Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Injective's 'supply squeeze' proposal was overwhelmingly approved with 99.89% of the vote. The plan aims to dramatically reduce the INJ token supply by doubling the token burn rate and cutting staking reward emissions in half. This aggressive deflationary upgrade complements the existing community buyback program, which has already removed over 6.8 million tokens from circulation. Despite the bullish tokenomics update, the price reaction was muted. INJ saw a brief 4% rally but gave back gains due to broader market pressures, including a Bitcoin dip. Futures market data showed persistently low demand and negative sentiment, indicating the update was overshadowed by macro conditions. It remains to be seen if the deflationary measures will significantly boost INJ's price long-term.

Injective will move forward with its aggressive deflationary plan. The proposal, dubbed “supply squeeze,” received unanimous approval, with 99.89% voting in favor, the blockchain said in a statement.

The Layer 1 chain added,

“The new chapter of INJ is live now to dramatically reduce the token supply, enabling INJ to become one of the most deflationary assets over time.”

The proposal was first floated on the 16th of January and aimed to offer a complementary but fixed solution to the INJ token’s community buyback program.

According to the proposal, IIP-617, INJ’s total supply reduction rate would be doubled. In other words, the supply reduction would be increased by 100% as part of a “structural upgrade to INJ tokenomics.”

For the unfamiliar, Injective [INJ] debuted with a total supply of 100,000,000 tokens and serves as the governance token for the Injective ecosystem.

Injective’s annual inflation rate or emissions distributed as staking rewards are dynamic and fluctuate between 5% and 10% based on an 85% staking ratio.

In the past, the chain’s deflationary plan involved using collected fees to drive token buybacks. Over 6.8 million INJ tokens have been removed from supply via the buyback program.

But the new plan takes it a notch higher. It will cut emissions by half and increase buybacks to tighten supply.

Will the deflation plan boost INJ’s outlook?

However, the results and views on buyback programs across various chains, such as Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pump.fun, and Jupiter [JUP], have been mixed.

Some bill it as a “token value accrual,” while others, like Jupiter, see it as a waste of resources if the token’s price doesn’t rally.

Whether INJ’s double approach will clear Jupiter’s doubts remains unclear.

In the meantime, INJ tracked broader market sentiment rather than the bullish update.

It rallied 4% after the update but erased some of those gains at the time of writing as Bitcoin [BTC] dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Europe.

After slipping below $5, INJ briefly dropped to December lows near $4.4 and may retest support or drop to $4.42 if pressure persists.

Besides, the overall demand on the Futures market remained muted.

Over the past week, Futures CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta), or demand for INJ on the Futures market, became increasingly negative from the 15th of January and dipped even lower despite the ‘supply squeeze’ update.

In fact, even the Open Interest (OI) remained unchanged near $25 million despite the bullish tokenomics update.

Taken together, these data sets showed that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive INJ development. It remains to be seen whether the price will catch up later.


Final Thoughts

  • Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions, currently 5%-10%, in half.
  • Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% bounce after the positive update.

Related Questions

QWhat was the result of the 'supply squeeze' proposal vote for Injective?

AThe 'supply squeeze' proposal received unanimous approval with 99.89% of the vote in favor.

QWhat is the main goal of Injective's new tokenomics plan, IIP-617?

AThe main goal of IIP-617 is to double the total supply reduction rate of INJ, making it one of the most deflationary assets over time by cutting emissions in half and increasing buybacks.

QHow did the price of INJ react immediately after the proposal update, and what was the broader market influence?

AINJ rallied 4% after the update but then erased some of those gains as Bitcoin dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on Europe, showing that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive news.

QWhat was the trend for INJ's Futures Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) after the proposal?

AThe Futures CVD for INJ became increasingly negative from January 15th and dipped even lower after the 'supply squeeze' update, indicating muted demand in the futures market.

QWhat are the two key takeaways listed in the article's 'Final Thoughts'?

AThe two key takeaways are: 1) Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions (5%-10%) in half, and 2) Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% price bounce after the update.

