Spicy Commentary | Michael Saylor's 'Player Talk'; 60-Year-Old Aunt Liquidated After 'Scamming a Young Man'

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-06-13Last updated on 2026-06-13

Abstract

**"Spicy Commentary": Three Tales of Crypto's Wild Week** This week's "Spicy Commentary" column highlights three dramatic stories from the cryptocurrency world. First, **MicroStrategy's Michael Saylor** addressed the controversy over his company potentially selling Bitcoin. At the BTC Prague event, he clarified, "I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. I told *you* never to sell *your* Bitcoin." This "do as I say, not as I do" stance was criticized by netizens as peak linguistic gymnastics, noting a history of him previously stating the company would "never" sell. Second, a **bizarre fraud case** emerged from Beijing. A 60-year-old woman, obsessed with getting rich from crypto but unwilling to risk her own savings, posed online as the 20-something "god-daughter" of a high-ranking official. She catfished a young man, convincing him to give her over 200,000 yuan for fabricated emergencies. She then invested all the stolen money into cryptocurrency with 10x leverage, only to lose everything in a market crash. The woman was sentenced to four years in prison for fraud. Finally, a **sobering trader's tale** surfaced on Reddit. A user posted "Tale of a crypto trader," confessing their net worth had plummeted from a peak of $45 million to roughly $17,200, primarily due to holding meme coins too long. The post, described as a crypto "book of confessions," sparked reactions ranging from sympathy to critique about greed, poor risk management, and the perils of treating meme coi...


Written by: Nicky, Foresight News


Welcome back to Spicy Commentary, where we review the week's notorious scenes in the crypto world involving 'stubborn talk, romance scams, and shaky hands'.


This week features three stories: 'A Big Shot's Stubborn Talk, An Old Lady's Romance Scam, and a Trader's Tearful Tale of Turning 40 Million in Profit to Dust'.


Michael Saylor: I Said 'You' Shouldn't Sell, Of Course the Company Can Sell


MicroStrategy founder Michael Saylor recently addressed the controversy over 'the company selling Bitcoin' at BTC Prague.



He said: 'I never said the company can't sell Bitcoin. What I said to you was: never sell your own Bitcoin. Anyone who has listened to our earnings calls, read the disclosure documents, or has half a brain knows that. Of course, the company will sell Bitcoin when necessary.'


Netizens' Spicy Comments:


'So the fine print behind 'never sell' is — refers to retail investors.'



I can, but you can't 😅.



Some netizens dug up old videos proving he had repeatedly said the company would never sell Bitcoin.



Dog🐶 and bee🐝?



Now it seems to have become a double-edged sword.



It's become brainwashing propaganda 😭.



So 'I' will hold until after MicroStrategy sells, right 🥺.



So will everyone's combined holdings exceed 845,000 coins?



Hold until the end of time!



This clarification is the pinnacle of linguistic art: I said 'you' shouldn't sell, I didn't say 'I' wouldn't sell.


Sixty-Year-Old Aunt Impersonates the 'Goddaughter' of a 20-Year-Old Senior Official, Scams Young Man Out of Over 200,000 RMB in Online Romance, Loses It All on 10x Leverage Crypto Trading


On June 5th, Beijing's Haidian District Procuratorate announced a bizarre case.


A sixty-year-old Ms. Meng, after retirement, became obsessed with cryptocurrencies. She dreamed of getting rich quick but was unwilling to risk her own pension money. So she hatched a devious plan: gamble with someone else's money.


She met a mother on a short-video platform who was worried about finding a partner for her honest son. Ms. Meng lied, saying she had a 20-something 'goddaughter' named Xiao Hong who worked for a central ministry, gentle and respectable. In reality, 'Xiao Hong' was an alter ego she created using another WeChat account. She changed her profile picture to a young woman and imitated a girl's tone of voice, starting an online romance with the young man.


The young man repeatedly asked to meet, but was always put off with excuses like 'work is busy, discipline is strict.' He had never seen 'Xiao Hong,' but had met Ms. Meng in person, always considering her a kind-hearted 'godmother.'


As their 'relationship' warmed up, Ms. Meng, using reasons like 'family illness, studying abroad,' swindled over 200,000 RMB from the young man. He gave her all his savings and even borrowed money.


The young man finally sensed something was off: her chat vocabulary was old-fashioned, and the 'photos from abroad' had a backdrop of a domestic KTV. He reported the case.


