# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Decentralization

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Decentralization", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Setting a 'Suicidal' Rule for Themselves: What Is the Ethereum Foundation Aiming For?

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has released a new mission statement, "EF Mandate," outlining its core philosophy and operational principles. Its ultimate goal is to pass the "walkaway test"—ensuring the Ethereum network would continue to function perfectly even if the EF were to dissolve. The foundation defines its role as a guardian, not a ruler, and commits to a "subtraction philosophy," focusing only on essential tasks like core protocol development and long-term research that others in the ecosystem cannot or will not do. It explicitly states what it will not do: act as a kingmaker, rating agency, marketing firm, or encourage Ethereum's use as a "casino." A key framework is CROPS, an indivisible set of non-negotiable principles for all development: Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. The vision is to create a "digital sanctuary" for the next 1,000 years, protecting users from coercion by governments, corporations, or AI, and enabling self-sovereignty over data, identity, and assets. The document serves as a decision-making algorithm, prioritizing long-term, decentralized solutions over short-term convenience and user autonomy over paternalistic protection. However, it faces real-world challenges, including budget dependency on ETH's price and potential trade-offs between its idealistic CROPS principles and user demands for speed and low cost. Community reaction is mixed, with critics calling it ideologically rigid and out of touch with practical applications like stablecoins and RWA, while supporters see it as a necessary commitment to Ethereum's foundational values. Vitalik Buterin clarified that the mandate represents a direction the EF has been moving toward for months.

marsbit03/16 04:43

Setting a 'Suicidal' Rule for Themselves: What Is the Ethereum Foundation Aiming For?

marsbit03/16 04:43

Daniil and David Liberman: AI is Not Just a Battle of Models, But a Battle of Computing Infrastructure

In the article "Daniil and David Liberman: AI Is Not Just a Battle of Models, but a Battle of Compute Infrastructure," the authors argue that the core of AI development is not just about algorithmic advances but control over computational resources. They emphasize that AI is not a neutral technology—who owns and governs the compute infrastructure ultimately determines who benefits from AI. Currently, advanced AI compute is highly concentrated among a few cloud providers and specific nations, creating a growing "compute divide." This centralization leads to high costs, limited access, and geographic imbalance. Decentralized alternatives, meanwhile, often waste resources on consensus mechanisms rather than meaningful computation. The authors propose a practical alternative: an infrastructure where most compute is used for actual AI work, governance is based on verified computational effort (not capital), and global GPU access is permissionless. They stress that infrastructure choices made today will have long-term economic and geopolitical consequences. For businesses, early reliance on centralized AI infrastructure creates lock-in effects that reduce strategic flexibility over time. The authors warn that waiting too long to explore decentralized options may make transition prohibitively difficult. They conclude that future generations must recognize that AI architecture is a deliberate design choice—not an inevitability—and that open, decentralized infrastructure is essential to preserving fairness, innovation, and freedom in the AI era.

marsbit03/16 03:19

Daniil and David Liberman: AI is Not Just a Battle of Models, But a Battle of Computing Infrastructure

marsbit03/16 03:19

Actually, ETH Scaling is a Major Boon for L2s

Vitalik Buterin's recent comments on Ethereum scaling have been misinterpreted. He did not declare Layer 2s (L2s) a failure but rather signaled a strategic shift: Ethereum is moving from a "rollup-centric" scaling model, where L2s were seen as simple replicas of the base layer, to one where the L1 itself undergoes aggressive scaling. L2s remain crucial, but their primary value proposition has evolved to be customization, not just cheap transactions. Two key developments drove this change. First, Ethereum's base layer is scaling faster than anticipated. After years of cautious progress to preserve decentralization, an ambitious new roadmap aims to drastically increase L1 throughput through a series of upgrades, including a higher gas limit, faster block times, parallel transaction processing, and a fundamental transition to a native zero-knowledge (zkEVM) architecture. This allows Ethereum to scale while maintaining its superior decentralization. Second, L2s have found product-market fit with institutions. Companies like Robinhood, Coinbase, and Kraken are building their own L2s because they need Ethereum's security and access to its liquidity, but also require control for regulatory compliance, custom fee structures, and operational flexibility. This creates a spectrum of L2s, from highly decentralized ones to more controlled, institutionally-focused chains—a reality Vitalik acknowledges is valid as long as marketing is honest. Crucially, scaling the L1 does not compete with L2s; it makes them better. A more powerful L1 means cheaper data availability and settlement costs for L2s, faster withdrawals, and quicker finality. The main unresolved challenge is liquidity fragmentation between L2s, which the Ethereum Foundation is prioritizing with new interoperability solutions for 2026. The narrative that Ethereum is abandoning L2s is incorrect. The ecosystem is maturing into a system with a radically scaling L1 at its core, surrounded by a flourishing ecosystem of specialized L2s.

