Solana vs Ethereum – $4.4T traded, RWA holders flipped – But who wins?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-08Обновлено 2026-03-08

Введение

Solana's trading activity has surged over three years, accumulating $4.4 trillion in total volume. Weekly trading, once below $10 billion, grew significantly in 2024, often reaching $20–40 billion and briefly spiking to $120–130 billion during memecoin-driven speculation. It has since stabilized around $12–15 billion, reflecting sustained retail demand due to its low-fee structure. In Real World Assets (RWA), Solana surpassed Ethereum in holder count (154,942 vs. 153,592), indicating broader retail accessibility. However, Ethereum leads in RWA value ($15.45B vs. $1.79B), maintaining its role as the institutional hub. Despite high trading volume, Solana's liquidity is thinner (0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio vs. Ethereum’s 4.57), making it efficient for small trades but challenging for large orders. It benefits from $15.4B in stablecoin supply and high throughput with minimal fees. Ethereum retains a structural advantage with deeper liquidity and institutional settlement capabilities.

Solana’s trading activity has expanded sharply over the past three years, accumulating roughly $4.4 trillion in total token trading volume.

Early periods showed modest weekly activity, often remaining below $10 billion. This phase reflected the network’s early adoption stage.

However, momentum accelerated through 2024 as weekly turnover climbed steadily. Activity frequently moved into the $20–$40 billion range.

That shift signaled rising participation across decentralized trading venues and memecoin ecosystems built on Solana.

Later, volatility intensified as several weeks recorded dramatic surges. At the peak, trading volume briefly reached about $120–$130 billion.

These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

Yet the surge proved temporary, and activity cooled afterward. Weekly volumes gradually compressed, indicating that speculative enthusiasm faded while core usage persisted.

As of press time, the network generated roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than early-cycle activity.

Thus, the trajectory reveals a hybrid structure.

Speculative spikes amplify short-term volume, while stabilized baselines suggest that Solana’s low-fee architecture continues attracting persistent retail trading demand.

Solana overtakes Ethereum in RWA holders

As Solana’s [SOL] trading activity expands, tokenized RWAs provide another lens into how its ecosystem is evolving beyond speculative markets.

Participation data begins to reveal shifting adoption dynamics across major networks.

Ethereum [ETH] still leads in capital concentration, securing roughly $15.45 billion in RWAs across 675 assets. This scale reflects strong institutional issuance and established financial integrations.

However, wallet distribution presents a different perspective.

Solana recorded roughly 154,942 RWA holders, slightly exceeding Ethereum’s 153,592 holders. This crossover suggested broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure.

At the same time, Solana’s total RWA value remained lower at around $1.79 billion, indicating an earlier stage of capital deployment.

Elsewhere, participation declines sharply.

BNB Chain [BNB] hosts roughly 39,218 holders, while Polygon records about 15,482 users.

Taken together, the structure suggests Ethereum remains the institutional hub, while Solana increasingly functions as a retail gateway for tokenized financial assets.

Volume surge test Solana’s liquidity resilience

Solana’s trading surge signals strong activity, yet underlying liquidity reveals a more complex structure.

DeFiLlama data showed $6.53 billion in TVL supporting $14.96 billion in weekly DEX volume. This produces a 0.4 liquidity-to-volume ratio, far thinner than Ethereum’s 4.57 benchmark.

As a result, smaller trades execute with minimal slippage, reinforcing Solana’s appeal among retail traders.

However, larger orders still encounter shallow depth, where price impact rises quickly during demand spikes.

On top of that, roughly $15.4 billion in stablecoin supply supported more than 60% of trading pairs.

This stablecoin liquidity helped maintain continuous market activity across Solana-based exchanges.

Meanwhile, the network processed roughly 3.4K transactions per second while Average Transaction Fees stayed below $0.00025.

Yet Ethereum preserves a structural edge through $160 billion in stablecoins and expanding RWA liquidity, suggesting a layered market where Solana drives trading velocity while Ethereum anchors institutional settlement.


