Bitcoin nears cycle bottom despite record $8B Spot ETF outflows – Why?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-12Last updated on 2026-07-12

Abstract

Bitcoin (BTC) is recovering near $64,100 after falling below $60,000, but faces headwinds from Middle East tensions and persistent U.S. inflation concerns, keeping the Federal Reserve's interest rate at 3.50%-3.75%. According to CoinShares' James Butterfill, signs suggest Bitcoin may be nearing a cycle bottom despite a record 8-week streak of Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows totaling ~$8 billion. Recent small ETF inflows hint at easing institutional selling pressure. Notably, a large 3,588 BTC sell-off by a specific strategy in early July had minimal market impact. On-chain data shows new buyer support forming in the $60k-$63k range, while the $77k price level has shifted from support to a key resistance zone. Overall, the market is under pressure but not broken, with cautious sentiment prevailing as Bitcoin trades below major historical cost bases.

At press time, Bitcoin [BTC] was trading at $64,099.20, indicating a recovery from the decline below the $60k mark, but there are still concerns lingering. CoinShares’ Head of Research, James Butterfill, in his recent report, emphasized the three-front headwind facing Bitcoin.

One of the main issues, according to Butterfill, is the shaky ceasefire between Iran and Israel, which hasn’t done much to allay worries about a new Middle East war.

He said,

In markets like this, the turn often begins when forced selling is exhausted rather than when the headline backdrop improves.

Concerns were further heightened by the minutes of the most recent Federal Reserve meeting, which concluded that interest rates remained unchanged at 3.50% to 3.75%.

Because of tariffs, disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, and robust demand for AI, the Fed’s top concern remained inflation, with core PCE inflation at 3.3% in April and an estimated 3.4% in May. However, there was little justification for policymakers to loosen monetary policy, as the U.S. unemployment rate was 4.3% in May and then decreased to 4.2% in June.

Is Bitcoin nearing the bottom?

Butterfill, however, finds preliminary indications that Bitcoin might be approaching a bottom despite these obstacles. The reason behind this is that the Spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced the longest withdrawal streak on record, with net outflows of about $8 billion over the last eight weeks.

However, recent inflows over the past three trading sessions indicate that institutional selling pressure might be lessening.

Source: Farside Investors

Meanwhile, there are no longer as many worries about Strategy’s Bitcoin sales. A much bigger sale of 3,588 BTC in early July had little effect on the market, with Bitcoin eventually rising toward $63,800.

Regarding regulations, Butterfill notes that there is waning hope for the CLARITY Act, which is still pending a Senate floor vote. The approval is further predicted to push Bitcoin to new heights.

Hence, Butterfill concluded it best when he said,

The market remains under pressure, but not broken.

Final Summary

Meanwhile, the BTC Cost Basis Distribution Heatmap displays that the $77k cost-basis cluster has now become a significant resistance zone after supporting prices in April and May.

Source: Glassnode

Since many holders might sell at break-even, a much larger supply cluster around $84k to $85k also represents significant overhead resistance.

Meanwhile, new accumulation in the $60k–$63k range indicates that buyers are establishing a new support base. While sustained buying above $77k would improve the bullish outlook, overall, Bitcoin is still below significant historical cost-basis levels, indicating cautious sentiment.


Final Summary

  • Middle East tensions and the 3.50% to 3.75% Fed rate are playing a major role behind Bitcoin’s weak momentum.
  • Spot Bitcoin ETF outflows and the BTC sell-off by Strategy suggest that Bitcoin might be nearing its bottom.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to James Butterfill, what are the two main reasons Bitcoin might be approaching a cycle bottom despite negative headwinds?

AAccording to James Butterfill, the two main reasons are: 1) Spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced a record-breaking $8 billion in net outflows over eight weeks, and recent inflows suggest this institutional selling pressure might be lessening. 2) A large sale of Bitcoin by Strategy (3,588 BTC) in early July had little negative impact on the price, indicating that forced selling pressure may be exhausted.

QWhat are the primary macroeconomic factors creating headwinds for Bitcoin, as mentioned in the article?

AThe primary macroeconomic factors are: 1) Geopolitical tensions in the Middle East, specifically the shaky ceasefire between Iran and Israel. 2) The Federal Reserve's monetary policy, where interest rates remain unchanged between 3.50% to 3.75% due to persistent inflation concerns, with little justification for policymakers to loosen policy given the low unemployment rate.