When apprehended, Ms. Meng tried to argue it was a 'loan,' but with solid evidence, she eventually confessed. All the over 200,000 RMB she swindled went into cryptocurrency, with 10x leverage, all in one go. The result: the market crashed, she got liquidated, and everything turned to zero🫪.


Recently, Haidian Court sentenced Ms. Meng to four years in prison for fraud, fined her, and ordered her to compensate the victim for his losses.



Sixty is the prime of life for hustling!



The old grandma👵 is still ahead of the curve!



After scamming old men, now scamming young men🤯.



The young sister turned out to be a 60-year-old aunt🤪.



So, should people be bolder🤣.



'Forced wealth creation,' huh🫢.



The age seems just right too🫠.



There really could be a fall guy🤔!



Do you want to learn from the aunt?



Take bold risks while you're 'young'!



Gotta work harder💪!


From 45 Million to 17 Thousand, Ask Me Anything



On the Reddit CryptoCurrency subreddit, someone posted:


'Tale of a crypto trader'


With a caption stating: Peak net worth $45 million, now roughly $17,200 left. Ask me anything. This trader had grown his funds to a peak of $45 million through Memecoin holdings.


The comment section was instantly flooded with 'eager' netizens:


'Have you ever thought about if you had bought index funds back then...'


'Bro, you're still alive, right?'


The post sparked massive resonance and gawking, a veritable crypto version of Confessions.



Netizen's Spicy Comment: 'I allocated 20% of my portfolio to POOPCAT' , that's just crazy. (POPCAT is currently trading at $0.041, having peaked at $2 in November 2024.)



Netizen said, he just wanted $100 million? Poor guy. (Looks like he just needed to double, but fell into the abyss.)



Imagine taking profit at $4 million and then enjoying life.



Netizen's Spicy Comment: But those screenshots of unrealized profits are eternal😎.
Comment reply: Could mint it as an NFT.



A netizen commented, Holding Memecoins like they were gold, if he had cashed out then, with the low liquidity of Memecoins, maybe he'd only get 50% of the value. (But that's still $20 million!)



I don't see a trader, more like a gambling addict🤑.



A netizen shared his own story: I was heartbroken at the time for holding a token too long, went from $6000 profit down to $2000 before realizing disaster was coming. If he can still post after losing $45 million (not counting time and other immeasurable resource inputs), then I'm fine too.



When people say you should diversify, they don't mean buying a million dollars worth of Memecoins. Why not buy some gold, silver, stocks, etc.? It had to be Memecoins🤣. It's a real shame.



Interestingly, I also made a lot from WIF and BONK, both dog-related coins, but ever since the TRUMP coin launched, all coins have crashed.


From Saylor's 'word games,' to the aunt's '10x leverage scam,' to the Reddit bro's '$45 million to $17 thousand,' this week had someone playing rhetoric, someone playing psychology, and someone playing heart palpitations.


The world is one big amateur stage, but Spicy Commentary is here to help you clip these brilliant scenes together!


Wishing everyone a happy weekend, see you next week!


(This week's content is based on public information and online discussions, interpreted lightly, for reference only.)


Past Reviews: Spicy Commentary| Three Stories Tell You: In the Crypto World, The Harder You Try, The More 'Miserable' You Become
Spicy Commentary| The 'King of Retail' Got His Account Hacked by His Brother for 'Scamming'? AI 'Archaeological Discovery' Unearths Bitcoin...
Spicy Commentary| Coinbase Layoffs Hit a Vital Artery? Can You Take a Time-Traveling Car Back to Before You Bought...

Related Questions

QWhat did Michael Saylor clarify about MicroStrategy's Bitcoin selling policy at BTC Prague?

AMichael Saylor clarified that his advice 'never sell your bitcoin' was directed at individual investors, not at his company MicroStrategy. He stated that MicroStrategy would sell Bitcoin if necessary, contradicting his previous public stance that the company would never sell its Bitcoin holdings.

QWhat was the method and outcome of the 60-year-old woman's scam in Beijing?

AThe 60-year-old woman pretended to be a 20-year-old 'goddaughter' of a high-ranking official online to scam a young man out of over 200,000 yuan. She then used all the stolen money to trade virtual currencies with 10x leverage, which resulted in a complete loss when the market crashed.

QWhat was the financial journey of the trader who posted on Reddit's CryptoCurrency subreddit?

