No Crypto Market Structure Deal Could Lead To Increased Regulatory Crackdown, Expert Says

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-03Actualizado a 2026-03-03

Resumen

The CLARITY Act, a key US crypto market structure bill, has missed its March 1 deadline due to a lack of agreement between the crypto and banking industries. Negotiations have stalled primarily over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield to holders. An expert warns that without a deal, regulators like the SEC may continue a strict enforcement approach. Conversely, a compromise could attract significant institutional investment. JPMorgan analysts believe the bill's passage would be a major turning point, replacing regulatory uncertainty with clear rules and boosting institutional participation and real-world asset tokenization. Further Senate negotiations are expected in April 2026.

The long-anticipated CLARITY Act, widely viewed as the cornerstone of a comprehensive US crypto market structure framework, has failed to meet the March 1 deadline set by the White House two weeks ago.

The administration had urged both the crypto industry and the banking sector to reach common ground to move the legislation forward. That agreement has yet to materialize.

Crypto Bill Hits ‘Yield Wall’

Representatives from both industries have held a series of meetings at the White House, frequently describing the discussions as “constructive.” However, despite that tone, negotiations have stalled at a critical point.

While the Senate Agriculture Committee has approved its portion of the bill, progress in the Senate Banking Committee has slowed considerably.

The sticking point centers on whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield or rewards to holders — an issue that has delayed any markup date for the Banking Committee’s section of the legislation.

The disagreement has fueled speculation that if lawmakers fail to strike a deal, federal regulators could revert to a tougher stance toward crypto firms.

Market commentator Paul Barron said the bill has effectively run into what he described as a “yield wall,” referring to the impasse over stablecoin rewards. He noted that the crypto industry is pushing for the right to provide regulated yield on stablecoins, arguing that without that flexibility, the US risks driving innovation offshore.

If no compromise is reached, Barron suggested that the likely outcome would be continued “regulation by enforcement” from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

On the other hand, a middle-ground solution — for example, restricting stablecoin yield to qualified investors — could unlock substantial institutional capital.

That possibility aligns with projections from JPMorgan, which has forecast meaningful institutional inflows into digital assets in the latter half of 2026 if regulatory clarity improves.

Institutional Surge Under CLARITY Act

JPMorgan analysts, led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, have described the potential passage of the CLARITY Act as a decisive turning point for the crypto market.

According to reporting from market expert MartyParty, the bank views the bill not as a minor regulatory adjustment but as a structural overhaul of the US digital asset framework.

In a recent research note, JPMorgan outlined three interconnected effects that could follow the bill’s approval. First, it would end the current reliance on enforcement actions as the primary method of oversight, replacing uncertainty with defined rules.

Second, it could shift institutional engagement with crypto from tentative exploration to high-conviction participation. Third, it may accelerate the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs), a trend many financial institutions have been cautiously developing.

New negotiations in the Senate are expected to resume in April 2026, with July 2026 seen as an informal deadline before the election cycle begins to dominate the legislative agenda and reduce the likelihood of major policy breakthroughs.

The daily chart shows the total crypto market cap rose toward $2.35 trillion on Monday. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the CLARITY Act has failed to meet its March 1 deadline?

AThe main reason is the disagreement over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer yield or rewards to holders, creating an impasse referred to as the 'yield wall'.

QAccording to market commentator Paul Barron, what is the likely outcome if no compromise is reached on the crypto market structure bill?

AThe likely outcome would be continued 'regulation by enforcement' from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).

QWhat potential middle-ground solution is mentioned regarding stablecoin yield?

AA potential middle-ground solution is restricting stablecoin yield to qualified investors, which could unlock substantial institutional capital.

QWhat three interconnected effects did JPMorgan outline that could follow the approval of the CLARITY Act?

AFirst, it would end reliance on enforcement actions and replace uncertainty with defined rules. Second, it could shift institutional engagement from tentative exploration to high-conviction participation. Third, it may accelerate the tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs).

QWhen are new negotiations on the bill expected to resume, and what is the significance of July 2026?

