# Loss Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Loss", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

With 300 Million Financing to Accumulate ETH, the Hidden Concerns Behind BitMine's High-Yield Preferred Shares

BitMine, led by Thomas Lee, plans to raise up to $300 million through an initial public offering of 3 million shares of perpetual Series A preferred stock on the NYSE (ticker: BMNP). The stock offers a fixed 9.5% annual dividend. The funds are intended to further the company's accumulation of Ethereum, expand its staking node operations, and for general corporate purposes. This move comes as BitMine faces significant challenges. Its massive Ethereum holdings, over 5.3 million ETH (roughly 4.5% of circulating supply), are currently at an unrealized loss exceeding $8.5 billion due to the crypto market downturn. The company's core business model relies on staking these ETH holdings to generate yield, which it presents as the primary means to cover the new, substantial annual dividend obligation of approximately $28.5 million if the offering is fully subscribed. While the model is similar to MicroStrategy's bitcoin-focused strategy of using capital markets to fund crypto acquisitions, BitMine's product differs with its fixed, non-adjustable dividend rate. The company acknowledges risks, stating dividend payments could also come from cash reserves, asset sales, or future financing, and warns that staking yields may underperform or be illiquid during market stress. The 9.5% fixed rate reflects the higher risk premium demanded from investors for a company heavily exposed to Ethereum's volatility.

Foresight News06/05 06:47

With 300 Million Financing to Accumulate ETH, the Hidden Concerns Behind BitMine's High-Yield Preferred Shares

Foresight News06/05 06:47

Bitcoin HODLer Pain Surpasses FTX Crash Levels As BTC Drawdown Deepens

Bitcoin long-term holders (those holding coins for over 155 days) are experiencing significant losses, with 5.3 million BTC currently held at an unrealized loss. This level surpasses the peak seen during the 2022 FTX crash bear market and is the highest since the COVID-19 crash in March 2020. The sharp increase follows recent price declines, with Bitcoin trading around $64,000, down over 13% in a week. Historically, such extreme readings in long-term holder loss supply have often coincided with market lows and potential trend reversals. The analyst suggests the high level of underwater supply indicates the market's adjustment process is still ongoing.

bitcoinist06/05 03:01

Bitcoin HODLer Pain Surpasses FTX Crash Levels As BTC Drawdown Deepens

bitcoinist06/05 03:01

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

Facing massive paper losses exceeding $90 billion each amidst a sharp market downturn, "Digital Asset Treasury" (DAT) giants Strategy and Bitmine find themselves in a precarious position, but with different underlying risks. Strategy, heavily invested in Bitcoin (BTC), faces significant financial strain. Its strategy relies heavily on debt, including convertible notes and preferred stock (STRC) requiring substantial dividend payments. With its cash reserves dwindling and BTC offering no staking yield for cash flow, Strategy's high leverage makes it vulnerable. A continued price decline could force asset sales to meet obligations, potentially creating a negative feedback loop. Its market value has already fallen sharply. In contrast, Bitmine, an Ethereum (ETH) holder, appears on firmer financial ground. It primarily funds its purchases through equity offerings (like ATM programs), avoiding debt pressure. It also generates income by staking a large portion of its ETH holdings. While not immune to market drops and shareholder dilution concerns, Bitmine maintains more flexibility, recently announcing a new preferred share offering to raise further capital. The core divergence lies in their financing: Bitmine uses equity (investor money), while Strategy uses debt (borrowed money). Consequently, Bitmine currently faces less immediate liquidity pressure than Strategy, which must navigate the dual challenge of servicing debt/dividends and a declining core asset (BTC) price.

marsbit06/04 10:33

Both Suffer Massive Losses Exceeding $90 Billion, Which Is in Greater Peril: Strategy or Bitmine?

marsbit06/04 10:33

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

As Bitcoin and Ethereum prices drop significantly, two major corporate treasury holders, Strategy and Bitmine, are facing massive unrealized losses—approximately $100 billion and $90 billion, respectively. The article compares their financial health and underlying risks. Bitmine, holding over 5.4 million ETH, relies primarily on equity financing (like ATM offerings) and has substantial cash reserves, alongside staking income from its ETH holdings. It plans a $300 million perpetual preferred stock offering. In contrast, Strategy, holding Bitcoin, is burdened by significant convertible debt and preferred stock dividends, with cash reserves covering only about six months of its annual dividend obligations. Strategy's leverage is higher, and it faces potential liquidity pressure if BTC prices fall further, possibly forcing asset sales. While both companies are under pressure, Bitmine’s financial structure appears more resilient, whereas Strategy’s high leverage makes it more vulnerable to continued market declines.