AThe trader's net worth peaked at $45 million from holding meme coins but subsequently plummeted to approximately $17,200. The post, titled 'Tale of a crypto trader,' served as a cautionary story about significant financial loss in cryptocurrency trading.

QWhat were the public's main reactions to Michael Saylor's 'never sell' clarification?

AThe public reaction was largely critical and mocking. People pointed out the hypocrisy, comparing his statement to 'fine print' for individual investors, called it 'brainwashing propaganda,' and noted it was the 'peak of linguistic artistry' to say 'you' shouldn't sell while 'I' (the company) can.

QWhat lesson does the article imply from the three stories it covers?

AThe article implies that the cryptocurrency world is full of tactics involving wordplay (like Saylor's), deception (like the woman's scam), and extreme risk-taking/gambling (like the Reddit trader's story). It highlights the unpredictable and often perilous nature of the space where people play with 'rhetoric, psychology, and heartbeats.'

Related Reads

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

**Raydium Exploit Reveals DeFi's Hidden Risk: Forgotten "Zombie" Contracts** A recent attack on Raydium's deprecated V3 AMM pools resulted in a loss of approximately $1.34 million. The hacker exploited pools that were no longer supported by Raydium's current UI or SDK but remained fully functional and accessible on-chain. This incident highlights a critical, often overlooked category of risk in DeFi: inactive or legacy smart contracts that projects fail to properly decommission. Since March 2025, there have been at least 8 publicly reported attacks targeting such abandoned contracts, with total losses around $10.8 million. Including older pools and deprecated features, the count rises to 10 incidents with roughly $22.5 million in losses. These "zombie contracts" represent a lifecycle management failure rather than a code vulnerability, yet they are typically misclassified under general "code bug" categories in security reports, masking the true scale of the problem. The root cause is that projects often merely document a contract as "deprecated" without taking essential technical steps to secure it: withdrawing remaining assets, disabling external call functions, and implementing ongoing monitoring. These forgotten, under-monitored components become prime targets for attackers. To address this, the industry needs to recognize "zombie contracts" as a distinct risk category and establish standardized decommissioning protocols. Essential steps should include: 1) a formal retirement announcement, 2) removal of all front-end integrations, 3) withdrawal of locked assets, 4) disabling key contract functions, 5) ongoing security monitoring, 6) clear user communication, and 7) a post-mortem analysis. The value of a DeFi project lies not only in its current TVL but also in the security of its historical codebase, which has now become a new attack surface.

Foresight NewsJust now

The Revelation from the Raydium Theft Incident: New DeFi Vulnerabilities Lurking in Forgotten Old Contracts

Foresight NewsJust now

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

Robots have started to 'consume data,' driving the formation of a new industrial supply chain focused on producing training data for embodied AI. Unlike large language models, which are trained on vast internet text corpora, embodied AI models face a 'data desert' in the physical world. This has created a massive demand for first-person perspective video data (Ego Data), captured by workers wearing cameras in places like Indian garment factories. Companies like Neocambrian AI are establishing 'data factories' where workers perform standardized tasks (e.g., sorting clothes, kitchen organization) to generate thousands of hours of video. Research, such as NVIDIA's EgoScale, demonstrates that scaling this human demonstration data predictably improves robot performance, particularly for dexterous manipulation. This has validated a training path combining large-scale human data for pre-training with smaller amounts of robot-specific data for fine-tuning. The value of different data types varies significantly, forming a 'data pyramid.' The base consists of low-cost, large-scale internet and Ego Data. Higher layers include more expensive motion-capture data (e.g., from data gloves), simulation/synthetic data, and the most costly and scarce layer: real robot teleoperation data. This demand has spawned a layered ecosystem of data suppliers: low-cost data factories, motion capture and alignment specialists, robot-native teleoperation service providers, simulation data companies, and platforms aiming for data standardization. Robot companies themselves are adopting a 'layered procurement' strategy: outsourcing generic Ego Data while building in-house capabilities for robot-specific adaptation data and the critical deployment/failure data generated in real-world applications. The industry is shifting focus from hardware and basic mobility to the data pipelines required for general-purpose capability. While parallels exist to data labeling companies like Scale AI in the LLM boom, the physical complexity of robot data—involving action success ambiguity and sim-to-real gaps—requires more integrated solutions for data collection, annotation, and a continuous feedback loop. The race is on to build the data engines that will teach robots to operate reliably in the unstructured real world.

