Bitcoin Braces For Quantum Shock — Inside Two Radical New Rescue Plans

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-10Обновлено 2026-04-10

Введение

The Bitcoin community is actively developing solutions to counter the future threat of quantum computers capable of breaking its current cryptography (ECDSA/Schnorr). Two primary proposals have emerged. The first, from Olaoluwa Osuntokun and Tim Ruffing, involves a "Taproot kill-switch" combined with a zk-STARK proof. This method would let users prove ownership of their coins from a vulnerable Taproot address without revealing their private keys, providing an escape hatch if a quantum-defense soft fork disables normal key-based spending. The second proposal, from Avihu Mordechai Levy, is called Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB). It uses Lamport-style one-time signatures and a new RIPEMD-160-based proof-of-work puzzle to make individual transactions quantum-safe today, without any changes to Bitcoin's base protocol. However, it is currently expensive and inefficient, costing hundreds of dollars per transaction. The debate has shifted from whether quantum is a threat to how to manage the migration. The community is split between solutions that aim to rescue the entire UTXO set and those who believe non-migrated coins should expire to preserve Bitcoin's monetary integrity.

Multiple devs and founders have been talking publicly about concrete post‐quantum paths for Bitcoin. Two different proposals have caught the crypto world’s attention.

Bitcoin’s Net-Watchers Start Building Their Blackwall

The ticking clock marking 2029 as the possible “deadline” for quantum computers to be able to break Bitcoin and Ethereum’s cryptography has made devs roll up their sleaves and get to work.

The recent spike of the Bitcoin quantum-panic or “quantum FUD” (fear, uncertainty and doubt) has moved on from the initial chaos that ensued following Google’s “doomsday” whitepaper to a race against an enemy that doesn’t yet exist. In the past days, two Bitcoin devs landed at different proposals aimed to protect Bitcoin from the future threat of quantum attacks.

One of them consists in a “Taproot kill‐switch + zk‐proof recovery” path for existing UTXOs (Unspent Transaction Outputs). The other is a QSB (Quantum Safe Bitcoin), a transaction‐level construction that makes individual spends quantum‐safe today without any soft fork (rule changes that stay compatible with old software).

Both approaches assume Shor‐style quantum computers (quantum computers based on Shor’s algorithm) will nuke the math behind Bitcoin’s current signatures (ECDSA/Schnorr), but they differ on how much of Bitcoin needs to change: consensus rules vs user‐level tooling.

Let’s examine both proposals closely.

Solution #1

The first solution comes from Olaoluwa Osuntokun, co‐founder and CTO of Lightning Labs (the main company building the Lightning Network implementation) and Tim Ruffing, co‐author and contributor on Schnorr/Taproot, multisignature schemes like MuSig2 and a maintainer of Bitcoin’s core elliptic‐curve library.

On a post made on the social media X on April 8, Osuntokun resurfaced Ruffing’s July 2025 whitepaper on Bitcoin’s post-quantum security in order to propose a solution for one of the problems presented in the paper: “to create a variant of seed-lifting that doesn’t reveal the wallet’s master secret”. He called this “zk-STARK proof”.

In plain language, Osuntokun’s tool creates a special cryptographic proof (the zk‐STARK) that lets you prove you really have the original wallet secret behind a given Taproot address, and that you used the standard wallet rules to get from that secret to this address. They crucial aspect of the zk-STARK proof is that it does this without ever revealing the secret itself, or any private keys, to anyone.

If, in the future, Bitcoin does a quantum‐defense soft fork that disables normal key‐based spends, many BIP‐86 Taproot wallets could be stuck and unable to move coins. With this proof, those users get an extra “escape hatch”: they can prove ownership of their Taproot coins via the seed‐derivation proof and move funds in a new, quantum‐safe way, even though the old key‐spend path is turned off.

He discussed all the technicalities behind this on the Bitcoin dev mailing list.

The solution has found acceptance, and it’s been generally received very well in the crypto community.

Solution #2

The second, and more polemic solution, comes from Avihu Mordechai Levy, a cryptography engineer at StarkWare who works on zero‐knowledge proofs and STARKs. His whitepaper, published yesterday, shows how to make individual Bitcoin transactions quantum‐safe today, using Lamport‐style one‐time signatures plus a “hash‐to‐signature” proof‐of‐work puzzle, with zero changes to Bitcoin’s base protocol.

QSB replaces the old signature‐size PoW (which quantum attacks could completely break by finding tiny ECDSA r‐values) with a RIPEMD‐160‐based puzzle that only relies on hash pre‐image resistance, which is merely weakened, not destroyed, by Grover’s algorithm (quantum tech).

Again in plain language, what QSB does is it throws away the old “make the signature tiny” proof‐of‐work trick, because a strong quantum computer could cheat that by exploiting the elliptic‐curve math. Instead, QSB uses a new puzzle built on the RIPEMD‐160 hash function. Breaking a hash like that is extremely hard, even with a quantum computer.

