Inside China’s mining ban: What it means for Bitcoin’s 2026 outlook

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Heading into 2026, Bitcoin faces a divergence in market dynamics. On one hand, risk-off sentiment persists, with BTC failing to recover from October's crash, leaving only 63% of supply in profit. NUPL indicates net losses, suggesting a capitulation setup. However, a key divergence hints this may not be entirely bearish. The weakness stems from forced selling, primarily due to China's renewed mining crackdown in Xinjiang, which shut down 1.3 GW of capacity and 400,000 rigs. This reduced Bitcoin's hashrate by 8%, squeezing miner margins and increasing selling pressure. Asian exchanges show consistent net selling, and long-term holders are reducing positions. Conversely, U.S. institutional demand remains strong, with spot ETFs recording significant inflows, including a $457 million single-day inflow. This divergence between Asia-led forced selling and sustained Western institutional buying could define Bitcoin's trajectory in 2026, making the current pullback appear more as a healthy reset than a fear-driven capitulation.

Heading into 2026, the market looks to be setting up a clear divergence.

On one side, the tone is still risk-off. Bitcoin [BTC] hasn’t reclaimed levels since the October crash, dropping the share of supply in profit from 98% before the sell-off to around 63% now. That’s a real squeeze on margins.

The result? BTC’s NUPL is deep into net-loss territory. From a technical standpoint, this looks like a classic capitulation setup. However, a key market divergence suggests this phase may not be bearish after all.

Mining shutdown and LTH sales explain Bitcoin’s weakness

Bitcoin’s supply dynamics are seeing a quiet but significant shakeout.

Notably, most of the pressure is coming from China, which has once again tightened mining restrictions. Specifically, the Xinjiang crackdown has shut down roughly 1.3 GW of mining capacity, taking 400,000 rigs offline.

Simply put, BTC miners are at risk as a large chunk of Bitcoin mining in China has been forced offline. The result? Bitcoin’s hashrate has dropped about 8%, making the network temporarily less secure against attacks.

As the chart shows, Bitcoin’s hashrate fell from 1.12 billion TH/s to 1.07 billion TH/s in less than a week. With China controlling around 14% of total hashpower, this highlights how regional moves are adding selling pressure.

On-chain data supports this trend. Asian exchanges have shown consistent net spot selling throughout Q4. At the same time, long‐term holders (LTHs) are also reducing positions, with selling activity rising over the past month or two.

In short, Bitcoin is facing Asia‐driven pressure. Meanwhile, U.S. BTC spot ETFs just recorded their largest single-day inflow in over a month. This divergence could play a decisive role in shaping Bitcoin’s trajectory as 2026 approaches.

Forced, not panic selling, could shape BTC’s 2026 move

Bitcoin’s outlook for 2026 is being defined by a subtle shift in supply dynamics.

As macro volatility picks up and renewed China mining pressure builds, different BTC cohorts are being pushed into selling just to manage losses. Miners are a clear part of this, with miner net position change flipping red.

In other words, with hashrate down around 8%, miner margins are getting squeezed, making continued selling more likely. That keeps Bitcoin’s short-term momentum capped, limiting its Q4 tailwind.

That said, this looks more like forced selling than panic.

BTC ETFs just pulled in $457 million in a single day, showing institutions are still buying. Big players haven’t tapped out yet, which makes the pullback feel more like a healthy reset than a fear-driven capitulation.

Notably, this divergence could define Bitcoin’s setup heading into 2026.


Final Thoughts

  • Asia-led forced selling is weighing on BTC short-term, driven by China’s mining shutdowns, falling hashrate, and long-term holder distribution.
  • Institutional demand remains intact, with strong U.S. spot ETF inflows creating a divergence that could shape Bitcoin’s setup heading into 2026.

Related Reads

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

**When AI Audits the World: From Claude's Discovery of a ZEC Vulnerability, Viewing the Crypto Industry Entering a "Recursive Security Era"** This article examines a pivotal shift in the blockchain security landscape, triggered by the convergence of two events: Anthropic's research on AI's "Recursive Self-Improvement" and Claude Opus 4.8's discovery of a critical vulnerability in Zcash's code. Traditionally, crypto security has relied on human experts and automated tools for periodic audits. However, the article argues AI is transitioning from a mere tool to an active participant in understanding and analyzing complex systems. Claude's ability to identify a subtle flaw in Zcash's zero-knowledge proof system demonstrates AI's potential to dramatically lower the cost and time required for risk discovery. This goes beyond finding a single bug; it signals a change in the very mechanism of how vulnerabilities are found. The core thesis introduces the concept of "Recursive Security," drawing a parallel to Anthropic's "Recursive Self-Improvement." Just as AI can accelerate its own development through feedback loops, security systems are evolving towards a continuous cycle of analysis, risk identification, remediation, and re-analysis. Security is becoming a persistent, evolving capability integrated into a system's lifecycle, rather than a one-time pre-launch audit. This shift is particularly urgent for the crypto industry, where system complexity from Layer-2 networks, modular architectures, and ZK-proofs is growing faster than human analysis capacity. AI excels at the pattern recognition and contextual understanding needed to navigate this complexity. Importantly, the article cautions that AI augments both defenders and potential attackers, accelerating the entire threat landscape. The future competitive advantage may not lie in having zero vulnerabilities, but in having the fastest risk discovery, validation, and response capabilities. The Claude-Zcash incident is thus an early signal of an era where AI-driven, recursive security systems become essential for managing risk in an increasingly complex digital world.

marsbit2h ago

When AI Begins to Audit the World: From Claude Discovering the ZEC Vulnerability, Watching the Encryption Industry Enter the 'Recursive Security Era'

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片