Artículos Relacionados con Exit

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Exit", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

Covenant AI accuses Bittensor of ‘centralized control with decentralized branding’ amid exit

Covenant AI, a major subnet on the Bittensor network, has exited, citing concerns over centralization. In a statement on X, the team accused Bittensor’s leadership of exercising centralized control while maintaining a decentralized brand. They claimed key decisions, such as suspending subnet emissions and removing community control, were influenced by a centralized authority. Additionally, they alleged the network deprecated infrastructure and applied economic pressure through token sales. This exit has generated uncertainty, highlighting ongoing tensions between decentralization ideals and operational realities in AI-driven crypto networks.

ambcrypto04/10 08:26

Covenant AI accuses Bittensor of ‘centralized control with decentralized branding’ amid exit

ambcrypto04/10 08:26

Why is Covenant AI Fleeing Bittensor?

Covenant AI announced its exit from the Bittensor network, accusing co-founder Jacob Steeves (Const) of centralized control and governance abuses. The team claimed Steeves unilaterally suspended subnet emissions, revoked community management permissions, deprecated infrastructure without due process, and exerted economic pressure through token sales. Covenant AI highlighted its achievement in developing Covenant-72B—a 72-billion-parameter language model trained collaboratively by over 70 contributors on consumer hardware—as proof that decentralized AI training is viable. However, they argued that Bittensor’s governance is effectively controlled by a small group, with Steeves retaining ultimate authority, contradicting the network’s promised decentralized and permissionless nature. The incident sparked community debate, with some critics pointing to Covenant AI founder Sam Dare’s prior sale of 37,000 $TAO tokens. Meanwhile, $TAO’s price dipped amid the controversy. Covenant AI reaffirmed its commitment to decentralized AI and will continue its mission independently, emphasizing that true decentralization cannot coexist with centralized control.

marsbit04/10 03:44

marsbit04/10 03:44

The TAO Subnet Team Praised by Jensen Huang Has Parted Ways with the Founder Amidst a Fallout

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently praised the decentralized AI project Bittensor (TAO) during a podcast, specifically highlighting a 72-billion-parameter Llama model trained collaboratively by a subnet team called Covenant AI. This endorsement initially boosted TAO's price, but the situation deteriorated rapidly when Covenant AI's founder, Sam Dare, publicly announced the team's departure from the Bittensor network. Covenant AI accused Bittensor and its key figure, Jacob Steeves (known as Const), of centralization and abuse of power, contradicting Bittensor’s decentralized ethos. The team claimed that Const exercised unilateral control by halting subnet emissions, removing administrative rights, discarding infrastructure, and using token sales to pressure the team. They argued that Bittensor’s governance is effectively centralized under Const, despite claims of distributed control. As a result, Covenant AI decided to leave, intending to continue its work on decentralized AI training elsewhere. The exit has sparked significant concern within the Bittensor community, raising doubts about the network’s decentralization narrative, technical future, and token value. TAO’s price fell sharply following the news. Const responded vaguely on social media, suggesting the event would push Bittensor toward more decentralized, “headless” subnets, but has not addressed the specific allegations in detail. The incident has damaged Bittensor’s reputation while raising Covenant AI’s profile.

Odaily星球日报04/10 03:08

The TAO Subnet Team Praised by Jensen Huang Has Parted Ways with the Founder Amidst a Fallout

Odaily星球日报04/10 03:08

‘Undisclosed voting power’ – ACI’s exit claim sends AAVE tumbling 10%

Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a key service provider, announced its exit from the Aave ecosystem, citing Aave Labs' "undisclosed voting power" and aggressive control as reasons. This follows a similar departure by BGD Labs last month. The ongoing governance crisis, which began with accusations of Aave Labs seizing DAO revenue, deepened after a controversial $50 million proposal passed narrowly. In response, Aave's CEO stated the protocol remains unaffected. However, investor confidence wavered, causing a 10% drop in the AAVE token price. Data shows major whales reduced their holdings by nearly half since January, reflecting growing concerns over centralization and governance.

ambcrypto03/04 13:02

‘Undisclosed voting power’ – ACI’s exit claim sends AAVE tumbling 10%

ambcrypto03/04 13:02

Core 'Key Contributors' Depart One After Another, Has Aave's DAO Dream Shattered?

Recent weeks have seen major internal turbulence within Aave, one of DeFi’s most successful DAOs. The Aave Chan Initiative (ACI), a core governance team, announced it would cease operations and exit the ecosystem on March 3, following the departure of BGD Labs, the development team behind Aave V3, just two weeks earlier. The crisis stems from governance disputes that began in December, when Aave Labs unilaterally switched the protocol’s front-end aggregator from ParaSwap to CoW Swap, redirecting fee revenue from the DAO treasury to Aave Labs. In response, Aave Labs proposed the bundled “Aave Will Win” proposal in February, requesting $51M in funding for V4 development in exchange for routing all future product revenue to the DAO and phasing out V3. ACI strongly criticized the proposal, alleging that a significant portion of supporting votes came from addresses linked to Aave Labs, raising concerns about self-dealing and lack of transparency. Despite ACI’s attempts to introduce stricter accountability measures, their proposals were not adopted. The departures of both BGD Labs and ACI—key contributors responsible for technical development and governance—raise serious questions about Aave’s future, including technical risks associated with transitioning to V4 and the centralization of decision-making power. The situation highlights broader challenges in DAO governance, where power often remains concentrated among founders, developers despite the ideal of decentralized token-holder control. Moving forward, the resolution of the “Aave Will Win” proposal and the possibility of a protocol fork remain critical points to watch. How Aave addresses its governance flaws and rebalances power among stakeholders may determine its ability to sustain long-term growth.

