Hong Kong’s SFC blocks 5 Digital Asset Treasury listings – Report

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-10-29Last updated on 2025-10-30

Key Takeaways

Why is Hong Kong hesitant about DATs? 

The regulator warned that retail traders may not fully grasp the risks tied to DAT valuations.

What’s next for the DATs segment? 

It remains to be seen if the space will navigate the current leverage risk as mNAVs trade at a discount. 


Hong Kong’s securities regulator is closely monitoring the digital asset treasuries (DATs) developments after blocking five firms from pivoting to crypto. 

According to a local media report, the watchdog was worried that some DATs have underlying risks that retailers may not be fully aware of. 

The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) Chairman, Kevin Wong Tin-yau, added, 

“The SFC is concerned about whether DAT companies’ share prices are traded at a substantial premium above the cost of their DAT holdings.”

He cited U.S. cases where premiums grew too high and created valuation risks for investors. Wong said the SFC will step up education and awareness programs.

Divergent regulatory stance on DATs

DATs hold crypto assets like Bitcoin [BTC], Ethereum [ETH], Solana [SOL] and others as part of their corporate strategy.

Pioneered by Michael Saylor’s Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), several firms have jumped on the DAT model to speculate on the crypto market. 

Some crypto treasuries like Strategy now sit on billions of dollars in profit. But the share price of the DATs also inherits crypto volatility and other risks, according to regulators. 

Last week, Bloomberg reported that the Hong Kong Exchange (HKEX) blocked five firms that sought to pivot to DATs.

A similar resistance has been reported in Australia. Firms have been barred from deploying more than half of their balance sheet into DATs, making the pivot essentially “impossible.” 

But some regions, like the U.S. (Strategy) and Japan (Metaplanet), have some of the top players in the DAT space. 

Even so, Nasdaq has become more strict with DAT listing, calling for more disclosure and involvement of shareholders to mitigate risks. 

Falling mNAV ratios threaten DAT stability

In fact, most of the DAT’s mNAVs (market-to-net asset value), which track relative share value to crypto holdings, have collapsed into a discount. 

Hong Kong DATs

Source: Blockworks

The trend could stall their crypto bids and force sell-offs of the underlying digital assets if the mNAV stays below 1 for too long. If this discount persists, companies may need to sell digital assets to reduce leverage.

Some players like Metaplanet and ETHZilla have begun boosting their mNAV via share buybacks funded by selling crypto holdings or using them as collateral for a credit facility. 

Share

Related Reads

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

DeFi in Peril: The Real Vulnerability Isn't in the Code April 2026 marked a paradigm shift in DeFi security, with over $625 million lost across 30 incidents—the worst month in crypto history by event count. Crucially, none of the major exploits (Drift Protocol: $285M, KelpDAO: $292M, Wasabi Protocol: $4.5M) resulted from smart contract vulnerabilities. Instead, failures occurred in the operational "plumbing": social engineering to compromise multi-signature councils, a single-point-of-failure 1-of-1 bridge validator, and stolen admin private keys. These events expose a fundamental misalignment: the industry's security model has long focused on code audits, while the actual attack surface has shifted to privileged access points and off-chain infrastructure. The article introduces the term "OpenFi" to describe this reality: permissionless, on-chain, yet operationally dependent on trusted third parties (admins, validators, oracles) at key junctures. The KelpDAO exploit vividly demonstrated asymmetric "contagion risk." A configuration error in a smaller protocol triggered a panic, causing approximately $13.2 billion in outflows from larger, unaffected protocols like Aave within 48 hours, as users fled uncertain collateral. The core dilemma is the double-edged sword of centralization. Operational levers like emergency councils (e.g., Arbitrum freezing stolen funds post-KelpDAO) enable crisis response but also create catastrophic attack surfaces if compromised (e.g., Drift). The path forward demands radical honesty: protocols must clearly disclose their trust assumptions, operational levers, and failure modes. The industry must treat operational security (key management, configurations, incident response) with the same rigor as code security. Survival depends on building systems whose risks can be understood, priced, and insured, moving beyond the outdated "code is law" mantra to a mature model of disclosed and managed trust.

链捕手3h ago

DeFi Has Reached Its Most Dangerous Moment: The Real Vulnerabilities Are Not in the Code

链捕手3h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

Vitalik Buterin has published a lengthy response to recent community criticism directed at the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Acknowledging a sense of "unease," he addresses concerns about the EF's strategic direction, its perceived disconnect from ETH's price performance, and calls for its reduced central role. Vitalik rejects the notion that the EF should be the central governing body of Ethereum, framing it instead as one "node with a clear mandate" among many within the ecosystem. He highlights the EF's limited ETH holdings (≈0.16% of supply) compared to other blockchain foundations and states it will no longer sell significant amounts of ETH. Its future focus will be on long-term, critical projects that align with Ethereum's core values of censorship-resistance and decentralization, which might not otherwise happen. A core argument is that Ethereum must be "amazing," but not by merely chasing higher transaction speeds at the cost of decentralization. He proposes focusing on the "CROPS" dimensions: creating a Cryptographically provable, Reliable, Open, Private, and Secure network. This includes pursuing goals like a formally verifiable, bug-free Ethereum client and minimizing protocol-level reliance on intermediaries. The article concludes by noting that while Vitalik clarifies the EF's refocused role, he does not directly address community suggestions for creating a new organization explicitly aligned with ETH's economic interests. This "alignment gap" is presented as a key challenge for Ethereum's future.

链捕手3h ago

Vitalik's Article Emphasizes Ethereum Must Be 'Amazing', But Foundation Is Not the Center

链捕手3h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

Galxe, once perceived as a simple Web3 quest platform, has evolved into a core growth infrastructure within the Web3 ecosystem. It addresses a fundamental Web3 growth dilemma: the lack of a mature, systematic user acquisition and retention system akin to Web2's advertising and analytics platforms. While users complete quests (social tasks, on-chain interactions) for rewards, Galxe's true innovation lies in transforming these fragmented, one-off actions into lasting, verifiable identity credentials. This process of *behavioral assetization* creates a persistent record of a user's activities across projects and chains. For users, their wallet accumulates a valuable history that can unlock future access and rewards, fostering a "profile-building" mentality. For projects, Galxe provides a pre-screened user pool with rich behavioral data, enabling targeted outreach to users based on their specific on-chain history and community engagement. Galxe employs a gamefied growth path, guiding users from low-friction social tasks into deeper, valuable on-chain interactions through a structured progression of quests. This solves the incentive-behavior mismatch common in Web3, filtering users by their willingness to engage. Beyond quests, products like Passport (identity verification) and Starboard (community analytics) position Galxe as a comprehensive growth operating system. The platform's defensible advantage is its self-reinforcing data and network flywheel: more projects attract more users, enriching behavioral data; richer data enables better user targeting, attracting more projects. Ultimately, Galxe is shifting Web3's growth logic from short-term "reward-driven" traffic towards a long-term "identity-driven" relationship model, where a user's accumulated on-chain履历 becomes a core asset.

marsbit3h ago

Galxe: How a Quest Platform Evolved into Web3's Growth Infrastructure

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片