# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Decentralization

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Decentralization", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

What Are the Highlights of Ethereum's Most Important Glamsterdam Upgrade This Year?

Ethereum's upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade, a major mid-year update, focuses on execution-layer improvements, building upon the data-layer enhancements of the previous Fusaka upgrade. The core features include ePBS (enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation) and BAL (Block Access List). ePBS (EIP-7732) formally bakes the separation of block building and validation roles into the protocol, moving away from reliance on third-party relays. This aims to reduce trust assumptions, prevent centralization at the validator level, and improve network efficiency. BAL allows block builders to pre-declare which accounts and storage locations a block's transactions will access, enabling validators to prepare data and verify transactions in parallel, significantly boosting throughput. Additional changes include gas fee re-pricing and multi-dimensional gas, which are expected to lower costs for average users while increasing overall network capacity (though potentially raising costs for some developers). For stakers, the upgrade promises a clearer income model and greater block selection power, smoothing out MEV rewards. However, the full potential of ePBS is dependent on a future upgrade (Hegotá) to implement FOCIL (Fork Choice-Enforced Inclusion Lists), which would give validators a final tool to combat transaction censorship. Potential challenges include the upgrade's high complexity, the risk of new forms of validator centralization, and the fact that toxic MEV (e.g., front-running) may persist, merely shifting elsewhere. Ultimately, Glamsterdam represents a significant step in Ethereum's commitment to decentralization, potentially increasing its trust and adoption.

marsbit03/06 01:12

What Are the Highlights of Ethereum's Most Important Glamsterdam Upgrade This Year?

marsbit03/06 01:12

Same Case, Different Verdicts: Why Was Uniswap Acquitted While Tornado Cash Was Not?

In a landmark ruling, the New York Southern District Court dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Uniswap and its founder, Hayden Adams, holding them not liable for scam tokens traded on the platform. The court, presided over by Judge Katherine Polk Failla, compared the case to holding a self-driving car developer responsible for crimes committed using the vehicle, emphasizing that open-source developers should not bear responsibility for misuse by third parties. This decision contrasts sharply with the legal outcome for Tornado Cash developers. Despite the same judge being involved, Tornado Cash co-developer Roman Storm was convicted for operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, while another developer, Alexey Pertsev, received a prison sentence in the Netherlands for money laundering. The U.S. Treasury had previously sanctioned Tornado Cash for allegedly facilitating over $7 billion in money laundering, including for North Korean hackers. The divergent rulings highlight a key regulatory stance: decentralization is permissible, but privacy tools enabling illicit activities face strict scrutiny. The author suggests that while Uniswap’s legal victory aligns with principles of developer immunity for open-source code, Tornado Cash’s case underscores that protocols knowingly aiding crime, especially at a state level, won’t be tolerated. The piece concludes by questioning if Uniswap, despite its legal win, should take more proactive steps to screen for scams to protect users, reflecting a broader responsibility within the DeFi ecosystem.

marsbit03/03 11:10

Same Case, Different Verdicts: Why Was Uniswap Acquitted While Tornado Cash Was Not?

marsbit03/03 11:10

Who Controls Computing Power, Implicitly Controls the Future of AI: Anastasia, Co-founder of Gonka Protocol

Who Controls Compute, Controls AI's Future: Gonka Protocol Co-Founder Anastasia The centralization of compute power, not just AI models, is the critical power node in AI's future, argues Anastasia Matveeva, co-founder of Gonka Protocol. While public debate focuses on models, true power lies in the underlying infrastructure—access to GPUs, power, and data center capacity. This centralization creates structural barriers to innovation, enforces a rent-extraction model, and introduces systemic fragility. Gonka is a permissionless global network designed to decentralize AI compute. It enables anyone to contribute or access GPU resources via a programmatic, open API. Key to its efficiency is an architecture that minimizes overhead, ensuring most compute is used for actual AI workloads (primarily inference) rather than network maintenance. Rewards and governance are tied to verified compute contribution, not capital stake. The protocol addresses scalability and accessibility by allowing participants of all sizes to join without permission, with influence proportional to their compute power. It supports the emerging AI agent economy with transparent, dynamic pricing and reliable, verifiable computation. While currently not optimized for strict data sovereignty, its decentralized design avoids data accumulation, and its governance allows for future evolution to meet regulatory demands. The urgency for such decentralized solutions is high to prevent a calcified AI future dominated by a few infrastructure gatekeepers.

marsbit03/03 07:58

Who Controls Computing Power, Implicitly Controls the Future of AI: Anastasia, Co-founder of Gonka Protocol

marsbit03/03 07:58

活动图片