Matrixport Research: After Months of Caution, Bitcoin Enters a Phase of Structural Gameplay

marsbitОпубликовано 2025-12-26Обновлено 2025-12-26

Введение

Since mid-October, Bitcoin has been in a corrective phase with subdued market sentiment, though recent structural shifts suggest a transition from a one-sided downtrend to a more complex, range-bound consolidation. Key indicators from derivatives positioning, ETF flows, and technical analysis point to a market entering a new phase of structural博弈. Bitcoin has been trading within a $70,000–$100,000 range amid low implied volatility and reduced risk appetite. Factors such as tax-loss selling and cautious institutional behavior have contributed to the sideways movement, with limited upward catalysts and restrained risk asset momentum. A significant structural inflection point is approaching with the expiration of a record $17.2 billion in Bitcoin options on December 26, 2025. The concentration of put options near $85,000 may make that level a focal point for price action. Post-expiration, market dynamics may shift as risk budgets reset and potential ETF inflows return in January, offering room for sentiment improvement. While 2026 may remain challenging for long-only strategies, tactical opportunities are emerging as Bitcoin’s a period of underperformance relative to other assets. The options expiration event may serve as a catalyst for renewed positioning ahead of expected January inflows, marking a critical window for observing structural change and potential sentiment reversal.

Since mid-October, Bitcoin has continued to decline, with market sentiment clearly turning cautious. As the market once again discusses the "four-year cycle," some traders project that 2026 may still be a phase of pressure. However, judging from recent structural changes, the market is entering a new phase different from a one-sided decline.

Over the past few months, Bitcoin has been operating in an environment of converging volatility, deleveraging, and a lack of risk appetite, with prices under continuous pressure. However, from the perspective of derivatives positions, ETF fund flows, and key technical indicators, the internal structure of the market has already changed. As the largest Bitcoin options expiration in history approaches, the distribution of strike prices is becoming an important window to observe market pressure and potential opportunities.

Low Volatility and De-risking in Parallel: Year-End Market Maintains Range-Bound Volatility

In recent months, Bitcoin's implied volatility has continued to converge, with prices likely trading within the range of $70,000 to $100,000. On one hand, there is a short-term lack of catalysts that could drive the market significantly away from this range, and event risks are relatively limited. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve's dovishness may not meet previous market expectations, limiting the overall upward momentum of risk assets.

At the same time, Bitcoin has significantly underperformed other major assets and is more likely to be used as a tool for "tax-loss selling" by multi-asset investors at year-end to offset realized gains in other markets, thereby creating additional selling pressure on prices. Coupled with the impact of the sharp decline in early October, many trading teams are still digesting earlier losses and have limited willingness to expand risk exposure before the end of the year. Against the backdrop of constrained risk appetite, increasing positions and capital allocation have become more cautious, and the market as a whole maintains a state of low volatility and range-bound fluctuations.

Options Expiration and Risk Budget Reset: Structural Inflection Point Window Approaches

On December 26, 2025, Bitcoin will witness the largest options expiration in history, with approximately $17.2 billion in call options and $6.2 billion in put options concentrated for settlement. Judging from the distribution of strike prices, call options are mainly concentrated above $100,000, which is difficult to reach in the short term. In contrast, a considerable amount of open interest in put options is gathered around $85,000, making this area more likely to become a range of repeated price games around expiration.

Historical experience shows that the year-end market is usually more conservative, but after entering the new year, with capital reallocation and risk budget recovery, the speed of sentiment reversal often exceeds expectations. The current technical structure is also changing: downward momentum is marginally slowing, but upward momentum has not yet formed a clear consensus. Against this backdrop, the market may be gradually shifting from "downside risk dominance" to a gameplay stage of "downside limited, upside still requires catalysts." After the options expiration is completed, position pressure is expected to be released in stages. Coupled with potential ETF fund回流 and risk appetite repair in January, there is room for improvement in market sentiment.

Overall, although 2026 may still be challenging for long-term one-sided long positions, the research focus has begun to shift to tactical opportunities with gradually improving risk-reward structures. Bitcoin's underperformance against other major assets for several consecutive weeks, combined with the calendar switching effect from year-end to the beginning of the year, means that related opportunities may appear earlier than market expectations. The significance of the December 26 options expiration event does not lie in the mechanical settlement of the contracts themselves, but in the fact that after this node, market participants often begin to reposition in advance for January's fund回流 and risk appetite repair. This stage may be becoming an important window to observe structural changes and sentiment inflection points.

The above views are partly from Matrix on Target, contact us to obtain the full Matrix on Target report.

Disclaimer: The market is risky, and investment requires caution. This article does not constitute investment advice. Digital asset trading can be extremely risky and volatile. Investment decisions should be made after careful consideration of personal circumstances and consultation with financial professionals. Matrixport is not responsible for any investment decisions based on the information provided in this content.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason for Bitcoin's recent price consolidation and cautious market sentiment?

AThe article states that Bitcoin has been in an environment of volatility convergence, deleveraging, and lack of risk appetite, with price remaining under pressure. Additionally, it has underperformed other major assets and is being used for tax-loss selling at year-end, creating extra selling pressure.

QWhat major event is highlighted as a potential structural inflection point for the Bitcoin market, and when does it occur?

AThe article highlights the largest-ever Bitcoin options expiration, with approximately $17.2 billion in call options and $6.2 billion in put options set to expire on December 26, 2025.

QHow does the strike price distribution of the expiring options influence potential price action around the expiration date?

ACall options are heavily concentrated above $100,000, which is difficult to reach short-term, while a significant amount of put open interest is clustered around $85,000, making that area a key level for price battles around expiration.

QWhat shift in market structure is the article suggesting is currently taking place?

AThe article suggests the market is shifting from a phase of 'downside risk dominance' to a new structural game theory phase characterized by 'limited downside but upside still needing catalysts'.

QWhat factors does the article suggest could contribute to a potential improvement in market sentiment after the options expiration?

AThe article suggests that after the options expiration, positional pressure could be released, potentially combined with ETF fund inflows in January and a recovery in risk appetite, which could improve market sentiment.

Похожее

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit28 мин. назад

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit28 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit32 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit32 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报38 мин. назад

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报38 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit43 мин. назад

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit43 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit44 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ZEST

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Zest Protocol (ZEST) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Zest Protocol (ZEST).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Zest Protocol (ZEST)После приобретения вами Zest Protocol (ZEST) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Zest Protocol (ZEST)С легкостью торгуйте Zest Protocol (ZEST) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

277 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.05.19Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить ZEST

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на A (A) представлены ниже.

活动图片