# Automation Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Automation", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Can Humans Control AI? Anthropic Conducted an Experiment Using Qwen

Can Humans Control Superintelligent AI? Anthropic’s Experiment with Qwen Models Anthropic conducted an experiment to explore whether humans can supervise AI systems smarter than themselves—a core challenge in AI safety known as scalable oversight. The study simulated a “weak human overseer” using a small model (Qwen1.5-0.5B-Chat) and a “strong AI” using a more powerful model (Qwen3-4B-Base). The goal was to see if the strong model could learn effectively despite imperfect supervision. The key metric was Performance Gap Recovered (PGR). A PGR of 1 means the strong model reached its full potential, while 0 means it was limited by the weak supervisor. Initially, human researchers achieved a PGR of 0.23 after a week of work. Then, nine AI agents (Automated Alignment Researchers, or AARs) based on Claude Opus took over. In five days, they improved PGR to 0.97 through iterative experimentation—proposing ideas, coding, training, and analyzing results. The findings suggest that, in well-defined and automatically scorable tasks, AI can help overcome the supervision gap. However, the methods didn’t generalize perfectly to unseen tasks, and applying them to a production model like Claude Sonnet didn’t yield significant improvements. The study highlights that while AI can automate parts of alignment research, human oversight remains essential to prevent “gaming” of evaluation systems and to handle more complex, real-world problems. Anthropic chose Qwen models for their open-source nature, performance, scalability, and reproducibility—key for rigorous and repeatable experiments. The research demonstrates progress toward automated alignment tools but also underscores that AI supervision remains a nuanced, human-AI collaborative effort.

marsbit04/15 09:28

Can Humans Control AI? Anthropic Conducted an Experiment Using Qwen

marsbit04/15 09:28

Only Work 2 Hours a Day? This Google Engineer Uses Claude to Automate 80% of His Work

A Google engineer with 11 years of experience automated 80% of his work using Claude Code and a simple .NET application, reducing his daily work from 8 hours to just 2–3 hours while generating $28,000 in monthly passive income. The key to this transformation lies in three core elements: First, using a structured CLAUDE.md file based on Andrej Karpathy’s principles—Think Before Coding, Simplicity First, Surgical Changes, and Goal-Driven Execution—reduces Claude’s rule violations from 40% to just 3%. Second, the "Everything Claude Code" system acts as a full AI engineering team, with 27 pre-built agents for planning, reviewing, and executing tasks across multiple AI platforms. Third, a hidden token consumption issue in Claude Code v2.1.100 was identified, where 20,000 extra tokens were silently added, diluting instructions and reducing output quality. A quick fix using npx downgrades the version to avoid this. The automated system enables code generation, testing, and review to run autonomously in 15-minute cycles. The engineer now only reviews output, saving 5–6 hours daily. The setup takes less than 20 minutes, and the return on time investment is significant—potentially saving $10,000–$12,000 monthly for those valuing their time at $100/hour. The article emphasizes that managing AI systems, not just using them, is the new critical skill, enabling a shift from doing work to overseeing automated processes.

marsbit04/15 04:10

Only Work 2 Hours a Day? This Google Engineer Uses Claude to Automate 80% of His Work

marsbit04/15 04:10

活动图片