比推03/03 23:09

Core 'Key Contributors' Depart One After Another, Has Aave's DAO Dream Shattered?

比推03/03 23:09

Aave struggles as BGD Labs plans April exit amid governance crisis

BGD Labs, a major service provider for the Aave DAO, announced it will exit by early April, citing concerns over Aave Labs' aggressive push toward centralized control. The team criticized Aave Labs for disregarding existing contributors' expertise and leveraging its influence over brand rights and voting power. BGD Labs, which built much of Aave V3, accused Aave Labs of promoting its own V4 upgrade by criticizing the current version. In response, Aave Labs founder Stani Kulechov assured the community that maintenance would continue and expressed support for retaining BGD under a new security arrangement. The ongoing governance crisis, including previous disputes over revenue sharing and a $50 million funding demand from Aave Labs, has unsettled investors. AAVE’s price dropped 8% following the news, reflecting market uncertainty.

ambcrypto02/21 10:01

Aave struggles as BGD Labs plans April exit amid governance crisis

ambcrypto02/21 10:01

ETHZilla crashes 97%, Thiel exits the ‘Ethereum Treasury’ model

ETHZilla, once a prominent corporate crypto firm known for holding large amounts of Ethereum as its core strategy, has collapsed by 97% from its peak. Billionaire investor Peter Thiel and his Founders Fund sold their entire 7.5% stake, marking a dramatic shift. The company has abandoned its Ethereum treasury model, selling $74.5 million worth of ETH to reduce debt and pivot into aerospace investments. This move came amid severe Ethereum price volatility, where ETH fell from around $3,400 to $1,900 between January and February 2026, causing financial instability for ETHZilla. Despite this, other institutions like Bitmine Immersion Technologies and Harvard Management Company continue to hold or increase Ethereum exposure, indicating ongoing institutional interest despite market weakness.

ambcrypto02/19 07:01

ETHZilla crashes 97%, Thiel exits the ‘Ethereum Treasury’ model

ambcrypto02/19 07:01

Peter Thiel Dumps Ethereum Treasury Play ETHZilla, Exits Entire Stake

Peter Thiel and entities linked to Founders Fund have completely exited their position in ETHZilla, a publicly traded company that initially positioned itself as an Ethereum treasury play. A recent SEC filing shows the group held zero common shares as of Dec. 31, 2025, eliminating a stake that previously amounted to 5.6% of the class. This exit coincides with ETHZilla's strategic pivot away from holding ETH and toward tokenized real-world assets, such as aircraft engine leases. The timing raises questions about whether Thiel’s departure preceded the company’s shift in strategy. Commentators on social media have noted Thiel’s history of exiting positions ahead of market downturns. At the time of reporting, Ethereum was trading at $1,984.

bitcoinist02/19 06:01

Peter Thiel Dumps Ethereum Treasury Play ETHZilla, Exits Entire Stake

bitcoinist02/19 06:01

The Turn of 'The Greatest Crypto Investor in History' Kyle Samani, and the Mirror Image from a Decade Ago

Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital and one of crypto's most prominent investors, announced in early 2026 that he would step back from daily management to focus on AI, robotics, and life sciences, while maintaining personal crypto investments. His earlier deleted statement expressing disillusionment with Web3 and dApps sparked industry-wide concern, interpreted by some as a loss of faith in crypto’s non-financial applications. Samani’s journey began after his first venture, Pristine—a Google Glass software startup—failed due to platform risk when Google discontinued consumer sales. This experience drew him to decentralized systems, leading to the founding of Multicoin in 2017. Though initially inspired by Ethereum, he became a vocal critic and instead championed Solana, making early and highly profitable investments. Known for his provocative style, Samani aggressively advocated for Solana while dismissing Ethereum’s scalability. Despite successes, Multicoin faced challenges, including significant exposure to FTX’s collapse and criticism over fund management during SOL’s price volatility. Samani’s partial exit mirrors his departure from Pristine a decade earlier—a shift prompted by narrative contraction, not failure. Just as Pristine’s technology eventually found new life through acquisitions and emerging tech, crypto’s current struggles may lead to renewed growth under better conditions, such as improved regulation, infrastructure, or AI integration. The industry’s poised for evolution, not extinction.

比推02/09 15:04

The Turn of 'The Greatest Crypto Investor in History' Kyle Samani, and the Mirror Image from a Decade Ago

比推02/09 15:04

After Three Years at Multicoin, My Thoughts on Kyle the 'Shill King' Announcing His Exit

Kyle Samani, co-founder of Multicoin Capital, is stepping back from the firm, a move that reflects his strategic focus on pursuing asymmetric, non-consensual bets rather than managing a conventional fund. According to the author, a former Multicoin partner, Samani excelled at identifying and investing in high-conviction, contrarian theses—such as Solana’s potential as a "Nasdaq on-chain"—long before they gained mainstream acceptance. While some have questioned why Multicoin missed certain trends in the current cycle, like leading perpetual DEXs, the author explains that these areas had already become consensus plays, which did not align with Samani’s investment philosophy. His strength lay in early, non-consensus conviction. The author expresses confidence in Multicoin’s remaining team, noting their expertise in on-chain trading, AI, and regulatory strategy. Meanwhile, Samani is expected to explore new ventures, possibly in data-centric businesses. The piece concludes with a personal reflection: everyone has a unique “game” they are meant to play. For Samani, it was asymmetric investing; for the author, it’s building value-transfer protocols. The key is to focus on what one does best and play to win.

marsbit02/06 07:49

After Three Years at Multicoin, My Thoughts on Kyle the 'Shill King' Announcing His Exit