QSB fits in legacy script limits and gives around 118‐bit post‐quantum pre‐image security. However, it costs hundreds of dollars in off‐chain GPU work per transaction and requires non‐standard bare scripts mined via private relay services. This is why many are calling QSB a “last resort” or even a “whale-grade band-aid”.

A Philosophical Split

The community is no longer arguing if quantum breaks ECDSA/Schnorr, but how to stage an orderly migration. Let’s remember that the creator of Bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto himself, assured in 2010 that a gradual transition to post-quantum, stronger technology, was possible for Bitcoin.

A post from Satoshi Nakamoto regarding the quantum threat for Bitcoin. Source: Bitcoin Magazine on X.

Taproot‐based recovery tries to protect the entire UTXO set with minimal value destruction, whereas some prominent voices still argue non‐migrated coins should simply expire rather than be “rescue” in weird ways, to preserve Bitcoin’s monetary story.

At the moment of writing, BTC trades for the high $71ks on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview.

Cover image from Perplexity. BTCUSD chart from Tradingview.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the main threat that Bitcoin developers are preparing for with these new proposals?

ABitcoin developers are preparing for the threat of quantum computers, specifically Shor-style quantum computers that could break Bitcoin's current ECDSA/Schnorr signature cryptography, potentially by 2029.

QWho proposed the first solution involving a 'zk-STARK proof' and what is its primary function?

AThe first solution was proposed by Olaoluwa Osuntokun of Lightning Labs and Tim Ruffing. Its primary function is to create a zk-STARK proof that allows users to prove ownership of their Taproot coins without revealing their private keys, providing an 'escape hatch' to move funds if a quantum-defense soft fork disables normal key-based spends.

QWhat does the QSB (Quantum Safe Bitcoin) solution replace to achieve quantum safety, and what is a major drawback of this approach?

AThe QSB solution replaces the old signature-size proof-of-work with a new RIPEMD-160-based hash pre-image puzzle. A major drawback is that it is extremely inefficient, costing hundreds of dollars in off-chain GPU work per transaction and requiring non-standard bare scripts mined via private relay services.

QAccording to the article, what did Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto say about the quantum threat in 2010?

AIn 2010, Satoshi Nakamoto assured that a gradual transition to post-quantum, stronger technology was possible for Bitcoin.

QWhat is the key philosophical difference between the two proposed solutions for Bitcoin's quantum resistance?

AThe key philosophical difference is in how much of Bitcoin needs to change. The Taproot-based recovery solution aims to protect the entire UTXO set with minimal value destruction through a potential soft fork (consensus rule changes), while the QSB solution is a transaction-level construction that makes individual spends quantum-safe today without any changes to Bitcoin's base protocol (user-level tooling).

Похожее

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit3 мин. назад

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit3 мин. назад

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit7 мин. назад

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

The 2026 FIFA World Cup has sparked significant interest not only on the pitch but also in AI-driven match prediction. Major models like Qwen, Copilot, and ChatGPT are being used to forecast outcomes, scores, upsets, red cards, and key player performances. Qwen gained early attention by accurately predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa (including a red card risk) and South Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic in the opening matches. Copilot's pre-tournament predictions had notable successes, such as correctly calling the Mexico 2-0 scoreline, South Korea's 2-1 win, and Brazil's 1-1 draw with Morocco. However, it also had clear misses, failing to predict upsets like Australia's 2-0 win over Turkey or Switzerland's draw with Qatar. ChatGPT provided detailed analytical reasoning, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win, but its full-tournament predictions tended to favor favorites, missing several underdog results and draws. Tests pitting multiple models (ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude) against the same match, like Mexico vs. South Africa, showed varying predictions, with only some hitting the exact score. In summary, while AI models like Qwen have shown promising early results in specific match details, and others have had isolated successes, they collectively struggle to consistently identify upsets and underdog performances. AI is becoming an additional reference tool for prediction markets but is far from a definitive source.

marsbit7 мин. назад

The World Cup has only been played for a few days, but some AI prediction models have already been crowned as oracles, while others have stumbled badly.