QBased on the BTC Cost Basis Distribution Heatmap, what are the key resistance and support levels for Bitcoin's price?

ABased on the Cost Basis Distribution Heatmap, the key resistance level is the $77k cost-basis cluster, which has now become a significant resistance zone. There is also significant overhead resistance in the $84k to $85k range. The key support level forming is in the $60k–$63k range, where new accumulation indicates buyers are establishing a new support base.

QWhat is the status and potential impact of the CLARITY Act, as noted by James Butterfill?

AJames Butterfill notes that hope for the CLARITY Act is waning, as it is still pending a Senate floor vote. He states that approval of the act is predicted to push Bitcoin to new heights.

QWhat is James Butterfill's overall conclusion about the current state of the Bitcoin market?

AJames Butterfill's overall conclusion is that 'The market remains under pressure, but not broken.' He sees preliminary signs of a potential bottom forming despite the various headwinds.

Related Reads

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

The domestic embodied AI data industry has attracted nearly 100 players, with 70 focused on data collection and 27 on data infrastructure. In the past year, 15 independent embodied data service providers raised approximately 4.47 billion yuan. Despite this growth, the sector remains early-stage, fragmented, and faces significant challenges. Data collection methods are diverse, categorized into four main routes: teleoperation of real robots, human demonstration without a robot (using motion capture, exoskeletons, etc.), simulation synthesis, and distillation from internet videos. Most companies (43%) adopt hybrid approaches, combining multiple routes, as no single method can meet all training needs. Teleoperation alone is pursued by 31% of players, often by state-owned platforms and robot companies, while newer firms favor asset-light, no-hardware human demonstration. Independent data service providers now form the largest player group (40%), indicating the emergence of a distinct industry segment rather than just a subsidiary function for robot makers. Two-thirds of all players are "embodied-native" startups, while one-third are companies that pivoted from fields like AI data annotation, which are more prevalent in the data infrastructure layer. Current annual industry capacity is estimated at 1.6-1.8 million hours plus 70-80 million data points, with a short-term goal to increase this 15-20 fold within 1-3 years. Data collection factories are spread across 20 provinces in China, concentrated in the Yangtze River Delta, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, and Pearl River Delta regions. Financially, the 4.47 billion yuan raised in the past year pales compared to the 43.8 billion yuan raised by the broader embodied intelligence sector in just the first half of 2026, highlighting that data remains a less "sexy" bet for investors. The 15 funded independent providers show clear stratification: a top tier led by a unicorn (Lightwheel Intelligence, 3.1 billion yuan), a middle tier of 11 firms raising tens to hundreds of millions, and an early-stage tier of 3 companies. Sixty-nine investment institutions have participated, but none have made concentrated bets, reflecting uncertainty about viable business models. Over half of these funded companies are less than a year old, most are at pre-A or A rounds, and profitability remains largely unproven. In summary, the embodied data industry has become an independent track creating jobs and local economic activity. However, it is still nascent, with unformed consensus, unsolved problems, and unproven business models. The coming 1-2 years will be a critical validation window to see if companies can build sustainable, profitable businesses purely by "selling data."

marsbit17m ago

Nearly a Hundred Players Rush into Embodied Data: With 4.47 Billion Yuan in Financing in One Year, Who Can Really Make Money by 'Selling Data'?

marsbit17m ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

In a recent interview, Multicoin Capital managing partner Tushar Jain shared his views on the crypto market. He believes the market has bottomed and is at an inflection point, citing that negative news no longer causes significant price declines and application adoption continues to grow. Jain remains highly bullish on Solana, viewing it as the correct architectural choice for internet capital markets, particularly for spot and tokenized security trading. He is also positive on Hyperliquid, noting its leadership in decentralized derivatives trading. His investment approach focuses on concentrating capital in top convictions rather than equal allocation. A distinct opportunity he highlights is Zcash (ZEC), which he sees as a return to the industry's cypherpunk ethos and a potential top-five asset by market cap. For assets like Zcash without cash flows, his valuation framework is based on relative market cap ranking. Regarding investment strategy, Jain employs a "three-part" entry method to avoid timing pitfalls and emphasizes long-term "active management" over "active trading." He outlines four sources of investment edge: informational, analytical, behavioral/psychological, and structural. On portfolio management, the fund uses Bitcoin as its "cash," selling assets into Bitcoin during market euphoria to reduce beta risk and using Bitcoin to buy dips. Sales occur only if a better opportunity arises, the investment thesis breaks, or valuations become excessively overheated. While respectful of Ethereum's resilience, he questions its unclear scaling roadmap. Finally, Jain reaffirms his commitment to the thesis that blockchains will form the foundational architecture for future capital markets.