marsbit03/15 03:20

Actually, ETH Scaling is a Major Boon for L2s

marsbit03/15 03:20

The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

The decline of Crypto is not primarily due to "scamming retail investors," but stems from deeper structural issues, according to a seasoned Crypto OG. Key problems include: 1. **Misunderstanding of Bitcoin’s Whitepaper**: The core concept is not "decentralization" (a term absent in the whitepaper) but "distributed trust architecture" — eliminating the need for trusted third parties. Many projects fail to achieve even basic distributed systems while overusing decentralized rhetoric. 2. **Loss of Incremental Users**: Grand narratives (Web3, Metaverse, GameFi, etc.) have oversold the technology’s capabilities, leading to repeated user disappointment and eroded trust. The market now suffers from a lack of new participants. 3. **Erosion of Community Belief**: Many communities engage in "narrative engineering" — using complex jargon to attract new users while insiders anticipate selling at peaks. This creates a cycle of hype, pump, and dump, damaging overall market credibility. 4. **Premature Financialization**: Crypto prioritized token launches and financialization before establishing robust infrastructure or mature applications. This led to overvaluation and repeated failures when technology couldn’t support inflated prices. 5. **Shift in Attention**: Human attention is moving from social and community interactions (like Telegram and Discord) toward AI-driven engagement. As an attention-dependent market, Crypto is naturally declining as interest wanes. The OG concludes that while Crypto isn’t dead, its current narrative has ended. The real tragedy is exhausting two decades of storytelling in just three years, before the underlying technology was ready. Scams are inevitable in markets, but the absence of new believers is fatal.

比推03/12 18:31

The Fall of Crypto Actually Has Little to Do with Scamming Retail Investors

比推03/12 18:31

Ethereum's Narrative Is Being Rewritten: When L1 zkEVM Becomes the Endgame, When Will the Next Revolution Arrive?

Ethereum's narrative is undergoing a significant rewrite, shifting from a programmable ledger (2015-2020) to an L2-centric settlement layer (2021-2023), and now toward becoming a verifiable computer with L1 zkEVM as its endgame (2024 onward). The newly proposed Strawmap roadmap outlines an ambitious technical direction, targeting faster L1 confirmation, "Gigagas"-level throughput (10,000 TPS), quantum resistance, and native privacy. This transformation is driven by eight core technical workstreams: formalizing EVM specifications, replacing Keccak with ZK-friendly hashes, transitioning to Verkle Trees, enabling stateless clients, standardizing ZK proof systems, decoupling execution and consensus layers, implementing recursive proof aggregation, and ensuring developer toolchain compatibility. L1 zkEVM aims to integrate zero-knowledge proofs directly into Ethereum’s consensus layer, fundamentally upgrading its trust model. While full implementation may take until 2028-2029, this shift repositions Ethereum as the verifiable trust root for the entire Web3 ecosystem—enhancing scalability without compromising decentralization. The move also redefines the role of L2s, evolving them from scaling solutions to specialized execution environments. Ethereum’s structured, multi-year effort reflects its unique capacity for coordinated innovation and may ultimately establish it as a global settlement layer—fast, secure, and private.

marsbit03/07 07:12

Ethereum's Narrative Is Being Rewritten: When L1 zkEVM Becomes the Endgame, When Will the Next Revolution Arrive?

marsbit03/07 07:12

Vitalik's Latest Reflection: Ethereum is Stuck in Path Dependency, It's Time to Start Anew from First Principles

Vitalik Buterin calls for the Ethereum community to break free from path dependency and rethink the ecosystem’s application layer from first principles. He emphasizes the importance of preserving core properties—censorship resistance, open source, privacy, and security (CROPS)—while encouraging more radical openness in how applications and external interfaces are designed. He suggests reevaluating technical assumptions, such as the future of browser plugins and mobile wallets in light of AI advancements, and proposes rebuilding the stack with privacy as a foundational priority. Examples include reimagining DeFi as generalized futures markets built on decentralized oracles, possibly verified via zk-SNARKs and LLMs, and reconsidering the role of L2s. Buterin also highlights cultural shifts, advocating for a break from conventional “professional” norms to unlock greater creativity. He urges developers to ignore existing ecosystem constraints, pretend current usage is zero, and imagine the most valuable applications as if starting from scratch today. In response to a comment, he clarifies that integration with traditional finance remains important for mainstream adoption, but the goal is to overcome internal path dependencies within Ethereum’s own application and wallet history—for instance, by exploring privacy-focused designs like Railgun or Aztec for payments without exposing addresses.

marsbit03/06 10:35

Vitalik's Latest Reflection: Ethereum is Stuck in Path Dependency, It's Time to Start Anew from First Principles

marsbit03/06 10:35

活动图片