Related Reads

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

On June 4th, despite a significant sell-off in the broader AI and semiconductor sector triggered by Broadcom's disappointing guidance, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) surged over 11%, showcasing a sharp divergence in market sentiment. Broadcom's warning about potential supply chain diversification by key customer Google and a weaker-than-expected outlook punctured the high-flying AI valuation narrative. This led to heavy selling in names like Broadcom (-12.6%) and Micron (-7%), with funds rotating into traditional industrial stocks. AAOI defied this trend. The stock has experienced high volatility recently, driven by bullish analyst coverage, notably from Rosenblatt which raised its price target to $220. Key catalysts include initial 800G optical module revenue from Amazon, potential certification from Oracle, and strong demand across its product portfolio. The company has reported cumulative orders for 800G/1.6T modules exceeding $324 million and is aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity in Texas, targeting an annualized run-rate of $1.4 billion for its module business by Q3 2027. However, AAOI's fundamentals present a mixed picture. Its Q1 2026 results missed expectations, showing a GAAP net loss, and Q2 guidance points to merely breakeven adjusted EPS. Risks include a delayed 800G production ramp to the second half of the year and high dependence on a few key cloud customers. Recent stock sales by company executives near price highs also noted. The article suggests AAOI's rally reflects a market beginning to differentiate within the AI ecosystem. While Broadcom's issues prompted a reassessment of custom ASIC and customer concentration risks, funds flowing into AAOI indicate a belief that the "physical bottleneck" narrative for optical connectivity—where supply remains tight—remains intact and is somewhat decoupled from the current sector weakness. The sustainability of AAOI's premium valuation now hinges on the successful execution of its production plans and upcoming quarterly results.

marsbit4m ago

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

marsbit4m ago

Worried about AI's Self-Evolution, Anthropic Intends to Stop Training?

In early 2026, Anthropic signaled a significant shift in its public narrative regarding AI development timelines and safety. In June, its Anthropic Institute published a detailed article, "When AI builds itself," presenting internal data suggesting accelerating AI self-improvement. Key figures included over 80% of merged code being written by Claude and a 52x speedup in certain optimization tasks. The article outlined three future scenarios, with the most speculative being full recursive self-improvement (RSI), where AI autonomously builds better successors. Anthropic stated RSI is "possible" and may arrive faster than most institutions are prepared for. This narrative pivot followed a series of strategic moves. In January, CEO Dario Amodei wrote about a powerful self-improvement feedback loop. In February, Anthropic revised its Responsible Scaling Policy, removing a core commitment to pause training if capabilities outstripped safety controls, citing the risk of falling behind competitors. This change coincided with reported pressure from the US Department of Defense. By May, Anthropic's valuation had soared to $965 billion. Anthropic's stance was mirrored by other industry leaders. DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis adjusted his AGI timeline to "by 2029" and admitted to using provocative language like "foothills of the singularity" to create urgency. OpenAI also released a model claiming a key role in its own creation process. The article's carefully calibrated tone—presenting dramatic data alongside qualifying footnotes—exemplifies a balancing act between signaling technological acceleration and managing commercial, regulatory, and safety imperatives. External experts offered contrasting interpretations of the same data, from warnings of catastrophic risk akin to Chernobyl to skepticism that current automation merely handles "grunt work," not genius. The coordinated narrative shift among top labs highlights the complex interplay between perceived technical inflection points and strategic communication aimed at investors, regulators, and the public.

marsbit6m ago

Worried about AI's Self-Evolution, Anthropic Intends to Stop Training?

marsbit6m ago

The Macroeconomic Underpinnings of Africa's Payment Market Landscape

The African payments market, characterized by the world's highest mobile money penetration and fastest-growing cryptocurrency adoption, is not a coincidence but a macroeconomic necessity driven by deep structural factors. Two key drivers create this landscape: (1) Africa's heavy reliance on commodity exports, trade, and remittances, generating massive cross-border settlement and remittance demand; and (2) chronically underdeveloped financial infrastructure, exacerbated by international bank de-risking, foreign exchange mismanagement, and persistent inflation. This vacuum has allowed mobile money and crypto to thrive. Mobile money platforms replace banks for domestic payments, while cryptocurrencies serve as a store of value against local currency depreciation and a low-cost medium for cross-border exchange. A crucial division lies along the Sahara Desert. North Africa is integrated into the oil-anchored MENA framework, while Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), plagued by dollar shortages and fragmented currencies, has become a natural, massive market for mobile money and crypto. Nigeria, Kenya, and South Africa are global leaders in adoption. The SSA economy is deeply dollarized due to currency instability, yet suffers from a severe "dollar shortage" caused by trade deficits and limited export capacity. This creates parallel forex markets and high remittance costs. Cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins, fill this gap by providing access to dollar liquidity, cheaper cross-border transfers, and an inflation-resistant store of value, primarily driven by retail users for small-value transactions. While regional initiatives like PAPSS aim to reduce dollar dependence, the fundamental constraints of commodity reliance, trade imbalances, and shallow financial markets persist. Therefore, mobile money and cryptocurrencies are not niche trends but essential financial infrastructure filling a structural void, and they are likely to remain central to Africa's economic landscape for the foreseeable future.

链捕手16m ago

The Macroeconomic Underpinnings of Africa's Payment Market Landscape

链捕手16m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片