted prediction markets operate on blockchain or crypto-based event-trading mechanisms. Users trade contracts on uncertain outcomes like elections or sports events, with prices reflecting collective market probability assessments. Key differences from traditional betting include market-driven pricing (rather than house-set odds), continuous trading opportunities, and a focus on information discovery rather than entertainment. The market is bifurcated into crypto-native platforms like Polymarket (global, blockchain-based) and regulated entities like Kalshi (U.S.-approved). While these markets are expanding quickly—evidenced by surging trading volumes around events like U.S. elections—they face significant challenges: regulatory uncertainty, liquidity instability (high activity around events but drops afterward), and disputes over outcome resolution standards. The alliance seeks to advocate for responsible and transparent development amid growing consumer interest and evolving regulations. However, major players like Polymarket, DraftKings, and FanDuel have not joined, indicating divergent strategies within the industry. The future of encrypted prediction markets hinges on achieving scalable liquidity and long-term trust within a regulatory-acceptable framework.

cointelegraph_中文12/15 09:34

Crypto Prediction in the Gray Zone: Alliance Formation, Regulatory Pressure, and the Battle for the Future

cointelegraph_中文12/15 09:34

Kalshi Teams Up with Coinbase, Robinhood, and Others to Form Prediction Market Alliance, Aiming to End the 'Casino' Argument

Kalshi, a leading prediction market platform, has formed the Coalition for Prediction Markets (CPM) alongside major platforms including Coinbase, Robinhood, Crypto.com, and Underdog. This move is a strategic response to increasing regulatory pressure and opposition from traditional gambling lobbyists, particularly following legal challenges in states like Connecticut and Nevada. The coalition aims to advocate for the prediction market industry, counter misinformation, and push for federal-level regulation, arguing that prediction markets are distinct from gambling. They emphasize that prediction markets generate valuable public information, outperform traditional polls by approximately 30%, and are used by nearly half of Americans under 45. With the industry valued at $28 billion as of October and platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket each exceeding $10 billion in valuation, the sector is expanding rapidly. Kalshi’s CEO, Tarek Mansour, asserts that attacks from gambling interests are motivated by profit protection rather than consumer safety. The CPM will focus on promoting transparency, market integrity, and customer protection while leveraging federal jurisdiction to overcome state-level regulatory obstacles. This development signals the maturation of prediction markets as a significant new internet-driven sector, potentially surpassing traditional gambling in relevance and utility.

Odaily星球日报12/12 10:42

Kalshi Teams Up with Coinbase, Robinhood, and Others to Form Prediction Market Alliance, Aiming to End the 'Casino' Argument

Odaily星球日报12/12 10:42

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather than a form of gambling.

比推12/09 14:20

Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推12/09 14:20

活动图片