Odaily星球日报06/04 10:28

Both Suffer Losses Exceeding $9 Billion, Which Is More at Risk: Strategy or Bitmine?

Odaily星球日报06/04 10:28

The Rally That Wasn't

The article analyzes Bitcoin's sharp decline amid a shift in macroeconomic expectations, with strong US job data leading markets to price out Fed rate cuts. Bitcoin fell 13% to around $67,000, triggering significant outflows from US spot ETFs and indicating institutional de-risking. On-chain data confirms a bearish structure. Price has dropped back into the "bear market range," with the Short-Term Holder Cost Basis falling below a key mean level—a pattern last seen in early 2022. The profitability bias has collapsed, with loss realization now dominating, mirroring a panic wave from February. Recent buyers who accumulated near the $82k top are under pressure, and loss realization is accelerating across both short-term and long-term holder cohorts. Off-chain, the rally failed at the aggregate US ETF cost basis near $83k, turning it into resistance. Spot market demand has deteriorated sharply, with sellers dominating order books. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot buyers have not returned to absorb supply. Options markets show sustained demand for downside protection (elevated put premiums) but not panic, with volatility premiums near three-month highs. The conclusion is that the market remains fragile, with overhead supply from trapped ETF investors, weak spot demand, and accelerating losses. Without a return of spot buying and a reclaim of key cost bases, Bitcoin is vulnerable to further downside within the prevailing bear market structure.

insights.glassnode06/03 17:39

insights.glassnode06/03 17:39

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Charlie Munger's Calculated "Loss-Making Account" Many traders, drawn to speculative tools like futures contracts, often face repeated failures. As the article notes, unless one is a genius, such instruments should be avoided for long-term profit-seeking. Similarly, the practice of short selling is viewed with caution. The author firmly states a policy of not shorting, even when bearish, preferring to simply wait. The core reason? Successful short selling requires exceptionally difficult conditions to profit. Legendary investors Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger have themselves reflected on painful short-selling experiences. Munger highlights two critical flaws in the mathematical logic of shorting: 1. Asymmetrical Risk/Reward: A long position has a maximum loss of 100% but unlimited upside. A short position caps profit at 100% (if a stock falls to zero) but carries theoretically unlimited loss potential. 2. The "Promoter" Problem: Fraudulent or struggling companies can prolong their decline. As Munger said, "You can run out of money before the promoter runs out of ideas," meaning short sellers may be forced to cover positions at a loss before the company's true fate unfolds. The article cites Stanley Druckenmiller, a famed hedge fund manager. He once shorted 12 companies that all eventually went bankrupt. However, intense market rallies forced him to cover his positions within three weeks, resulting in massive losses—$200 million of his capital plus an additional $600 million. He concluded he likely never made money shorting in his career. His experience perfectly illustrates Munger's points: facing unlimited losses and being wiped out before being proven right. The conclusion is clear: for most investors, complex instruments like short selling and derivatives are not viable paths to stable, long-term gains. Self-reflection is advised before repeatedly wasting time and capital on such speculative strategies.

marsbit06/03 02:35

Why Not Short Even When Bearish? Munger Did the Math on a 'Losing Trade'

marsbit06/03 02:35

Missed the AI Stock Surge, What to Do Now?

