# Loss Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Loss", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Veterans of the 'Little Smart' Era Return, This Time Leading a Robot Company in a Sprint to an IPO

UTStarcom Veteran Returns: Robot Maker Rushes for IPO On August 24, UDI Robot passed the listing hearing for the Hong Kong Stock Exchange main board. Known for its delivery robots in hotels and KTVs, the company was founded in 2013 by Lu Ying, former CEO of the once-dominant "PHS" phone maker UTStarcom, and other ex-colleagues. UDI has five main product series, including indoor delivery, outdoor delivery, and cleaning robots. Significantly, its business model is shifting from hardware sales to recurring service revenue. In 2025, AI vision model solutions contributed 37.5% of its total revenue of ~318 million RMB, while robot product sales accounted for 42.5%. However, its overall business remains unprofitable, with a cumulative net loss of 5.44 billion RMB from 2023 to Q1 2026. A key challenge is low hardware毛利率 (gross margin for robot products was 8.3% in 2025). Despite losses common in the robotics sector, UDI's deficit is narrowing. It has raised ~989 million RMB over 13 pre-IPO rounds from investors including Alibaba (Ele.me, Yunfeng Capital), Legend Capital, SenseTime, and hotel chains like Huazhu. The founding team, largely from UTStarcom, collectively controls 33.40% of the company. UDI ranks as China's third-largest commercial service robotics company with an 8.9% market share in 2025. Its IPO, sought via Hong Kong's special tech chapter 18C, aims to fund R&D, expansion, and working capital, marking a comeback attempt for the "PHS" veterans in a new technological era.

marsbit39m ago

Veterans of the 'Little Smart' Era Return, This Time Leading a Robot Company in a Sprint to an IPO

marsbit39m ago

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

A user lost over 1,010 ETH (worth millions) due to a phishing attack via an expired official domain of the Tornado Cash protocol. As reported on August 20, 2026, the domain `tornado.cash` was not renewed by the original developers amid U.S. OFAC sanctions and was subsequently registered by malicious actors. They deployed a fake frontend mimicking the legitimate Tornado Cash interface. Through this site, the attackers gained access to the user's deposit notes—the data required to withdraw funds from the protocol's pools—and drained the ETH within 12 hours. On-chain data shows the stolen funds (e.g., wallet 0xd8B356...) were withdrawn from Tornado Cash pools. However, on-chain analyst Specter cast doubt on the victim's story. He suggested the individual might be involved in illicit activity, noting that a large sum of BTC was received from a coin-mixing service (Whirlpool) and converted to ETH before being sent to the fake Tornado Cash site. The victim's explanation of urgently moving funds due to a compromised hardware wallet was questioned, as the fund trail indicated deliberate obfuscation. Specter speculated this might be a conflict between malicious actors rather than a simple phishing case. The incident highlights the danger of expired domains for major protocols, where old bookmarks can lead to compromised sites. WHOIS records show the domain was registered in March 2025. Broader analysis notes that in 2025, over $1.8 billion was lost to scams and exploits, largely through social engineering like phishing via familiar but hijacked links. This case underscores the persistent risk when a domain's legal status changes but user trust and search engine reputation remain.

cryptonews.ru08/23 17:40

The Danger of Old Bookmarks: How an Expired Tornado Cash Domain Cost a User 1,000 ETH

cryptonews.ru08/23 17:40

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

Securitize's first quarterly report post-IPO reveals a paradox: while its tokenized assets under management hit a record $4.3 billion (up 16% YoY) and platform trading volume surged 147% to $5.3 billion, total revenue fell 5% to $14.4 million. Tokenization revenue specifically dropped ~12% to $7.8 million, leading to an adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.5 million. CFO Francisco Flores explained that most trading volume is not yet monetized, with the majority of tokenization revenue still coming from one-time projects like new protocol integrations. In contrast, asset servicing revenue, a more recurring stream, grew slightly to $6.6 million. The company has lowered its full-year revenue guidance to $70-$80 million from an initial projection of $110 million. Industry experts note this highlights a structural challenge for the tokenization sector. Scaling assets on-chain doesn't automatically scale a profitable business model. Current implementations often rely on costly, customized projects for each new asset or jurisdiction. The future, they argue, lies in building standardized infrastructure that generates recurring "infrastructure revenue" from post-issuance activities like compliance, distributions, and secondary trading—similar to enterprise software. Analysts caution against misinterpreting high trading volumes as indicative of a mature fee-based model, as Securitize's broad volume metric includes many non-monetized actions. The key test for the industry is whether adding billions in new assets can generate sustainable revenue without constant new custom projects.

marsbit08/20 10:06

Tokenization Scale Soars to $4.3 Billion, But Why Did Securitize Incur a $5.5 Million Loss?

marsbit08/20 10:06

活动图片