Final Summary

  • Solana continues attracting strong retail trading activity as weekly volumes stabilize near $15 billion, though liquidity depth remains thinner than Ethereum’s institutional capital base.
  • Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the peak weekly trading volume reached on Solana, and what was the primary driver behind such spikes?

AThe peak weekly trading volume on Solana briefly reached about $120–$130 billion. These spikes aligned with speculative bursts and memecoin-driven liquidity cycles across the Solana ecosystem.

QWhich blockchain currently has more holders of Real World Assets (RWA), and what does this suggest about its user base?

ASolana currently has more RWA holders with roughly 154,942, slightly exceeding Ethereum's 153,592. This suggests broader retail accessibility within Solana’s infrastructure, while Ethereum remains the institutional hub.

QHow does Solana's liquidity-to-volume ratio compare to Ethereum's, and what are the implications for traders?

ASolana has a liquidity-to-volume ratio of 0.4, which is far thinner than Ethereum’s benchmark of 4.57. This means smaller trades on Solana execute with minimal slippage, appealing to retail traders, but larger orders encounter shallow depth and greater price impact during demand spikes.

QWhat is the current approximate weekly trading volume on Solana, and how does it compare to its early activity?

AAs of press time, Solana generates roughly $12–$15 billion in weekly trading volume. This level remains significantly higher than its early-cycle activity, which often remained below $10 billion weekly.

QWhat key advantage does Ethereum maintain over Solana according to the final summary of the article?

AAccording to the final summary, Ethereum retains structural dominance through deeper stablecoin and RWA liquidity, anchoring institutional settlement.

Похожее

RWA First Stock's Major Acquisition: Why Buy a 'Traditional' Mortgage Company?

On June 10th, Figure Technology Solutions (Nasdaq: FIGR), a blockchain-native capital markets firm, announced a $717 million acquisition of Kiavi, a leading non-bank lender for residential real estate investors. The deal involves Figure acquiring Kiavi's technology and operations for approximately $538 million, while forming a joint venture with alternative asset manager Sixth Street to purchase Kiavi's existing loan portfolio. Sixth Street also provided a $3 billion forward purchase commitment. This acquisition marks a strategic shift for Figure, known as the "RWA (Real World Asset) first stock," allowing it to expand significantly into the larger market of first-lien mortgages. Kiavi specializes in non-qualified mortgage (Non-QM) loans, such as short-term fix-and-flip (RTL) and rental property (DSCR) loans—a segment traditionally underserved by major banks. The move is expected to increase Figure's first-lien loan origination to over $7 billion annually, aiming for these to constitute about 40% of its business by 2027. Both companies leverage AI for underwriting: Kiavi uses proprietary models to value renovated properties and automate document processing, dominating the fix-and-flip lending space. Figure plans to integrate these assets onto its blockchain platform, Provenance, using its new 'Adaptor' product to standardize and tokenize the loans for institutional investors on its Democratized Prime marketplace. While the integration poses challenges—including merging different asset types, interest rate sensitivity of Kiavi's loans, and post-IPO execution risks—Figure projects the deal to be accretive to earnings with a cash payback period under four years. The transaction is seen as a major step in scaling blockchain-based capital markets, moving RWA tokenization from concept validation toward large-scale operation.

Foresight News24 мин. назад

RWA First Stock's Major Acquisition: Why Buy a 'Traditional' Mortgage Company?

Foresight News24 мин. назад

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

On Thursday (June 11, U.S. Eastern Time), Wall Street staged a textbook V-shaped reversal. The Dow Jones surged 929.97 points (+1.86%) to close above 50,000, while the Nasdaq and S&P 500 rose 2.54% and 1.75%, respectively. The rally occurred despite the hottest PPI report in years, with May data showing a 6.5% year-on-year surge, the highest since 2022. The market ignored the inflation data, focusing instead on reports that former President Trump called off a planned strike on Iran, hinting at a potential multi-party peace agreement draft. This sparked a sharp drop in oil prices, fueling hopes that inflation may have peaked. Sector rotations were stark: previously battered AI hardware and cyclical stocks led the gains, while defensive sectors that hit record highs the prior day were sold off. Chip stocks like Micron and Intel saw sharp rebounds. In contrast, software giant Oracle plunged nearly 10% despite beating earnings, with concerns over cloud revenue and cash flow. Adobe also fell after hours despite raising guidance, as its CFO announced departure. The rally's sustainability is questioned, driven largely by social media posts about unconfirmed geopolitical developments. Inflation risks remain, with pipeline pressures still high. Meanwhile, the market's risk appetite faces a major test with SpaceX's historic IPO. Priced at $135 per share, it aims to raise ~$75 billion with a $1.75 trillion valuation, becoming the largest U.S. IPO ever. It will join the Nasdaq 100 in 15 days, triggering massive index fund buying. However, critics cite extreme valuation (88x sales) and market liquidity concerns.

marsbit47 мин. назад

Trend in US Stocks: A Post Triggers a 930-Point Rebound, Tonight Belongs to SpaceX

marsbit47 мин. назад

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Mega IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare? The capital market in 2026 is witnessing a highly anticipated wave of tech IPOs, centered on SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic. Collectively valued at over $3.5 trillion, their potential listing represents one of the largest such waves in recent years. This raises concerns about market liquidity, valuation bubbles, and potential capital outflows from other assets like crypto. SpaceX's valuation narrative has shifted from rocket launches to becoming a global infrastructure play via its Starlink satellite network, which now drives most revenue. Despite ongoing losses, investors focus on its long-term growth potential. OpenAI and Anthropic represent the core productivity engines of generative AI. Their public listings would offer the first direct investment opportunity in large foundation model companies, potentially triggering a repricing within the AI sector. Market fears of a massive "capital drain" from these IPOs are likely overstated. Historical precedents like Alibaba and Saudi Aramco show that mega-listings primarily cause capital reallocation, not destruction, within the vast equities market. Systemic risk is rarely triggered by IPOs alone. For stock markets, short-term volatility and sector repricing are expected, especially for AI concept stocks. Long-term, these listings could reinforce the tech sector's importance. For crypto, direct competition for speculative capital exists, particularly affecting AI-themed tokens. However, crypto's trajectory remains more tied to its own cycles, macro liquidity, and Bitcoin ETF flows rather than a single IPO event. The real risk lies not in the listings themselves but in the sky-high growth expectations embedded in these valuations. If future revenue, profitability, or commercialization progress disappoints, significant valuation resets could follow, impacting high-growth tech stocks. Ultimately, the market's direction hinges on macroeconomic conditions and whether these companies can deliver on their ambitious promises.

链捕手1 ч. назад

The Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

链捕手1 ч. назад

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

Title: Trillion-Dollar Valuations at Stake: Super IPOs of SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic – Tech Boom or Crypto Nightmare? TL;DR: A wave of mega-tech IPOs is approaching, featuring SpaceX (targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation), OpenAI (~$852B), and Anthropic (~$965B), with a combined potential valuation exceeding $3.5 trillion. This tests the market's pricing of innovation and sparks debate on liquidity impact. * **SpaceX**'s valuation is now driven more by its Starlink global communications infrastructure than its core rocket business. * **OpenAI & Anthropic** offer the first major public investment opportunities in foundational AI models, potentially repricing the entire AI sector. * Concerns about a market-wide "liquidity drain" are likely overblown; history shows large IPOs mainly cause fund reallocation, not disappearance, and rarely trigger systemic risk. * Crypto markets, especially some AI-themed tokens, may face short-term fund competition, but their long-term trajectory depends more on macro liquidity, regulation, and Bitcoin cycles. * The real risk lies not in the IPOs themselves, but in whether these companies can justify their sky-high valuations with future revenue growth and profitability. Unmet expectations could lead to significant repricing pressure. Ultimately, these IPOs represent a massive market pricing of next-gen tech infrastructure, not a prelude to a market crash. The broader market direction will be determined by macro conditions, corporate earnings, and risk appetite.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Trillion-Dollar Valuation Test: Are the Three Super IPOs a Tech Stock Frenzy or a Crypto Market Nightmare?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SOL (SOL) представлены ниже.

活动图片