The article addresses investor anxiety over having missed the explosive, multi-year rally in AI stocks (e.g., NVIDIA, Micron, SK Hynix) across global markets. It notes that despite the broad bull run, data shows most retail investors lost money in 2025, and even major institutions like Bridgewater and Berkshire Hathaway significantly reduced holdings or held excessive cash, thereby missing substantial gains. The piece highlights common pitfalls: panic selling during corrections, misdirected investments into underperforming AI verticals, and premature profit-taking. It argues that AI represents a foundational, long-term technological shift comparable to electricity or the internet, implying the opportunity is not over. Citing figures like Jack Ma and Ma Huateng, the article suggests the AI wave is just beginning, with vast potential across the entire产业链, from infrastructure to applications. The conclusion advises against chasing trends blindly. Instead, it recommends a disciplined, long-term approach—focusing on one's own strengths within the expansive AI ecosystem to prepare for the next structural opportunities.

marsbit06/03 00:19

Missed the AI Stock Surge, What to Do Now?

marsbit06/03 00:19

The End of the 'Bitcoin Hoarding Myth': MicroStrategy Sells BTC for the First Time in 3 Years

The article discusses the significant move by MicroStrategy, often dubbed the "Bitcoin whale," which sold 32 BTC at an average price of $77,135 last week, marking its first sale in three years. This action, primarily to service obligations on its STRC digital credit product, has impacted market sentiment, contributing to a BTC price drop below $71,000 and declines in related crypto stocks. While the sale was small relative to its total holdings of over 843,706 BTC (with a cost basis of ~$75,699), it symbolically challenges the firm's long-standing "HODL" strategy and the broader "digital gold" narrative for Bitcoin. The piece also highlights a related event on the Polymarket prediction platform, where a contract on the sale was settled as "no" due to the lack of an official statement, underscoring how such markets trade on defined rules rather than absolute facts. Furthermore, it notes growing skepticism from figures like Mark Cuban and Peter Schiff regarding Bitcoin's role as a hedge, suggesting a potential shift in investor perception amid current market pressures.

Odaily星球日报06/02 04:07

The End of the 'Bitcoin Hoarding Myth': MicroStrategy Sells BTC for the First Time in 3 Years

Odaily星球日报06/02 04:07

Another Corporate Bitcoin Treasury Strategy Ends: From High-Profile Entry to Liquidation at a Massive Loss in 11 Months

French semiconductor company Sequans Communications has sold off its bitcoin holdings and terminated its corporate bitcoin treasury strategy less than a year after launching it, sustaining heavy losses. Facing delisting from the New York Stock Exchange in mid-2025 due to low market capitalization, Sequans announced a plan to hold over 3,000 bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset. The strategy was executed with Swan Bitcoin and backed by a $384 million private financing round. At its peak in October 2025, the company held 3,234 bitcoin with an average cost of approximately $116,643 per coin. However, the plan quickly unraveled. With bitcoin's price falling, Sequans sold 970 bitcoin in late 2025 to repay debt, contradicting the core "hold" philosophy of such corporate strategies. The company has now sold more bitcoin to fully repay its convertible notes and announced the termination of its bitcoin reserve strategy. It plans to liquidate its remaining 658 bitcoin. The venture resulted in significant financial damage. The company reported an unrealized loss of $67.4 million on its bitcoin holdings in 2025, contributing to a total net loss of $109.3 million for the year. Sequans' stock (SQNS) has plummeted over 80% since the strategy's launch and is down 77% year-to-date. CEO Georges Karam, who previously championed bitcoin's long-term value, now states the company will refocus entirely on its core IoT semiconductor business. The failed experiment highlights the risks for companies adopting volatile digital assets as treasury reserves.

marsbit06/01 03:08

Bitcoin Correction Pushes 580,000 BTC Into Loss Territory

Bitcoin's recent price correction has pushed a significant portion of its supply into loss. According to Glassnode data, the total amount of BTC held at a loss (Total Supply in Loss) has risen to 8.33 million. This marks an increase of 580,000 BTC, primarily due to the asset's decline from above $76,600 to around $73,000 in the latter half of May. This indicates that a substantial volume of coins changed hands within that price range. The analytics firm notes that these recently underwater holders could contribute to near-term sell pressure as they reassess their positions. While the network's state is still better than during February's sharper crash, the increased loss supply highlights the market's sensitivity to corrections. Bitcoin is currently trading near $73,200, down over 5% for the week.

bitcoinist05/30 05:01

Bitcoin Correction Pushes 580,000 BTC Into Loss Territory