marsbit41m ago

Dialogue with Multicoin Partner: The Crypto Market Has Bottomed Out, Favoring Three Cryptocurrencies in This Cycle

marsbit41m ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

Robinhood is launching its own Layer 2 blockchain (Robinhood Chain) and "tokenized stocks," but these are not actual equity shares. The tokens are legally structured as debt securities or derivatives, offering economic exposure to a reference stock without granting voting rights or direct ownership. This move represents Robinhood's strategy to expand from a traditional brokerage into a "financial super app," building a user-friendly, programmable financial interface on top of complex, legally compliant, and jurisdiction-specific backend structures. The company's existing business remains strong, driven by options, event contracts, and stock trading. The new blockchain and tokenization efforts are an ambitious layer of infrastructure built atop this core, aiming to make financial products more portable and globally accessible via crypto rails. Key components include the Robinhood Wallet, Bitstamp acquisition (for institutional reach), the Lighter perpetual contracts platform, and Robinhood Earn (DeFi yield). The central challenge is the "brokerage chain paradox": maintaining a simple, intuitive user experience while the underlying assets are highly structured, regulated, and legally distinct from direct ownership. The success of this strategy depends on users, developers, and regulators accepting this model. If the complexity is misunderstood or deemed misleading, it could create product liability issues and stall expansion. The initiative is a significant infrastructure play, but its long-term viability hinges on navigating this fundamental tension between simplicity and legal reality.

marsbit1h ago

Behind Robinhood's Chain Launch and Tokenized Stocks: No Equity Rights, How Far Can This Packaging Game Go?

marsbit1h ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

Title: Zhipu, Fearing to Become the Next MiniMax In July 2026, amid the success of its coding-focused AI, Zhipu's founder, Tang Jie, issued an internal letter titled "The Giant Wave Has Come." It notably avoided celebrating recent triumphs, such as Zhipu's trillion-HKD market cap and booming MaaS revenue driven by its GLM-5.2 model in coding applications. Instead, the letter pivoted the narrative to future-oriented concepts like Long Horizon Task, Autonomous Agents, Self-Evolving systems, and AGI. This strategic shift in messaging followed the sharp devaluation of its competitor, MiniMax. After its lock-up period expired, MiniMax's stock plummeted as the market began evaluating it with traditional SaaS metrics like ARR and user growth, rather than as a frontier AI pioneer. Seeing this, Tang Jie aimed to preempt a similar revaluation of Zhipu. He fears that if the market starts viewing Zhipu primarily as a profitable "AI coding company," its valuation would become anchored to conventional financial metrics, losing the premium associated with AGI potential. Therefore, the letter reframed Zhipu's mission. While acknowledging that coding was the current commercial driver, Tang positioned Zhipu on the "infrastructure path," akin to OpenAI and Anthropic. The new focus is on developing agents capable of complex, long-term planning and autonomous operation—moving from assisting individuals (OPC: One Person Company) to automating entire organizations (NPC: No People Company). This "Touch High" plan explicitly prioritizes long-term AGI research over short-term monetization. The article frames this as a critical divergence in China's AI landscape: the "commercialization path" (exemplified by MiniMax) versus the "infrastructure path" (chosen by Zhipu). The former risks being judged harshly by internet-era metrics once growth slows, while the latter risks failing if technological breakthroughs stall. Tang Jie's letter is thus a calculated move to secure Zhipu's identity as an AGI contender, buying time before the inevitable market demand for commercial proof. The core question remains: can Zhipu's "mo gao" (reach high) plan achieve genuine technological leaps fast enough to outpace the market's diminishing patience for stories over substance?

marsbit1h ago

Zhipu, Afraid of Becoming the Next MiniMax

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

734 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片