ANew negotiations are expected to resume in April 2026, with July 2026 seen as an informal deadline before the election cycle begins to dominate the legislative agenda and reduce the likelihood of major policy breakthroughs.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Harcok Exclusivo | La empresa de inteligencia corpórea marina 'Shihang Intelligent' obtiene una inversión récord de 10.000 millones, Zhu Xiaohu y Temasek apuestan por ella

**La empresa emergente china de inteligencia corpórea marina, Shiheng Intelligence, ha cerrado una ronda de financiación Serie A récord de más de 1.000 millones de yuanes (unos 10.000 millones de RMB).** Esta es la mayor ronda única en el campo global de la robótica marina. La ronda fue liderada por inversores industriales, incluido el fondo Shanghe Momentum (respaldado por las empresas de chips Moore Threads y Kunlunxin), Vertex Growth (plataforma de inversión estatal de Singapur) y la empresa cotizada en bolsa Broad-Ocean Motor. Inversores existentes como GSR Ventures, Vertex Ventures China y Vision Plus Capital también participaron. Fundada por Chen Xiaobo (graduado de la Universidad de Ingeniería de Harbin y ganador más joven del Premio Nacional al Progreso en Ciencia y Tecnología para la Defensa), Shiheng Intelligence se centra en el desarrollo de robots submarinos y su modelo de IA corpórea "Cangqiong CEORION". La compañía afirma que sus robots son capaces de operar a profundidades de hasta 10.000 metros y realizar tareas complejas en 3D. Sus aplicaciones prácticas incluyen la limpieza de buques, seguridad submarina, parques eólicos marinos, granjas de acuicultura e inspección de fondos marinos, con pedidos que superaron los 10.000 millones de RMB en el primer semestre de 2026. El modelo de IA "Cangqiong CEORION", lanzado en abril, integra percepción, comprensión y ejecución autónoma en una arquitectura única. Está entrenado con millones de horas de datos de operaciones reales y de simulación, cubriendo 12 categorías principales de tareas submarinas. En pruebas, logra una tasa de éxito superior al 90% en tareas y una capacidad de adaptación a entornos nuevos superior al 70%. El modelo incorpora un módulo de razonamiento físico que reduce las colisiones en un 80%. La empresa utilizará los nuevos fondos para I+D, expansión global y desarrollo del ecosistema de la cadena de suministro. Recientemente, fue seleccionada como socio tecnológico clave para el plan nacional de inspección y limpieza de cascos de Singapur.

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

Harcok Exclusivo | La empresa de inteligencia corpórea marina 'Shihang Intelligent' obtiene una inversión récord de 10.000 millones, Zhu Xiaohu y Temasek apuestan por ella

marsbitHace 54 min(s)

¿Qué tiene que ver Huang Zheng, el creador de Pinduoduo, con la blockchain?

Resumen: La conexión entre Huang Zheng, fundador de Pinduoduo, y la blockchain En su artículo "Voltear el capitalismo", Huang Zheng, fundador de Pinduoduo, expone la lógica central de su plataforma: no es solo sobre productos baratos, sino un "negocio de seguros" que gestiona la incertidumbre. Argumenta que la riqueza fluye hacia los ricos porque estos asumen la "incertidumbre" (riesgos como enfermedades o pérdidas) por otros. La gente común paga por certeza (seguros, ahorros), transfiriendo valor hacia arriba. Pinduoduo intenta "voltear" esto mediante un "seguro inverso": agrega la demanda masiva de consumidores a través de funciones como "compras en grupo" para crear pedidos certeros y a gran escala. Esta "certeza agregada" permite a los fabricantes reducir los costos de riesgo y ofrecer precios más bajos. Huang señala que el eslabón final para hacer viable este modelo a gran escala podría ser la **blockchain**. El problema clave del "seguro inverso" es que las promesas individuales carecen de valor: son fáciles de romper. La blockchain, mediante **contratos inteligentes**, puede hacer que los compromisos sean creíbles, ejecutables y con un coste por incumplimiento. Transforma la confianza, pasando de depender de personas o intermediarios a depender de reglas codificadas e inmutables. Así, mientras Pinduoduo crea certeza mediante la **agregación masiva** de voluntades dispersas, la blockchain (ejemplificada por sistemas como Bitcoin) la crea mediante **reglas predefinidas e inalterables**. Ambas son caminos distintos para generar confianza y reducir la incertidumbre en las transacciones económicas.

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

¿Qué tiene que ver Huang Zheng, el creador de Pinduoduo, con la blockchain?

链捕手Hace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片