Is Bitcoin’s 4-year cycle finally breaking? This post-halving data says…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Bitcoin's traditional 4-year cycle, historically defined by post-halving rallies followed by sharp corrections, may be breaking. The 2024 halving did not trigger the typical strong upside; instead, BTC is on track to close the first post-halving year down roughly 7%. This deviation is attributed to new fundamentals, including institutional inflows, declining exchange reserves, ETF launches, and broader macroeconomic support. These factors are helping stabilize Bitcoin, potentially avoiding extreme boom-bust swings and suggesting a transition into a prolonged "supercycle" rather than a repeat of past patterns.

The number “four” has always played a major role in crypto cycles.

Historically, Bitcoin has closely followed its halving pattern. Within each four-year cycle, scarcity drove strong post-halving rallies.

As the cycle matured, Bitcoin [BTC] rolled over into a bear phase before finding a bottom.

Notably, the latest halving took place in April 2024, dropping the block reward to 3.125 BTC, which puts us roughly 18 months into the current cycle. That said, this cycle isn’t tracking cleanly with prior ones.

A cycle behaving differently

Historically, the first year after a halving has produced solid upside for BTC.

Looking at the 2020 cycle, the halving set the supply shock in motion, leading to a 60% rally in 2021. That move was followed by a 64% correction in 2022 as BTC found its cycle low, before ripping 153% in 2023.

This time, despite the 2024 halving, Bitcoin is tracking very differently.

Technically, its price is on pace to close the first post-halving year down roughly 7%, with less than two weeks left in Q4.

In that context, it raises a bigger question: Is Bitcoin’s four-year cycle starting to lose its reliability?

New fundamentals are rewriting Bitcoin playbook

Bitcoin might be breaking free from its usual 4-year boom-and-bust cycle.

And that’s good news for the bulls.

For starters, BTC may avoid sharp drops like the 73% pullback in 2018 or the 64% dip in 2022, which were largely hype-driven. Instead, CryptoQuant data showed things may be changing.

Specifically, a mix of four key factors is helping stabilize BTC, keeping it in a loop-like pattern, limiting sudden swings, and sustaining FOMO, as reflected in Exchange Reserves, with 140k BTC accumulated in Q4 alone.

Meanwhile, the launch of ETFs in 2024 is adding another layer of support.

Together, these trends show that Bitcoin is maturing.

In past four-year cycles, hype drove extreme BTC moves. For instance, the 64% drop after 2020’s 300% run or the 125% rally in 2016 that led to a 73% dip in 2018.

This time, the cycle is different.

With stronger fundamentals, BTC is breaking out of its sudden boom-bust pattern, making the current pullback look more like part of a prolonged bull market, or a Bitcoin “supercycle.”


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s traditional 4-year boom-bust pattern is showing signs of change, with the 2024 halving not triggering the usual sharp rallies or corrections.
  • Institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, ETF launches, and broader macro support are helping BTC stabilize, creating what many are calling a Bitcoin “supercycle.”

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason Bitcoin's 4-year cycle might be breaking, according to the article?

AThe article suggests that Bitcoin's 4-year cycle is breaking due to a combination of new fundamentals, including institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, the launch of ETFs, and broader macro support, which are helping to stabilize the price and prevent the extreme boom-bust patterns of the past.

QHow did Bitcoin's price perform in the first year after the 2024 halving compared to historical cycles?

AUnlike historical cycles which saw strong rallies in the first post-halving year, Bitcoin's price is on pace to close the first year down roughly 7% after the 2024 halving.

QWhat are the four key factors mentioned that are helping to stabilize Bitcoin's price?

AThe four key factors are institutional inflows, falling exchange reserves, the launch of ETFs, and broader macro support.

QWhat historical examples of extreme price movements does the article cite from previous cycles?

AThe article cites a 64% drop after the 2020 halving's 300% run and a 73% dip in 2018 that followed a 125% rally in 2016.

QWhat new term does the article use to describe the potential new market phase for Bitcoin?

AThe article uses the term 'Bitcoin supercycle' to describe a prolonged bull market that breaks free from the sudden boom-bust pattern.

Related Reads

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

Title: Upbit's Rushed Counterattack to Reclaim Stablecoin Market Share Facing a dramatic shift in South Korea's stablecoin market, leading exchange Upbit launched a promotional campaign from July 26 to August 9, waiving the 0.05% trading fee for stablecoins paired with the Korean Won (KRW) and rapidly listing new stablecoins like RLUSD and USDG. This move is a direct response to its plummeting market share in this sector. Historically a duopoly with Bithumb, the market has been reshaped since October 2025 when Coinone permanently removed fees for USDC trading. By June 2026, Coinone led with 34.8% of stablecoin volume, followed by Bithumb (31.1%) and Upbit (30.1%). This contrasts sharply with the overall crypto market, where Upbit commands 60%. The data shows stablecoin demand is highly sensitive to fees, as users primarily buy them to transfer capital overseas for derivatives trading or forex arbitrage. South Korean exchanges have seen a net outflow of stablecoins for 18 consecutive months, totaling approximately 14.9 trillion KRW, underscoring their role as a cross-border capital conduit. Upbit's limited-time promotion initially boosted its daily stablecoin volume by 162%, but the surge was almost entirely in USDT (98.1% of volume). The newly listed stablecoins saw negligible, fleeting interest. Furthermore, the promotional effect quickly waned in the second week, with volume dropping 33% on weekdays. A concurrent weakening of the KRW also contributed to the trading spike, independent of the fee waiver. The analysis suggests that once the promotion ends, Upbit is unlikely to retain its temporary gains unless it matches Coinone's permanent zero-fee policy, forcing a choice between market share and fee revenue. Upbit's strategic push may be less about immediate profit and more about preparing for future regulatory shifts. With South Korea's *Digital Asset Basic Act* on the horizon, which will regulate KRW-backed stablecoins, and following Dunamu's (Upbit's parent) integration into Naver Financial to build a payment ecosystem, securing a dominant position in the dollar stablecoin distribution channel holds long-term strategic value. However, potential regulatory conflicts could prevent Upbit from listing a future Naver-issued KRW stablecoin, making the current fight for dollar stablecoin flow even more critical.

marsbit1h ago

Upbit is Anxious: A Hasty Counterattack Aimed at Regaining Stablecoin Market Share

marsbit1h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

Michael Saylor, founder of MicroStrategy, argues that Bitcoin fundamentally changes how wealth is stored and transferred by transforming digital scarcity into economic value. He describes Bitcoin as the first digital monetary network, combining computers, digital networks, and cryptography. It digitizes monetary assets, allowing their supply to be controlled by public protocols rather than institutions, thus converting economic value into information transmissible over global networks. Comparing Bitcoin to gold, Saylor states that while increasing Bitcoin's supply is harder, its integration with software and transfer is easier. He highlights Bitcoin's proof-of-work mechanism, which ties it to the physical world by consuming real energy to secure the ledger, making past transactions immutable. This creates a shared security system involving miners, energy companies, and investors. Saylor suggests "digital monetary energy" is a more accurate term than "digital gold." He emphasizes that the Bitcoin network is an adaptive ecosystem of miners, nodes, developers, and users. Its core design is intentionally simple, focused on maintaining a secure ledger for scarce digital assets, with complex functionalities built in higher-layer applications. This architecture allows Bitcoin to serve as a foundation for transmitting value and fostering innovation in payments and financial services. Saylor notes Bitcoin's deeper impact lies in creating digital sovereignty, where private keys give individuals permissionless control over their economic power, with ownership verified mathematically, not by institutions. He concludes that while gold's physical scarcity makes it money, Bitcoin's digital scarcity does the same, characterizing Bitcoin as the monetary energy of the digital age.

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Michael Saylor Compares Bitcoin and Gold!

cryptonews.ru2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片