Ironlight Group’s big $21 mln bet on tokenized securities: Worth the hype?

ambcryptoОпубликовано 2026-03-17Обновлено 2026-03-17

Введение

Ironlight Group has secured $21 million in funding from investors including former TD Bank CEO Greg Braca, the Sei Development Foundation, and Laidlaw Private Equity to scale its infrastructure for tokenized securities. The funds will support the development of Ironlight Markets ATS, a platform designed to connect issuance, distribution, and trading of regulated tokenized assets. Laidlaw's managing member emphasized that Ironlight is building critical infrastructure to enable institutional participation in this growing market. The tokenized securities sector is highly competitive, with major players like Securitize, Ondo Finance, and Robinhood already active. However, growth projections are significant: the market is expected to reach between $2 trillion and $11 trillion by 2030, up from the current $27 billion (excluding stablecoins). Tokenized stocks, the fifth-largest segment, recently hit a record $1.05 billion market cap with strong monthly transfer volume and nearly 200,000 holders. Ethereum leads in settlement volume for tokenized securities at nearly $400 million, followed by Solana and BNB Chain. As regulatory clarity improves and adoption accelerates, these blockchain networks may see increased demand. For investors, tracking top settlement layers could provide strategic exposure to the sector’s anticipated expansion.

As the tokenized securities market booms, more players are positioning for a piece of the cake. Ironlight Group, a fintech developing infrastructure for tokenized securities, is the latest to join the race.

The firm announced that it had secured $21 million from Greg Braca, former TD Bank CEO, the Sei Development Foundation, and Laidlaw Private Equity.

The funds will help scale the Ironlight Markets ATS, which seamlessly connects issuance, distribution, and trading to support regulated tokenized securities.

For Hugh Regan, managing member at LaidLaw, safety is the real unlock for institutional adoption of tokenized securities. He added,

We believe Ironlight Group is building the missing layer of infrastructure to support institutional participation in tokenized securities markets.

But the space is already becoming saturated, with players like Securitize, Ondo Finance, XStocks (Backed Finance), Dinari, Remora Markets, Robinhood, and more fighting for market share.

Tokenized securities: Worth the fight?

But the ongoing adoption and growth projection partly explain why firms are rushing into this sector. From Ark Invest to Deutsche Bank Research, the tokenized market growth is projected to reach between $2 trillion and $11 trillion by 2030.

Even if the conservative lower target is met, that would be massive growth from the current global tokenized market cap of $27 billion, excluding stablecoins.

In particular, tokenized stocks are the fifth-largest segment with strong adoption, posting a 10% growth to a record $1.05 billion market cap in the past 30 days.

With over $2 billion in monthly transfer volume and nearly 200K holders, the segment’s rapid traction likely shows why most players are keen to join the race. Besides, the ongoing regulatory guidelines are fueling the momentum.

Source: RWA

At the network level, Ethereum leads in overall settlement, handling nearly $400 million in tokenized securities. Solana and BNB Chain come in at second and third and control $286 million and $230 million, respectively.

In other words, should the rise in settlement due to tokenized market booms accelerate the demand and value for the underlying token, then these three assets could be one of the best ways to gain exposure to the segment.

Source: RWA

Overall, there is cutthroat competition amongst tokenized securities issuers as new entrants make their moves. For crypto investors, however, tracking the top settlement layers could offer insights on where to place one’s bets if the segment’s growth explodes as projected.


Final Summary

  • Ironlight has joined the tokenized securities race with a $21 million raise to scale its trading platform to accommodate the new products.
  • Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain lead as the top three chains for the settlement of tokenized stocks.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the Ironlight Group and what recent funding did they secure?

AIronlight Group is a fintech company developing infrastructure for tokenized securities. They recently secured $21 million in funding from Greg Braca (former TD Bank CEO), the Sei Development Foundation, and Laidlaw Private Equity.

QAccording to Hugh Regan, what is the key to institutional adoption of tokenized securities?

AAccording to Hugh Regan, managing member at LaidLaw, safety is the real unlock for institutional adoption of tokenized securities.

QWhat is the projected market size for tokenized securities by 2030, according to the article?

AThe tokenized market is projected to reach between $2 trillion and $11 trillion by 2030, according to projections from firms like Ark Invest and Deutsche Bank Research.

QWhich three blockchain networks lead in the settlement of tokenized securities, and what are their respective volumes?

AEthereum, Solana, and BNB Chain are the top three. Ethereum handles nearly $400 million, Solana controls $286 million, and BNB Chain handles $230 million in tokenized securities settlement.

QWhat is the current market capitalization of the global tokenized market, excluding stablecoins?

AThe current global tokenized market capitalization, excluding stablecoins, is $27 billion.

Похожее

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit6 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit6 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit10 мин. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit10 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit16 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit17 мин. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit17 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit32 мин. назад

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit32 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить HYPE

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Hyperliquid (HYPE) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Hyperliquid (HYPE).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Hyperliquid (HYPE)После приобретения вами Hyperliquid (HYPE) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Hyperliquid (HYPE)С легкостью торгуйте Hyperliquid (HYPE) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

500 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.12.11Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить HYPE

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на HYPE (HYPE) представлены ниже.

活动图片