marsbit7 мин. назад

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

SpaceX is now public, but its high valuation and losses may deter some investors. However, the real opportunity, as seen with Apple, Tesla, and Nvidia, may lie in its extensive supply chain. SpaceX, funded primarily by its profitable Starlink service, spends hundreds of billions annually on components for its rockets, satellites, and planned orbital AI data centers, creating significant revenue streams for suppliers. Key suppliers are categorized by their indispensability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like **NVIDIA** (GPUs for AI supercomputers), **Eutelsat (SATS)** (spectrum rights), **Filtronic** (millimeter-wave amplifiers), **Materion (MTRN)** (beryllium alloys), and **STMicroelectronics (STM)** (phased array chips). The second category comprises suppliers costly to replace due to long certification cycles or deep integration, such as **Honeywell (HON)** (flight controls), **Carpenter Technology (CRS)** (specialty steel), **Hexcel (HXL)** (carbon fiber), **Broadcom (AVGO)** (data switching), and **Linde** (industrial gases). The third group involves high-volume, cost-critical manufacturers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Major players here include Taiwanese contract manufacturer **Wistron NeWeb (6285)** and several Chinese-listed firms: **Sunway Communication (300136)**, **Parker Advanced Materials (605123)**, **Western Superconducting (002149)**, and **Yingliu Co., Ltd. (603308)**. Other niche providers include **Tianyin Electromechanical**, **Tongyu Communication**, **Trimble (TRMB)**, **Astronics (ATRO)**, and **CTSH**. The timing is now relevant because: 1) SpaceX's procurement is accelerating with plans for 100 launches in 2026, 30 million Starlink terminals, and orbital data centers. 2) Its IPO has brought unprecedented transparency to its supply chain. 3) This phase mirrors early days of the Tesla supply chain boom. The investment thesis shifts from betting on SpaceX's stock to betting on the steady, order-book-driven revenues of its essential suppliers. Risks remain, such as commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, and technological shifts, but the supply chain offers a potentially less speculative path to participate in SpaceX's growth.

marsbit25 мин. назад

Missed Out on SpaceX's IPO? Take a Look at SpaceX's Complete Supply Chain

marsbit25 мин. назад

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Jane Street: Crypto's Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator A recent 13F filing revealed Jane Street, the secretive Wall Street quant giant, drastically reduced its Bitcoin ETF holdings while increasing stakes in Ethereum ETFs. This move highlights its role not as a directional investor, but as a critical infrastructure player extracting "tolls" from crypto's institutionalization. The firm, founded in 2000 and famously lacking a CEO, has systematically embedded itself across crypto markets. It acts as a key Authorized Participant (AP) and market maker for major Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, profiting from arbitrage between ETF shares and underlying assets. Its approach combines quantitative prowess with a willingness to hold positions for structural arbitrage, differing from pure high-frequency traders. Jane Street faces allegations related to the 2022 Terra (LUNA) collapse. A lawsuit claims it used non-public information to withdraw $85 million in UST minutes before a critical withdrawal by Terraform Labs, allegedly exacerbating the crash and avoiding over $200 million in losses. The company denies the claims. Further indicating its reach, a wallet suspected to be operated by Jane Street ("JaneStreetIndia") was identified on the prediction market Polymarket. This bot executed over 11,000 high-frequency trades on short-term crypto price movements with a near-perfect win rate, showcasing a套利 strategy divorced from traditional prediction. Beyond trading, Jane Street holds equity in crypto infrastructure like Kraken, 1inch, and Arbitrum, and mining stocks. Its strategy is clear: avoid betting on winners, but secure a position in the market's essential plumbing. By becoming a ubiquitous part of the liquidity infrastructure—from ETFs to OTC trading and potentially链上 markets—Jane Street operates as a market force itself, raising questions about whether crypto's decentralized,散户-friendly alpha is being permanently eroded by traditional finance's most sophisticated players.

Foresight News28 мин. назад

Jane Street: The Most Powerful Behind-the-Scenes Operator in the Crypto Industry

Foresight News28 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Тест по Bitcoin Биткоина

HTX Learn: Изучите Bitcoin halving и Заработаете Токены USDT

3.1k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.04.16Обновлено 2024.04.16