marsbit2h ago

Robots Begin to 'Consume Data': The Hidden Production Chain from Indian Data Factories to Billion-Dollar Humanoid Robots

marsbit2h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

Trembling, Humans: AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint Yes, AI is still rapidly accelerating. While deep learning seemed to stall quickly in its early years, large models after years of development show no sign of hitting their ceiling. At the Zhiyuan Conference 2026, the focus is on enabling AI to move from the digital world into the physical world. Scaling Law remains effective, continuing to drive advancements in both large language models and multimodal models. The industry is now entering a phase of pursuing World Models, though unresolved technical paths and data issues mean this exploration may take 3-5 more years. Concurrently, breakthroughs in Agents are accelerating AI's real-world application in fields like healthcare and meetings. Making Agents truly useful requires key hardware-software co-design, evident from the strong presence of chip vendors at the conference. We stand at a new historical threshold where AI is becoming a foundational force reshaping the world. The first day of the conference highlighted AI's evolution from "knowing how to chat" to "knowing how to work." Scaling Law persists, World Models are the next key battleground, and Agents are transitioning from usable to好用 (user-friendly). Scaling Law is not ending but diversifying. New models like Anthropic's Fable 5 demonstrate scaling through parameter size, synthetic data, and reinforcement learning. Advancements in AI Coding and Agent deployment are enabling a trend of AI self-evolution, potentially allowing AI to take over digital world iterations. World Models represent the next frontier for large models extending into the physical realm, but no current model is truly impressive at solving real-world problems. Technical consensus is lacking, with debates on data sources (video, simulation, real-world). Different approaches are emerging: language-centric, pixel-centric, 3D-structure-centric, and visual-representation-centric models. Zhiyuan Institute is exploring a fifth path: unified latent space modeling fusing language and visual representations, and introduced its own under-development World Model, Physis-v0.1. On the product side, Agents are key to bringing AI into daily life. Since 2025, the "Year of the Agent," products have become more proactive and capable of complex tasks. Zhiyuan showcased four vertical Agents for cardiac diagnosis, autonomous research, meeting summarization, and protein risk discovery. However, technical challenges remain, particularly in context engineering like memory and orchestration. "Harness" – the engineering framework around an Agent – is crucial for maximizing its capabilities by clarifying intent, designing workflows, and incorporating validation and feedback. In summary, AI's breakneck pace continues on multiple fronts: foundational model scaling, the ambitious pursuit of World Models for physical understanding, and the ongoing refinement of practical Agents. The journey from capable to truly reliable and useful AI systems is well underway.

marsbit3h ago

Tremble Humans, AI Continues Its Accelerated Sprint

marsbit3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

Elon Musk becomes the world's first trillionaire, driven by SpaceX's IPO valuing the company at $1.77 trillion. However, his vast wealth is largely illiquid: he holds over 85% voting control, likely through super-voting shares that are subject to lock-ups and selling restrictions. While his net worth surpasses $1 trillion across SpaceX, Tesla, and private holdings, only a tiny fraction (potentially under 2% annually) could be converted to cash without jeopardizing control and market confidence. SpaceX's IPO also creates paper millionaires for roughly 4,400 employees, but their holdings face lock-up periods, exercise costs, and taxes, delaying and reducing actual cash proceeds. Only 4.2% of total shares are initially available for public trading, making the stock price highly sensitive to limited net buying or selling pressure. A major test will come when lock-ups expire for the remaining 96% of shares. The article contrasts SpaceX's wealth distribution with potential AI IPOs. Anthropic and OpenAI could generate employee wealth pools 20 times larger than SpaceX's in paper value, due to their higher valuations relative to revenue and potentially more distributed ownership. However, sustaining those high price-to-sales multiples post-IPO is uncertain. A key financial puzzle for SpaceX investors is its xAI unit. While it has locked in an estimated $26 billion in annual compute revenue from clients like Anthropic and Google, the unit reported a $6.4 billion loss in 2025. More critically, estimated annual capital expenditures of ~$30.8 billion exceed that revenue. The long-term viability of SpaceX's AI narrative hinges on whether this compute income can eventually cover the unit's massive ongoing investments and losses.

链捕手3h ago

The Backside of Musk's Trillion-Dollar Fortune: 85% Can't Be Sold

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片