Тест по Bitcoin Биткоина

Что такое $BITCOIN

ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN): Комплексный анализ Введение в ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN) ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN) — это проект на основе блокчейна, работающий в сети Solana, который стремится объединить характеристики традиционных драгоценных металлов с инновациями децентрализованных технологий. Хотя он носит имя Биткойн, часто называемого “цифровым золотом” из-за его восприятия как средства хранения ценности, ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО является отдельным токеном, предназначенным для создания уникальной экосистемы в ландшафте Web3. Его цель — позиционировать себя как жизнеспособный альтернативный цифровой актив, хотя детали его применения и функциональности все еще развиваются. Что такое ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN)? ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN) — это токен криптовалюты, специально разработанный для использования в блокчейне Solana. В отличие от Биткойна, который выполняет широко признанную роль хранения ценности, этот токен, похоже, сосредоточен на более широких приложениях и характеристиках. Примечательные аспекты включают: Инфраструктура блокчейна: Токен построен на блокчейне Solana, известном своей способностью обрабатывать высокоскоростные и недорогие транзакции. Динамика предложения: ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО имеет максимальное предложение, ограниченное 100 квадриллионами токенов (100P $BITCOIN), хотя детали о его обращающемся предложении в настоящее время не раскрыты. Утилита: Хотя точные функциональные возможности не описаны, есть указания на то, что токен может быть использован для различных приложений, потенциально связанных с децентрализованными приложениями (dApps) или стратегиями токенизации активов. Кто создатель ЦИФРОВОГО ЗОЛОТА ($BITCOIN)? На данный момент личность создателей и команды разработчиков, стоящих за ЦИФРОВЫМ ЗОЛОТОМ ($BITCOIN), остается неизвестной. Эта ситуация типична для многих инновационных проектов в области блокчейна, особенно тех, которые связаны с децентрализованными финансами и феноменом мем-криптовалют. Хотя такая анонимность может способствовать культуре, ориентированной на сообщество, она усиливает опасения по поводу управления и ответственности. Кто инвесторы ЦИФРОВОГО ЗОЛОТА ($BITCOIN)? Доступная информация указывает на то, что у ЦИФРОВОГО ЗОЛОТА ($BITCOIN) нет известных институциональных спонсоров или значительных венчурных капиталовложений. Проект, похоже, функционирует по модели пирингового взаимодействия, сосредоточенной на поддержке и принятии сообществом, а не на традиционных путях финансирования. Его активность и ликвидность в основном сосредоточены на децентрализованных биржах (DEX), таких как PumpSwap, а не на устоявшихся централизованных торговых платформах, что еще больше подчеркивает его подход, ориентированный на grassroots. Как работает ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN) Операционные механизмы ЦИФРОВОГО ЗОЛОТА ($BITCOIN) можно подробно описать на основе его дизайна блокчейна и характеристик сети: Механизм консенсуса: Используя уникальный механизм доказательства истории (PoH) Solana в сочетании с моделью доказательства доли (PoS), проект обеспечивает эффективную валидацию транзакций, что способствует высокой производительности сети. Токеномика: Хотя конкретные дефляционные механизмы не были подробно описаны, большое максимальное предложение токенов подразумевает, что оно может быть предназначено для микротранзакций или нишевых случаев использования, которые еще предстоит определить. Интероперабельность: Существует потенциал для интеграции с более широкой экосистемой Solana, включая различные платформы децентрализованных финансов (DeFi). Однако детали относительно конкретных интеграций остаются неуточненными. Хронология ключевых событий Вот хронология, которая подчеркивает значимые вехи, касающиеся ЦИФРОВОГО ЗОЛОТА ($BITCOIN): 2023: Первоначальное развертывание токена происходит в блокчейне Solana, отмеченное его адресом контракта. 2024: ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО приобретает видимость, когда оно становится доступным для торговли на децентрализованных биржах, таких как PumpSwap, позволяя пользователям обменивать его на SOL. 2025: Проект наблюдает спорадическую торговую активность и потенциальный интерес к инициативам, возглавляемым сообществом, хотя на данный момент не зафиксировано никаких значительных партнерств или технических достижений. Критический анализ Сильные стороны Масштабируемость: Основная инфраструктура Solana поддерживает высокие объемы транзакций, что может повысить полезность $BITCOIN в различных сценариях транзакций. Доступность: Потенциально низкая цена торговли за токен может привлечь розничных инвесторов, способствуя более широкому участию благодаря возможностям дробного владения. Риски Отсутствие прозрачности: Отсутствие публично известных спонсоров, разработчиков или процесса аудита может вызвать скептицизм относительно устойчивости и надежности проекта. Волатильность рынка: Торговая активность сильно зависит от спекулятивного поведения, что может привести к значительной волатильности цен и неопределенности для инвесторов. Заключение ЦИФРОВОЕ ЗОЛОТО ($BITCOIN) является интригующим, но неоднозначным проектом в быстро развивающейся экосистеме Solana. Хотя он пытается использовать нарратив “цифрового золота”, его отход от установленной роли Биткойна как средства хранения ценности подчеркивает необходимость более четкого различения его предполагаемой утилиты и структуры управления. Будущее принятие и усвоение, вероятно, будут зависеть от решения текущей непрозрачности и более четкого определения его операционных и экономических стратегий. Примечание: Этот отчет охватывает синтезированную информацию, доступную на октябрь 2023 года, и с тех пор могут произойти события.

102 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.05.13Обновлено 2025.05.13

Что такое $BITCOIN

Fractal Bitcoin: масштабирование Биткоина с помощью рекурсивной системы

Fractal Bitcoin — масштабное Layer-1-решнение, созданное на базе кода Биткоина, позволяющего достигать бесконечного масштабирования с помощью рекурсивного подхода.

2.3k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.06.30Обновлено 2025.06.30

Fractal Bitcoin: масштабирование Биткоина с помощью рекурсивной системы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на BTC (BTC) представлены ниже.

活动图片

Топ вопросы

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow